Living with a Vestibular Schwannoma: Bridging the Gap Between Treatment and Quality of Life—A Review of 25 Years of Quality of Life Outcomes in Patients

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vestibular schwannoma (VS), a non-cancerous tumour of the vestibulocochlear nerve, poses significant challenges to patients’ quality of life (QoL), regardless of its typically slow growth and high treatment success rates. Although tumour control is excellent with microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, or active surveillance, many patients report persistent symptoms affecting physical, psychological, and social well-being. OBJECTIVE: This review synthesises current scientific and medical literature published on QoL outcomes in VS patients, highlighting symptom burden, treatment impacts, and gaps in patient-centred care. METHODS: A narrative review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they assessed QoL in adult VS patients using validated tools or qualitative methods. Key themes were identified and analysed across management modalities. RESULTS: Physical symptoms such as hearing loss, facial weakness, dizziness, and fatigue significantly impact QoL. Psychological concerns—including anxiety, depression, and uncertainty—are underreported in the literature but prevalent amongst patients. The SF-36 and PANQOL were the most commonly used QoL tools, though they varied in sensitivity. Few studies incorporated long-term follow-up or patient perspectives. CONCLUSION: QoL assessment should be integrated into routine VS care. Future research must prioritise longitudinal data, emotional support needs, and patient involvement in decision-making to ensure holistic, equitable treatment strategies.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0