Abstract
Most PhD graduates work in sectors beyond academia. However, only 15% of PhD students report discussing other-sector careers with supervisors. The extent to which supervisors feel capable, motivated and have the opportunity to provide support for academic versus other-sector careers is unknown. This project applied behaviour change theory (COM-B; Michie, van Stralen & West, 2011) to assess and compare PhD supervisors’ capability, opportunity and motivation to provide careers support to PhD students for academic versus other-sector careers. An online survey of 39 science-based PhD supervisors at a UK-based University assessed capability, opportunity and motivation to discuss and signpost students to University careers services for academic and other-sector careers (pre-registered: LINK [https://osf.io/hgwdq/]-ANONYMISED). Open-ended questions assessed barriers/enablers to providing support for other-sector careers. However, most reported no training on careers, were unaware of specific University careers resources, and less than one third thought there were sufficient reminders to discuss careers. Supervisors reported significantly greater confidence (_p_<.001), ease (_p_=.002) and enthusiasm (p=.03) to discuss academic careers compared to other-sector careers. Open-ended responses indicated that generally supervisors were motivated to support the career development of students for academic and other-sector careers, and that a quick supervisor guide would be useful. It is recommended that strategies which target supervisors’ capability (training, guide) and opportunity (e.g. reminders) to provide careers support to PhD students are adopted, to ensure students are sufficiently supported for careers within and beyond academia.
Full text
621 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version
{{ publication.field_name }}
{{ publication.subfield_name }}
Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information.
Listen on
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.