How simple physics drives the earliest stages of embryogenesis

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

The paper develops a force-based computational vertex model of the earliest mammalian embryogenesis, focusing on the first few cleavages of a fertilised egg into a morula. Using model components for cortical tension, cell–cell adhesion, membrane curvature and cell volume, and including the zona pellucida, cell division, and noise, the authors fit simulations to both mouse and human experimental data to quantify how these biophysical forces drive compaction and internalisation, including why the morula does not decompact during internalisation, and to analyze division-axis and trophectoderm differentiation debates. A major caveat is that the study relies on computational assumptions embedded in the modeling framework and on how experimental measurements can be represented by those force terms. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 2,896 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The initial stages of mammalian embryo development involve a single fertilised egg that repeatedly divides to create a solid ball of cells called a morula. Despite the apparent simplicity of this process, which involves only one cell type and a few tens of cells, there are still a host of unanswered questions, particularly around the underlying biophysical mechanisms that are at play. To address this, we here develop a novel type of vertex model that includes cortical tension, cell-to-cell adhesion, membrane curvature and cell volume forces, along with a zona pellucida, cell division and the effect of noise. We fit our model to both mouse and human experimental data, which allows us to address a number of key questions including the relative roles of adhesion and tension, how the cortical tension varies around the cell, the purpose of the zona pellucida, and the rules governing the first few cell divisions. We also determine the biophysical effects responsible for compaction and internalisation, including addressing why the morula does not typically decompact during internalisation. Next, we investigate the position-versus-polarisation debate during trophectoderm differentiation, how the division axis is determined during later divisions, and the role of noise. Finally, we compare human and mouse, focussing on the key similarities that may span all mammals. Our use of a force-based computational model allows us to address fundamental questions relating to mammalian development, particularly the underlying biophysical rules governing early embryogenesis, with important applications to stem cell models such as blastoids, conservation efforts of endangered species and embryo grading during IVF. Significance Statement The very first stages of embryogenesis are a vital but still poorly understood part of development, with important applications to fertility, fertility lifespan and assisted conception such as IVF. Most research in this area has focussed on experimental approaches, ignoring the potential for biophysical modelling. Here, we address this by developing a novel computer simulation of the first thee-to-four cell divisions of the fertilised egg, resulting in a compact bunch of cells called a morula. In particular, we develop a new type of vertex model for the early embryo that for the first time includes contributions from a range of realistic biophysical forces. By analysing real mouse and human embryo data through our model, we reveal how simple physics drives crucial early developmental processes, including compaction, internalisation, cleavage, noise and species-specific differences. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes AC, PS and DMR developed, collaborated and validated the model; AC, PS, KT-A and DMR wrote the manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0