Reproductive Trade-offs in Caribbean Corals: Plasticity Accelerates While Fragmentation Delays Reproductive Capacity

Abstract In modular organisms, where growth and fragmentation blur the boundaries between individuals, the interplay between asexual and sexual reproduction creates complex fitness trade-offs. Life-history theory predicts that resources allocated to one fitness component necessarily reduce investment in others, yet detecting these trade-offs in wild populations of clonal organisms remains challenging. Phenotypic plasticity can enhance survival, yet its influence on reproductive capacity and life history trade-offs remains poorly understood. Using a fully crossed reciprocal transplant design, we tracked 263 colonies of the branching coral Acropora cervicornis across nine reef sites over 42 months, investigating relationships between fragmentation, morphological plasticity, and the capacity for sexual reproduction. Breakage patterns reflected both environmental and genetic factors. Primary branch breaks created a “double negative” effect—simultaneously more than doubling mortality risk and delaying attainment of a validated reproductive size class by ∼40%. Conversely, higher morphological plasticity in surface area-to-volume ratio accelerated sexual maturation up to 6-fold, counteracting the negative effects of fragmentation. In parallel, a simple demographic model parameterized with published fecundity data estimated that primary breakage reduces expected cumulative reproductive output by ∼58%, a result robust across a wide range of parameter assumptions. These results demonstrate a fundamental reproductive trade-off in which asexual reproduction through fragmentation undermines sexual reproductive potential by reducing colony size. Moreover, our findings reveal that fragmentation susceptibility is broadly heritable and subject to selection, and identify a compensatory mechanism through which plasticity enhances fitness beyond immediate survival. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.