Clinical study on the necessity and feasibility of routine MRCP in patients with cholecystolithiasis before LC

Clinical study on the necessity and feasibility of routine MRCP in patients with cholecystolithiasis before LC | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Clinical study on the necessity and feasibility of routine MRCP in patients with cholecystolithiasis before LC Xu Guo, Qing Fan, Yiman Guo, Xinming Li, Jili Hu, Zhuoyin Wang, and 5 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3126472/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 09 Jan, 2024 Read the published version in BMC Gastroenterology → Version 1 posted 8 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background: In the past quite a long time, intraoperative cholangiography（IOC）was necessary during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Now magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the main method for diagnosing common bile duct stones (CBDS). Whether MRCP can replace IOC as routine examination before LC is still inconclusive. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical data of patientsundergoing LC for cholecystolithiasis, and to explore the necessity and feasibility of preoperative routine MRCP in patients with cholecystolithiasis. Methods: According to whether MRCP was performed before operation, 184 patients undergoing LC for cholecystolithiasis in the Department of General Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018 were divided into non-MRCP group and MRCP group for this retrospective study. The results of preoperative laboratory test, abdominal ultrasound and MRCP, biliary related comorbidities, surgical complications, hospital stay and hospitalization expenses were compared between the two groups. Results: Among the 184 patients, there were 83 patients in non-MRCP group and 101 patients in MRCP group. In MRCP group, the detection rates of cholecystolithiasis combined with CBDS and common bile duct dilatation by MRCPwere higher than those by abdominal ultrasound ( P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in non-MRCP group (8.43%) was significantly higher ( P 0.05), but there was significant difference in hospitalization expenses ( P < 0.05) between the two groups. According to the stratification of gallbladder stone patients with CBDS, hospital stay and hospitalization expenses were compared, and there was no significant difference between the two groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusions: The preoperative MRCP can detect CBDS, cystic duct stones and anatomical variants of biliary tract that cannot be diagnosed by abdominal ultrasound, which is helpful to plan the surgical methods and reduce the surgical complications. From the perspective of health economics, routine MRCP in patients with cholecystolithiasis before LC does not increase hospitalization costs, and is necessary and feasible. Cholecystolithiasis magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) preoperative routine MRCP Introduction Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the standard treatment for patients with gallstones [1]. For most patients with cholecystolithiasis, preoperative abdominal ultrasound can confirm the diagnosis [2, 3]. But the results of ultrasonography are easily influenced by the gastrointestinal gas of patients and the skill level of operators, and it is easy to miss combined common bile duct stones (CBDS) and difficult to detect the anatomical variation of bile duct. In the past quite a long time, intraoperative cholangiography（IOC）was necessary during LC. At present, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the main method for diagnosing CBDS. Usually, MRCP is only required when abdominal ultrasound shows dilatation of the common bile duct (diameter ＞6 mm) or the patient has jaundice and elevated transaminases [4]. MRCP before LC has the following advantages in theory. First, MRCP can diagnose CBDS and common bile duct dilatation that cannot be detected by abdominal ultrasound, and clarify the cause of biliary obstruction [5]. Second, MRCP can fully understand the anatomical variation of extrahepatic bile duct and the severity of gallbladder inflammation, which can assess the difficulty of surgery and reduce conversion to laparotomy and complications such as bile duct injury [6]. Third, MRCP is helpful for the diagnosis of gallbladder cancer and other biliary and pancreatic diseases [7]. However, is it appropriate for all patients with cholecystolithiasis to undergo MRCP before LC? Does the cost of MRCP match its benefits (price-performance ratio)? At present, there is no strong evidence to support or refute this view. In this study, we analyzed the clinical data of 184 patients with cholecystolithiasis treated by LC and discussed the necessity and feasibility of preoperative routine MRCP by a “real world” study. Patients and methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study to analyze the clinical data of patients who underwent LC for cholecystolithiasis in the Department of General Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018. According to whether MRCP was performed before operation, patients were divided into non-MRCP group and MRCP group for this study. Only abdominal ultrasonography was performed in non MRCP group, and both abdominal ultrasonography and MRCP were performed in MRCP group. The selected patients for enrollment were adults (age 18 and older), who were diagnosed as gallstones by abdominal ultrasound before operation, and received LC or LC combined with other stone extraction. But patients with the following conditions need to be excluded. First, patient underwent LC for gallbladder cancer. Secondary, patients had cardiopulmonary and other organ insufficiency. Third, patients had some items missing from the case data. This study finally included 184 cases. The relevant research content data were collected mainly through the hospital medical record center and the medical record query system, and the clinical data of the two groups were compared to explore the necessity and feasibility of preoperative routine MRCP in patients with cholecystolithiasis. The main evaluating indicators were the results of abdominal ultrasound and MRCP, incidence of biliary related comorbidities and postoperative complications of LC. The secondary evaluating indicators were including the hospitalization-related information (hospital stay, hospitalization costs) and the preoperative relevant laboratory tests, such as white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil percentage (N%), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT), direct bilirubin (D-Bil), indirect bilirubin (I-Bil) and total bilirubin (T-Bil). Statistical analysis was performed by using the SPSS software (version 26.0, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Continuous variable data were compared by the t-test. Categorical variable data were compared by the χ2 test. If any cell had expected count less than 5, Fisher's test was analyzed. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant difference. Results Basic information and preoperative laboratory examination Among the 184 patients, there were 83 patients in non-MRCP group and 101 patients in MRCP group. There was no significant difference ( P > 0.05) in general demographic data such as age, gender and body mass index (BMI) between the two groups (Table 1 ). There was no significant difference in preoperative axillary temperature (T), liver function and D-Bil results between the two groups ( P > 0.05). While there was a statistically significant difference in I-Bil and T-Bil between the two groups ( P < 0.05), the two indicators were higher in the MRCP group than in the non-MRCP group (Table 1 ). Table 1 Comparison of basic information and preoperative laboratory examination data between the two groups Non-MRCP group(n = 83) MRCP group (n = 101) T/Z P Age (years) 57.33 ± 14.72(mean ± SD) 22–86 60.03 ± 15.61 23–89 -1.200 0.232 Gender Male 30 48 2.416 0.120 Female 53 53 Height (cm) 165.20 ± 6.79 166.72 ± 7.61 -1.412 0.160 Body weight (kg) 67.44 ± 11.63 69.40 ± 11.81 -1.132 0.259 BMI(kg/m 2 ) 24.67 ± 3.81 24.88 ± 3.28 -0.392 0.695 T(℃) 36.44 ± 0.45 36.42 ± 0.34 0.401 0.689 WBC(*10 9 ) 5.66 ± 1.53 5.78 ± 1.72 -0.509 0.612 N% 58.59 ± 10.36 58.90 ± 11.58 -0.192 0.848 ALT(u/L) 28.48 ± 20.86 34.97 ± 31.18 -1.621 0.107 AST(u/L) 26.34 ± 17.63 26.76 ± 20.56 -0.149 0.882 ALP(u/L) 70.25 ± 23.69 76.06 ± 26.29 -1.558 0.121 γ-GT(u/L) 42.83 ± 33.29 46.07 ± 35.30 -0.635 0.526 D-Bil(umol/l) 5.73 ± 3.99 7.11 ± 5.34 -1.956 0.052 I-Bil(umol/l) 8.14 ± 3.53 9.69 ± 4.65 -2.497 0.013 T-Bil(umol/l) 13.87 ± 5.44 16.80 ± 8.14 -2.805 0.006 Note: Normal values for each indicator: T (axillary temperature)37 <°C; WBC 4–10*10 9 /L; N% 50%-70%; ALT 7–40 u/L; AST 13–35 u/L; γ-GT 0–50 u/L; ALP 40–110 u/L; D-Bil 0–8 umol/l (or 0-0.47 mg/dL); I-Bil 1–14 umol /l (or 0-0.82 mg/dL); T-Bil 0–23 umol/l (or 0-1.35 mg/dL). Clinical diagnosis, imaging examination and surgical-related information The biliary related comorbidities and ultrasonography results of the 83 patients with cholecystolithiasis in non-MRCP group were shown in Table 2 . Among them, 76 patients underwent simple LC surgery. Six cases of CBDS with common bile duct dilatation (one of them combined with preoperative percutaneous gallbladder puncture and drainage) underwent LC combined with common bile duct exploration, choledocholithotomy and T-tube drainage. One case of CBDS without common bile duct dilatation underwent LC combined with preoperative Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), Endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy (EST) lithotomy. The biliary related comorbidities, ultrasound and MRCP results of 101 patients with cholecystolithiasis in MRCP group were shown in Table 2 and Table 3 . Of the 101 cases, 80 cases underwent simple LC surgery. Fifteen cases of CBDS with common bile duct dilatation (one of them combined with preoperative percutaneous gallbladder puncture and drainage) underwent LC combined with common bile duct exploration, choledocholithotomy and T-tube drainage. Seven cases without common bile duct dilatation (one case combined with common bile duct exploration, common bile duct lithotomy and T-tube drainage) underwent LC combined with preoperative ERCP, EST stone extraction. There was a statistically significant difference in CBDS, adenomyomatosis and biliary tract variation between the two groups ( P < 0.05). MRCP can find more CBDS, adenomyomatosis and biliary tract variation than ultrasound. Table 2 Comparison of clinical diagnosis, imaging examination and surgery-related information between the two groups Non-MRCP group(n = 83) MRCP group (n = 101) χ2/Z P Biliary related comorbidities Cholecystitis 73(87.95%) 94(93.07%) 1.423 0.233 CBDS 7(8.43%) 21(20.79%) 5.393 0.020 Cholangitis 3(3.61%) 6(5.94%) -0.726 0.468 Gallbladder duct stones 2(2.40%) 6(5.94%) -1.166 0.244 Adenomyomatosis of gallbladder 2(2.40%) 10(9.90%) -2.042 0.041 Biliary pancreatitis 0 3(2.97%) -1.579 0.114 Gallbladder polyps 4(4.82%) 5(4.95%) -0.041 0.967 Mirizzi syndrome 1(1.20%) 3(2.97%) -0.815 0.415 Abdominal ultrasound findings 83 101 CBDS 7(8.43%) 10(9.90%) 0.117 0.732 Dilation of the common bile duct 6(7.23%) 10(9.90%) 0.410 0.522 Biliary tract variation 0 0 Biliary tract tumors 0 0 LC combined surgery Common bile duct exploration 6(7.23%) 15(14.85%) 2.618 0.106 Common bile duct incision 6(7.23%) 15(14.85%) 2.618 0.106 T-tube drainage 6(7.23%) 15(14.85%) 2.618 0.106 Preoperative cholecystocentesis drainage 1*(1.20%) 1*(0.99%) -0.139 0.889 Preoperative ERCP + EST stone extraction 1(1.20%) 7*(6.93%) -1.890 0.059 LC intraoperative situation CBDS 6(7.23%) 15(14.85%) 2.618 0.106 Dilation of the common bile duct 6(7.23%) 15(14.85%) 2.618 0.106 Biliary tract variation 1(1.20%) 5(4.95%) -2.050 0.040 Biliary tract tumors 0 0 Operating time (min) 78.48 ± 49.54 89.26 ± 48.31 -1.488 0.138 Note: Dilated common bile duct: diameter of common bile duct > 6mm. *One patient in non-MRCP group and one patient in MRCP group underwent LC combined with preoperative percutaneous cholecystocentesis and drainage, common bile duct exploration, choledocholithotomy and T-tube drainage; one patient in the MRCP group underwent LC combined with preoperative ERCP + EST lithotomy, common bile duct exploration, choledochotomy and T-tube drainage. In MRCP group, the detection rate of preoperative MRCP in the diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis with CBDS, cystic duct stones, gallbladder adenomyosis, common bile duct dilatation and biliary tract variation was higher than those of abdominal ultrasound. There was significant difference ( P < 0.05) in the detection rate of CBDS and common bile duct dilatation between MRCP and abdominal ultrasound (Table 3 , Table 4 and Table 5 ). Table 3 Comparison of abdominal ultrasound and MRCP findings in the MRCP group Inspection findings ultrasonography MRCP CBDS 10/101(9.90%) 21/101(20.79%) Gallbladder duct stones 0 6/101(5.94%) Adenomyomatosis of gallbladder 0 10/101(9.90%) Biliary pancreatitis 0 3/101(2.97%) Mirizzi syndrome 0 3/101(2.97%) Biliary tract tumors 0 0 Dilation of the common bile duct 10/101(9.90%) 15/101(14.85%) Biliary tract variation 0 13/101(12.87%) Table 4 Diagnosis of CBDS by abdominal ultrasound with MRCP in the MRCP group ultrasonography MRCP Total χ2/Z P + - + 10 0 10 -3.317 0.001 - 11 80 91 Total 21 80 101 Table 5 Diagnosis of common bile duct dilatation by abdominal ultrasound and MRCP in the MRCP group ultrasonography MRCP Total χ2/Z P + - + 10 0 10 -2.236 0.025 - 5 86 91 Total 15 86 101 Postoperative complications There were no postoperative complications in MRCP group, while there were 7 cases of postoperative complications in non-MRCP group. Among 5 cases with comorbidities of residual CBDS, one patient developed obstructive jaundice after LC, and then ERCP + EST stone removal was performed, who was hospitalized for 18 days at a total cost of 44,277.49 yuan (RMB). One patient was readmitted due to acute pancreatitis after LC, and then underwent ERCP + EST stone extraction and was hospitalized again for 16 days at a cost of 20,878.72 yuan. Two patients were readmitted due to biliary colic after LC, and underwent ERCP + EST stone extraction for 8 days and 9 days at a cost of 12,389.42 yuan and 13,090.56 yuan respectively. One patient had biliary colic symptoms after LC. MRCP found that the residual CBDS was very small, and there was no common bile duct dilatation. After a period of observation, MRCP was performed again, indicating no stones. In addition, one patient with biliary colic after LC was found to be cystic duct residual gallstones by MRCP, who was hospitalized for surgery again and recovered after stone removal. The other patient with biliary tract variation had intraoperative biliary tract injury, and no biliary tract variation was found by preoperative ultrasonography. After Rou-x surgery, he recovered and was hospitalized for 20 days at a cost of 24,366.67 yuan. Comparing the postoperative complications between the two groups, the non-MRCP group (7/83, 8.43%) was significantly higher than the MRCP group (0/101) with a statistically significant difference ( P < 0.05) in Table 6 . Table 6 Comparison of postoperative complications between the two groups Complications Group Total χ2/Z P Non-MRCP group MRCP group Yes 7 0 7 -2.968 0.003 No 76 101 177 Total 83 101 184 Hospital stay and hospitalization expenses There was no significant difference in hospital stay ( P > 0.05), but there was a statistically significant difference in hospitalization costs ( P < 0.05) between the two groups. According to whether patients with CBDS, the hospital stay and hospitalization costs were stratified and analyzed. In non-MRCP group, there were 7 patients with CBDS and 76 patients without CBDS. In MRCP group, there were 21 patients with CBDS and 80 patients without CBDS. There was no significant difference ( P > 0.05) in hospital stay and costs between the two groups (Table 7 ). Table 7 Comparison of hospital stay and hospitalization expenses between the two groups Non-MRCP group(n = 83) MRCP group (n = 101) t P Hospital stay (day) 8.28 ± 4.10 9.18 ± 4.73 -1.365 0.174 Hospitalization costs (ten thousand yuan) 1.67 ± 0.60 1.92 ± 0.65 -2.625 0.009 Hospital stay of patients with CBDS (day) 14.57 ± 2.76 14.85 ± 5.04 -0.142 0.888 Hospitalization costs of patients with CBDS (Ten thousand yuan) 2.50 ± 0.53 2.74 ± 0.53 -1.050 0.303 Hospital stay of patients without CBDS (day) 7.70 ± 3.71 7.69 ± 3.32 0.018 0.986 Hospitalization costs of patients without CBDS (Ten thousand yuan) 1.60 ± 0.55 1.70 ± 0.48 -1.255 0.211 Discussion LC has become the first choice for the treatment of cholecystolithiasis [ 8 – 11 ]. However, the postoperative residual CBDS and bile duct injury after LC cannot be ignored [ 12 ]. It is reported that 10% ~ 20% of patients with cholecystolithiasis coexist with CBDS [ 13 ]. If the presence of CBDS can be determined before LC, the incidence of postoperative residual CBDS can be reduced [ 14 ]. The incidence of LC bile duct injury is 0.2–1.1% [ 15 ]. Although there is a "learning curve" factor in the cause of bile duct injury, bile duct anatomical factors such as bile duct anatomical variation, acute inflammation of the gallbladder and Mirizzi syndrome are also factors that cannot be ignored for bile duct injury, which increase the difficulty of surgery [ 16 , 17 ]. Adequate preoperative knowledge of the bile duct-related anatomy and prediction of LC difficulty can help to reduce the occurrence of complications. At present, preoperative prediction of the possibility of LC in patients with cholecystolithiasis mainly relies on the results of medical history, laboratory examinations and imaging examinations. Abdominal ultrasound is helpful for the accurate diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis and cholecystitis, and the diagnostic accuracy of common bile duct dilatation can also reach 77–87% [ 18 ]. The accuracy of abdominal CT in the diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis and CBDS is higher than that of abdominal ultrasound. Abdominal CT is not the first choice for diagnosing cholecystolithiasis because it is difficult to diagnose stones with low calcium content and due to the influence of radiation and other factors [ 19 ]. IOC has always been an effective method for the diagnosis of CBDS [20]. However, IOC lengthens LC, complicates the surgery and possibly introduces more opportunities for detrimental outcomes. Preoperative MRCP has a tendency to replace IOC in recent years. ASGE guidelines predict the probability of CBDS according to different clinical indicators, which are divided into three levels. First, very strong predictive factors for choledocholithiasis include evidence of CBDS in abdominal ultrasound. Second, strong predictive factors for choledocholithiasis include common bile duct diameter > 6 mm (with gallbladder in situ), total serum bilirubin > 4 mg/dL or bilirubin level 1.8 to 4 mg/dL. Third, moderate predictive factors for choledocholithiasis include abnormal liver biochemical test other than bilirubin, age older than 55 years or clinical gallstone pancreatitis [20–22]. According to the above prediction indicators, the ASGE guidelines also classify the classes for CBDS and give corresponding treatment suggestions. Patients with very strong predictive factors for choledocholithiasis belong to the high risk classes (> 50%) for choledocholithiasis and need to be clearly diagnosed by ERCP, and treated accordingly. Patients with predictors strong and moderate predictive factors for choledocholithiasis belong to the intermediate risk classes (10%ཞ50%) for choledocholithiasis and should undergo preoperative MRCP, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), IOC, or laparoscopic ultrasound depending on the local expertise and availability. Patients with no predictive factors for choledocholithiasis belong to the low risk classes (<10%) for choledocholithiasis and can choose to undergo LC directly [ 22 , 23 ]. The clinical guideline recommends that patients with gallstone at moderate risk or above of CBDS undergo further preoperative examinations such as MRCP before LC. Should patients with low risk for CBDS (< 10%) and no predictors undergo preoperative MRCP in addition to abdominal ultrasound? This is the problem to be solved in this study. An important reason for residual CBDS after LC is insufficient preoperative examination. Abdominal ultrasound has high specificity in the diagnosis of CBDS, but the sensitivity is only 22%ཞ55%. It is more difficult to find distal CBDS without bile duct dilatation and anatomical variation of bile duct. Studies showed that the sensitivity and specificity of MRCP examination for the diagnosis of gallbladder and bile duct diseases could reach 90–100% [ 23 ]. MRCP can clearly display the image of the "biliary tree" and obtain the effect similar to direct cholangiography that the surgeon wants to know. At the same time, MRCP can accurately show the image information such as the size, number, location of the bile duct stones and the degree of biliary tract dilatation [ 24 , 25 ]. Many patients in our study benefited from MRCP examination. In MRCP group, there were 21 patients combined with CBDS. Preoperative abdominal ultrasound revealed only 10 of these patients with CBDS, all of whom were dilatation of common bile duct; while MRCP diagnosed all cases of CBDS, including 15 cases of common bile duct dilatation, 6 cases without common bile duct dilatation, jaundice and abnormal liver function. MRCP showed CBDS and bile duct dilatation that were not diagnosed by abdominal ultrasound, especially in cases of CBDS with normal liver function, no jaundice and no bile duct dilatation. MRCP can make up for the defect that abdominal ultrasound cannot show the deep extrahepatic bile duct. Residual CBDS after LC also has the risk of causing other gallstone-related complications, such as early bile leakage, obstructive jaundice, cholangitis and pancreatitis, which results in prolonged hospitalization or readmission and consequently increase medical costs. In this study, one patient in non-MRCP group developed obstructive jaundice after LC, who was diagnosed with residual CBDS and cured by a further EST stone extraction. Another patient developed acute pancreatitis due to residual CBDS after LC and was readmitted to the hospital, who also recovered after EST stone extraction. Postoperative complications such as residual cystic duct stones or residual small gallbladder often occur when the cystic duct is tortuously too long or too short. In addition, the complications also occur in patients with low openings and openings behind or on the left side of the common bile duct [ 26 ]. Preoperative MRCP can help the surgeon understand the relationship between the cystic duct, the common hepatic duct and the common bile duct, the length of the cystic duct and the presence of stones. In this study, preoperative MRCP revealed cystic duct stones in 6 cases, which were treated in a targeted manner during surgery to avoid the occurrence of residual stones in the cystic duct. In non-MRCP group, the residual cystic duct stones were found by postoperative MRCP in one case of right upper abdominal pain after LC and the symptoms were relieved after the second operation. Anatomical variation of the bile duct, acute inflammation of the gallbladder, stone incarceration in the gallbladder neck, gallbladder-colic fistula and Mirizzi syndrome will increase the difficulty of surgery, which are also factors that can easily cause bile duct injury in LC [ 16 , 17 , 26 ].The surgeon can objectively judge the severity of cholecystitis and the thickness of the gallbladder wall by MRCP, which is helpful to estimate the difficulty of surgery, prevent bile duct injury and reduce the incidence of conversion to laparotomy [ 5 ]. Preoperative MRCP is also helpful for the diagnosis of Mirizzi syndrome and the selection of appropriate surgical methods to minimize the occurrence of bile duct injury [ 27 ]. In non MRCP group, one patient with common bile duct injury failed to detect the bile duct variation by preoperative abdominal ultrasound, which may be one of the reasons for bile duct injury. In MRCP group, preoperative MRCP revealed there were pancreaticobiliary variants in 13 patients, including the variation of cystic duct passed through the back of common bile duct or flowed into common hepatic duct, accessory pancreatic duct and intrahepatic bile duct. The surgeon fully understood the anatomical structure of biliary system before operation, so as to effectively prevent the occurrence of complications such as intraoperative biliary injury during the operation. Three patients with Mirizzi syndrome were diagnosed by preoperative MRCP in this study. Because of proper intraoperative management, there were no complications such as biliary tract injury. In addition, MRCP before LC is also helpful for the diagnosis of pancreatitis and biliopancreatic tumors [ 28 , 29 ]. In our study, there were 3 patients with biliary colic in the MRCP group. Preoperative MRCP identified acute pancreatitis that was not diagnosed by abdominal ultrasound. The patients received conservative treatment before LC, avoiding LC in the acute stage of pancreatitis. Therefore, MRCP before LC in patients with cholecystolithiasis can determine whether CBDS is combined, and fully understand the anatomy of the biliary tract and the degree of gallbladder inflammation. It is helpful to predict the difficulty of surgery and reduce the occurrence of complications such as residual CBDS and bile duct injury after LC. Although routine MRCP before LC has certain clinical value for cholecystolithiasis, it increases the cost of examination. How is it cost-effective? Due to the different degree of illness of the two groups of patients, there were more patients with CBDS in MRCP group, which led to an increase in the hospitalization costs compared with non-MRCP group. But according to whether patients of cholecystolithiasis were combined with CBDS or not, the hospital stay and expenses of the two groups were compared and there was no significant difference, suggesting that MRCP did not significantly increase length of stay and the hospitalization costs. The cost of MRCP examinations is very cheap now. It is worthwhile to perform preoperative MRCP, compared with the possible complications and damage to patients without preoperative MRCP. In addition, medical insurance only covers the cost of hospitalization in China, so patients undergoing surgery have a longer hospital stay. From the perspective of health economics, MRCP has obvious advantages in terms of cost-effectiveness. We believe that routine MRCP before LC for gallstones is necessary and feasible. However, this study also has certain limitations. This is a retrospective study. For one thing, the preoperative I-Bil and T-Bil of the two groups are statistically significant. For another, the ultrasound and MRCP between the two groups cannot be compared horizontally. The diagnostic effects of the two examinations can be compared only by patients in the MRCP group. In addition, there are certain biases and confounding factors. Whether patients with gallstones should undergo routine MRCP before LC needs to be discussed in a follow-up control study with better settings. In conclusion, routine MRCP in patients with gallstone before LC is a rational use of medical resources and is helpful to further clarify the diagnosis of diseases such as CBDS and understand the anatomy of biliary tract, which has certain guiding significance for predicting the difficulty of operation. According to the preoperative MRCP results, the surgeon can formulate a reasonable surgical plan to deal with CBDS, cystic duct stones, avoid the injury of bile duct, residual stones, effectively prevent intraoperative and postoperative complications, and reduce the risk of secondary surgery. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of Beijing Shijitan Hospital and the ethics number is sjtkyll-1x-2020 (87). All participants have signed an informed consent form. Also all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulation. Consent for publication Not applicable. Availability of data and materials The datasets were available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Competing interests Authors have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Funding This work was supported by China Railway Corporation Foundation (J2018Z605). Authors' contributions XG, QF, KL, NMZ, BHAM and BZ contributed to the study conception and design. XG, YMG, XML, JLH, JYW, and JW completed the data collection. XG, XML, JLH, ZYW and JW completed the data analysis and data interpretation. XG, QF and BZ completed the manuscript. BHAM and BZ proofread the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to all the patients, researchers, and institutions that participated in this study. References Cianci P, Restini E. Management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis: Endoscopic and surgical approaches. World J Gastroenterol, 2021, 27(28):4536-4554. Gutt C, Schläfer S, Lammert F. The treatment of gallstone disease. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2020, 117(9):148-158. Hashimoto S, Nakaoka K, Kawabe N, et al. The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of gallbladder lesions. Diagnostics (Basel), 2021, 11(10): 1789. Kohga A, Suzuki K, Okumura T, et al. Does preoperative MRCP imaging predict risk for conversion to subtotal cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis?. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(12):6717-6723. Robinson C, Turner RM, Potter J. A retrospective analysis of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography investigating gallstones in a contemporary surgical setting. ANZ J Surg, 2022, 92(9):2174-2179. Sarawagi R, Sundar S, Raghuvanshi S, et al. Common and uncommon anatomical variants of intrahepatic bile ducts in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and its clinical implication. Pol J Radiol. 2016, 81:250-255. Khan T, Alam SZ, Al Mamun M, et al. Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Case of Biliary Obstruction Comparing Post-operative Findings: A Study of 50 Cases. Mymensingh Med J, 2021, 30(4):1079-1085. Gustafsson S, Stromqvist M, Ekelund J, et al. Factors Influencing Early Postoperative Recovery After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. J Perianesth Nurs, 2020, 35(1):80-84. Ibrahim M, Sarvepalli S, Morris-Stiff G, et al. Gallstones: Watch and wait, or intervene?. Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine, 2018, 85(4): 323–331. Wakabayashi G, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2018, 25:73–86. Tazuma S, Unno M, Igarashi Y, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016. J Gastroenterol, 2017, 52(3):276-300. Alexander HC, Bartlett AS, Wells CI, et al. Reporting of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford), 2018, 20(9):786-794. Latenstein CSS, de Reuver PR. Tailoring diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic gallstone disease. Br J Surg, 2022, 109(9):832-838. Platt T, Smith K, Nixon M, et al. Success of intraoperative imaging and management of suspected choledocholithiasis without pre-operative bile duct imaging - A case series. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2018, 36:173-177. Pucher PH, Brunt LM, Davies N, et al. Outcome trends and safety measures after 30 years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and pooled data analysis. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(5):2175-2183. Dokmak S, Amharar N, Aussilhou B, et al. Laparoscopic repair of post-cholecystectomy bile duct injury: an advance in surgical management. J Gastrointest Surg, 2017, 21(8):1368-1372. Wang JX, Zhang Q, Shen WF, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery model's system idea for multi-dimensional multi-angle reduction of bile duct injury: A surgeon's experience. Asian J Surg, 2019, 42(3):524-525. Borzellino G, Massimiliano Motton AP, Minniti F, et al. Sonographic diagnosis of acute cholecystitis in patients with symptomatic gallstones. J Clin Ultrasound, 2016, 44:152–8. Suzuki M, Sekino Y, Hosono K, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of computed tomography-negative common bile duct stone: Prospective randomized controlled trial. Dig Endosc, 2022, 34(5):1052-1059. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc, 2010, 71(1):1–9. Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L, et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy, 2019, 51(5):472-491. Lee TY. Optimal evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis: Does this patient really have choledocholithiasis?. Clin Endosc, 2017, 50(5):415-416. Luo Y, Yang T, Yu Q, et al. Laparoscopic ultrasonography versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in laparoscopic surgery for symptomatic cholelithiasis and suspected common bile duct stones. J Gastrointest Surg, 2019, 23(6):1143-1147. Milburn JA, Bailey JA, Dunn W, et al. Inpatient magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: does it increase the efficiency in emergency hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery services? Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2017, 99(4):289-294. Michael Brunt L, Deziel DJ, Telem DA, et al. Safe cholecystectomy multi-society practice guideline and state-of-the-art consensus conference on prevention of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(7):2827-2855. Clemente G, Tringali A, De Rose AM, et al. Mirizzi syndrome: diagnosis and management of a challenging biliary disease. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 2018:6962090. Ishaque I, Ilyas A, Khan O, et al. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in learning anatomical variations in pancreatic duct. J Pak Med Assoc, 2020, 70(3):472-476. Aljiffry M, Abbas M, Wazzan MAM, et al. Biliary anatomy and pancreatic duct variations: A cross-sectional study. Saudi J Gastroenterol, 2020, 26(4):188-193. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 09 Jan, 2024 Read the published version in BMC Gastroenterology → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 30 Nov, 2023 Reviews received at journal 12 Nov, 2023 Reviewers agreed at journal 09 Nov, 2023 Reviewers invited by journal 07 Nov, 2023 Editor assigned by journal 07 Nov, 2023 Editor invited by journal 14 Jul, 2023 Submission checks completed at journal 14 Jul, 2023 First submitted to journal 29 Jun, 2023 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-3126472","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":218685022,"identity":"b3246581-62c3-492e-9761-09806a3f0785","order_by":0,"name":"Xu Guo","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Beijing Shijitan Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xu","middleName":"","lastName":"Guo","suffix":""},{"id":218685023,"identity":"76ef3801-d14b-43da-98e8-027289a6a3af","order_by":1,"name":"Qing Fan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Beijing Shijitan Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Qing","middleName":"","lastName":"Fan","suffix":""},{"id":218685024,"identity":"93e6eee1-0dd4-4ccd-9621-60d802162203","order_by":2,"name":"Yiman Guo","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Hebei University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yiman","middleName":"","lastName":"Guo","suffix":""},{"id":218685025,"identity":"69b0413d-a98c-400b-93c8-917860bbdd4b","order_by":3,"name":"Xinming Li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Beijing Shijitan Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xinming","middleName":"","lastName":"Li","suffix":""},{"id":218685026,"identity":"e296d0a6-32b4-42be-ba86-e09997d09add","order_by":4,"name":"Jili Hu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Beijing Shijitan Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jili","middleName":"","lastName":"Hu","suffix":""},{"id":218685028,"identity":"9c5727a7-d3a9-4e82-aea0-740436ed7bdc","order_by":5,"name":"Zhuoyin Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Beijing Shijitan Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zhuoyin","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":218685030,"identity":"2ae27f00-56f0-4211-aa00-f685cbf650d1","order_by":6,"name":"Jing Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Beijing Shijitan Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jing","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":218685032,"identity":"4497f4be-c33e-443a-8727-34844739a023","order_by":7,"name":"Kai Li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Beijing Shijitan Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kai","middleName":"","lastName":"Li","suffix":""},{"id":218685034,"identity":"e04b491f-1523-4431-bc08-649d395de71e","order_by":8,"name":"Nengwei Zhang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Beijing Shijitan Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Nengwei","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhang","suffix":""},{"id":218685036,"identity":"9f29a340-ec0b-410f-98ae-cf719e824d91","order_by":9,"name":"Buhe Amin","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Beijing Shijitan Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Buhe","middleName":"","lastName":"Amin","suffix":""},{"id":218685037,"identity":"89dbe11f-a4ac-4a84-9421-065fda319197","order_by":10,"name":"Bin Zhu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Beijing Shijitan Hospital","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Bin","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhu","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2023-06-30 01:59:22","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3126472/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3126472/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-03117-3","type":"published","date":"2024-01-09T15:01:37+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":49628762,"identity":"7a46bf7b-c431-40d1-8114-af3c36703993","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-01-15 15:09:15","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":373083,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3126472/v1/07c199f1-35fb-4c7d-bba7-66c347a1760a.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Clinical study on the necessity and feasibility of routine MRCP in patients with cholecystolithiasis before LC","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the standard treatment for patients with gallstones [1]. For most patients with cholecystolithiasis, preoperative abdominal ultrasound can confirm the diagnosis [2, 3]. But the results of ultrasonography are easily influenced by the gastrointestinal gas of patients and the skill level of operators, and it is easy to miss combined common bile duct stones (CBDS) and difficult to detect the anatomical variation of bile duct. In the past quite a long time, intraoperative cholangiography（IOC）was necessary during LC. At present, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the main method for diagnosing CBDS. Usually, MRCP is only required when abdominal ultrasound shows dilatation of the common bile duct (diameter ＞6 mm) or the patient has jaundice and elevated transaminases [4]. MRCP before LC has the following advantages in theory. First, MRCP can diagnose CBDS and common bile duct dilatation that cannot be detected by abdominal ultrasound, and clarify the cause of biliary obstruction [5]. Second, MRCP can fully understand the anatomical variation of extrahepatic bile duct and the severity of gallbladder inflammation, which can assess the difficulty of surgery and reduce conversion to laparotomy and complications such as bile duct injury [6]. Third, MRCP is helpful for the diagnosis of gallbladder cancer and other biliary and pancreatic diseases [7]. However, is it appropriate for all patients with cholecystolithiasis to undergo MRCP before LC? Does the cost of MRCP match its benefits (price-performance ratio)? \u0026nbsp;At present, there is no strong evidence to support or refute this view. In this study, we analyzed the clinical data of 184 patients with cholecystolithiasis treated by LC and discussed the necessity and feasibility of preoperative routine MRCP by a \u0026ldquo;real world\u0026rdquo; study.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Patients and methods","content":"\u003cp\u003eWe conducted a retrospective cohort study to analyze the clinical data of patients who underwent LC for cholecystolithiasis in the Department of General Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018. According to whether MRCP was performed before operation, patients were divided into non-MRCP group and MRCP group for this study. Only abdominal ultrasonography was performed in non MRCP group, and both abdominal ultrasonography and MRCP were performed in MRCP group. The selected patients for enrollment were adults (age 18 and older), who were diagnosed as gallstones by abdominal ultrasound before operation, and received LC or LC combined with other stone extraction. But patients with the following conditions need to be excluded. First, patient underwent LC for gallbladder cancer. Secondary, patients had cardiopulmonary and other organ insufficiency. Third, patients had some items missing from the case data. This study finally included 184 cases.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe relevant research content data were collected mainly through the hospital medical record center and the medical record query system, and the clinical data of the two groups were compared to explore the necessity and feasibility of preoperative routine MRCP in patients with cholecystolithiasis. The main evaluating indicators were the results of abdominal ultrasound and MRCP, incidence of biliary related comorbidities and postoperative complications of LC. The secondary evaluating indicators were including the hospitalization-related information (hospital stay, hospitalization costs) and the preoperative relevant laboratory tests, such as white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil percentage (N%), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT), direct bilirubin (D-Bil), indirect bilirubin (I-Bil) and total bilirubin (T-Bil).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStatistical analysis was performed by using the SPSS software (version 26.0, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Continuous variable data were compared by the t-test. Categorical variable data were compared by the χ2 test. If any cell had expected count less than 5, Fisher's test was analyzed. \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003c0.05 was considered statistically significant difference.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eBasic information and preoperative laboratory examination\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAmong the 184 patients, there were 83 patients in non-MRCP group and 101 patients in MRCP group. There was no significant difference (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) in general demographic data such as age, gender and body mass index (BMI) between the two groups (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere was no significant difference in preoperative axillary temperature (T), liver function and D-Bil results between the two groups (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). While there was a statistically significant difference in I-Bil and T-Bil between the two groups (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), the two indicators were higher in the MRCP group than in the non-MRCP group (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eComparison of basic information and preoperative laboratory examination data between the two groups\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNon-MRCP group(n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;83)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMRCP group (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;101)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eT/Z\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAge (years)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e57.33\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;14.72(mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e22\u0026ndash;86\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e60.03\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;15.61\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e23\u0026ndash;89\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-1.200\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.232\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGender\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e30\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e48\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.416\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.120\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFemale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e53\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e53\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHeight (cm)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e165.20\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;6.79\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e166.72\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;7.61\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-1.412\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.160\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBody weight (kg)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e67.44\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;11.63\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e69.40\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;11.81\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-1.132\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.259\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBMI(kg/m\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e24.67\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.81\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e24.88\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.28\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.392\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.695\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eT(℃)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36.44\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.45\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36.42\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.34\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.401\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.689\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWBC(*10\u003csup\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.66\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.53\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.78\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.72\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.509\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.612\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eN%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e58.59\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;10.36\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e58.90\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;11.58\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.192\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.848\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eALT(u/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e28.48\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;20.86\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e34.97\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;31.18\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-1.621\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.107\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAST(u/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e26.34\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;17.63\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e26.76\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;20.56\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.149\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.882\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eALP(u/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e70.25\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;23.69\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e76.06\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;26.29\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-1.558\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.121\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eγ-GT(u/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e42.83\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;33.29\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e46.07\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;35.30\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.635\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.526\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eD-Bil(umol/l)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.73\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.99\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.11\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.34\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-1.956\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.052\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eI-Bil(umol/l)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.14\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.53\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.69\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.65\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-2.497\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.013\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eT-Bil(umol/l)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13.87\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.44\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16.80\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;8.14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-2.805\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.006\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"5\"\u003eNote: Normal values for each indicator: T (axillary temperature)37 \u0026lt;\u0026deg;C; WBC 4\u0026ndash;10*10\u003csup\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e/L; N% 50%-70%; ALT 7\u0026ndash;40 u/L; AST 13\u0026ndash;35 u/L; γ-GT 0\u0026ndash;50 u/L; ALP 40\u0026ndash;110 u/L; D-Bil 0\u0026ndash;8 umol/l (or 0-0.47 mg/dL); I-Bil 1\u0026ndash;14 umol /l (or 0-0.82 mg/dL); T-Bil 0\u0026ndash;23 umol/l (or 0-1.35 mg/dL).\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eClinical diagnosis, imaging examination and surgical-related information\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe biliary related comorbidities and ultrasonography results of the 83 patients with cholecystolithiasis in non-MRCP group were shown in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e. Among them, 76 patients underwent simple LC surgery. Six cases of CBDS with common bile duct dilatation (one of them combined with preoperative percutaneous gallbladder puncture and drainage) underwent LC combined with common bile duct exploration, choledocholithotomy and T-tube drainage. One case of CBDS without common bile duct dilatation underwent LC combined with preoperative Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), Endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy (EST) lithotomy.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe biliary related comorbidities, ultrasound and MRCP results of 101 patients with cholecystolithiasis in MRCP group were shown in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e and Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e. Of the 101 cases, 80 cases underwent simple LC surgery. Fifteen cases of CBDS with common bile duct dilatation (one of them combined with preoperative percutaneous gallbladder puncture and drainage) underwent LC combined with common bile duct exploration, choledocholithotomy and T-tube drainage. Seven cases without common bile duct dilatation (one case combined with common bile duct exploration, common bile duct lithotomy and T-tube drainage) underwent LC combined with preoperative ERCP, EST stone extraction.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere was a statistically significant difference in CBDS, adenomyomatosis and biliary tract variation between the two groups (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). MRCP can find more CBDS, adenomyomatosis and biliary tract variation than ultrasound.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eComparison of clinical diagnosis, imaging examination and surgery-related information between the two groups\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNon-MRCP group(n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;83)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMRCP group (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;101)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eχ2/Z\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBiliary related comorbidities\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCholecystitis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e73(87.95%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e94(93.07%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.423\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.233\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCBDS\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7(8.43%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21(20.79%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.393\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.020\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCholangitis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3(3.61%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6(5.94%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.726\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.468\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGallbladder duct stones\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2(2.40%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6(5.94%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-1.166\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.244\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdenomyomatosis of gallbladder\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2(2.40%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10(9.90%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-2.042\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.041\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBiliary pancreatitis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3(2.97%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-1.579\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.114\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGallbladder polyps\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4(4.82%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5(4.95%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.041\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.967\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMirizzi syndrome\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1(1.20%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3(2.97%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.815\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.415\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAbdominal ultrasound findings\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e83\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e101\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCBDS\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7(8.43%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10(9.90%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.117\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.732\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDilation of the common bile duct\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6(7.23%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10(9.90%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.410\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.522\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBiliary tract variation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBiliary tract tumors\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLC combined surgery\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCommon bile duct exploration\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6(7.23%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15(14.85%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.618\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.106\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCommon bile duct incision\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6(7.23%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15(14.85%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.618\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.106\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eT-tube drainage\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6(7.23%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15(14.85%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.618\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.106\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePreoperative cholecystocentesis drainage\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1*(1.20%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1*(0.99%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.139\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.889\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePreoperative ERCP\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;EST stone extraction\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1(1.20%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7*(6.93%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-1.890\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.059\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLC intraoperative situation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCBDS\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6(7.23%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15(14.85%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.618\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.106\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDilation of the common bile duct\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6(7.23%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15(14.85%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.618\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.106\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBiliary tract variation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1(1.20%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5(4.95%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-2.050\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.040\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBiliary tract tumors\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOperating time (min)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e78.48\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;49.54\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e89.26\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;48.31\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-1.488\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.138\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"5\"\u003eNote: Dilated common bile duct: diameter of common bile duct\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;6mm. *One patient in non-MRCP group and one patient in MRCP group underwent LC combined with preoperative percutaneous cholecystocentesis and drainage, common bile duct exploration, choledocholithotomy and T-tube drainage; one patient in the MRCP group underwent LC combined with preoperative ERCP\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;EST lithotomy, common bile duct exploration, choledochotomy and T-tube drainage.\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn MRCP group, the detection rate of preoperative MRCP in the diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis with CBDS, cystic duct stones, gallbladder adenomyosis, common bile duct dilatation and biliary tract variation was higher than those of abdominal ultrasound. There was significant difference (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) in the detection rate of CBDS and common bile duct dilatation between MRCP and abdominal ultrasound (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e, Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e and Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eComparison of abdominal ultrasound and MRCP findings in the MRCP group\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInspection findings\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eultrasonography\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMRCP\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCBDS\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10/101(9.90%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21/101(20.79%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGallbladder duct stones\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6/101(5.94%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdenomyomatosis of gallbladder\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10/101(9.90%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBiliary pancreatitis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3/101(2.97%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMirizzi syndrome\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3/101(2.97%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBiliary tract tumors\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDilation of the common bile duct\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10/101(9.90%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15/101(14.85%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBiliary tract variation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13/101(12.87%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab4\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 4\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiagnosis of CBDS by abdominal ultrasound with MRCP in the MRCP group\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"6\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eultrasonography\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMRCP\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTotal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eχ2/Z\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-3.317\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e80\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e91\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTotal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e80\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e101\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab5\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 5\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiagnosis of common bile duct dilatation by abdominal ultrasound and MRCP in the MRCP group\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"6\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eultrasonography\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMRCP\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTotal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eχ2/Z\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-2.236\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.025\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e86\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e91\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTotal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e86\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e101\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePostoperative complications\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere were no postoperative complications in MRCP group, while there were 7 cases of postoperative complications in non-MRCP group. Among 5 cases with comorbidities of residual CBDS, one patient developed obstructive jaundice after LC, and then ERCP\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;EST stone removal was performed, who was hospitalized for 18 days at a total cost of 44,277.49 yuan (RMB). One patient was readmitted due to acute pancreatitis after LC, and then underwent ERCP\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;EST stone extraction and was hospitalized again for 16 days at a cost of 20,878.72 yuan. Two patients were readmitted due to biliary colic after LC, and underwent ERCP\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;EST stone extraction for 8 days and 9 days at a cost of 12,389.42 yuan and 13,090.56 yuan respectively. One patient had biliary colic symptoms after LC. MRCP found that the residual CBDS was very small, and there was no common bile duct dilatation. After a period of observation, MRCP was performed again, indicating no stones. In addition, one patient with biliary colic after LC was found to be cystic duct residual gallstones by MRCP, who was hospitalized for surgery again and recovered after stone removal. The other patient with biliary tract variation had intraoperative biliary tract injury, and no biliary tract variation was found by preoperative ultrasonography. After Rou-x surgery, he recovered and was hospitalized for 20 days at a cost of 24,366.67 yuan.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eComparing the postoperative complications between the two groups, the non-MRCP group (7/83, 8.43%) was significantly higher than the MRCP group (0/101) with a statistically significant difference (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab6\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 6\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eComparison of postoperative complications between the two groups\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"6\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eComplications\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGroup\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTotal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eχ2/Z\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNon-MRCP group\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMRCP group\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-2.968\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.003\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e76\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e101\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e177\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTotal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e83\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e101\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e184\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eHospital stay and hospitalization expenses\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere was no significant difference in hospital stay (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), but there was a statistically significant difference in hospitalization costs (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) between the two groups. According to whether patients with CBDS, the hospital stay and hospitalization costs were stratified and analyzed. In non-MRCP group, there were 7 patients with CBDS and 76 patients without CBDS. In MRCP group, there were 21 patients with CBDS and 80 patients without CBDS. There was no significant difference (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) in hospital stay and costs between the two groups (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab7\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 7\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eComparison of hospital stay and hospitalization expenses between the two groups\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNon-MRCP group(n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;83)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMRCP group (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;101)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003et\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHospital stay (day)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.28\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.18\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.73\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-1.365\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.174\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHospitalization costs (ten thousand yuan)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.67\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.60\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.92\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.65\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-2.625\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.009\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHospital stay of patients with CBDS (day)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14.57\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.76\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14.85\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.04\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.142\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.888\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHospitalization costs of patients with CBDS\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Ten thousand yuan)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.50\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.53\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.74\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.53\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-1.050\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.303\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHospital stay of patients without CBDS (day)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.70\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.71\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.69\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.32\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.018\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.986\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHospitalization costs of patients without CBDS\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Ten thousand yuan)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.60\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.55\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.70\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.48\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-1.255\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.211\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eLC has become the first choice for the treatment of cholecystolithiasis [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR9 CR10\" citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. However, the postoperative residual CBDS and bile duct injury after LC cannot be ignored [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e]. It is reported that 10% ~ 20% of patients with cholecystolithiasis coexist with CBDS [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e]. If the presence of CBDS can be determined before LC, the incidence of postoperative residual CBDS can be reduced [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. The incidence of LC bile duct injury is 0.2\u0026ndash;1.1% [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e]. Although there is a \"learning curve\" factor in the cause of bile duct injury, bile duct anatomical factors such as bile duct anatomical variation, acute inflammation of the gallbladder and Mirizzi syndrome are also factors that cannot be ignored for bile duct injury, which increase the difficulty of surgery [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e]. Adequate preoperative knowledge of the bile duct-related anatomy and prediction of LC difficulty can help to reduce the occurrence of complications.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAt present, preoperative prediction of the possibility of LC in patients with cholecystolithiasis mainly relies on the results of medical history, laboratory examinations and imaging examinations. Abdominal ultrasound is helpful for the accurate diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis and cholecystitis, and the diagnostic accuracy of common bile duct dilatation can also reach 77\u0026ndash;87% [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e]. The accuracy of abdominal CT in the diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis and CBDS is higher than that of abdominal ultrasound. Abdominal CT is not the first choice for diagnosing cholecystolithiasis because it is difficult to diagnose stones with low calcium content and due to the influence of radiation and other factors [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e]. IOC has always been an effective method for the diagnosis of CBDS [20]. However, IOC lengthens LC, complicates the surgery and possibly introduces more opportunities for detrimental outcomes. Preoperative MRCP has a tendency to replace IOC in recent years.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e ASGE guidelines predict the probability of CBDS according to different clinical indicators, which are divided into three levels. First, very strong predictive factors for choledocholithiasis include evidence of CBDS in abdominal ultrasound. Second, strong predictive factors for choledocholithiasis include common bile duct diameter\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;6 mm (with gallbladder in situ), total serum bilirubin\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;4 mg/dL or bilirubin level 1.8 to 4 mg/dL. Third, moderate predictive factors for choledocholithiasis include abnormal liver biochemical test other than bilirubin, age older than 55 years or clinical gallstone pancreatitis [20\u0026ndash;22]. According to the above prediction indicators, the ASGE guidelines also classify the classes for CBDS and give corresponding treatment suggestions. Patients with very strong predictive factors for choledocholithiasis belong to the high risk classes (\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;50%) for choledocholithiasis and need to be clearly diagnosed by ERCP, and treated accordingly. Patients with predictors strong and moderate predictive factors for choledocholithiasis belong to the intermediate risk classes (10%ཞ50%) for choledocholithiasis and should undergo preoperative MRCP, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), IOC, or laparoscopic ultrasound depending on the local expertise and availability. Patients with no predictive factors for choledocholithiasis belong to the low risk classes (\u003c10%) for choledocholithiasis and can choose to undergo LC directly [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. The clinical guideline recommends that patients with gallstone at moderate risk or above of CBDS undergo further preoperative examinations such as MRCP before LC. Should patients with low risk for CBDS (\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;10%) and no predictors undergo preoperative MRCP in addition to abdominal ultrasound? This is the problem to be solved in this study.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAn important reason for residual CBDS after LC is insufficient preoperative examination. Abdominal ultrasound has high specificity in the diagnosis of CBDS, but the sensitivity is only 22%ཞ55%. It is more difficult to find distal CBDS without bile duct dilatation and anatomical variation of bile duct. Studies showed that the sensitivity and specificity of MRCP examination for the diagnosis of gallbladder and bile duct diseases could reach 90\u0026ndash;100% [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. MRCP can clearly display the image of the \"biliary tree\" and obtain the effect similar to direct cholangiography that the surgeon wants to know. At the same time, MRCP can accurately show the image information such as the size, number, location of the bile duct stones and the degree of biliary tract dilatation [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e]. Many patients in our study benefited from MRCP examination. In MRCP group, there were 21 patients combined with CBDS. Preoperative abdominal ultrasound revealed only 10 of these patients with CBDS, all of whom were dilatation of common bile duct; while MRCP diagnosed all cases of CBDS, including 15 cases of common bile duct dilatation, 6 cases without common bile duct dilatation, jaundice and abnormal liver function. MRCP showed CBDS and bile duct dilatation that were not diagnosed by abdominal ultrasound, especially in cases of CBDS with normal liver function, no jaundice and no bile duct dilatation. MRCP can make up for the defect that abdominal ultrasound cannot show the deep extrahepatic bile duct.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eResidual CBDS after LC also has the risk of causing other gallstone-related complications, such as early bile leakage, obstructive jaundice, cholangitis and pancreatitis, which results in prolonged hospitalization or readmission and consequently increase medical costs. In this study, one patient in non-MRCP group developed obstructive jaundice after LC, who was diagnosed with residual CBDS and cured by a further EST stone extraction. Another patient developed acute pancreatitis due to residual CBDS after LC and was readmitted to the hospital, who also recovered after EST stone extraction.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePostoperative complications such as residual cystic duct stones or residual small gallbladder often occur when the cystic duct is tortuously too long or too short. In addition, the complications also occur in patients with low openings and openings behind or on the left side of the common bile duct [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e]. Preoperative MRCP can help the surgeon understand the relationship between the cystic duct, the common hepatic duct and the common bile duct, the length of the cystic duct and the presence of stones. In this study, preoperative MRCP revealed cystic duct stones in 6 cases, which were treated in a targeted manner during surgery to avoid the occurrence of residual stones in the cystic duct. In non-MRCP group, the residual cystic duct stones were found by postoperative MRCP in one case of right upper abdominal pain after LC and the symptoms were relieved after the second operation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnatomical variation of the bile duct, acute inflammation of the gallbladder, stone incarceration in the gallbladder neck, gallbladder-colic fistula and Mirizzi syndrome will increase the difficulty of surgery, which are also factors that can easily cause bile duct injury in LC [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e].The surgeon can objectively judge the severity of cholecystitis and the thickness of the gallbladder wall by MRCP, which is helpful to estimate the difficulty of surgery, prevent bile duct injury and reduce the incidence of conversion to laparotomy [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. Preoperative MRCP is also helpful for the diagnosis of Mirizzi syndrome and the selection of appropriate surgical methods to minimize the occurrence of bile duct injury [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]. In non MRCP group, one patient with common bile duct injury failed to detect the bile duct variation by preoperative abdominal ultrasound, which may be one of the reasons for bile duct injury. In MRCP group, preoperative MRCP revealed there were pancreaticobiliary variants in 13 patients, including the variation of cystic duct passed through the back of common bile duct or flowed into common hepatic duct, accessory pancreatic duct and intrahepatic bile duct. The surgeon fully understood the anatomical structure of biliary system before operation, so as to effectively prevent the occurrence of complications such as intraoperative biliary injury during the operation. Three patients with Mirizzi syndrome were diagnosed by preoperative MRCP in this study. Because of proper intraoperative management, there were no complications such as biliary tract injury.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition, MRCP before LC is also helpful for the diagnosis of pancreatitis and biliopancreatic tumors [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e]. In our study, there were 3 patients with biliary colic in the MRCP group. Preoperative MRCP identified acute pancreatitis that was not diagnosed by abdominal ultrasound. The patients received conservative treatment before LC, avoiding LC in the acute stage of pancreatitis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTherefore, MRCP before LC in patients with cholecystolithiasis can determine whether CBDS is combined, and fully understand the anatomy of the biliary tract and the degree of gallbladder inflammation. It is helpful to predict the difficulty of surgery and reduce the occurrence of complications such as residual CBDS and bile duct injury after LC.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlthough routine MRCP before LC has certain clinical value for cholecystolithiasis, it increases the cost of examination. How is it cost-effective? Due to the different degree of illness of the two groups of patients, there were more patients with CBDS in MRCP group, which led to an increase in the hospitalization costs compared with non-MRCP group. But according to whether patients of cholecystolithiasis were combined with CBDS or not, the hospital stay and expenses of the two groups were compared and there was no significant difference, suggesting that MRCP did not significantly increase length of stay and the hospitalization costs. The cost of MRCP examinations is very cheap now. It is worthwhile to perform preoperative MRCP, compared with the possible complications and damage to patients without preoperative MRCP. In addition, medical insurance only covers the cost of hospitalization in China, so patients undergoing surgery have a longer hospital stay. From the perspective of health economics, MRCP has obvious advantages in terms of cost-effectiveness. We believe that routine MRCP before LC for gallstones is necessary and feasible.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHowever, this study also has certain limitations. This is a retrospective study. For one thing, the preoperative I-Bil and T-Bil of the two groups are statistically significant. For another, the ultrasound and MRCP between the two groups cannot be compared horizontally. The diagnostic effects of the two examinations can be compared only by patients in the MRCP group. In addition, there are certain biases and confounding factors. Whether patients with gallstones should undergo routine MRCP before LC needs to be discussed in a follow-up control study with better settings.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn conclusion, routine MRCP in patients with gallstone before LC is a rational use of medical resources and is helpful to further clarify the diagnosis of diseases such as CBDS and understand the anatomy of biliary tract, which has certain guiding significance for predicting the difficulty of operation. According to the preoperative MRCP results, the surgeon can formulate a reasonable surgical plan to deal with CBDS, cystic duct stones, avoid the injury of bile duct, residual stones, effectively prevent intraoperative and postoperative complications, and reduce the risk of secondary surgery.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of Beijing Shijitan Hospital and the ethics number is sjtkyll-1x-2020 (87). All participants have signed an informed consent form. Also all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe datasets were available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAuthors have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis work was supported by China Railway Corporation\u0026nbsp;Foundation (J2018Z605).\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors\u0026apos; contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eXG, QF, KL, NMZ, BHAM and BZ contributed to the study conception and design. XG, YMG, XML, JLH, JYW, and JW completed the data collection. XG, XML, JLH, ZYW and JW completed the data analysis and data interpretation. XG, QF and BZ completed the manuscript. BHAM and BZ proofread the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors are grateful to all the patients, researchers, and institutions that participated in this study.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCianci P, Restini E. Management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis: Endoscopic and surgical approaches. World J Gastroenterol, 2021, 27(28):4536-4554. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGutt C, Schl\u0026auml;fer S, Lammert F. The treatment of gallstone disease. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2020, 117(9):148-158. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHashimoto S, Nakaoka K, Kawabe N, et al. The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of gallbladder lesions. Diagnostics (Basel), 2021, 11(10): 1789. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKohga A, Suzuki K, Okumura T, et al. Does preoperative MRCP imaging predict risk for conversion to subtotal cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis?. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(12):6717-6723.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRobinson C, Turner RM, Potter J. A retrospective analysis of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography investigating gallstones in a contemporary surgical setting. ANZ J Surg, 2022, 92(9):2174-2179.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSarawagi R, Sundar S, Raghuvanshi S, et al. Common and uncommon anatomical variants of intrahepatic bile ducts in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and its clinical implication. Pol J Radiol. 2016, 81:250-255. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKhan T, Alam SZ, Al Mamun M, et al. Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Case of Biliary Obstruction Comparing Post-operative Findings: A Study of 50 Cases. Mymensingh Med J, 2021, 30(4):1079-1085.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGustafsson S, Stromqvist M, Ekelund J, et al. Factors Influencing Early Postoperative Recovery After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. J Perianesth Nurs, 2020, 35(1):80-84. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIbrahim M, Sarvepalli S, Morris-Stiff G, et al. Gallstones: Watch and wait, or intervene?. Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine, 2018, 85(4): 323\u0026ndash;331. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWakabayashi G, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2018, 25:73\u0026ndash;86.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTazuma S, Unno M, Igarashi Y, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016. J Gastroenterol, 2017, 52(3):276-300.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlexander HC, Bartlett AS, Wells CI, et al. Reporting of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford), 2018, 20(9):786-794.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLatenstein CSS, de Reuver PR. Tailoring diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic gallstone disease. Br J Surg, 2022, 109(9):832-838.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePlatt T, Smith K, Nixon M, et al. Success of intraoperative imaging and management of suspected choledocholithiasis without pre-operative bile duct imaging - A case series. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2018, 36:173-177. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePucher PH, Brunt LM, Davies N, et al. Outcome trends and safety measures after 30 years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and pooled data analysis. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(5):2175-2183.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDokmak S, Amharar N, Aussilhou B, et al. Laparoscopic repair of post-cholecystectomy bile duct injury: an advance in surgical management. J Gastrointest Surg, 2017, 21(8):1368-1372. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang JX, Zhang Q, Shen WF, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery model\u0026apos;s system idea for multi-dimensional multi-angle reduction of bile duct injury: A surgeon\u0026apos;s experience. Asian J Surg, 2019, 42(3):524-525.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBorzellino G, Massimiliano Motton AP, Minniti F, et al. Sonographic diagnosis of acute cholecystitis in patients with symptomatic gallstones. J Clin Ultrasound, 2016, 44:152\u0026ndash;8.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSuzuki M, Sekino Y, Hosono K, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of computed tomography-negative common bile duct stone: Prospective randomized controlled trial. Dig Endosc, 2022, 34(5):1052-1059.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc, 2010, 71(1):1\u0026ndash;9.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eManes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L, et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy, 2019, 51(5):472-491.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLee TY. Optimal evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis: Does this patient really have choledocholithiasis?. Clin Endosc, 2017, 50(5):415-416.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLuo Y, Yang T, Yu Q, et al. Laparoscopic ultrasonography versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in laparoscopic surgery for symptomatic cholelithiasis and suspected common bile duct stones. J Gastrointest Surg, 2019, 23(6):1143-1147.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMilburn JA, Bailey JA, Dunn W, et al. Inpatient magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: does it increase the efficiency in emergency hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery services? Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2017, 99(4):289-294.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMichael Brunt L, Deziel DJ, Telem DA, et al. Safe cholecystectomy multi-society practice guideline and state-of-the-art consensus conference on prevention of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(7):2827-2855.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eClemente G, Tringali A, De Rose AM, et al. Mirizzi syndrome: diagnosis and management of a challenging biliary disease. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 2018:6962090.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIshaque I, Ilyas A, Khan O, et al. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in learning anatomical variations in pancreatic duct. J Pak Med Assoc, 2020, 70(3):472-476.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAljiffry M, Abbas M, Wazzan MAM, et al. Biliary anatomy and pancreatic duct variations: A cross-sectional study. Saudi J Gastroenterol, 2020, 26(4):188-193.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-gastroenterology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"bmge","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Gastroenterology](http://bmcgastroenterol.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/bmge/default.aspx","title":"BMC Gastroenterology","twitterHandle":"BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Cholecystolithiasis, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), preoperative routine MRCP","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3126472/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3126472/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground: \u003c/strong\u003eIn the past quite a long time, intraoperative cholangiography（IOC）was necessary during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Now magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the main method for diagnosing common bile duct stones (CBDS). Whether MRCP can replace IOC as routine examination before LC is still inconclusive. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical data of patientsundergoing LC for cholecystolithiasis, and to explore the necessity and feasibility of preoperative routine MRCP in patients with cholecystolithiasis.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods: \u003c/strong\u003eAccording to whether MRCP was performed before operation, 184 patients undergoing LC for cholecystolithiasis in the Department of General Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018 were divided into non-MRCP group and MRCP group for this retrospective study. The results of preoperative laboratory test, abdominal ultrasound and MRCP, biliary related comorbidities, surgical complications, hospital stay and hospitalization expenses were compared between the two groups.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults: \u003c/strong\u003eAmong the 184 patients, there were 83 patients in non-MRCP group and 101 patients in MRCP group. In MRCP group, the detection rates of cholecystolithiasis combined with CBDS and common bile duct dilatation by MRCPwere higher than those by abdominal ultrasound (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e \u0026lt; 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in non-MRCP group (8.43%) was significantly higher (\u003cem\u003eP \u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 0.05) than that in MRCP group (0%). There was no significant difference in hospital stay (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e \u0026gt; 0.05), but there was significant difference in hospitalization expenses (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e \u0026lt; 0.05) between the two groups. According to the stratification of gallbladder stone patients with CBDS, hospital stay and hospitalization expenses were compared, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e \u0026gt; 0.05).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusions:\u003c/strong\u003e The preoperative MRCP can detect CBDS, cystic duct stones and anatomical variants of biliary tract that cannot be diagnosed by abdominal ultrasound, which is helpful to plan the surgical methods and reduce the surgical complications. From the perspective of health economics, routine MRCP in patients with cholecystolithiasis before LC does not increase hospitalization costs, and is necessary and feasible.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Clinical study on the necessity and feasibility of routine MRCP in patients with cholecystolithiasis before LC","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2023-07-19 13:35:56","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3126472/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2023-11-30T06:07:12+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2023-11-12T16:28:20+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"03ec1365-7191-47c7-a3ba-b4485d9b18ed","date":"2023-11-09T22:45:08+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2023-11-07T14:30:06+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2023-11-07T14:28:10+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2023-07-14T18:25:45+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2023-07-14T18:22:56+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"BMC Gastroenterology","date":"2023-06-30T01:53:55+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-gastroenterology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"bmge","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Gastroenterology](http://bmcgastroenterol.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/bmge/default.aspx","title":"BMC Gastroenterology","twitterHandle":"BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"d5e8dd54-4fe6-493c-b9f7-1f14dee24eaf","owner":[],"postedDate":"July 19th, 2023","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-01-15T15:06:57+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-3126472","link":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-03117-3","journal":{"identity":"bmc-gastroenterology","isVorOnly":false,"title":"BMC Gastroenterology"},"publishedOn":"2024-01-09 15:01:37","publishedOnDateReadable":"January 9th, 2024"},"versionCreatedAt":"2023-07-19 13:35:56","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1186/s12876-023-03117-3","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-03117-3","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-3126472","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-3126472","identity":"rs-3126472","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"7rjqhiLT3MXkJMwkYKINL","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}