Hemostasis by bipolar coagulation versus laparoscopic suture after surgical excision of bilateral ovarian endometriomas: a randomised controlled trial

Simone Ferrero; Matteo Morotti; Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore; Amy Nicoletti; Pier Luigi Venturini; Valentino Remorgida

Hemostasis by bipolar coagulation versus laparoscopic suture after surgical excision of bilateral ovarian endometriomas: a randomised controlled trial

Simone Ferrero, Matteo Morotti, Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore, Amy Nicoletti, Pier Luigi Venturini, Valentino Remorgida

2011 · pp. 12 · W2796175021

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation Metadata only

Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".

View on OpenAlex

⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 ⓘ

This randomized controlled trial compared hemostasis by bipolar coagulation versus laparoscopic suture following surgical excision of bilateral ovarian endometriomas.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (1)

Effect of Hemostatic Method on Ovarian Reserve Following Laparoscopic Endometrioma Excision; Comparison of Suture, Hemostatic Sealant, and Bipolar Dessication. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2015

Cited by (1)

Effect of Hemostatic Method on Ovarian Reserve Following Laparoscopic Endometrioma Excision; Comparison of Suture, Hemostatic Sealant, and Bipolar Dessication. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2015

Source provenance

openalex: last seen: 2026-05-10T17:57:49.540755+00:00

License: CC0 · commercial use OK