Does Transvaginal Ultrasonography Have Good Diagnostic Value in Endometrial Pathology?
Transvaginal ultrasonography's diagnostic value for endometrial pathology in post-menopausal bleeding was evaluated, finding an endometrial thickness of less than 6 mm unlikely to indicate pathology.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study evaluated whether endometrial thickness measured by transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) has diagnostic value for endometrial pathology in 60 post-menopausal women with uterine bleeding, with TVS followed by dilatation and curettage within one day. Endometrial atrophy was classified as normal, while hyperplasia, endometrial polyps, and carcinoma were classified as abnormal. TVS for uterine pathology showed sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 86.7%, and predictive values around 84–86%, and an endometrial thickness less than 6 mm was reported as unlikely to indicate endometrial pathology. The paper’s limitation is that the study population is relatively small and confined to post-menopausal bleeding, limiting generalizability beyond that setting. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,756 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (21)
- W1511936052 via openalex
- W1911856269 via openalex
- W1972812466 via openalex
- W1986543439 via openalex
- W1997015143 via openalex
- W2032586376 via openalex
- W2064370309 via openalex
- W2065172153 via openalex
- W2068796004 via openalex
- W2090369759 via openalex
- W2096599057 via openalex
- W2120501854 via openalex
- W2128698390 via openalex
- W2139868277 via openalex
- W2312402210 via openalex
- W2411260805 via openalex
- W2414011663 via openalex
- W3152262318 via openalex
- W4231793820 via openalex
- W4243597178 via openalex
- W6980583568 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00