Intro
Despite many improvements in assisted reproductive technology (ART), the success rate
remains relatively low ( Zargar et
al ., 2021 ). The selection of a high-quality embryo to
transfer to the mother’s uterus is a crucial factor in enhancing the success rate of
ART ( Zmuidinaite et al .,
2021 ). Furthermore, transferring only one embryo helps reduce the risks
associated with multiple pregnancies. Selecting a high-quality embryo is a
challenging task and needs the expertise of an experienced embryologist or the
application of specialized lab techniques ( Mains
et al ., 2011 ). Currently, in most fertility clinics,
the assessment of embryo quality is carried out according to the morphological
criteria ( Ebner et al .,
2003 ; Kim et al .,
2022 ); however, morphological assessment alone may not identify
chromosome aneuploidies ( Bielanska et
al ., 2005 ).
Increasing maternal age is one of the important causes of chromosomal abnormalities
in human oocytes and embryos ( Sawarkar et
al ., 2021 ). Approximately 50% of abortions occur during the
first trimester of pregnancy due to aneuploidy ( Maxwell et al., 2016 ). Therefore, transferring a
euploid embryo (with all 23 pairs of human chromosomes) to the uterus can enhance
implantation and live birth rates while reducing the risk of spontaneous pregnancy
loss ( Sullivan-Pyke & Dokras, 2018 ).
Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is widely used for aneuploidy screening of
an embryo; however, blastomere biopsy for PGD is invasive and may potentially affect
the embryo growth and the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) ( Chen et al ., 2021 ; Navarro-Sánchez et al .,
2022 ). In contrast to PGD, omics technologies, including genomics (study
of genes), transcriptomics (study of mRNA), proteomics (study of proteins) and
metabolomics (study of metabolome) offer a noninvasive approach to aneuploidy
screening ( Anagnostopoulou et al .,
2022 ; Egea et al .,
2014 ). Although the number of omics technology is increasing,
transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics are widely used in assisted
reproductive technologies. Omics techniques can be used to design non-invasive
diagnostic methods that are applicable in fertility clinics. For instance, they can
be applied for selecting a high quality embryo, particularly in single embryo
transfer protocols. Noninvasive analysis of the embryo secretome (proteins and
metabolites secreted by an embryo into the surrounding conditioned media) can detect
a set of aneuploidy biomarkers, leading to noninvasive viability screening ( Cortezzi et al ., 2011 ; Schoolcraft et al ., 2010 ;
Sousa & Monteiro, 2022 ).
Apolipoprotein A1 (APOA1) is a primary apolipoprotein found in high-density
lipoprotein (HDL) and has been identified in human blastocysts ( Telford et al ., 1990 ). The
levels of APOA1 are positively correlated with the quality of human blastocysts and
the rate of implantation. Apparently, cholesterol metabolism has a direct
relationship with the quality of blastocysts due to the crucial role of cholesterol
in the synthesis of cell membranes of the pre-implantation embryo ( Mains et al ., 2011 ). Given the
indication that APOA1 levels are linked to human embryo quality, we hypothesized
that the quantity of APOA1 in the secretome may be correlated with aneuploidy.
Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the APOA1 protein levels in the secretome
of human embryos with chromosome abnormalities (aneuploid) and normal embryos
(euploid) in a non-invasive manner.
Results
APOA1 levels in all aneuploid embryos, including cleavage-arrested embryos
(44.74±6.5ng/mL), morulae (50.74±4.2ng/mL), and blastocysts
(51.07±3.6ng/mL), as well as in euploid blastocysts
(59.58±8.12ng/mL) were significantly higher than those in the control
group (29±4.59ng/mL) ( p =0.04) ( Figure 2 ). APOA1 levels were significantly lower in euploid
cleavage-arrested embryos (14.67±2.63ng/mL) compared to all other groups
( p =0.02) and the control group ( p =0.04).
However, this reduction was not significant compared to the euploid morulae
group (35.86±10.03ng/mL) ( Figure
2 ).
Figure 2 APOA1 level in spent embryo culture media for groups of control
(without embryos), euploid embryos and aneuploid embryos. Data are
reported as Mean±SE. *: Significant difference between groups
( p =0.04) vs . control. **:
Significant difference between groups ( p =0.02)
vs . euploid cleavage arrested.
APOA1 level in spent embryo culture media for groups of control
(without embryos), euploid embryos and aneuploid embryos. Data are
reported as Mean±SE. *: Significant difference between groups
( p =0.04) vs . control. **:
Significant difference between groups ( p =0.02)
vs . euploid cleavage arrested.
APOA1 levels were notably higher in euploid early blastocysts
(77.67±9.13ng/mL) compared to euploid hatching blastocysts
(41.60±3.96ng/mL) and aneuploid blastocysts, including early
(44.59±7.2ng/mL), mid (52.75±4.8ng/mL), and late
(50±5.43ng/mL) blastocysts ( p= 0.03) ( Figure 3 ). APOA1 levels changed significantly
among euploid blastocysts of different grades, with late-stage blastocysts
(71±1ng/mL) showing significantly higher levels compared to mid-stage
(61±1ng/mL) and hatching blastocysts (41.6±3.96ng/mL)
( p =0.03) ( Figure 3 ).
However, the APOA1 levels did not show significant changes in aneuploid
blastocysts across different grades ( Figure
3 ).
Figure 3 APOA1 level in spent embryo culture media for groups of euploid
blastocysts and aneuploid blastocysts at different grades. Data are
reported as Mean±SE. *: Significant difference between groups
( p =0.03) vs . euploid early
blastocysts. **: Significant difference between groups
( p =0.03) vs . euploid late
blastocysts. Blast.: blastocyst.
APOA1 level in spent embryo culture media for groups of euploid
blastocysts and aneuploid blastocysts at different grades. Data are
reported as Mean±SE. *: Significant difference between groups
( p =0.03) vs . euploid early
blastocysts. **: Significant difference between groups
( p =0.03) vs . euploid late
blastocysts. Blast.: blastocyst.
Discussion
Finding a noninvasive, low-cost, and time-consuming method for aneuploidy screening
of an embryo can help embryologists select a healthy embryo without any chromosomal
abnormalities for embryo transfer. Additionally, a specific biomarker in
pre-implantation embryos may guide embryologists to transfer only one high-quality
embryo to the endometrium, increasing the chance of embryo implantation and avoiding
the risk of multiple gestations. Recently, some molecules including ubiquitin ( Katz-Jaffe et al ., 2006 ) and
lipocalin 1 ( McReynolds et al .,
2011 ) have been introduced as biomarkers indicating a healthy state of an
embryo. However, to date, no distinct biomarker has been found. Indeed, the
complexity of embryo development involves many molecules and factors, making it
challenging to identify a single potential biomarker for noninvasive aneuploidy
screening, therefore a set of biomarkers is required for the selection of a
high-quality embryo.
APOA1 is a main apolipoprotein found in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ( Santos et al ., 2008 ), which
plays an important role in cholesterol metabolism during cell division, cell
membrane synthesis, and embryo implantation ( Brosens
et al ., 2010 ). Although there are many studies on
APOA1 concerning the female reproductive system, particularly endometrium, there
remains insufficient information regarding the synthesis and function of APOA1 in
pre-implantation embryos. Given the indication that APOA1 levels are linked to human
embryo quality, we hypothesized that the quantity of APOA1 in the secretome may be
correlated with aneuploidy.
The reduction in APOA1 in follicular fluid leads to increased embryo fragmentation
( Browne et al ., 2008 ) and
the occurrence of cleavage-arrested embryos ( Trigatti et al ., 1999 ), indicating the importance of
cholesterol and APOA1 in pre-implantation embryo development. In women with
recurrent implantation failure (RIF), the level of APOA1 in the endometrium was
found to be 4.2 times higher than in healthy women. APOA1 levels decrease in the
endometrium during the mid-secretory phase under the influence of LH/hCG and also
diminish during embryo implantation ( Brosens
et al ., 2010 ). Therefore, the elevation of APOA1
levels in the secretome of euploid blastocysts, as indicated by the findings of this
study, along with the reduction of APOA1 expression in the endometrium during embryo
implantation ( Brosens et al .,
2010 ), may serve as a signaling mechanism. This signaling could
potentially aid in the embryo’s interaction with the mother’s endometrium, leading
to a more favorable response of the endometrium to the implanting embryo.
Familial APOA1 deficiency causes a remarkable reduction in HDL levels ( Bekaert et al ., 1991 ; Santos et al ., 2008 ), and mice
with impaired APOA1 synthesis exhibit very low HDL levels ( Williamson et al ., 1992 ). Intracellular
cholesterol plays a crucial role in cytokinesis during mitosis ( Simons & Ikonen, 2000 ); thus, cholesterol
depletion in urchins results in incomplete cytokinesis ( Ng et al ., 2005 ). Also, cholesterol is vital
for embryo development as it aids in energy production through oxidative pathways
and supports rapid membrane synthesis during cellular proliferation ( Sturmey et al ., 2006 ).
Therefore, the increase in APOA1 levels in the secretome of euploid blastocysts
compared to euploid morulae may be linked to the significance of cholesterol
metabolism and phospholipids in pre-implantation embryo development. As the embryo
develops from the morula stage (16-32 blastomeres) to the blastocyst stage (100-120
blastomeres), rapid mitosis divisions and a rise in cell numbers occur within only
1-2 days, facilitated by cholesterol metabolism and the synthesis of cell membranes
for the newly formed blastomeres. However, minimal and insignificant changes were
observed in APOA1 secretion among aneuploid embryos in the current study. Embryos
with chromosomal abnormalities likely encounter disruptions in the expression and
synthesis of proteins, including APOA1.
Mains et al . (2011) reported
that the APOA1 levels in the spent embryo culture media of high-quality blastocysts
are higher than in low-quality blastocysts, demonstrating that cholesterol
metabolism can be an important factor for embryo developmental competence. This
observation could also be linked to the antioxidant properties of HDL in the
presence of APOA1 ( Goulinet & Chapman,
1997 ; Kontush & Chapman, 2010 ;
Moss et al ., 2012 ).
Therefore, the increase in APOA1 levels in the secretome of euploid blastocysts
compared to aneuploid blastocysts may help in scavenging the free radicals generated
during ART procedures ( Agarwal & Majzoub,
2017 ).
The evaluation of human embryo secretome presents challenges because of differences
in protocols, reagents, and culture media used in fertility clinics. Many fertility
clinics utilize serum protein substitutes to supply the culture media, which contain
many undesired proteins, including albumin, potentially leading to discrepancies in
secretome assessments ( Mains et
al ., 2011 ). In other words, the accuracy of measurement tools,
various embryo culture media, and the actual and precise levels of secreted proteins
(varying orders of magnitude) ( Ménézo
et al ., 2006 ; Sargent et al ., 2007 ) can result in conflicting data.
Virant-Klun et al .
(2016) reported findings contradicting those of Mains et al . (2011) . They found that the APOA1
levels in the spent embryo culture media of high-quality blastocysts are lower than
low-quality blastocysts, morulae, and degenerated embryos, supporting the findings
of Nyalwidhe et al . (2013) .
However, this comparison may not be entirely accurate as they measured APOA1 levels
in the secretome of blastocysts, whereas Nyalwidhe
et al . (2013) measured them in the secretome of
day-2 and day-3 embryos.
Nyalwidhe et al . (2013)
reported a negative correlation between APOA1 levels in the secretome of 2- and
3-day embryos and the quality of embryos and pregnancy rate. This could be
attributed to high-quality embryos using more APOA1 from the embryo culture or APOA1
from culture media binding to the zona pellucida (ZP) or/and the embryo surface
( Nyalwidhe et al . 2013 ).
Human embryo development and protein synthesis are entirely reliant on the mother’s
genome until the 4-8 cell stage, after which the human embryo genome becomes active,
initiating transcription, translation, and protein synthesis at this point ( Jukam et al ., 2017 ). APOA1
mRNA has been detected in human blastocysts but not in day-3 human embryos ( Telford et al ., 1990 ).
However, in another study, the APOA1 protein was identified in the conditioned
medium of human embryos on the third day of in vitro embryo culture ( Foresta et al ., 2016 ). The
conflicting data may arise due to the application of different techniques in the
studies. Before the blastocyst stage, the embryo is not able to synthesize active
cholesterol because of the absence of APOA1 protein and the lack of
hydroxymethylglutaryl co-enzyme A. Apparently, the oocyte is the only source of
cholesterol for the embryo before the blastocyst stage ( Fujimoto et al ., 2010 ). Therefore, the
blastocyst stage could be the best embryo development stage to investigate the
levels of APOA1 in embryo secretome. This stage may explain the reasons for the
contradictory results between the study by Nyalwidhe
et al . (2013) and the present study.
The main limitation of the present study is the inability to track the outcome of the
embryo implantation and ongoing pregnancies of the embryos whose conditioned medium
was used for the study, as multiple embryos were transferred to the uterus. To
address this issue, conducting the study with a protocol of single-embryo transfer
would be preferable to monitor the outcomes of embryo implantation and pregnancy.
Using vitrified/warmed embryos in this research instead of fresh embryos was another
limitation of the study, as vitrification/warming can impact embryo viability and
may also change the secreted proteins by the embryo. Therefore, using the fresh
embryo secretome could help to avoid this problem. A strength of the present study
is that the samples were derived from humans and not based on animal research.
Furthermore, the study focused on the human embryo secretome in spent culture media
rather than on the human embryo itself, thereby adhering to strict ethical standards
regarding research on human samples.
In general, finding a noninvasive method for screening aneuploidy in fertility
clinics is useful and necessary. However, to achieve a biomarker for aneuploidy,
conducting research with a larger sample size and using various types of laboratory
techniques, including mass spectrometry, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, and
protein microarray, is suggested. Furthermore, delving deeper into the embryo
secretome enhances our understanding of the biological functions of the embryo and
the communication between the developing embryo and its surrounding environment.
Based on the findings of this study, APOA1 could be a promising candidate to
consider as a potential biomarker for aneuploidy screening, although further
comprehensive studies are necessary. Given the complexity of embryo development
involving numerous molecules and factors, identifying a single potential biomarker
for noninvasive aneuploidy screening may prove challenging. It might be more
effective to concentrate on a panel of biomarkers rather than relying only on
one.
Materials|Methods
This study was carried out at the Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center at the
Royan Institute and involved analyzing conditioned spent media surrounding embryos
from PGD candidates who provided informed consent. The research protocol was
approved by the Ethics Committee of Royan Institute, Tehran, Iran (reference number:
EC/93/1081).
The study included women aged between 25 and 40 years who were PGD candidates.
The exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) endometriosis, (ii) ovarian
polycystic syndrome, and (iii) sperms extracted from the testes or epididymis by
surgical procedures. The spent media of embryos that were first vitrified and
then underwent PGD were included in this study. The experimental design of this
study is summarized in a diagram indicated in Figure 1 .
Figure 1 The schematic image indicates the study design in brief.
The schematic image indicates the study design in brief.
Human embryos were produced through Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) after
oocyte retrieval using a standard GnRH agonist long protocol as previously
described ( Rezazadeh Valojerdi et
al ., 2009 ). The newly formed embryos were cultured in
G-1 medium (Vitrolife, Kungsback, Sweden), supplemented with 10% recombinant
human serum albumin (rHA, Vitrolife) in an environment of 5% CO 2 in
air at 37°C for 2 - 3 days. On either day 2 or 3, the embryos were cryopreserved
and thawed when the endometrium was prepared to receive the embryo ( Rezazadeh Valojerdi et al .,
2009 ).
For vitrification, embryos were initially incubated in equilibration solution of
7.5% ethylene glycol (EG) (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinleim, Germany) and 7.5% dimethyl
sulphoxide (DMSO) (Sigma-Aldrich) in Ham’s F-10 medium supplemented with 20%
Albuminal-5 for 5-15 min. Then equilibrated embryos were exposed to the
vitrification solution of 15% EG, 15% DMSO and 0.5 M sucrose in Ham’s F-10
medium supplemented with 20% Albuminal-5 for 50-60 s and then loaded on the tip
of the cryotop (Kitazato, Japan) and immediately plunged into the liquid
nitrogen. For warming, the embryos were incubated in thawing solution (1M
sucrose in Ham’s F-10 medium supplemented with 20% Albumin-5) for 50-60 s and
then transferred into dilution solution of 0.5 M sucrose for 3min, followed by
another dilution solution of 0.25M sucrose for 3min.
Cryopreserved-thawed embryos (72 hours after fertilization) underwent PGD to
detect chromosomal abnormalities. For the embryo biopsy procedure, the embryos
were incubated in Ca2+/Mg2±free G-PGDTM biopsy medium (Vitrolife, Sweden)
for 1-2 minutes. To detect chromosomal abnormalities, fluorescence in situ
hybridization (FISH) was carried out on the isolated blastomere ( Bazrgar et al ., 2016 ).
Following the biopsy of one blastomere, the embryos were placed in individual 50
µL droplets of G-2 medium (Vitrolife, Kungsback, Sweden) supplemented
with 10% recombinant human serum albumin and incubated until day 5.
Simultaneously, a 50 µL droplet of G-2 culture media without any embryo
was incubated for 48 hours under the same conditions as a blank control.
On day 5 post-fertilization, all embryos were examined under an inverted
microscope (Olympus, Japan) by an expert embryologist, and the embryos were
classified into three main groups: embryos arrested at the cleavage stage,
embryos at the morula stage, and embryos at the blastocyst stage. Blastocysts
were also classified into four subgroups: early blastocyst (grade I) where the
blastocoel cavity occupied less than 50% of the embryo volume, mid blastocyst
(grade II) where the blastocoel cavity filled 50% or more of the embryo volume,
late blastocyst (grade III) where the blastocoel cavity filled the embryos and
the zona pellucida (ZP) became thinner, and hatching/hatched blastocysts (grade
IV) representing embryos that had hatched from the ZP ( Hardarson et al ., 2012 ).
A total of 131 spent embryo culture media samples from 22 patients with an
average maternal age of 31.36±1.07 years were collected. After the
receipt of PGD results, the normal embryos (euploid) were transferred to the
uterus on day 5 post-fertilization, and their spent culture media were
collected. Also, the spent embryo culture media of embryos with two or higher
chromosomal abnormalities were collected for the study. In total, all spent
embryo culture media, where the embryos were incubated for about 48 hours, from
both euploid (41 samples) and aneuploid (90 samples) embryos, along with the
blank control culture media (media without embryos, 20 samples) were collected
and kept individually in labeled cryotubes at -80°C for further analysis.
The APOA1 levels in spent embryo culture media and blank control media were
determined using a quantitative sandwich ELISA kit (ab108803, Abcam Ltd,
Cambridge, UK). The minimum detectable dose of APOA1 for this kit was 3 ng/mL.
Serial dilutions of the APOA1 protein standard were performed using a diluent to
achieve a concentration range from 200 to 3.13 ng in a final volume of 50
µL. The culture media were thawed and diluted to a final volume of 50
µL. Each well in the ELISA plate was coated with polyclonal anti-APOA1
(anti-human APOA1). Also, 50 µL of all standards, diluted samples, and
blank control (only diluent) were incubated on the antibody-coated plate at room
temperature. All standards, diluted samples, and the blank control were tested
in duplicate. After 2 hours, the plate was rinsed, and then the biotinylated
APOA1 antibody was added and incubated for 1 hour. Following the plate rinse,
the streptavidin conjugate antibody (streptavidin-peroxidase complex) was
applied and left to incubate for 30 minutes. Subsequently, the unbound
conjugates were washed off. A chromogenic substrate, TMB
(3,30,5,50-tetramethylbenzidine), was then used to measure the
streptavidin-peroxidase enzymatic reaction. After about 15 minutes, the reaction
was halted by adding an acidic stop solution, resulting in a yellow-colored
product. The intensity of the yellow color was then measured at 450 nm using a
spectrophotometer to determine the APOA1 concentration in all the samples used.
Each duplicated media sample was tested three times, resulting in six estimates.
These six estimates were analyzed simultaneously to indicate the relative levels
of APOA1 compared to the standard curve.
After testing the normality of the data through histograms and statistical tests,
such as Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, the normally distributed data
were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test using SPSS 16
software (IBM, Chicago, USA) to assess the significance of differences.
Differences were deemed significant if p =0.05, and statistical
comparisons between specific groups were carried out using the student’s t-test.
The results are expressed as mean±standard error (SE).
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.