Efficient coding explains altered neural representations elicited by subtle sensory lesions

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Sensory systems must represent a vast range of stimulus dimensions and energy whilst subject to metabolic constraints. Efficient-coding theory predicts that neural adaptation re-allocates a relatively limited range of neural activity toward the most informative stimulus values, but it is unclear how subtle peripheral lesions shift this operating point in central circuits. Hearing is a stringent test because sound level varies enormously across environments, yet clinical assessment still relies heavily on tone-detection thresholds that can miss listening deficits in noise. We analyzed extracellular recordings from single neurons in the gerbil auditory midbrain across 14 animals in four experimental groups exposed to unfolding distributions of sound intensities drawn either uniformly from a wide range (24-96 decibels) of sound pressure levels or from contexts in which 80% of levels were restricted to a 12-decibel high-probability range. For each context we summarized each neuron’s rate-intensity input-output function by an effective threshold and gain, and we interpreted the resulting threshold-gain distributions with an information-cost model that trades bits of stimulus information against a penalty on mean spiking. Noise exposure consistent with loss of synapses between inner-ear cells and auditory nerve fibers altered gain modulation across acoustic contexts, with noise-exposed animals showing compressed gain adjustments relative to controls; within the information-cost framework, the clearest hidden-hearing-loss effect was a quiet-context utility advantage distributed across low- and intermediate-threshold neurons, whereas moderate-to-loud contexts showed weaker or absent group differences. Temporary conductive attenuation caused by ear-canal plugging shifted effective thresholds to higher sound levels, with incomplete recovery after plug removal; the corresponding optimization-prior trajectories were consistent with incomplete rapid renormalization but were weaker than the hidden-hearing-loss effect. These results support an efficient-coding interpretation of altered central auditory representations after subtle lesions and provide a quantitative, context-based framework for comparing mechanisms of hearing difficulty beyond threshold-only tests and Fisher information alone. Author Summary Everyday hearing is an ecological challenge for the auditory system: we must follow speech while background sounds fluctuate and overlap. Standard tests emphasize tone-detection thresholds, but many listeners struggle in noise even when thresholds appear normal. We asked whether subtle peripheral changes shift how the auditory brain trades information for neural effort. We analyzed recordings from single neurons in the gerbil auditory midbrain during sound environments with different loudness statistics, including ones dominated by a narrow intensity range. Using information-theoretic measures, we quantified how much spikes distinguished sound-level categories and related this to the amount of spiking produced. Noise exposure consistent with inner-ear synaptic loss altered gain modulation across acoustic contexts and most strongly improved model-based coding utility in quieter settings, but reduced adaptation and efficiency as sound environments became louder. Temporary ear-canal plugging raised effective response thresholds substantially above both control and synaptopathy groups, with only partial recovery immediately after plug removal. By mapping both manipulations onto a common information-versus-cost scale, we highlight context-dependent metrics that may prove more informative than threshold audiograms for subtle hearing problems.
Full text 3,772 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Sensory systems must represent a vast range of stimulus dimensions and energy whilst subject to metabolic constraints. Efficient-coding theory predicts that neural adaptation re-allocates a relatively limited range of neural activity toward the most informative stimulus values, but it is unclear how subtle peripheral lesions shift this operating point in central circuits. Hearing is a stringent test because sound level varies enormously across environments, yet clinical assessment still relies heavily on tone-detection thresholds that can miss listening deficits in noise. We analyzed extracellular recordings from single neurons in the gerbil auditory midbrain across 14 animals in four experimental groups exposed to unfolding distributions of sound intensities drawn either uniformly from a wide range (24–96 decibels) of sound pressure levels or from contexts in which 80% of levels were restricted to a 12-decibel high-probability range. For each context we summarized each neuron’s rate–intensity input–output function by an effective threshold and gain, and we interpreted the resulting threshold–gain distributions with an information–cost model that trades bits of stimulus information against a penalty on mean spiking. Noise exposure consistent with loss of synapses between inner-ear cells and auditory nerve fibers altered gain modulation across acoustic contexts, with noise-exposed animals showing compressed gain adjustments relative to controls; within the information–cost framework, the clearest hidden-hearing-loss effect was a quiet-context utility advantage concentrated in the low-threshold neural population, whereas moderate-to-loud contexts showed weaker or absent group differences. Temporary conductive attenuation caused by ear-canal plugging shifted effective thresholds to higher sound levels, with incomplete recovery after plug removal; the corresponding optimization-prior trajectories were consistent with incomplete rapid renormalization but were weaker than the hidden-hearing-loss effect. These results support an efficient-coding interpretation of altered central auditory representations after subtle lesions and provide a quantitative, context-based framework for comparing mechanisms of hearing difficulty beyond threshold-only tests and Fisher information alone. Author Summary Everyday hearing is an ecological challenge for the auditory system: we must follow speech while background sounds fluctuate and overlap. Standard tests emphasize tone-detection thresholds, but many listeners struggle in noise even when thresholds appear normal. We asked whether subtle peripheral changes shift how the auditory brain trades information for neural effort. We analyzed recordings from single neurons in the gerbil auditory midbrain during sound environments with different loudness statistics, including ones dominated by a narrow intensity range. Using information-theoretic measures, we quantified how much spikes distinguished sound-level categories and related this to the amount of spiking produced. Noise exposure consistent with inner-ear synaptic loss altered gain modulation across acoustic contexts and most strongly improved model-based coding utility in quieter settings, but reduced adaptation and efficiency as sound environments became louder. Temporary ear-canal plugging raised effective response thresholds substantially above both control and synaptopathy groups, with only partial recovery immediately after plug removal. By mapping both manipulations onto a common information-versus-cost scale, we highlight context-dependent metrics that may prove more informative than threshold audiograms for subtle hearing problems. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0