Natural scene segmentation dynamics reveal iterative Bayesian inference

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The visual system operates by segmenting visual inputs into distinct perceptual objects. Segmentation is dynamic, as revealed by the tempo of perceptual choices and neural activity in visual cortex. Dynamics for natural stimuli however, are poorly understood because natural scene segmentation is ambiguous and subjective. We measured subjective human segmentation maps for natural images using an innovative paradigm, and uncovered richer spatiotemporal dynamics than predicted by current theories of segmentation. To explain these dynamics, we introduced Iterative Bayesian Inference algorithms for segmentation that iteratively integrate visual inputs with the prior expectation that objects are spatially compact. When visual inputs were consistent with such a spatial prior, iterative inference was faster. This predicted relationship between spatial prior and inferential dynamics was evident in our data, and correctly reflected each individual participant’s spatial biases. We conclude that iterative Bayesian inference sets the tempo for a fundamental function of natural vision.
Full text 1,175 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT The visual system operates by segmenting visual inputs into distinct perceptual objects. Segmentation is dynamic, as revealed by the tempo of perceptual choices and neural activity in visual cortex. Dynamics for natural stimuli however, are poorly understood because natural scene segmentation is ambiguous and subjective. We measured subjective human segmentation maps for natural images using an innovative paradigm, and uncovered richer spatiotemporal dynamics than predicted by current theories of segmentation. To explain these dynamics, we introduced Iterative Bayesian Inference algorithms for segmentation that iteratively integrate visual inputs with the prior expectation that objects are spatially compact. When visual inputs were consistent with such a spatial prior, iterative inference was faster. This predicted relationship between spatial prior and inferential dynamics was evident in our data, and correctly reflected each individual participant’s spatial biases. We conclude that iterative Bayesian inference sets the tempo for a fundamental function of natural vision. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0