Diclofenac versus a combination of hyoscine and diclofenac for outpatient hysteroscopy: A placebo controlled randomized clinical trial
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This randomized controlled trial compared diclofenac alone to a combination of hyoscine and diclofenac for outpatient hysteroscopy, assessing their efficacy.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Objectiveto compare the effect of administering diclofenac sodium and/or oral hyoscine in pain perception during and after outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy without anesthesia.Study designa randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial was performed in an University Hospital. We included 217 patients submitted to office hysteroscopy for the following indications: diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding, endometrial polyps, submucous myomas, infertility and recurrent miscarriage. Patients were allocated into 3 groups: (Group 1) placebo, (Group 2) diclofenac sodium 50 mg and (Group 3) diclofenac sodium 50 mg plus Hyoscine-N-Butylbromide 10 mg. The primary outcome was the visual analogue score immediately after the procedure. The secondary outcomes included Likert acceptance scale, the need for extra analgesia after the procedure, need to stay in the observation room and the occurrence of vagal symptoms.ResultsGroups were similar according to age, color, age of menarche, gravity, c-section, abortion, presence of pelvic pain, presence of uterine scar, height and body mass index. Patients in all three groups demonstrated similar visual pain scores when submitted to office hysteroscopy (Group 1: 4.18 ± 3.1, Group 2: 4.68 ± 2.9, group 3: 4.45 ± 2.9, P = 0.59). Moreover, patients presented high acceptance scores of the procedure, similar between groups. We performed a subgroup analysis in patients in treatment for chronic pelvic pain and, in this subgroup, prior medication with diclofenac sodium isolated or associated with hyoscine were both effective in decreasing pain levels when compared to placebo (Group 1: 6.0 ± 1.9, Group 2: 3.6 ± 2.1, group 3: 4.2 ± 1.5, P = 0.04).Conclusion(s)Office hysteroscopy is a well tolerated procedure and prior use of analgesic medication was not effective in decreasing pain. In selected patients with chronic pelvic pain the use prior analgesic medication may be beneficial.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (26)
- Efficacy of Dienogest in Thinning the Endometrium Before Hysteroscopic Surgery via openalex
- Endometrial preparation with Dienogest before hysteroscopic surgery: a systematic review via openalex
- Oral contraceptives and endometriosis: the past use of oral contraceptives for treating severe primary dysmenorrhea is associated with endometriosis, especially deep infiltrating endometriosis via openalex
- Pain relief in office gynaecology: a systematic review and meta-analysis via openalex
- The cost of illness and economic burden of endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain in Australia: A national online survey via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0959-4388(94)90053-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.003 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/brain/112.3.621 via openalex
- W2322584079 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.049 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2014.04.006 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2013.08.005 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/13645706.2019.1576054 via openalex
- W6759684443 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.072 via openalex
- doi:10.1159/000441787 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01326.x via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12031.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.009 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0104-4230(11)70084-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01351.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2018.08.001 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2014.02.014 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80362-1 via openalex
- W1560729591 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s2255-4823(11)70084-4 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T05:41:49.878000+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-17T06:25:09.426038+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK