Comparing long-term patterns of spread of native and invasive plants in a successional forest

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract A fundamental question in invasive plant ecology is whether invasive and native plants have different ecological roles. Differences in functional traits have been explored, but we lack a comparison of the factors affecting the spread of co-occurring natives and invasives. Some have proposed that to succeed, invasives would colonize a wider variety of sites, would disperse farther, or would be better at colonizing sites with more available light and soil nutrients than natives. We examined patterns of spread over 70 years in a regenerating forest in Connecticut, USA where both native and invasive species acted as colonizers. We compared seven invasive and 19 native species in the characteristics of colonized plots, variation in these characteristics, and the importance of site variables for colonization. We found little support for the hypotheses that invasive plants succeed by dispersing farther than native plants or by having a broader range of site tolerances. Colonization by invasives was also not more dependent on light than colonization by natives. Like native understory species, invasive plants spread into closed-canopy forest and species-rich communities despite earlier predictions that these communities would resist invasion. The biggest differences were that soil nitrate and the initial land cover being open field increased the odds of colonization for most invasives but only for some natives. In large part, though, the spread of native and invasive plants was affected by similar factors.
Full text 12,279 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Comparing long-term patterns of spread of native and invasive plants in a successional forest | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Comparing long-term patterns of spread of native and invasive plants in a successional forest Matthew Yamamoto, Chad Jones This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3293804/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 17 May, 2024 Read the published version in Oecologia → Version 1 posted 4 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract A fundamental question in invasive plant ecology is whether invasive and native plants have different ecological roles. Differences in functional traits have been explored, but we lack a comparison of the factors affecting the spread of co-occurring natives and invasives. Some have proposed that to succeed, invasives would colonize a wider variety of sites, would disperse farther, or would be better at colonizing sites with more available light and soil nutrients than natives. We examined patterns of spread over 70 years in a regenerating forest in Connecticut, USA where both native and invasive species acted as colonizers. We compared seven invasive and 19 native species in the characteristics of colonized plots, variation in these characteristics, and the importance of site variables for colonization. We found little support for the hypotheses that invasive plants succeed by dispersing farther than native plants or by having a broader range of site tolerances. Colonization by invasives was also not more dependent on light than colonization by natives. Like native understory species, invasive plants spread into closed-canopy forest and species-rich communities despite earlier predictions that these communities would resist invasion. The biggest differences were that soil nitrate and the initial land cover being open field increased the odds of colonization for most invasives but only for some natives. In large part, though, the spread of native and invasive plants was affected by similar factors. Diversity-invasibility Land-use history Species richness Colonization Biotic resistance Resource availability Full Text Supplementary Files YamamotoandJonesSupplementaryFileforOecologia.pdf Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 17 May, 2024 Read the published version in Oecologia → Version 1 posted Reviewers agreed at journal 26 Sep, 2023 Reviewers invited by journal 25 Sep, 2023 Editor assigned by journal 25 Aug, 2023 First submitted to journal 24 Aug, 2023 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-3293804","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":236000040,"identity":"ab270206-98c3-4cb7-9214-6ba30d5f7661","order_by":0,"name":"Matthew Yamamoto","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Connecticut College","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Matthew","middleName":"","lastName":"Yamamoto","suffix":""},{"id":236000041,"identity":"df93d3e4-b271-4b06-b375-f9c9ab588ce9","order_by":1,"name":"Chad Jones","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2989-5827","institution":"Connecticut College","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Chad","middleName":"","lastName":"Jones","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2023-08-24 21:45:11","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3293804/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3293804/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-024-05554-7","type":"published","date":"2024-05-17T18:05:28+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":57551439,"identity":"cd499731-bfb3-4b15-b931-f0a718a871b0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-06-01 18:05:38","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":668279,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"YamamotoandJonesOecologiaAugust2023.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3293804/v1_covered_4b8032cd-a234-4161-9176-7c1192be185e.pdf"},{"id":43993945,"identity":"4d5092ef-ff9f-410a-aefc-af5a73a5b9da","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2023-10-03 03:52:42","extension":"pdf","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":431204,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"YamamotoandJonesSupplementaryFileforOecologia.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3293804/v1/55a2ff9d205e3ff9e32507d4.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"Comparing long-term patterns of spread of native and invasive plants in a successional forest","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":true,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"oecologia","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"oeco","sideBox":"Learn more about [Oecologia](https://www.springer.com/journal/442)","snPcode":"442","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/442/3","title":"Oecologia","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"Diversity-invasibility, Land-use history, Species richness, Colonization, Biotic resistance, Resource availability","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3293804/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3293804/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"A fundamental question in invasive plant ecology is whether invasive and native plants have different ecological roles. Differences in functional traits have been explored, but we lack a comparison of the factors affecting the spread of co-occurring natives and invasives. Some have proposed that to succeed, invasives would colonize a wider variety of sites, would disperse farther, or would be better at colonizing sites with more available light and soil nutrients than natives. We examined patterns of spread over 70 years in a regenerating forest in Connecticut, USA where both native and invasive species acted as colonizers. We compared seven invasive and 19 native species in the characteristics of colonized plots, variation in these characteristics, and the importance of site variables for colonization. We found little support for the hypotheses that invasive plants succeed by dispersing farther than native plants or by having a broader range of site tolerances. Colonization by invasives was also not more dependent on light than colonization by natives. Like native understory species, invasive plants spread into closed-canopy forest and species-rich communities despite earlier predictions that these communities would resist invasion. The biggest differences were that soil nitrate and the initial land cover being open field increased the odds of colonization for most invasives but only for some natives. In large part, though, the spread of native and invasive plants was affected by similar factors.","manuscriptTitle":"Comparing long-term patterns of spread of native and invasive plants in a successional forest","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2023-10-03 03:52:37","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3293804/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2023-09-26T07:27:49+00:00","index":0,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2023-09-26T01:42:28+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2023-08-25T04:02:50+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Oecologia","date":"2023-08-24T17:45:04+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"oecologia","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"oeco","sideBox":"Learn more about [Oecologia](https://www.springer.com/journal/442)","snPcode":"442","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/442/3","title":"Oecologia","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"cc7087d2-c320-4c8e-9e99-e90a4ce8cb11","owner":[],"postedDate":"October 3rd, 2023","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-06-01T18:05:28+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-3293804","link":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-024-05554-7","journal":{"identity":"oecologia","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Oecologia"},"publishedOn":"2024-05-17 18:05:28","publishedOnDateReadable":"May 17th, 2024"},"versionCreatedAt":"2023-10-03 03:52:37","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1007/s00442-024-05554-7","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-024-05554-7","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-3293804","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-3293804","identity":"rs-3293804","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"-HB7Z8yhvgn0wM9Nzuekk","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0