Differences in external loads of different pitch types in Chinese male college baseball players

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

This study examined how external training load, quantified as GPS-derived Player Load metrics, differs across pitch types (fastball, changeup, curveball, slider) and assessed how Player Load relates to ball velocity in four Chinese male collegiate Division I pitchers. Using a wearable device capturing six load/velocity variables and Kruskal-Wallis and stepwise multiple regression, the authors found significant pitch-type differences for Max Player Load, Max Rotation, hourly speed, Up Load percentage, and forward load percentage, but not for Side Load percentage. Regression results indicated pitching speed was influenced by Max Player Load (mph = 78.816 + 7.001 Max PL, R² = 0.192), with Max PL explaining 19.2% of speed variability, and the analysis was limited by the very small sample size of four players. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background In baseball, monitoring player load solely through pitch count and innings overlooks the variability introduced by different pitch types. This study analyzed differences in external load, measured as Player Load, across various pitch types using a GPS-based wearable device. Additionally, the relationship between Player Load and ball velocity was examined. Methods Four male collegiate Division I baseball players from China (age: 18.5 ± 0.58 years, height: 181.00 ± 6.83 cm, weight: 78.00 ± 5.48 kg) participated in this study. External loads were collected for four pitch types, fastball, changeup, curveball, and slider, using a wearable sensor device that recorded six variables: Maximum Player Load (Max PL), Maximum Rotation (Max Rot), Pitching Hourly Velocity, and Percentage of Acceleration Change in the Three Axes (Up Load %, Side Load %, and Fwd Load %). A Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test was used to assess differences across pitch types, while stepwise multiple regression analyzed the impact of Player Load on pitching speed. Results Significant differences were observed among pitch types for Max PL, Max Rot, Hourly Speed, Up Load %, and Fwd Load % (p0.05). Stepwise multiple regression indicated that pitching speed was influenced by Max PL, with the equation: mph = 78.816 + 7.001 Max PL, R2 = 0.192, suggesting that Max PL accounted for 19.2% of the variability in pitching speed. Discussion External training loads in pitching vary by pitch type, with variable-speed pitches generating higher peak external loads, whereas fastballs are associated with greater ball speeds.
Full text 1,761 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background In baseball, monitoring player load solely through pitch count and innings overlooks the variability introduced by different pitch types. This study analyzed differences in external load, measured as Player Load, across various pitch types using a GPS-based wearable device. Additionally, the relationship between Player Load and ball velocity was examined.

Methods

Four male collegiate Division I baseball players from China (age: 18.5 ± 0.58 years, height: 181.00 ± 6.83 cm, weight: 78.00 ± 5.48 kg) participated in this study. External loads were collected for four pitch types, fastball, changeup, curveball, and slider, using a wearable sensor device that recorded six variables: Maximum Player Load (Max PL), Maximum Rotation (Max Rot), Pitching Hourly Velocity, and Percentage of Acceleration Change in the Three Axes (Up Load %, Side Load %, and Fwd Load %). A Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test was used to assess differences across pitch types, while stepwise multiple regression analyzed the impact of Player Load on pitching speed.

Results

Significant differences were observed among pitch types for Max PL, Max Rot, Hourly Speed, Up Load %, and Fwd Load % (p0.05). Stepwise multiple regression indicated that pitching speed was influenced by Max PL, with the equation: mph = 78.816 + 7.001 Max PL, R2 = 0.192, suggesting that Max PL accounted for 19.2% of the variability in pitching speed.

Discussion

External training loads in pitching vary by pitch type, with variable-speed pitches generating higher peak external loads, whereas fastballs are associated with greater ball speeds. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0