Hope, fertility, and the ethics of clinical discernment: a personalist supplement to ethical decision-making in gynecological practice

Other OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-21 ⓘ

This paper proposes a personalist framework for gynecological decision-making that integrates hope and fertility as ethically relevant categories to enhance patient care beyond immediate symptom management.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-31 · read from full text ⓘ

This paper proposes a theological-bioethical framework of clinical discernment, grounded in Karol Wojtyla’s personalist philosophy, to supplement shared decision-making in gynecological care. It argues that fertility should be viewed as a dimension of embodied personhood with relational significance, requiring clinicians to integrate attention to value-laden dimensions such as hope and future possibilities into standard biomedical reasoning. The authors outline a fertility-sensitive approach emphasizing proportionality in intervention and holistic patient accompaniment to align medical practice with moral agency and dignity. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

This article examines gynecological decision-making in clinical contexts where interventions carry significant implications for fertility and future reproductive possibilities. Conditions such as uterine fibroids, endometriosis, and ovarian cysts are commonly managed through treatments that differ in their potential impact on reproductive capacity, introducing an ethical dimension beyond immediate symptom management. This proposes a theological-bioethical framework of clinical discernment as a conceptual supplement to shared decision-making in reproductive healthcare. Drawing primarily on Karol Wojtyla's personalist philosophy, it advances an account of the human person as an irreducible moral subject whose embodied life carries existential and relational significance. Clinical discernment is understood as a structured ethical orientation that enhances standard biomedical reasoning by integrating attention to value-laden dimensions of fertility-related care. The framework articulates hope as an ethically relevant category referring to the openness of the patient's future possibilities, and fertility as a dimension of embodied personhood with relational meaning beyond biological function. On this basis, the article outlines a fertility-sensitive approach to gynecological care emphasizing proportionality in intervention, clarity and responsibility in risk communication, and holistic patient accompaniment. The paper concludes that integrating clinical discernment into gynecological decision-making offers a philosophically and theologically grounded enrichment of contemporary reproductive healthcare by aligning biomedical practice with a personalist account of moral agency, embodied dignity, and future-oriented care.
Full text 15,615 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

This article examines gynecological decision-making in clinical contexts where interventions carry significant implications for fertility and future reproductive possibilities. Conditions such as uterine fibroids, endometriosis, and ovarian cysts are commonly managed through treatments that differ in their potential impact on reproductive capacity, introducing an ethical dimension beyond immediate symptom management. This proposes a theological-bioethical framework of clinical discernment as a conceptual supplement to shared decision-making in reproductive healthcare. Drawing primarily on Karol Wojtyla’s personalist philosophy, it advances an account of the human person as an irreducible moral subject whose embodied life carries existential and relational significance. Clinical discernment is understood as a structured ethical orientation that enhances standard biomedical reasoning by integrating attention to value-laden dimensions of fertility-related care. The framework articulates hope as an ethically relevant category referring to the openness of the patient’s future possibilities, and fertility as a dimension of embodied personhood with relational meaning beyond biological function. On this basis, the article outlines a fertility-sensitive approach to gynecological care emphasizing proportionality in intervention, clarity and responsibility in risk communication, and holistic patient accompaniment. The paper concludes that integrating clinical discernment into gynecological decision-making offers a philosophically and theologically grounded enrichment of contemporary reproductive healthcare by aligning biomedical practice with a personalist account of moral agency, embodied dignity, and future-oriented care. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Aguas, Jove Jim. 2013. Ethics and Moral Philosophy of Karol Wojtyla. Kritike 7 (1). Aiello, Andria, Mary Jane Esplen, Heather Boon, Rhonda Zwingerman, Brenda Toner, and Robert G. Maunder. 2025. A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis of Women’s Experience of Infertility and Fertility Treatment From an Existential Perspective. SAGE Open 15(3):21582440251372769. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251372769 Amoah, A., N. Joseph, S. Reap, and S. D. Quinn. 2022. Appraisal of National and International Uterine Fibroid Management Guidelines: A Systematic Review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 129(3):356–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16928 Becker, Andréa. 2023. Stratified Reproduction, Hysterectomy, and the Social Process of Opting into Infertility. Gender & Society 37(4):614–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432231175655 Benetti-Pinto, Cristina, and Laguna. Ana Carolina Japur De Sá Rosa-e-Silva, Daniela Angerame Yela, and José Maria Soares Júnior. 2017. Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia / RBGO Gynecology and Obstetrics 39 (07): 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603807 Biesaga, Tadeusz. 2003. Personalism versus Principlism in Bioethics. Forum Philosophicum (Krakow) 8:23–34. Boivin, Jacky, and Janet Takefman, Andrea Braverman. 2011. The Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) Tool: Development and General Psychometric Properties†. Human Reproduction 26(8):2084–2091. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der171 Bougie, Olga. 2024. Hysterectomy at a Young Age: A Reasonable Option or a Recipe for Regret? Obstetrics & Gynecology 144(6):755–756. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005766 Brumsted, John R., A. Judith, J. Blackman, Gary, Badger, and Daniel H. Riddick. 1996. Hysteroscopy versus Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: A Comparison of Cost. Fertility and Sterility 65(2):310–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58091-1 Burgos, Juan Manuel. 2019. Wojtyła’s Personalism as Integral Personalism: The Future of an Intellectual Project. Quaestiones Disputatae 9(2):91–111. Capezzuoli, Tommaso, Gretha Orlandi, and Sara Clemenza et al. 2022. Gynaecologic and Systemic Comorbidities in Patients with Endometriosis: Impact on Quality of Life and Global Health. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology 49(7):157. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog4907157 Crosby, John F. 2016. The Personalism of John Henry Newman as Interpreted Through the Personalism of Karol Wojtyla. Newman Studies Journal 13(2):24–39. https://doi.org/10.1353/nsj.2016.0006 De la Cruz, and Maria Syl D., Edward M. Buchanan. 2017. Uterine Fibroids: Diagnosis and Treatment. American Family Physician 05(2):100–107. De Smit, Noa S., E. Maria, Martijn F. De Lange, Judith A. F. Boomsma, Huirne, J. K. Wouter, and Hehenkamp. 2025. Current Treatment for Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids: Available Evidence and Therapeutic Dilemmas. The Lancet 406(10498):91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00728-7 Di Nardo, Matteo, Anna Dalle, Giuseppina Ore, and Testa et al. 2019. Principlism and Personalism. Comparing Two Ethical Models Applied Clinically in Neonates Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support. Frontiers in Pediatrics 7:312. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00312 Ely, J. W., C. M. Kennedy, E. C. Clark, and N. C. Bowdler. 2006. Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: A Management Algorithm. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 19(6):590–602. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.6.590 Espartinez, Alma S. 2023. Karol Wojtyła on Participation and Alienation. Studia Gilsoniana (US) 12(1):33–59. https://doi.org/10.26385/SG.120102 Facchin, Federica, Laura Buggio, Dhouha Dridi, and Paolo Vercellini. 2021. A Woman’s Worth: The Psychological Impact of Beliefs about Motherhood, Female Identity and Infertility on Childless Women with Endometriosis. Journal of Health Psychology 26(7):1026–1034. Ferdynus, Marcin Paweł. 2024. Is Dignity Still Necessary in Health Care? From Definition to Recognition of Human Dignity. Journal of Religion and Health 63(2):1154–1177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-023-01995-1 Finco, Andrea, Gabriele Centini, and Lucia Lazzeri, Errico Zupi. 2015. Surgical Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Fertile Age Women. Women’s Health 11(4):513–525. https://doi.org/10.2217/WHE.15.12 Girard, Elodie, Anna Mazloum, Isabelle Navarria-Forney, Nicola Pluchino, and Isabelle Streuli, Christine Cedraschi. 2023. Women’s Lived Experience of Endometriosis-Related Fertility Issues. PLOS ONE 18(11):e0293531. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293531 Gnanachandran, Chellappah, Richard Penketh, and Rupali Banzal, Piyanga Athauda. 2023. Myomectomy Benefits, Risks, Long-Term Outcomes, and Effects on Fertility and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Literature Review. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery 39(4):151–157. https://doi.org/10.1089/gyn.2022.0127 Grignoli, Nicola, Roberta Wullschleger, and Valentina Di Bernardo et al. 2021. Hope and Therapeutic Privilege: Time for Shared Prognosis Communication. Journal of Medical Ethics 47(12):e47–e47. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106157 Guarnaccia, Michael M. MD, and Mitchell S. MD Rein. 2001. Traditional Surgical Approaches to Uterine Fibroids: Abdominal Myomectomy and Hysterectomy. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 44(2):385–400. Hart, David B. 2005. The Anti-Theology of the Body. The New Atlantis 9:65–73. Havryliuk, Yelena, Robert Setton, John J. Carlow, and Barry D. Shaktman. 2017. Symptomatic Fibroid Management: Systematic Review of the Literature. JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 21 (3): e2017.00041. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2017.00041 Heng, Fiona Wenyan, Shefaly Shorey. 2022. Experiences of Endometriosis-associated Infertility among Women and Their Partners: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Nursing 31(19–20):2706–2715. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16145 John Paul, I. I. 1981. Familiaris Consortio. Apostolic Exhortation. Dicastery for Communication, November 22. https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_jp-ii_exh_19811122_familiaris-consortio.html Kamışlı, Songül, Candan Terzioğlu, Gürkan, and Bozdag. 2021. MENTAL HEALTH of INFERTILE WOMEN: HOPELESSNESS, ANXİETY and DEPRESSION LEVELS. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing 12(1):43–49. https://doi.org/10.14744/phd.2020.48030 Khan, Aamir, Manjeet Shehmar, and Janesh Gupta. 2014. Uterine Fibroids: Current Perspectives. International Journal of Women’s Health January 95. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S51083 Kube, Tobias, Charlotte Blease, Sarah K. Ballou, and J. Kaptchuk Ted. 2019. Hope in Medicine: Applying Multidisciplinary Insights. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 62(4):591–616. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2019.0035 La Rosa, Valentina, Fabio Lucia, Benito Barra, and Chiofalo et al. 2020. An Overview on the Relationship between Endometriosis and Infertility: The Impact on Sexuality and Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology 41(2):93–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2019.1659775 Lee, Patrick. 2004. The Human Body and Sexuality in the Teaching of Pope John Paul II. In John Paul II’s Contribution to Catholic Bioethics, edited by C. Tollefsen. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Levy, Barbara S. 2008. Modern Management of Uterine Fibroids. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 87(8):812–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340802146912 Leyland, Nicholas, Mathew Leonardi, Ally Murji, Sukhbir S. Singh, and Ayman Al-Hendy, Linda Bradley. 2022. A Call-to-Action for Clinicians to Implement Evidence-Based Best Practices When Caring for Women with Uterine Fibroids. Reproductive Sciences 29(4):1188–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-022-00877-3 Lin, Yiwen, Qian Ma, and Xiaoyu Wang et al. 2025. Shared Decision-Making on Fertility Preservation in Reproductive-Aged Women with Gynecological Cancer: A Qualitative Study of Patients’ and Health Care Professionals’ Perspectives. International Journal of Women’s Health 17(December):5155–5168. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S563769 Neis, K., W. Zubke, and T. Römer et al. 2016. Indications and Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/070, April 2015). Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 76 (04): 350–64. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-104288 Nik Hazlina, Nik, Mohd Noor Hussain, Ismail Shaiful Norhayati, Bahari, and Nik Ahmad Nik Muhammad Arif. 2022. Worldwide Prevalence, Risk Factors and Psychological Impact of Infertility among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. British Medical Journal Open 12(3):e057132. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057132 Riggan, Kirsten A., A. Elizabeth, E. Stewart, Joyce, Sateria Balls-Berry, Venable, and Megan A. Allyse. 2021. Patient Recommendations for Shared Decision-Making in Uterine Fibroid Treatment Decisions. Journal of Patient Experience 8(1–8):23743735211049655. https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735211049655 Saleeb, Maria, Fariba Mohtashami, and Anne Gadermann et al. 2023. Associations between Perceptions of Shared Decision Making and Health among Hysterectomy Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 162(3):1020–1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14802 Sarafis, Pavlos, Andreas Tsounis, and Maria Malliarou, Eleni Lahana. 2013. Disclosing the Truth: A Dilemma between Instilling Hope and Respecting Patient Autonomy in Everyday Clinical Practice. Global Journal of Health Science 6(2):p128. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n2p128 Schreurs, Anneke Margaretha Francisca. 2023. What Women with Endometriosis Want from Their Health Care Providers. Dr., Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.5463/thesis.217 Sgreccia, Emanuela. 2012. Personalist Bioethics: Foundations and Applications. The National Catholic Bioethics Center. Silberzweig, James, Daniel Powell, and Alan Matsumoto, James Spies. 2016. Management of Uterine Fibroids: A Focus on Uterine-Sparing Interventional Techniques. Radiology 280(3):675–692. Simionescu, Gabriela, Bogdan Doroftei, and Radu Maftei et al. 2021. The Complex Relationship between Infertility and Psychological Distress (Review). Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 21(4):306. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.9737 Sohn, Geum, SiHyun Seon, Yong Man Cho, and Kim et al. 2018. Current Medical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids. Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 61(2):192. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2018.61.2.192 Suhrabi, Zainab, Farnaz Farnam, and Abbas Ebadi. 2023. and Maryam Damghanian. Exploring the Concept of Female Identity in Reproductive Health: A Systematic Review. Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences 21 (2): 114–22. Telner, Deanna E., Difat Jakubovicz. 2007. Approach to Diagnosis and Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. Canadian Family Physician 53:58–64. Vioreanu, Ana-Maria. 2021. Psychological Impact of Infertility. Directions for the Development of Interventions. Mental Health: Global Challenges Journal 4(1). https://doi.org/10.32437/mhgcj.v4i1.113 Walsh, Sarah K., S. Elizabeth, Lisa Soleymani Ginsburg, Lehmann, and Ann H. Partridge. 2017. Oncofertility: Fertile Ground for Conflict Between Patient Autonomy and Medical Values. The Oncologist 22(7):860–863. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0373 Wierzbicki, Alfred Marek. 2020. The Person, Human Action and Morality as Seen in the Personalist Philosophy of Karol Wojtyła. Quién Revista de Filosofía Personalista 11:51–66. Wojtyła, Karol. 1993a. Problem of the Will in the Analysis of the Ethical Act. In Person and Community Selected Essays, translated by Theresa Sandok OSM. Peter Lang. Wojtyła, Karol. 1993b. Thomistic Personalism. In Person and Community Selected Essays, translated by Theresa Sandok OSM. Peter Lang. Wojtyła, Karol. 1993c. Subjectivity and the Irreducible in the Human Being. In Person and Community Selected Essays, translated by Theresa Sandok OSM. Peter Lang. Wojtyła, Karol. 2001. Love and Responsibility. Scientific Society of the Catholic University of Lublin. Wojtyła, Karol. 1979. The Acting Person. Translated by A. Potocki. D. Reidel Publishing Company. Yasmin, Ephia, Neerujah Balachandren, and Melanie C. Davies et al. 2018. Fertility Preservation for Medical Reasons in Girls and Women: British Fertility Society Policy and Practice Guideline. Human Fertility 21(1):3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2017.1422297

Acknowledgements

The author has no acknowledgments to declare. Funding The author received no funding for this study. The author has no funding to declare. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Ethics declarations Competing interests The author has no competing interests, financial or non-financial, to declare. Ethical approval This study does not involve any human participants, animals, or sensitive data requiring ethical approval. Therefore, ethical review and approval were not applicable. Additional information Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Nuqui, J.M.F.M., Duarte, K.L. Hope, fertility, and the ethics of clinical discernment: a personalist supplement to ethical decision-making in gynecological practice. Med Health Care and Philos (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-026-10379-7 Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-026-10379-7

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

MeSH descriptors

Decision Making Decision Making Decision Making Decision Making Fertility Fertility Fertility Gynecology Gynecology Gynecology Gynecology Decision Making, Shared Decision Making, Shared Decision Making, Shared Female Female Female Fertility Preservation Fertility Preservation Fertility Preservation

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

SciLite annotations

organisms 1
human

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-12T06:17:10.165071+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-12T06:10:29.290786+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-07-12T09:48:33.364277+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-12T06:33:14.382917+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine