A randomized trial comparing monopolar electrodes using glycine 1.5% with two different types of bipolar electrodes (TCRis, Versapoint) using saline, in hysteroscopic surgery
article
OA: bronze
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary
This randomized trial compared monopolar electrodes with glycine to two bipolar electrodes with saline in hysteroscopic surgery to assess their performance.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
ObjectiveTo compare three types of equipment during hysteroscopic resection.DesignA randomized study.SettingWomen's clinic at Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.Patient(s)Two hundred premenopausal women with menorrhagia caused by dysfunctional bleedings, fibroids, or polyps.Intervention(s)Hysteroscopic resection was performed either with monopolar electrodes using glycine 1.5% as irrigant or with two different types of bipolar electrodes (TCRis; Olympus, Hamburg, Germany and Versapoint; Gynecare, Menlo Park, CA) using saline as irrigant.Main outcome measure(s)Change in serum sodium as a result of irrigant consumption, operating time, and amount of tissue removed.Result(s)A statistically significant reduction in mean serum sodium from 138.7 mmol/L to 133.8 mmol/L was seen in the monopolar group, compared with the case of the saline groups with no reduction. The amount of resected tissue in the monopolar and TCRis group was approximately 1.00 g/min, compared with 0.65 g/min in the Versapoint group. Loss of fluid during the procedure was significantly higher in the two bipolar groups.Conclusion(s)Bipolar electrodes appear to have a safer profile compared with monopolar electrodes because of the unchanged serum sodium. Irrigant consumption was significantly higher in the two bipolar groups, without any side effects during or after the procedure. Furthermore, the TCRis loop appears to be superior to the Versapoint loop, as regards operating time and amount of tissue removed.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (4)
- Endometrial Resection for the Treatment of Menorrhagia 1996
- Medical Research Council randomised trial of endometrial resection versus hysterectomy in management of menorrhagia 1997
- Endoscopic surgery for gynecologists 1998
- Hyperammonaemia after transcervical resection of the endometrium 1993
Cited by (1)
References (31)
- Endometrial Resection for the Treatment of Menorrhagia via openalex
- Endoscopic surgery for gynecologists via openalex
- Hyperammonaemia after transcervical resection of the endometrium via openalex
- Medical Research Council randomised trial of endometrial resection versus hysterectomy in management of menorrhagia via openalex
- W187947832 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/00016349109007889 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80132-x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0002-9378(95)90025-x via openalex
- W2471765550 via openalex
- W6603152611 via openalex
- W6607660975 via openalex
- W6661047562 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90507-x via openalex
- doi:10.1089/end.2005.19.333 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0976-0016(11)60091-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00146-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00000539-199505000-00035 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb16249.x via openalex
- doi:10.1136/bmj.300.6720.304 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.10.010 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/bmj.300.6720.305 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/00016349609054673 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03510100080037 via openalex
- doi:10.1213/00000539-199406000-00028 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.038 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(13)70273-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56268-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)51414-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70283-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70377-9 via openalex
- W74622494 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T05:49:40.447239+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK