Materials
and Methods78
Site Description and Sample Collection79
Soils were collected from the riparean areas of two natural headwater catchments in the Swiss Alps:80
Blatt in the Binntal valley (46°22’N/8°16’E) and Ar du Tsan (46°12’N/7°30’E) in the Vallon de R´ echy.81
Both catchments feature a mixed bedrock mainly comprised of gneiss and carbonated rock, and82
diverse vegetation made up of siliceous alpine grasslands and moorlands (Fr´ elechoux and Gallandat,83
1995; Matteodo et al., 2018; Richard et al., 1993; swisstopo, 2024). The sampling sites within the84
two catchments were strategically chosen to encompass both slope and plain areas. At R´ echy, the85
elevation of sampling locations varied from 2154 to 2243 meters above sea level (m a.s.l.), while at86
Binntal, the range was between 1984 and 2105 m a.s.l. Soil sampling was carried out in late July 2023.87
Average July temperatures at l’Ar du Tsan and Binntal are 12.9◦C and 8.7 ◦C, with precipitation levels88
of 76 mm and 97 mm, respectively (Fick and Hijmans, 2017). At 13 sampling locations (Figure 1),89
soil from three soil depths (0-10 cm, 10-30 cm, and 30-50 cm, when available - see Table S1) was90
collected with an auger. Precise coordinates, slope, and specific landscape position were recorded for91
each location. Once gathered, the samples were placed in zip-lock bags; bags for water-logged soils92
contained oxygen scrubbers. Samples were kept cool with ice packs, and transported to the laboratory.93
Samples for soil physicochemical characterization were immediately processed; sub-samples for soil94
redox characterization were stored at -20 °C until analysis. Samples for DNA extraction were placed in95
a sterile manner into Whirl-Pack®bags and homogenised directly by kneading. Post-homogenisation,96
the soil was split into triplicate subsamples, put into cryotubes snd shock-frozen using liquid nitrogen.97
After transport to the laboratory, they were stored at -80 °C until analysis.98
4
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 1: Spatial distribution of mean soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, calculated from three soil
depth-specific samples within the top 50 cm of soil, at a R´ echy andb Binntal. Slope soils are
represented in shaded terrain, plain soils in unshaded areas. Background: SWISSIMAGE orthophoto
and hillshade from swissALTI3D.
Soil Physicochemical Characterisation99
Sample preparation, pH measurements, and soil texture analyses: Soil samples were air-dried100
and subsequently oven-dried at 105 °C, homogenised, sieved through a 2 mm mesh to remove coarse101
particles (e.g., plant roots and stones), and ground using a ball mill (Pulverisette 7, Fritsch) to achieve102
a fine, uniform powder. Dry weight was determined from changes in soil mass upon drying. Soil pH103
was measured SevenDirect SD50 pH meter, Mettler Toledo) in a 1:5 soil-to-deionised water suspension104
after 30 minutes of agitation at 200 RPM, followed by 30 minutes of settling (Table S2). Soil texture105
was analysed using laser diffraction (LS 13 320, Beckman Coulter) with a grain size analyser, on 0.5 g106
of air-dried, sieved bulk soil following organic matter digestion with hydrogen peroxide over two weeks107
(Table S2).108
Elemental composition: Total carbon was measured by chromatography after combustion at 900109
°C on a CHNS element analyser (Flash EA 1112, Thermo Finnigan). As the soils lacked carbonates,110
the total SOC content (expressed as weight % of dry soil) was considered equivalent to the measured111
total carbon. Total content of Fe, Mn, and S were determined on 5 g of dried, sieved, and powdered112
soil using X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (SPECTRO XEPOS).113
SOC composition: The relative abundance of major compound classes were determined using py-114
rolysis gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS, Tolu et al., 2015). Soil samples were115
5
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
placed in clean, fire-polished quartz tubes and pyrolysed at 600 °C for 20 seconds under a helium flow.116
The released pyrolysis moieties were transferred via a heated transfer line into an Agilent 7980A GC117
equipped with a Zebron ZB-5MS column (Phenomenex, Woerden, the Netherlands; 30 m × 250 µm118
× 0.25 µm) coupled to an Agilent 5975C MSD single quadrupole mass spectrometer operating in119
electron ionisation mode (scanning m/z 50 to 650 at 2.7 scans per second; ionisation energy: 70 eV),120
using helium as the carrier gas and introduced in split mode (70: 1 split ratio; constant flow of 2 ml121
per min, with gas saver mode active). The pyrolysis transfer line and rotor oven temperature were122
maintained at 325°C, the heated GC interface at 280 °C, the electron ionisation source at 230 °C, and123
the quadrupole at 150°C. The GC oven was programmed from 40°C (held for 5 minutes) to 300 °C at124
5°C per minute, where it was held for 3 minutes, giving a total run time of 60 minutes. Approximately125
106 of the most abundant pyrolysis moieties were identified, identified by comparing their retention126
times and spectra to entries in the NIST Mass Spectral Library and grouped into categories based on127
their origin and chemical characteristics: lipids, lignins, polysaccharides, phenols, nitrogen containing128
compounds, and aromatics (Figure S1 and Table S1). Given the complexity of the pyrograms, it was129
not possible to integrate individual moiety in total ion current mode due to significant overlap between130
ion peaks. Instead, single ion filtering was used to measure the peak area of each compound. The131
major ions of each compound were filtered and integrated (Table S3). The relative abundance of each132
identified compound was calculated as a percentage of the total identified compounds.133
Electron accepting & donating capacities: Electron accepting and electron donating capacities134
(EAC & EDC), were determined through mediated electrochemical analyses using an 8-channel po-135
tentiostat (CH Instruments, Inc.) in an anoxic environment inside a glovebox workstation (Labmaster136
pro MBraun), as previously described (Aeppli et al., 2018, 2022). Experiments were conducted using137
a pH-buffered solution at pH 5.5 (0.4 M sodium acetate-acetic acid) with 10 mM sodium chloride138
as a background electrolyte. Mediated electrochemical reduction (MER) potentials were set versus139
standard hydrogen electrodes at -0.51 V vs. SHE (E H, MER ) and mediated electrochemical oxidation140
(MEO) potentials at +0.82 V vs. SHE ( EH, MEO ). For EAC measurements, ethyl viologen (Michaelis141
and Hill, 1933) was used as an electron transfer mediator; for EDC, ABTS (Thomas et al., 2004) was142
used. To prepare the samples, 1 g of frozen soil was transferred into 10 mL of Milli-Q water under143
anaerobic conditions to create a slurry. For each measurement, 30 µL of the slurry was used for EAC144
determination, and 20 µL for EDC determination. An additional 1 mL aliquot was taken from each145
6
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
slurry in triplicate to determine soil dry weight for normalisation. During EAC determination, elec-146
trons are delivered from the electrode via the mediator to the sample’s redox reactive constituents,147
thereby reducing them. Conversely, during EDC measurement, electrons are withdrawn from these148
constituents through the mediator and transferred to the electrode. EAC and EDC values were deter-149
mined from current responses measured upon the addition of the sample to the electrochemical cells at150
EH, MER and EH, MEO , respectively. Capacities (mol e− g−1 dried soil) were determined by integrating151
the baseline-corrected current, i(t), over time from t0 until the current returned to baseline at tend152
following equations 1 and 2.153
EAC = 1
F × msample
Z tend
t0
i(t) dt (1)
EDC = − 1
F × msample
Z tend
t0
i(t) dt (2)
where F ≈ 96485 C mol−1 is the Faraday constant and msample is the dry mass of the soil.154
DNA Extraction, Sequencing, and Analysis155
DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of soil using the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit (Qiagen®, Germany) follow-156
ing the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA content and purity were assessed using microspectrophotometry157
(NanoDrop One; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA). Library preparation and shotgun metagenomic158
sequencing were performed by Novogene (UK) with Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform to generate159
paired-end (150 bp) reads.160
Initial quality checks of raw sequencing reads were conducted using FastQC to ensure data integrity161
(Andrews, 2010). Reads were subjected to quality filtering using fastp (Chen et al., 2018), followed by162
a second round of quality checks with FastQC to verify improvements in read quality. De novo assem-163
bly of high-quality reads was performed with MEGAHIT, generating contigs suitable for downstream164
analyses (Li et al., 2015). Assembly statistics were evaluated using QUAST to ensure completeness165
and accuracy (Gurevich et al., 2013). High-quality reads were mapped to assembled contigs using166
Strobealign to generate coverage profiles (Sahlin, 2022). Metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs)167
7
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
were reconstructed using MetaBAT2 (Kang et al., 2019), and bin quality was assessed using CheckM2168
to ensure completeness and contamination metrics were within acceptable thresholds (Chklovski et169
al., 2023). Taxonomic classification of MAGs was assigned using the Genome Taxonomy Database170
Toolkit (GTDB-Tk, Chaumeil et al., 2020). Functional annotation of MAGs was conducted using171
METABOLIC (Zhou et al., 2021), allowing for the prediction of key metabolic pathways and bio-172
geochemical functions. Dereplication of MAGs was performed using dRep to consolidate redundant173
genomes and generate a representative set (Olm et al., 2017). The relative abundance of dereplicated174
MAGs was calculated using CoverM (Wood and Salzberg, 2024).175
Statistical Analysis176
SOC content and composition were analysed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for comparison of plain177
and slope soils and one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD post-hoc tests for soil depth effects. Spearman178
correlations were used to examine associations between functional gene categories and taxonomic lin-179
eages identified in the metagenomic data. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis was180
used to to visualise microbial community dissimilarities based on Bray-Curtis distances and identify ef-181
fects of environmental factors on microbial community composition. This analysis was complemented182
by a PERMANOVA test to assess the influence of location, landscape position, and soil depth on183
microbial community structures. Figures and statistical analyses were generated in R using the vegan184
package to explore microbial community composition and diversity metrics (Oksanen et al., 2015).185
8
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
Results186
Plain Soils Store More Organic Carbon Than Slope Soils187
Plain soils had higher SOC contents than slope soils at all soil depths (Figure 2): SOC ranged was188
24.3 ± 8.3% in the 0 - 10 cm layer and 22 .8 ± 20.5% at 30 - 50 cm. with highest SOC values observed189
in the mid-soil depth layer (10 - 30 cm: 29.6 ± 16.3%) for plain soils. In contrast, slope soils exhibited190
a clear soil depth-dependent trend in SOC concentrations, with SOC decreasing from 6 .49 ± 4.92% in191
the surface layer (0 - 10 cm) to 2.48 ± 0.66% at 10 - 30 cm, and 1.80 ± 0.20% at 30 - 50 cm. SOC192
content in plain soils was significantly higher than that of the slope across all soil depths, with mean193
SOC at 0 - 10 cm soil depth in plain soils being approximately 3.7 times higher than in slope soils. The194
spatial distribution of SOC stocks is shown in Figure 1. In both the R´ echy and Binntal catchments,195
plain soils in unshaded terrain showed higher SOC (R´ echy: 10 - 30%, Binntal: 20 - 42%), while shaded196
slope soils were lower (2 - 10% for both).197
Plain Slope
Soil organic carbon (%)
Figure 2: Soil organic carbon content (percentage of soil dry weight) at three soil depths in plain and
slope soils (n = 20). Asterisks indicate levels of significance: * for p < 0.05, ** for p < 0.01, and ***
for p < 0.001.
9
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
Soil Organic Carbon Composition Differs by Landscape Position and Soil Depth198
The composition of organic matter varied by landscape position and soil depth (Figure 3). Slope199
soils were enriched in polysaccharides (31.9 %), whereas plain soils contained higher proportions of200
phenols (20.9 %). The proportions of aromatics, lipids, nitrogen-containing compounds, and lignin was201
comparable between both types of soils. The relative contribution of aromatic compounds increased202
with soil depth from 23.3 % at 0 - 10 cm to 36.4 % at 30 - 50 cm, while the relative contriubtion of203
lignins decreased from 8.2 % at 0 - 10 cm to 2.1 % at 30 - 50 cm.204
a) b)
Figure 3: Composition of soil organic carbon (SOC) in plain ( a) and slope soils (b). Relative abun-
dances for each compound class are provided in Table S1.
Plain Soils Exhibit soil depth-Dependent Redox Zonation205
Soil redox state was described the EAC and EDC values, which represent the contribution of the206
soils’ pools of redox-active oxidised and reduced geochemical species, respectively. In plain soils,207
EAC and EDC values exhibited an inverse relationship, with EDC increasing from 0 .12 ± 0.05 to208
0.33 ± 0.07 mmol g −1 soil and EAC decreasing from 0.41 ± 0.10 to 0.16 ± 0.05 mmol g −1 soil from209
0-10 cm to 30-50 cm soil depth, consistent with increasingly reducing conditions (Figure 4a). In210
contrast, slope soils showed low EDC values (e.g., 0 .02 ± 0.01 at 10 cm) and constant EAC values211
(e.g., 0.48 ±0.12 at 10 cm) across all soil depths, indicating oxic conditions (Figure 4b). We compared212
total electron exchanging capacity (sum of EAC and EDC) to elemental composition to attribute the213
EAC and EDC responses to geochemical phases (Figure S2). In plain soils, iron explained most of the214
10
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
redox reactivity, followed by sulfur. In slope soils, iron was the dominant redox-active phase, with a215
small contribution from redox-active organic matter.216
a) b)
Figure 4: Average electron donating (EDC, green) and accepting capacities (EAC, orange) of plain (a)
and slope soils (b). Shaded areas represent the standard error of the mean. Each data point reflects
the average of five soil samples.
Microbial Community Composition and Functional Potential Are Linked to Soil Redox217
Conditions218
Microbial community composition differed between plain and slope soils (Figure 5): plain soils had219
higher relative abundances of Chloroflexota, Acidobacteriota, and Desulfobacterota, whereas slope soils220
contained greater proportions of Verrucomicrobiota, Thermoproteota, and Dormibacterota. The heat221
map of functional genes (Figure 6) shows that plain soils exhibited higher relative abundances of genes222
assigned to nitrate, metal (Fe/Mn), and sulfate reduction across all soil depths, while slope soils had223
lower relative abundances of these genes. Potential methanogenesis genes were not detected, whereas224
genes attributed to methane oxidation (Methylomirabilota ) were present in both landscape positions225
at low abundance.226
Taxon–function links were identified between specific microbial lineages and key reductive processes227
(Table 1). Chloroflexota lineages (e.g., class Anaerolineae; class Dehalococcoidia lineages DSTF029228
and SM23-31) correlated with nitrate-reduction genes. Acidobacteriota classes Thermoanaerobaculia,229
Acidobacteriae, and Blastocatellia correlated with Fe/Mn-reduction genes. Orders within Desulfobac-230
11
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
terota (Geobacterales, BSN033, and Desulfatiales) correlated with sulfate-reduction genes.231
Plain Slope
Figure 5: Microbial community composition. The relative abundance of key prokaryotic phyla is shown
for plain and slope soils at three soil depths. Circle size represents the relative abundance of each
taxon.
12
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
Plain Slope
Figure 6: Heatmap of potential anaerobic microbial respiration pathways in plain and slope soils across
three soil depths. Genes associated with nitrate, iron/manganese, and sulfate reduction, as well as
methane production, are shown as relative abundances.
13
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
Table 1: Spearman correlations between functional gene categories and taxonomic lineages identified
in metagenomic data. Lineages are grouped by taxonomic rank: p = phylum, c = class, o = order.
Only statistically significant associations (p < 0.05) are shown.
T axon Lineage Potential
F unction
Correlation
Estimate
P-V alue
p Chloroflexota
c Anaerolineae
o Anaerolineales
Nitrate reduction 0.598 0.00535
p Chloroflexota
c Dehalococcoidia
o DSTF029
Nitrate reduction 0.560 0.01025
p Chloroflexota
c Dehalococcoidia
o SM23-31
Nitrate reduction 0.372 0.01802
p Acidobacteriota
c Thermoanaerobaculia
o Thermoanaerobaculales
Fe/Mn reduction 0.786 9.83e-14
p Acidobacteriota
c Acidobacteriae
o Acidobacterales
Fe/Mn reduction 0.738 0.000202
p Acidobacteriota
c Blastocatellia
o Pyrinomonadales
Fe/Mn reduction 0.734 0.000228
p Desulfobacterota
c Desulfuromonadia
o Geobacterales
Sulfate reduction 0.400 0.01051
p Desulfobacterota
c BSN033
o BSN033
Sulfate reduction 0.466 0.03830
p Desulfobacterota
c DSM-4660
o Desulfatiales
Sulfate reduction 0.457 0.04254
14
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
Microbiomes Exhibit Enhanced Metabolic Versatility and Greater Potential for232
Anaerobic Carbon Turnover in Plain Soils233
We assessed the core set of metabolic functions relative to carbon turnover following the flowgram234
pipeline by Zhou et al., 2021. Distribution of these functions, showing the proportion of metagenome-235
assembled genomes (MAGs) that encode the genes required for each transformation, indicate that236
SOC oxidation genes were present in 24.67 % of plain soil genomes (444 MAGs) versus 18.94 % in237
slope soil genomes (Figure 7). Fermentation potential was likewise greater in plain soil communities238
(12.85 %; 234 MAGs) than in slope soil communities (8.10 %). Hydrogen generation genes occurred239
in 11.61 % of plain soil genomes (231 MAGs) compared with 7.51 % of slope soil genomes, whereas240
hydrogen oxidation genes were found in 4.47 % and 1.30 % of genomes, respectively (74 MAGs). In241
contrast, acetate-oxidation genes showed slightly higher representation in slope soil communities (1.78242
%; 28 MAGs) than in plain soil communities (1.30 %) while genes for ethanol oxidation and carbon243
fixation were detected at low levels in both settings (ethanol oxidation: 10.35 % plain, 9.55 % slope;244
carbon fixation: 1.09 % plain, 0.40 % slope). Methanotrophy genes were rare but detectable (0.66245
% plain, 0.76 % slope; 21 MAGs), whereas methanogenesis genes were absent from all assemblies.246
Overall, the higher prevalence of fermentation, hydrogen metabolism, and SOC-oxidation genes in247
plain soil MAGs indicates a larger genomic investment in anaerobic carbon turnover than in slope248
soils.249
15
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 7: Soil organic carbon (SOC) transformations mediated by microbial communities in plain and
slope soils. The flowgram illustrates SOC-related metabolic steps reconstructed from metagenomic
data using a modified script from METABOLIC (Zhou et al., 2021). Each arrow represents a distinct
transformation step, with boxes denoting key compounds involved. Arrow labels indicate the step
number and transformation type, the number of genomes encoding the necessary genes (in brackets),
and the relative abundance of those genomes in plain (purple) and slope soil communities (teal),
expressed as a percentage of total community composition. Community-level genome abundance and
function were inferred from metagenome-assembled genomes.
16
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
Microbial Community Composition Correlates with Soil Physicochemical Properties250
Across Landscape Positions and Catchments251
Similarities of microbial community composition across catchments and landscape positions were as-252
sessed using an NMDS plot (Figure 8, supplementary environmental values in Table S2). Plain soil253
communities cluster on the bottom left, while slope soil communities cluster on the top right with254
minimal overlap between groups. Vectors for Ca content, soil pH, EAC, and phenols have the largest255
percentage value and point toward the plain soil cluster, indicating strong positive correlations with256
those communities. Conversely, vectors for polysaccharides, nitrogen-containing compounds, EDC,257
and clay content project toward the slope soil cluster. Sand and silt vectors plot between the two258
groups with intermediate vector lengths. Thus, variation in Ca content, pH, EAC, EDC, and specific259
SOC fractions (phenols, nitrogen compounds, and polysaccharides) aligns with the primary ordination260
axis that separates plain and slope microbial assemblages.261
17
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 8: NMDS plot illustrating the microbial community composition of soils from two alpine head-
water catchments, Binntal and R´ echy, based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity. Environmental vectors
overlaid on the ordination indicate the direction and strength of correlations between environmental
variables and microbial community composition. Vector length is scaled by the square root of the
r² value, reflecting the strength of these correlations. The vectors represent the top ten environmen-
tal variables, selected based on descending r ² values from envfit analysis. These variables include
polysaccharides (PS), nitrogen compounds (N compounds), silt, clay, sand, soil pH, electron accept-
ing capacity (EAC), calcium (Ca), phenols, and electron donating capacity (EDC). PERMANOVA
attributes 23.3 % of the Bray–Curtis variation to landscape position ( R2 = 0.2325, p = 0.001) and
10.0 % to catchment identity (R 2 = 0.0999, p = 0.030); soil depth effects are negligible.
18
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
Discussion262
Soil Redox State Is Linked to Soil Organic Carbon Quantity and Chemistry263
Plain soils had substantially higher SOC content than slope soils, with nearly four times more carbon264
per g dry soil in the surface layer (0 - 10 cm; Figure 2). These differences mirrored differences in265
soil redox state (Figure 4). In plain soils, conditions became increasingly reducing with soil depth.266
The observed EDC values likely reflect the accumulation of reduced organic compounds, ferrous iron,267
and sulfide, produced vial microbial respiration under past anoxic conditions. Iron was the major268
contributor to electron exchanging capacity and was therefore a key TEA in plain soils. In slope soils,269
no EDC was detected, suggesting that these soils were fully oxic. Most of the EAC response was270
explained by iron with some contribution from organic matter. The observed patterns in SOC content271
and soil redox state are therefore in agreement with our first hypothesis stating that soils on the plain272
exhibit anoxic conditions that are associated with higher SOC contents.273
Differences in SOC composition between plain and slope soils are likely due to variations in organic274
matter inputs and preservation mechanisms. Plain soils were enriched in phenolic compounds, whereas275
slope soils contained higher proportions of polysaccharides (Figure 3). This pattern was linked to con-276
trasting vegetation types and moisture regimes. On the plain, grasses and sedges produce litter rich in277
phenol-containing structural polymers, which are selectively preserved under periodically anoxic con-278
ditions because the degradation of phenolic compounds depends on extracellular oxidative enzymes,279
such as phenol oxidase and peroxidase (Fenner and Freeman, 2011; Freeman et al., 2001). In con-280
trast, slope soils dominated by dwarf shrubs and upland herbs receive litter rich in easily degradable281
carbohydrates, which likely causes the higher abundance of polysaccharides. Across both landscape282
positions, we observed a decline in lignin-derived compounds and an increase in aromatic compound283
contributions with soil depth. The relative higher lignin content in surface soils likely reflects recent284
plant inputs from vascular tissue. Aromatic compounds are chemically more stable and persist un-285
der oxygen-limited conditions (Fenner and Freeman, 2011; Freeman et al., 2001; Sinsabaugh, 2010).286
Combined, these findings indicate that as soil depth increases, lignin is progressively broken down or287
transformed, while less bioavailable aromatic structures accumulate.288
The observed trends in SOC content and composition, and soil redox state align with the expected289
19
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
sequential microbial use of substrates based on reaction thermodynamics. Compared to polysac-290
charides, phenolic and aromatic compounds are chemically more reduced on average and therefore291
require higher energy input to be oxidized. Under anoxic conditions, this required energy input may292
outweigh the energy released upon redeuction of alternative TEAs, resulting in the accumulation of293
these compounds (Boye et al., 2017; Gunina and Kuzyakov, 2022).294
Microbial Community Composition and Potential Functions are Linked to Landscape295
Position and Soil Physicochemical Characteristics296
Microbial community composition differed between plain and slope soils (Figure 5), with plain soils297
having higher relative abundances of potential microbial respiratory pathways, in agreement with our298
second hypothesis. These higher abundances are likely driven by seasonal moisture fluctuations and299
nutrient-rich conditions. Recurrent anoxic windows likely support a rich assemblage of anaerobic mi-300
crobial metabolisms, including the potential reduction of nitrate, iron, manganese and sulfate, thereby301
sustaining SOC turnover in the riparian corridor (Keiluweit et al., 2016). We found higher abundance302
of taxa commonly associated with anaerobic respiration at soil depth in plain soils, including members303
of the Chloroflexota or Desulfobacterota phyla (Eilers et al., 2012), in line with the redox stratification304
inferred from EDC–EAC profiles. Conversely, slope soils were dominated by phyla such as Verrucomi-305
crobiota, Thermoproteota and Dormibacterota. These soils were well-drained and oxygen-rich which, in306
concert with lateral inputs of carbohydrate-rich litter, promotes high-energy yielding aerobic microbial307
respiration pathways. Methanogenesis genes were detected neither in plain nor slope soils; however,308
low-abundance methanotrophs (anaerobic Methylomirabilota) were present in both soils, implying that309
any methane produced in deeper plain soils or in anoxic microsites in slope soil was oxidised. The310
absence of canonical mcrA-bearing MAGs does not necessarily preclude methanogenesis; these genes311
are often confined to low-abundance taxa inhabiting deeper, more water-logged soil horizons and can312
evade detection when reads assemble into short or unbinned contigs (Woodcroft et al., 2018). Differen-313
tial expression analyses further highlighted up-regulation of Group 3 and Group 1 NiFe hydrogenases314
in plain soils (Figure S3), enzymes that confer redox plasticity by allowing microbial communities to315
alternate between fermentative and respiratory metabolic strategies as oxygen availability fluctuates316
(Pich´ e-Choquette and Constant, 2019).317
20
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
Microbial community composition aligned with the observed differences in SOC composition across318
landscape positions (Figure 5). Microbial community assemblages in plain soils likely need to invest319
more in enzymatic machinery for the partial degradation and preservation of phenol-rich litter derived320
from hydrophilic grasses and sedges (Pich´ e-Choquette and Constant, 2019; Yang et al., 2021). The321
selective preservation of phenolic compounds under anoxic conditions likely reflects slow decomposition322
of soil organic matter, and these compounds may also contribute to the elevated EDC observed in323
plain soils by providing redox-active moieties that function as extracellular electron shuttles (Fenner324
and Freeman, 2020; Kappler et al., 2004). In contrast, microbial communities in slope soils were325
dominated by fast-growing copiotrophs and likely preferred polysaccharide-rich substrates, congruent326
with the higher proportion of depolymerisable carbohydrates we observed in these soils. Building on327
the previous discussion, the abundance of aromatic compounds increased with soil depth, whereas328
lignin-derived phenols decreased. Surface soil horizons may therefore support microbial communities329
that favour easily oxidisable polysaccharides and secrete ligninolytic oxidases, driving rapid lignin330
turnover (Baldrian, 2017; Dao et al., 2022).331
Several environmental variables influenced microbial community structure in plain and slope soils (Fig-332
ure 8). EAC, Ca content, pH and phenolic content explained most variance in microbial community333
composition in plain soils. Calcium has previously been shown to stabilise SOC through cation bridg-334
ing with negatively charged organic surfaces, potentially restricting microbial access to SOC (Rowley335
et al., 2018). Given the pH-dependence of these interactions and the propensity of alpine plain sys-336
tems to experience seasonal water saturation (Ma et al., 2021), it is plausible that associated redox337
and pH fluctuations influenced microbial niche differentiation (Blagodatskaya and Kuzyakov, 2008).338
The observed association between phenolic content and microbial community composition may also339
reflect the presence of redox-active substrates that select for microbial groups capable of utilising these340
substrates either as carbon sources or as electron shuttles under oxygen-limited conditions. In slope341
soils, microbial assemblages were more closely aligned with polysaccharide content, EDC, and clay342
content. While mean EDC values were relatively low, the spatial variation across samples may point343
to micro-heterogeneity in the distribution of redox-active substrates, which could influence microbial344
organisation even under well-drained conditions. Polysaccharides, derived from rapid cycling of plant345
litter, may provide readily accessible energy, selecting for copiotrophic lineages (notably several pro-346
teobacterial MAGs that our metagenomic analysis showed to be enriched in slope soils). Clay content347
21
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
may also play a role through its known capacity to stabilise organic matter via adsorption, thereby348
modifying substrate accessibility (Sollins et al., 1996). Our results suggest that substrate quality,349
rather than the amount of SOC only, shape microbial assemblages under well-aerated conditions.350
Conclusions351
Our work shows how microbial community composition varies across landscape positions from wet352
plain soils to drier slope soils in alpine riparian zones. Plain soils contained three to four times more353
SOC than adjacent slope soils, were enriched in phenolic compounds, had higher EDC values, and har-354
bored microbial communities with genes for nitrate, iron, manganese, and sulfate reduction—features355
consistent with periodic anoxia and the accumulation of SOC due to thermodynamic limitations on356
microbial activity. In contrast, slope soils had lower SOC contents, were not reduced, had a higher357
proportion of labile polysaccharides, and microbial communities dominated by aerobic taxa. Together,358
these patterns demonstrate how moisture-driven redox regimes shape microbial potential and SOC359
composition, influencing the balance between SOC preservation and mineralization across the land-360
scape. By comparing analogous landscape positions in two independent alpine catchments, our work361
provides a case study of how topographically driven redox gradients govern microbial ecology.362
Several open questions remain regarding the role of microbial metabolism in carbon cycling in alpine363
riparian soils, particularly during seasonal transitions. Microbial communities may remain active364
beneath the winter snowpack, but their response to the spring melt pulse of dissolved organic carbon365
is not well understood. Future studies applying metatranscriptomics, extracellular enzyme assays, and366
stable isotope probing could capture these dynamics, revealing how microbial activity under shifting367
redox and substrate conditions influences SOC stability. Such insights would clarify how seasonal and368
topographic variability regulates organic carbon turnover and ultimately the net carbon balance of369
alpine catchments.370
Acknowledgements371
The authors thank Lorenz Schwab, Antoine Wallart, and Eric Pizem for their support with soil372
sampling, and Gordanna Pistoletti for technical assistance. We also thank the Swiss National Science373
22
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
Foundation for financial support (Grant No. 212056).374
References375
Aeppli, M., Thompson, A., Dewey, C., & Fendorf, S. (2022). Redox properties of solid phase electron376
acceptors affect anaerobic microbial respiration under oxygen-limited conditions in floodplain377
soils. Environmental Science & Technology , 56(23), 17462–17470. https://doi.org/10.1021/378
acs.est.2c05797379
Aeppli, M., Voegelin, A., Gorski, C. A., Hofstetter, T. B., & Sander, M. (2018). Mediated electrochemi-380
cal reduction of iron (oxyhydr-)oxides under defined thermodynamic boundary conditions. En-381
vironmental Science & Technology, 52(2), 560–570. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04411382
Andrews, S. (2010). FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. https://doi.383
org/https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/384
Baldrian, P. (2017). Microbial activity and the dynamics of ecosystem processes in forest soils.Current385
Opinion in Microbiology, 37, 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2017.06.008386
Berhe, A. A., & Kleber, M. (2013). Erosion, deposition, and the persistence of soil organic matter:387
Mechanistic considerations and problems with terminology [Commentary]. Earth Surface Pro-388
cesses and Landforms. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3408389
Blagodatskaya, E., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2008). Mechanisms of real and apparent priming effects and their390
dependence on soil microbial biomass and community structure: Critical review. Biology and391
Fertility of Soils, 45(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0334-y392
Boye, K., No¨ el, V., Tfaily, M. M., Bone, S. E., Williams, K. H., Bargar, J. R., & Fendorf, S. (2017).393
Thermodynamically controlled preservation of organic carbon in floodplains. Nature Geo-394
science, 10(6), 415–419. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2940395
Chaumeil, P.-A., Mussig, A. J., Hugenholtz, P., & Parks, D. H. (2020). Gtdb-tk: A toolkit to classify396
genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics, 36(6), 1925–1927. https://doi.397
org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848398
Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y., & Gu, J. (2018). Fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one fastq preprocessor.399
Bioinformatics, 34(17), i884–i890. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560400
23
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
Chklovski, A., Parks, D. H., Woodcroft, B. J., & Tyson, G. W. (2023). Checkm2: A rapid, scalable and401
accurate tool for assessing microbial genome quality using machine learning. Nature Methods,402
20, 1203–1212. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-01940-w403
Dao, T. T., Mikutta, R., Sauheitl, L., Gentsch, N., Shibistova, O., Wild, B., Schnecker, J., B´ arta, J.,404
ˇCapek, P., Gittel, A., Lashchinskiy, N., & Urich, T. (2022). Lignin preservation and microbial405
carbohydrate metabolism in permafrost soils. JGR Biogeosciences, 127(1), e2020JG006181.406
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG006181407
Davidson, E. A., & Janssens, I. A. (2006). Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition408
and feedbacks to climate change. Nature, 440(7081), 165–173. https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1038 /409
nature04514410
Duan, X., Li, Z., Li, Y., Yuan, H., Gao, W., Chen, X., Ge, T., Wu, J., & Zhu, Z. (2023). Iron–organic411
carbon associations stimulate carbon accumulation in paddy soils by decreasing soil organic412
carbon priming. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 179, 108972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.413
2023.108972414
Eilers, K. G., Debenport, S., Anderson, S., & Fierer, N. (2012). Digging deeper to find unique microbial415
communities: The strong effect of depth on the structure of bacterial and archaeal communities416
in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 50, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.03.011417
Fenner, N., & Freeman, C. (2020). Woody litter protects peat carbon stocks during drought. Nature418
Climate Change, 10(4), 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0727-y419
Fenner, N., & Freeman, C. (2011). Drought-induced carbon loss in peatlands. Nature Geoscience,420
4(12), 895–900. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1323421
Fick, S. E., & Hijmans, R. J. (2017). WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for422
global land areas [ eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/joc.5086]. Interna-423
tional Journal of Climatology , 37(12), 4302–4315. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086424
Freeman, C., Ostle, N., & Kang, H. S. (2001). An enzymic ’latch’ on a global carbon store. Nature,425
409(6817), 149. https://doi.org/10.1038/35051650426
Fr´ elechoux, F., & Gallandat, J.-D. (1995). Flore et v´ eg´ etation du haut val de binn entre chiestafel et427
le col de l’albrun [Postprint]. Bulletin de la Murithienne, 113, 105–128.428
24
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
Fu, L., Xie, R., Ma, D., Zhang, M., & Liu, L. (2023). Variations in soil microbial community struc-429
ture and extracellular enzymatic activities along a forest–wetland ecotone in high-latitude430
permafrost regions. Ecology and Evolution, 13(6), e10205. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10205431
Gunina, A., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2022). From energy to (soil organic) matter. Global Change Biology,432
28(7), 2169–2182. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16071433
Gurevich, A., Saveliev, V., Vyahhi, N., & Tesler, G. (2013). Quast: Quality assessment tool for genome434
assemblies. Bioinformatics, 29(8), 1072–1075. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086435
Kang, D. D., Li, F., Kirton, E., Thomas, A., Egan, R., An, H., & Wang, Z. (2019). Metabat 2: An436
adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome437
assemblies. PeerJ, 7, e7359. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7359438
Kappler, A., Benz, M., Schink, B., & Brune, A. (2004). Electron shuttling via humic acids in microbial439
iron(iii) reduction in a freshwater sediment. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 47(1), 85–92. https:440
//doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00245-9441
Keiluweit, M., Nico, P. S., Kleber, M., & Fendorf, S. (2016). Are oxygen limitations under recognized442
regulators of organic carbon turnover in upland soils? Biogeochemistry, 127(2), 157–171. https:443
//doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0180-6444
K¨ orner, C. (2021).The alpine life zone. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/445
978-3-030-59538-8 2446
Li, D., Liu, C. M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K., & Lam, T. W. (2015). Megahit: An ultra-fast single-447
node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de bruijn graph.448
Bioinformatics, 31(10), 1674–1676. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033449
Ma, M., Zhu, Y., Wei, Y., & Zhao, N. (2021). Soil nutrient and vegetation diversity patterns of alpine450
wetlands on the qinghai-tibetan plateau. Sustainability, 13(11), 6221. https://doi.org/10.451
3390/su13116221452
Matteodo, M., Grand, S., Sebag, D., Rowley, M. C., Vittoz, P., & Verrecchia, E. P. (2018). Decoupling453
of topsoil and subsoil controls on organic matter dynamics in the Swiss Alps. Geoderma, 330,454
41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.05.011455
Michaelis, L., & Hill, E. S. (1933). The viologen indicators. Journal of General Physiology , 16(6),456
859–873. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.16.6.859457
25
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., Minchin, P. R.,458
O’Hara, R. B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., & Wagner, H.459
(2015). Vegan: Community ecology package [R package version 2.6-4]. https : / / CRAN . R -460
project.org/package=vegan461
Olm, M. R., Brown, C. T., Brooks, B., & Banfield, J. F. (2017). Drep: A tool for fast and accurate462
genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-463
replication. The ISME Journal, 11(12), 2864–2868. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.126464
Pacific, V. J., McGlynn, B. L., Riveros-Iregui, D., & Welsch, D. L. (2011). Landscape structure,465
groundwater dynamics, and soil water content influence soil respiration across riparian-hillslope466
transitions in the tenderfoot creek experimental forest, montana.Hydrological Processes, 25(5),467
811–827. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7870468
Philben, M., Ta¸ s, N., Chen, H., Wullschleger, S. D., Kholodov, A., Graham, D. E., & Gu, B. (2020).469
Influences of hillslope biogeochemistry on anaerobic soil organic matter decomposition in a470
tundra watershed [First published: 29 April 2020]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeo-471
sciences, 125(7), e2019JG005512. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005512472
Philippot, L., Chenu, C., Kappler, A., Rillig, M. C., & Fierer, N. (2023). The interplay between mi-473
crobial communities and soil properties [Publisher: Nature Publishing Group]. Nature Reviews474
Microbiology, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-023-00980-5475
Pich´ e-Choquette, S., & Constant, P. (2019). Molecular hydrogen, a neglected key driver of soil biogeo-476
chemical processes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology , 85(7), e02418–18. https://doi.477
org/10.1128/AEM.02418-18478
Richard, J.-L., Bressoud, B., Buttler, A., Duckert, O., & Gallandat, J.-D. (1993). Carte de la v´ eg´ etation479
de la r´ egion val de r´ echy-sasseneire (objet cpn 3.77, alpes valaisannes, suisse) [Postprint].480
Bulletin de la Murithienne, 111, 9–40.481
Romanowicz, K. J., Crump, B. C., & Kling, G. W. (2023). Genomic evidence that microbial carbon482
degradation is dominated by iron redox metabolism in thawing permafrost [Number: 1 Pub-483
lisher: Nature Publishing Group]. ISME Communications, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.484
1038/s43705-023-00326-5485
Rowley, M. C., Grand, S., & Verrecchia, ´E. P. (2018). Calcium-mediated stabilisation of soil organic486
carbon. Biogeochemistry, 137(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0410-1487
26
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
Ruan, Y., Ling, N., Jiang, S., Jing, X., He, J.-S., Shen, Q., & Nan, Z. (2024). Warming and al-488
tered precipitation independently and interactively suppress alpine soil microbial growth in a489
decadal-long experiment. eLife, 12, RP89392. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.89392490
Sahlin, K. (2022). Strobealign: Flexible seed size enables ultra-fast and accurate read alignment.491
Genome Biology, 23(1), 260. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-022-02831-7492
Schimel, J. P., & Schaeffer, S. M. (2012). Microbial control over carbon cycling in soil. Frontiers in493
Microbiology, 3, 348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00348494
Sinsabaugh, R. L. (2010). Phenol oxidase, peroxidase and organic matter dynamics of soil. Soil Biology495
and Biochemistry, 42(3), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.014496
Sollins, P., Homann, P., & Caldwell, B. A. (1996). Stabilization and destabilization of soil organic497
matter: Mechanisms and controls. Geoderma, 74(1-2), 65–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-498
7061(96)00036-5499
swisstopo. (2024). Swiss federal office of topography: Topographic and geospatial data [ © swisstopo500
(2024)]. https://www.swisstopo.admin.ch501
Thomas, J. H., Drake, J. M., Paddock, J. R., & Conklin, S. D. (2004). Characterization of abts at502
a polymer-modified electrode. Electroanalysis, 16(7), 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.503
200302862504
Tolu, J., Gerber, L., Boily, J.-F., & Bindler, R. (2015). High-throughput characterization of sediment505
organic matter by pyrolysis–gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and multivariate curve506
resolution: A promising analytical tool in (paleo)limnology. Analytica Chimica Acta, 880, 93–507
102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.03.043508
Waldrop, M. P., Chabot, C. L., Liebner, S., Holm, S., Snyder, M. W., Dillon, M., Dudgeon, S. R., Dou-509
glas, T. A., Leewis, M.-C., Walter Anthony, K. M., McFarland, J. W., Arp, C. D., Bondurant,510
A. C., Ta¸ s, N., & Mackelprang, R. (2023). Permafrost microbial communities and functional511
genes are structured by latitudinal and soil geochemical gradients [Publisher: Nature Publishing512
Group]. The ISME Journal, 17(8), 1224–1235. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-023-01429-6513
Wood, D. E., & Salzberg, S. L. (2024). Coverm: Read alignment statistics for metagenomics. Bioin-514
formatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf147515
27
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint
Woodcroft, B. J., Singleton, C. M., Boyd, J. A., Evans, P. N., Emerson, J. B., et al. (2018). Genome-516
centric view of carbon processing in thawing permafrost. Nature, 560(7716), 49–54. https:517
//doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0338-1518
Yang, Y., et al. (2021). Deciphering factors driving soil microbial life-history strategies in restored519
grasslands. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 13(2), 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/520
imt2.66521
Zhang, Z., & Furman, A. (2021). Soil redox dynamics under dynamic hydrologic regimes - a review.522
Science of The Total Environment, 763, 143026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.523
143026524
Zhou, Z., Tran, P. Q., Breister, A. M., Liu, Y., Kieft, K., Cowley, E. S., Karaoz, U., & Anantharaman,525
K. (2021). Metabolic: High-throughput profiling of microbial genomes for functional traits,526
biogeochemistry, and community-scale metabolic networks. Microbiome, 9(1), 102. https://527
doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01213-8528
28
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 22, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.22.677713doi: bioRxiv preprint