The Assessment of Psychological Richness, Meaning, and Happiness with Social Media Text Data: Predictive Accuracy and Distinct Behavioral Correlates

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

Assessing well-being with social media text data is a promising method, but besides hedonic well-being, little is known about whether additional well-being dimensions, such as psychological richness and eudaimonic well-being, can be predicted from such data. We compare the predictive accuracy for hedonic well-being, eudaimonic well-being, and the recently proposed construct of psychological richness in a large sample of Facebook users (n = 2,644), and find that the inclusion of language features incrementally improved model prediction accuracy beyond demographic features for psychological richness, but not for hedonic or eudaimonic well-being. Psychological richness had the lowest overall prediction accuracy (r = .21) followed by hedonic well-being (r = .27) and eudaimonic well-being (r = .29). The linguistic features associated with Psychological Richness were face valid, and in many instances the content and direction of the associations were unique to Psychological Richness, which provides discriminant validity evidence.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-30T02:00:01.510937+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0