A hierarchy of locomotion costs shapes optimal foraging strategy

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

*C. elegans* employs a hierarchical search strategy with planar locomotion and volumetric reorientations to achieve optimal volumetric coverage, driven by embodied constraints and action costs.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Animals must make decisions about how to move through their environment to find food, shelter and mates, yet the general principles underpinning effective search strategies remain poorly understood. Exploration patterns, such as alternating intensive local search with long-range relocation, are observed across many species, but whether these reflect universal organising principles, or are simply imposed by structured environments, is an open question. Here, we reconstruct hours of Caenorhabditis elegans foraging in homogeneous three-dimensional volumes and show that this animal achieves optimal volumetric coverage using a hierarchical search strategy of quasi-planar locomotion patches punctuated by costlier volumetric reorientations. We propose that underlying this cost hierarchy is the worm’s highly-constrained shape-space and show that despite being spanned by only five body-posture modes, it gives rise to effective locomotion, combining non-planar gaits, planar turns and three-dimensional reorientation manoeuvres. Our finding that action frequencies decay with inferred cost in a Boltzmann-like distribution is consistent with the Principle of Maximum Entropy: optimal search emerging from the tendency to maximise information gained subject to embodied constraints. This general principle offers a unifying framework to assess the optimality of animal decision-making, with implications for understanding nervous system function, foraging ecology, and the physics of living active matter.
Full text 1,663 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Animals must make decisions about how to move through their environment to find food, shelter and mates, yet the general principles underpinning effective search strategies remain poorly understood. Exploration patterns, such as alternating intensive local search with long-range relocation, are observed across many species, but whether these reflect universal organising principles, or are simply imposed by structured environments, is an open question. Here, we reconstruct hours of Caenorhabditis elegans foraging in homogeneous three-dimensional volumes and show that this animal achieves optimal volumetric coverage using a hierarchical search strategy of quasi-planar locomotion patches punctuated by costlier volumetric reorientations. We propose that underlying this cost hierarchy is the worm’s highly-constrained shape-space and show that despite being spanned by only five body-posture modes, it gives rise to effective locomotion, combining non-planar gaits, planar turns and three-dimensional reorientation manoeuvres. Our finding that action frequencies decay with inferred cost in a Boltzmann-like distribution is consistent with the Principle of Maximum Entropy: optimal search emerging from the tendency to maximise information gained subject to embodied constraints. This general principle offers a unifying framework to assess the optimality of animal decision-making, with implications for understanding nervous system function, foraging ecology, and the physics of living active matter. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes This revision corrects a typo in one of the author names.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0