MacArthur’s consumer-resource model: a Rosetta Stone for competitive interactions
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-SA-4.0
Abstract
Recent developments in competition theory, namely, Modern Coexistence Theory (MCT), have aided empiricists in formulating tests of species persistence, coexistence, and evolution from simple to complex community settings. However, the parameters used to predict competitive outcomes, such as interaction coefficients, invasion growth rates, or stabilizing differences, remain biologically opaque, making findings difficult to generalize across ecological settings. Here, our article is structured around five goals, towards clarifying MCT by first making a case for the modern-day utility of MacArthur’s consumer-resource model, a model with surprising complexity and depth: (i) to describe the model in uniquely accessible language, deciphering the mathematics towards cultivating deeper biological intuition about competition’s innerworkings regardless of what empirical toolkit one uses, (ii) to provide translation between biological mechanisms from MacArthur’s model and parameters used to predict coexistence in MCT, (iii) to make explicit important but understated assumptions of MacArthur’s model in plain terms, (iv) provide empirical recommendations, and (v) to examine how key ecological concepts (e.g., r/K selection) can be understood with renewed clarity through MacArthur’s lens. We end by highlighting opportunities to explore mechanisms in tandem with MCT and to compare and translate results across ecological currencies towards a more unified ecological science.
Full text
2,116 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Recent developments in competition theory, namely, Modern Coexistence Theory (MCT), have aided empiricists in formulating tests of species persistence, coexistence, and evolution from simple to complex community settings. However, the parameters used to predict competitive outcomes, such as interaction coefficients, invasion growth rates, or stabilizing differences, remain biologically opaque, making findings difficult to generalize across ecological settings. Here, our article is structured around five goals, towards clarifying MCT by first making a case for the modern-day utility of MacArthur’s consumer-resource model, a model with surprising complexity and depth: (i) to describe the model in uniquely accessible language, deciphering the mathematics towards cultivating deeper biological intuition about competition’s innerworkings regardless of what empirical toolkit one uses, (ii) to provide translation between biological mechanisms from MacArthur’s model and parameters used to predict coexistence in MCT, (iii) to make explicit important but understated assumptions of MacArthur’s model in plain terms, (iv) provide empirical recommendations, and (v) to examine how key ecological concepts (e.g., r/K selection) can be understood with renewed clarity through MacArthur’s lens. We end by highlighting opportunities to explore mechanisms in tandem with MCT and to compare and translate results across ecological currencies towards a more unified ecological science.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2W32G
Subjects
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences, Population Biology
Keywords
coexistence theory, competition theory, contemporary niche theory, Lotka-Volterra, R*, resource utilization, competition theory, contemporary niche theory, Lotka-Volterra, R*, resource utilization
Dates
Published: 2024-04-26 23:20
Last Updated: 2024-08-27 19:35
Older Versions
License
CC-By Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Data and Code Availability Statement:
Open code are not available
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Ask this paper
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC-BY-SA-4.0