Disrupted Frontoparietal Dynamics in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Reduced Sensitivity and Atypical Modulation During Working Memory

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text

This study examined whether neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is characterized by altered inhibitory activity in the frontoparietal network during verbal working memory, using fMRI in 43 adolescents with NF1 and 26 age-matched neurotypical controls. Dynamic causal modeling of bilateral frontoparietal regions tested the hypothesis of greater inhibitory intrinsic (self-connection) connectivity, with parametric empirical Bayes and Bayesian model reduction and leave-one-out cross-validation for group-difference generalizability. NF1 showed increased average intrinsic connectivity across several frontoparietal regions, but the working-memory–relevant model also indicated weaker intrinsic connectivity in right vlPFC and left dlPFC, alongside more atypical modulatory patterns that could not be explained by increased inhibition alone; the paper notes only modest predictive correlations and a trend toward diagnosis value (r = 0.19, p = 0.055). This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) is a rare, single-gene neurodevelopmental disorder. Atypical brain activation patterns have been linked to working memory difficulties in individuals with NF1. The present work investigates if NF1 has increased inhibitory activity in the frontoparietal network during working memory tasks compared to neurotypical controls. Forty-three adolescents with NF1 and twenty-six age-matched neurotypical controls completed functional magnetic resonance imaging scans during a verbal working memory task. Dynamic causal models (DCMs) were estimated for bilateral frontoparietal network (dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortices (dlPFC and vlPFC), superior and inferior parietal gyri (SPG and IPG)). The parametric empirical Bayes approach with Bayesian model reduction was used to test the hypothesis that NF1 diagnosis would be characterised by greater inhibitory self-connections (intrinsic connectivity). Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV) was performed to test the generalisability of group differences. NF1 participants demonstrated greater average intrinsic connectivity of left dlPFC, IPG, SPG and bilateral vlPFC. The DCM that best explained effects of working memory showed that NF1 group has increased intrinsic connectivity of left vlPFC, but weaker intrinsic connectivity of right vlPFC and left dlPFC. The parameters of these connections showed a modest but positive predictive correlation of r = 0.19 (p = 0.055) with diagnosis status, suggesting a trend toward predictive value. Overall, increased average intrinsic connectivity of left dlPFC, IPG, SPG and bilateral vlPFC in NF1, suggests reduced overall sensitivity of these regions to inputs. Working memory evoked different patterns of input processing in NF1, that cannot be characterised by increased inhibition alone. Instead, modulatory connectivity related to working memory showed less inhibitory self-connectivity of left dlPFC and left vlPFC, and more inhibitory intrinsic connectivity of right vlPFC in NF1. This discrepancy between average and modulatory connectivity suggests that overall NF1 participants are responsive to cognitive task-related inputs but may show atypical adaptation to the task demands of working memory.
Full text 3,119 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) is a rare, single-gene neurodevelopmental disorder. Atypical brain activation patterns have been linked to working memory difficulties in individuals with NF1. The present work investigates if NF1 has increased inhibitory activity in the frontoparietal network during working memory tasks compared to neurotypical controls. Forty-three adolescents with NF1 and twenty-six age-matched neurotypical controls completed functional magnetic resonance imaging scans during a verbal working memory task. Dynamic causal models (DCMs) were estimated for bilateral frontoparietal network (dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortices (dlPFC and vlPFC), superior and inferior parietal gyri (SPG and IPG)). The parametric empirical Bayes approach with Bayesian model reduction was used to test the hypothesis that NF1 diagnosis would be characterised by greater inhibitory self-connections (intrinsic connectivity). Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV) was performed to test the generalisability of group differences. NF1 participants demonstrated greater average intrinsic connectivity of left dlPFC, IPG, SPG and bilateral vlPFC. The DCM that best explained effects of working memory showed that NF1 group has increased intrinsic connectivity of left vlPFC, but weaker intrinsic connectivity of right vlPFC and left dlPFC. The parameters of these connections showed a modest but positive predictive correlation of r = 0.19 (p = 0.055) with diagnosis status, suggesting a trend toward predictive value. Overall, increased average intrinsic connectivity of left dlPFC, IPG, SPG and bilateral vlPFC in NF1, suggests reduced overall sensitivity of these regions to inputs. Working memory evoked different patterns of input processing in NF1, that cannot be characterised by increased inhibition alone. Instead, modulatory connectivity related to working memory showed less inhibitory self-connectivity of left dlPFC and left vlPFC, and more inhibitory intrinsic connectivity of right vlPFC in NF1. This discrepancy between average and modulatory connectivity suggests that overall NF1 participants are responsive to cognitive task-related inputs but may show atypical adaptation to the task demands of working memory. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes ↵* Joint senior authors Data/code availability: The NF1 group’s data have been deposited on the Sage Bionetworks data repository https://www.synapse.org/. Approved researchers can request to obtain the data which are subject to data sharing agreements. Codes for data processing and analysis are available at https://github.com/MCLit/NF1-DCM-WM. Ethics statement: Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the North West-Greater Manchester South Research Ethics Committee (reference: 18/NW/0762). Written informed consent was obtained from the parents and older adolescent participants and assent was obtained from the younger participants. Conflict of Interests: None of the authors have a conflict of interest to disclose Refining figures and results and interpretation.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0