Maternal & Infant Health Benefits of a Nicotine Product Standard in the United States

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

The study used the Smoking, E-cigarette use, and Pregnancy (SEP) individual-level microsimulation model to project how a proposed U.S. nicotine product standard would affect smoking and vaping during pregnancy and subsequent maternal morbidities and infant mortality from 2027 to 2100. Model inputs were drawn from national surveillance and vital statistics (NHIS and BRFSS for exposure patterns in pregnancy; NVSS Natality/linked birth–infant death data for pregnancy complications and infant mortality), and policy effects on tobacco/e-cig transitions were based on FDA expert elicitation. The authors projected that under the standard, smoking in pregnancy would drop from 6.0% in 2027 to 1.2% by 2040, averting about 167,000 ectopic pregnancies, 950,000 miscarriages, 167,000 hypertensive disorders of pregnancy/pre-eclampsia, and 64,000 infant deaths, alongside 103,000 maternal pregnancy QALYs gained and $4.9 billion in avoided pregnancy-related medical costs. A key caveat is that outcomes depend on model structure and the assumed transition effects for tobacco/e-cig use derived from expert elicitation rather than observed trial/policy effects. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Importance Cigarette smoking during pregnancy increases the risks of miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, placental complications, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and infant mortality. Reducing smoking in pregnancy remains a pressing public health priority. Objective To project the impact of a proposed nicotine product standard on maternal complications and infant mortality using the Smoking, E-cigarette use, and Pregnancy (SEP) microsimulation model. Design, Settings, and Participants Individual-level, annual‐cycle microsimulation of U.S. females of reproductive age that tracks smoking, vaping, pregnancy, and pregnancy outcomes was constructed. Model inputs were drawn from national surveillance and vital statistics, including National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) for general population, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (2016–2023) for smoking/vaping among pregnant women and NVSS Natality/Linked Birth–Infant Death files for late-pregnancy morbidities and infant mortality. Policy effects on tobacco and e-cig usage transitions are based on FDA’s expert-elicitation and used to simulate outcomes under status quo vs. the new policy from 2027-2100. Exposure Smoking and vaping. Main Outcome(s) Maternal outcomes during pregnancy (ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, placenta previa, placental abruption, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy/pre-eclampsia, eclampsia), infant mortality, pregnancy-related costs, and maternal Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). Results Under the nicotine product standard (policy start 2027), smoking in pregnancy falls sharply from 6.0% in 2027 to 1.2% by 2040. These behavioral shifts translate into large perinatal gains through 2100: approximately 167,000 ectopic pregnancies, 950,000 miscarriages, 15,000 placenta previa, 62,000 placental abruptions, 167,000 hypertensive disorders of pregnancy/pre-eclampsia, 9,000 eclampsia cases, and 64,000 infant deaths are averted cumulatively. Maternal health improves as well, with 103,000 pregnancy QALYs gained. Health system spending falls despite conservative costing, with $4.9 billion in pregnancy-related medical costs avoided. Across uncertainty bounds, direction and magnitude of benefit remain favorable for all maternal morbidities and infant deaths, indicating that new policy yields substantial and durable health gains alongside meaningful cost offsets. Conclusions A proposed nicotine product standard is projected to improve maternal and infant outcomes and yield sizable pregnancy-related health gains and cost offsets. The SEP model complements prior tobacco policy evaluation frameworks while focusing on maternal and infant health.
Full text 5,785 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Importance Cigarette smoking during pregnancy increases the risks of miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, placental complications, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and infant mortality. Reducing smoking in pregnancy remains a pressing public health priority.

Objective

To project the impact of a proposed nicotine product standard on maternal complications and infant mortality using the Smoking, E-cigarette use, and Pregnancy (SEP) microsimulation model. Design, Settings, and Participants Individual-level, annual‐cycle microsimulation of U.S. females of reproductive age that tracks smoking, vaping, pregnancy, and pregnancy outcomes was constructed. Model inputs were drawn from national surveillance and vital statistics, including National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) for general population, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (2016–2023) for smoking/vaping among pregnant women and NVSS Natality/Linked Birth–Infant Death files for late-pregnancy morbidities and infant mortality. Policy effects on tobacco and e-cig usage transitions are based on FDA’s expert-elicitation and used to simulate outcomes under status quo vs. the new policy from 2027-2100. Exposure Smoking and vaping. Main Outcome(s) Maternal outcomes during pregnancy (ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, placenta previa, placental abruption, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy/pre-eclampsia, eclampsia), infant mortality, pregnancy-related costs, and maternal Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs).

Results

Under the nicotine product standard (policy start 2027), smoking in pregnancy falls sharply from 6.0% in 2027 to 1.2% by 2040. These behavioral shifts translate into large perinatal gains through 2100: approximately 167,000 ectopic pregnancies, 950,000 miscarriages, 15,000 placenta previa, 62,000 placental abruptions, 167,000 hypertensive disorders of pregnancy/pre-eclampsia, 9,000 eclampsia cases, and 64,000 infant deaths are averted cumulatively. Maternal health improves as well, with 103,000 pregnancy QALYs gained. Health system spending falls despite conservative costing, with $4.9 billion in pregnancy-related medical costs avoided. Across uncertainty bounds, direction and magnitude of benefit remain favorable for all maternal morbidities and infant deaths, indicating that new policy yields substantial and durable health gains alongside meaningful cost offsets.

Conclusions

A proposed nicotine product standard is projected to improve maternal and infant outcomes and yield sizable pregnancy-related health gains and cost offsets. The SEP model complements prior tobacco policy evaluation frameworks while focusing on maternal and infant health. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (K01DA056424). Dr. Tam and Dr. Skolnick are also supported by the National Cancer Institute (U01CA253858, U54CA229974). Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Footnotes Funding: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (K01DA056424). Dr. Tam and Dr. Skolnick are also supported by the National Cancer Institute (U01CA253858, U54CA229974). Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ own and do not reflect the views of the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Health and Human Services or the US government. Data Availability All data used in this study are publicly available online from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Specifically: adult tobacco use data from NHIS, BRFSS questionnaires for constructing smoking/vaping indicators, NVSS Natality Public Use documentation, and NSFG survey files and documentation. Direct access links: NHIS Adult Tobacco Use overview: https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/nchs/nhis/tobacco/tobacco_overview.htm BRFSS Questionnaires: https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/questionnaires/index.htm NVSS Natality Public Use File (User Guide 2023): https://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/health_statistics/nchs/dataset_documentation/DVS/natality/UserGuide2023.pdf NSFG Homepage: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/index.htm These resources are open-access and contain only deidentified public-use data. No special permissions or data-sharing agreements are required to obtain them. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/index.htm https://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/health_statistics/nchs/dataset_documentation/DVS/natality/UserGuide2023.pdf https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/questionnaires/index.htm https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/nchs/nhis/tobacco/tobacco_overview.htm

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0