Doctors’ Perception on Patients: Dynamics of Relationships and Challenges in a Peripheral Hospital in Bangladesh

Doctors’ Perception on Patients: Dynamics of Relationships and Challenges in a Peripheral Hospital in Bangladesh | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Doctors’ Perception on Patients: Dynamics of Relationships and Challenges in a Peripheral Hospital in Bangladesh Md. Mamun Ur Rashid This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6383931/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This ethnographic study explores how doctors perceive patients in a rural government hospital in Bangladesh and how such perceptions influence clinical interaction. Conducted at Tetulia Upazila Health Complex in Panchagarh, one of the country’s most remote subdistricts the study uncovers how systemic pressures, institutional norms, and cultural assumptions shape the dynamics of the doctor-patient relationship. Drawing from in-depth interviews and field observation, it reveals that doctors often see patients through a lens of frustration and mistrust, while simultaneously expressing compassion and professional commitment. This paper argues that to improve patient-centered care in Bangladesh, it is vital to address both interpersonal and structural challenges within the healthcare system. Doctor-patient relationship rural healthcare perception bureaucracy Bangladesh medical anthropology 1. Introduction Doctors are often positioned as clinical authorities in healthcare systems, but their capacity to offer empathetic care is deeply influenced by institutional and cultural contexts. In low-resource settings like rural Bangladesh, doctors are burdened not only by high caseloads and bureaucratic demands but also by their own perceptions of patients’ perceptions that shape their clinical behavior and emotional engagement. While studies in Bangladesh have examined patients’ dissatisfaction with healthcare delivery (Islam, 1996 ), fewer have interrogated the perceptions held by doctors themselves. Understanding these perceptions can illuminate the underlying tensions in clinical care and offer new directions for improving public health services. This study investigates how doctors stationed in a rural hospital in Tetulia, Panchagarh, perceive their patients and how such perceptions affect their practices and attitudes. 2. Literature Review Anthropological work on the clinical encounter highlights that the doctor-patient relationship is never neutral—it is shaped by cultural scripts, institutional logics, and power hierarchies (Kleinman, 1980 ; Cassell, 1976 ). In many health systems, especially in the Global South, doctors occupy an ambivalent position, caught between biomedical authority and humanistic caregiving (Landy, 1977 ; Press, 1980 ). Kleinman ( 1980 ) introduced the idea of “explanatory models,” showing that patients and doctors often operate with differing understandings of illness. When these models clash, miscommunication and dissatisfaction emerge. Eisenberg ( 1977 ) emphasized the gap between the professional concept of disease and the lay concept of illness, suggesting that medical systems often fail to acknowledge patients’ lived experiences. In Bangladesh, Khaleda Islam’s ( 1996 ) study on patient opinions about government hospitals revealed that many patients feel disrespected or neglected experiences that shape their trust in the system. At the same time, Jalal and Nahar ( 1994 ) found that rural health providers, though overburdened, often lack training in communication or cultural sensitivity. These conditions exacerbate social distance between providers and patients. Foucault’s ( 1975 ) insights into the medical gaze and bureaucratic control also help contextualize how doctors' authority is reinforced and challenged in clinical spaces. Within hierarchical and resource-strained public institutions, doctors may develop defensive postures, often perceiving patients as noncompliant, ungrateful, or excessively demanding. 3. Methodology 3.1 Field Site and Duration The research was conducted over a three-month period in 2015 at Tetulia Upazila Health Complex , located in the Panchagarh district Bangladesh’s northernmost administrative region. This facility serves thousands monthly despite chronic shortages of staff, equipment, and medicines. 3.2 Data Collection Methods In-depth interviews with 7 doctors (including male and female practitioners, RMOs, and MOs) Participant observation in consultation rooms, corridors, wards, and informal staff settings Informal discussions and case shadowing Field diary documenting doctors’ comments, body language, interruptions, and patient flow 3.3 Analysis Thematic analysis was used, with coding informed by Kleinman’s explanatory model framework and critical medical anthropology. Key themes were triangulated across interviews and observations. 4. Findings with Integrated Literature 4.1 Patients as “Emotionally Reactive” and “Medically Uninformed” Doctors frequently described patients as lacking medical literacy and being overly emotional. Many referred to patients’ tendency to "demand unnecessary medicine" or “exaggerate minor symptoms.” These views resonate with Eisenberg’s ( 1977 ) distinction between biomedical and experiential framings of illness. The lack of shared understanding contributes to clinical distancing. “They come with stomachaches and expect antibiotics. If we say rest and hydration, they think we’re doing nothing,” said one doctor. This reflects a disjunction of explanatory models (Kleinman, 1980 ), where patients’ expectations of visible, material interventions conflict with medical minimalism. 4.2 Emotional Fatigue and the Collapse of Empathy Doctors expressed a desire to care, but admitted that burnout and emotional fatigue reduce their ability to remain empathetic. Overwhelming patient loads 60 to 100 patients per shift left little room for reflective engagement. “Even if you want to listen, there’s no time. You become numb,” noted a senior RMO. This echoes Cassell’s ( 1976 ) argument that the relational dimension of healing is often lost under bureaucratic pressure. Doctors, as caregivers, become emotionally fragmented in high-volume settings. 4.3 Bureaucratic and Structural Constraints Doctors were quick to point out systemic failures: inadequate drugs, outdated facilities, staff shortages, and managerial micromanagement. Foucault’s ( 1975 ) notion of the “bureaucratized body” is evident here where doctors themselves are subject to disciplinary routines that curtail autonomy. “We are blamed when medicine runs out, but we have no control over procurement,” said one junior doctor. This creates a defensive mindset, where patients are seen less as partners in care and more as challengers of professional legitimacy. 4.4 Social Distance and Hierarchies The class and educational divide between doctors and most patients in Tetulia were significant. Patients, often poor and with limited schooling, were viewed as “child-like” or “ignorant.” Conversely, elite patients were seen as demanding and entitled. Gendered assumptions also played a role. Female patients were described as shy or non-compliant, often viewed with paternalistic concern rather than clinical neutrality. Such perceptions reflect what Landy ( 1977 ) and Press ( 1980 ) termed “medical othering” where patients are seen not as equal participants but as subjects to be managed. 5. Discussion The findings of this study illuminate a layered and complex picture of how doctors in rural Bangladesh, particularly at Tetulia Upazila Health Complex, perceive and engage with patients. These perceptions are far from homogenous—they reflect a tension between professional ideals and ground-level constraints, shaped both by institutional pressures and socio-cultural distance. 5.1 Systemic Pressure and Emotional Detachment Doctors in this study oscillated between empathy and frustration. While some expressed genuine concern for patients' well-being, many acknowledged that heavy patient loads and insufficient time eroded their ability to offer quality care. This echoes Cassell’s (1976) argument that healing requires emotional engagement, not just clinical competence but in practice, the bureaucratic burden discourages such connection. A doctor facing 80–100 patients a day may default to brief, transactional interactions, contributing to patient dissatisfaction. Drawing on Foucault’s (1975) notion of the medical gaze, we see how institutional structures frame patients as “cases” to be managed, rather than people with lived realities. The public health system inadvertently encourages this depersonalization doctors are held accountable for numbers, not narratives. 5.2 Perceptions of Patient Behavior: Trust and Moral Judgement The narrative of patients being “ignorant,” “uncooperative,” or “excessively emotional” frequently surfaced. This aligns with Eisenberg’s (1977) disease-illness dichotomy and Kleinman’s (1980) concept of clashing explanatory models. Many doctors felt patients misunderstood the purpose of prescriptions or expected immediate pharmaceutical solutions, even when unwarranted. However, such perceptions may obscure deeper systemic failures such as poor health literacy stemming from lack of public education or community health engagement. Furthermore, Chapter 7 reflects how some doctors interpret patient behavior through a moral lens. They see patients not just as medically uninformed but also as socially undisciplined or lacking gratitude. These judgments reflect the medical habitus (Bourdieu, 1990) internalized through professional training and class position, reinforcing emotional distance. 5.3 Doctors as Bureaucratic Subjects Doctors are not just providers—they are also subjects within a hierarchical, under-resourced, and often punitive bureaucracy. Many respondents, as reflected in your thesis, expressed frustration over being blamed for medicine shortages, equipment failure, or procedural delays they do not control. This aligns with what Elizabeth (2001) frames in her systemic model of care quality : organizational structure, resource flows, and control variables heavily influence both staff and patient outcomes. In this system, doctors develop survival strategies: limiting interaction, following rigid routines, or emotionally distancing themselves. While this protects the provider, it inadvertently harms the patient experience and increases alienation. As your field insights suggest, doctors may even feel “punished” for showing compassion, as emotional labor goes unrecognized in formal assessments. 5.4 Gender, Class, and Patient Stereotyping Doctors' views of patients were also shaped by gendered and classed perceptions. Female patients were often seen as timid or hesitant yet their silence may result from structural barriers like lack of transport, financial dependence, or fear of stigma. Similarly, doctors were more critical of “entitled” patients from elite backgrounds who questioned clinical decisions, despite these patients often being more informed. This power imbalance reinforces a top-down model of care , where the ideal patient is passive, grateful, and deferential. When this script is disrupted by skepticism, alternative beliefs, or emotion—doctors may respond with authority rather than empathy. 5.5 Toward a Contextualized Understanding of Quality Care Integrating your reflections from Elizabeth’s (2001) care quality framework and the System Approach , the study supports the notion that care outcomes are not merely determined by clinical skill but by how care is organized, perceived, and enacted. The interaction between organizational structures , doctors' perspectives , and patients’ expectations produces a lived experience of healthcare that cannot be reduced to inputs and outputs. If doctors view patients as irrational or inconvenient, and patients view doctors as rushed or arrogant, the relationship becomes adversarial rather than therapeutic. To bridge this gap, we need to humanize both sides of the encounter. 6. Recommendations Mandate training on communication and cultural competence in MBBS and in-service medical curricula. Introduce structured time for reflection and supervision for doctors, particularly those in high-pressure rural postings. Improve material support (housing, bonuses, career incentives) for doctors in peripheral facilities to reduce stress and burnout. Establish patient feedback systems to promote mutual understanding and accountability. Bridge doctor-patient gaps through community health mediators or trained social workers, particularly for gender-sensitive communication. 7. Conclusion The doctor-patient relationship in Tetulia is shaped by more than clinical expertise—it is defined by cultural expectations, institutional hierarchies, and emotional survival strategies. By exploring how doctors perceive their patients, this study sheds light on a critical but often ignored facet of healthcare delivery: the moral and emotional labor of caregiving under constraint. A reorientation toward empathetic, inclusive, and reflective clinical practice is urgently needed in Bangladesh’s public health system. Declarations Author Contribution This manuscript is based on my original academic thesis work. I, Md. Mamunur Rashid, confirm that I solely conducted all aspects of the research, including the development of the research proposal, literature review, ethnographic data collection, transcription, data analysis, interpretation, and manuscript writing. No external assistance was used in the conceptual or analytical components of this study. The work presented is entirely my own and has not been published or submitted elsewhere. Clinical trial number: not applicable Ethics Approval Statement: This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the Department of Anthropology, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh, in 2014. All research participants provided informed consent prior to participation. References Cassell, E. J. (1976). The healer’s art: A new approach to the doctor-patient relationship . Lippincott. Eisenberg, L. (1977). Disease and illness: Distinctions between professional and popular ideas of sickness. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 1 (1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114809 Elizabeth, B. (2001). Organizational influences on quality care. In B. Elizabeth & C. Leatt (Eds.), Managing Health Services (pp. 150–175). Open University Press. Foucault, M. (1975). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception (A. M. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published in 1963) Islam, K. K. (1996). Patients’ opinions regarding the quality of medical care in a government hospital (Unpublished MPH thesis). National Institute of Preventive and Social Medicine (NIPSOM), Dhaka. Jalal, S., & Nahar, A. (1994). Anthropology of health and illness: Bangladesh perspective. The Jahangirnagar Review , XV–XVIII. Kleinman, A. (1980). Patients and healers in the context of culture: An exploration of the borderland between anthropology, medicine, and psychiatry . University of California Press. Landy, D. (1977). Culture, disease, and healing: Studies in medical anthropology . Macmillan Publishing. Press, I. (1980). Problems in the definition and classification of medical systems. Social Science & Medicine. Part B: Medical Anthropology, 14 (1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7987(80)90005-5 Sen, A., & Sengupta, S. (1983). Malnutrition of rural children and the sex bias. Economic and Political Weekly , 18(19/21), 855–864. https://www.epw.in/journal/1983/19-21 Webster, C., & Anderson, I. (2001). Applying a systems approach to health services. In Managing Health Services (pp. 100–125). Open University Press. Islam, K. K. (1996). Patients' Opinions Regarding the Quality of Medical Care. MPH Thesis, NIPSOM. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6383931","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":440527563,"identity":"a9d3afba-db51-4b43-adab-6996e49c8c57","order_by":0,"name":"Md. Mamun Ur Rashid","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Jahangirnagar University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Md.","middleName":"Mamun Ur","lastName":"Rashid","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-04-05 21:38:10","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6383931/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6383931/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":80404735,"identity":"f90d07df-e5d2-4980-9c1d-7fc45e3939b1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-11 14:32:05","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":863005,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6383931/v1/2656b1a8-42a5-4dd3-891e-9a5468cca463.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Doctors’ Perception on Patients: Dynamics of Relationships and Challenges in a Peripheral Hospital in Bangladesh","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eDoctors are often positioned as clinical authorities in healthcare systems, but their capacity to offer empathetic care is deeply influenced by institutional and cultural contexts. In low-resource settings like rural Bangladesh, doctors are burdened not only by high caseloads and bureaucratic demands but also by their own perceptions of patients\u0026rsquo; perceptions that shape their clinical behavior and emotional engagement.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhile studies in Bangladesh have examined patients\u0026rsquo; dissatisfaction with healthcare delivery (Islam, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e), fewer have interrogated the perceptions held by doctors themselves. Understanding these perceptions can illuminate the underlying tensions in clinical care and offer new directions for improving public health services. This study investigates how doctors stationed in a rural hospital in Tetulia, Panchagarh, perceive their patients and how such perceptions affect their practices and attitudes.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. Literature Review","content":"\u003cp\u003eAnthropological work on the clinical encounter highlights that the doctor-patient relationship is never neutral\u0026mdash;it is shaped by cultural scripts, institutional logics, and power hierarchies (Kleinman, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1980\u003c/span\u003e; Cassell, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1976\u003c/span\u003e). In many health systems, especially in the Global South, doctors occupy an ambivalent position, caught between biomedical authority and humanistic caregiving (Landy, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1977\u003c/span\u003e; Press, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1980\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eKleinman (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1980\u003c/span\u003e) introduced the idea of \u0026ldquo;explanatory models,\u0026rdquo; showing that patients and doctors often operate with differing understandings of illness. When these models clash, miscommunication and dissatisfaction emerge. Eisenberg (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1977\u003c/span\u003e) emphasized the gap between the professional concept of disease and the lay concept of illness, suggesting that medical systems often fail to acknowledge patients\u0026rsquo; lived experiences.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn Bangladesh, Khaleda Islam\u0026rsquo;s (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e) study on patient opinions about government hospitals revealed that many patients feel disrespected or neglected experiences that shape their trust in the system. At the same time, Jalal and Nahar (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1994\u003c/span\u003e) found that rural health providers, though overburdened, often lack training in communication or cultural sensitivity. These conditions exacerbate social distance between providers and patients.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFoucault\u0026rsquo;s (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1975\u003c/span\u003e) insights into the medical gaze and bureaucratic control also help contextualize how doctors' authority is reinforced and challenged in clinical spaces. Within hierarchical and resource-strained public institutions, doctors may develop defensive postures, often perceiving patients as noncompliant, ungrateful, or excessively demanding.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"3. Methodology","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.1 Field Site and Duration\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe research was conducted over a three-month period in 2015 at \u003cstrong\u003eTetulia Upazila Health Complex\u003c/strong\u003e, located in the Panchagarh district Bangladesh’s northernmost administrative region. This facility serves thousands monthly despite chronic shortages of staff, equipment, and medicines.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.2 Data Collection Methods\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul type=\"disc\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIn-depth interviews\u003c/strong\u003e with 7 doctors (including male and female practitioners, RMOs, and MOs)\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eParticipant observation\u003c/strong\u003e in consultation rooms, corridors, wards, and informal staff settings\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInformal discussions and case shadowing\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eField diary\u003c/strong\u003e documenting doctors’ comments, body language, interruptions, and patient flow\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.3 Analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThematic analysis was used, with coding informed by Kleinman’s explanatory model framework and critical medical anthropology. Key themes were triangulated across interviews and observations.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"4. Findings with Integrated Literature","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1 Patients as \u0026ldquo;Emotionally Reactive\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;Medically Uninformed\u0026rdquo;\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eDoctors frequently described patients as lacking medical literacy and being overly emotional. Many referred to patients\u0026rsquo; tendency to \"demand unnecessary medicine\" or \u0026ldquo;exaggerate minor symptoms.\u0026rdquo; These views resonate with Eisenberg\u0026rsquo;s (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1977\u003c/span\u003e) distinction between biomedical and experiential framings of illness. The lack of shared understanding contributes to clinical distancing.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003e\u0026ldquo;They come with stomachaches and expect antibiotics. If we say rest and hydration, they think we\u0026rsquo;re doing nothing,\u0026rdquo;\u003c/b\u003e said one doctor.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis reflects a disjunction of explanatory models (Kleinman, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1980\u003c/span\u003e), where patients\u0026rsquo; expectations of visible, material interventions conflict with medical minimalism.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.2 Emotional Fatigue and the Collapse of Empathy\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eDoctors expressed a desire to care, but admitted that burnout and emotional fatigue reduce their ability to remain empathetic. Overwhelming patient loads 60 to 100 patients per shift left little room for reflective engagement.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003e\u0026ldquo;Even if you want to listen, there\u0026rsquo;s no time. You become numb,\u0026rdquo;\u003c/b\u003e noted a senior RMO.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis echoes Cassell\u0026rsquo;s (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1976\u003c/span\u003e) argument that the relational dimension of healing is often lost under bureaucratic pressure. Doctors, as caregivers, become emotionally fragmented in high-volume settings.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.3 Bureaucratic and Structural Constraints\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eDoctors were quick to point out systemic failures: inadequate drugs, outdated facilities, staff shortages, and managerial micromanagement. Foucault\u0026rsquo;s (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1975\u003c/span\u003e) notion of the \u0026ldquo;bureaucratized body\u0026rdquo; is evident here where doctors themselves are subject to disciplinary routines that curtail autonomy.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003e\u0026ldquo;We are blamed when medicine runs out, but we have no control over procurement,\u0026rdquo;\u003c/b\u003e said one junior doctor.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis creates a defensive mindset, where patients are seen less as partners in care and more as challengers of professional legitimacy.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.4 Social Distance and Hierarchies\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe class and educational divide between doctors and most patients in Tetulia were significant. Patients, often poor and with limited schooling, were viewed as \u0026ldquo;child-like\u0026rdquo; or \u0026ldquo;ignorant.\u0026rdquo; Conversely, elite patients were seen as demanding and entitled.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGendered assumptions also played a role. Female patients were described as shy or non-compliant, often viewed with paternalistic concern rather than clinical neutrality.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSuch perceptions reflect what Landy (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1977\u003c/span\u003e) and Press (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1980\u003c/span\u003e) termed \u0026ldquo;medical othering\u0026rdquo; where patients are seen not as equal participants but as subjects to be managed.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"5. Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe findings of this study illuminate a layered and complex picture of how doctors in rural Bangladesh, particularly at Tetulia Upazila Health Complex, perceive and engage with patients. These perceptions are far from homogenous—they reflect a tension between professional ideals and ground-level constraints, shaped both by institutional pressures and socio-cultural distance.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e5.1 Systemic Pressure and Emotional Detachment\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoctors in this study oscillated between empathy and frustration. While some expressed genuine concern for patients' well-being, many acknowledged that heavy patient loads and insufficient time eroded their ability to offer quality care. This echoes \u003cstrong\u003eCassell’s (1976)\u003c/strong\u003e argument that healing requires emotional engagement, not just clinical competence but in practice, the bureaucratic burden discourages such connection. A doctor facing 80–100 patients a day may default to brief, transactional interactions, contributing to patient dissatisfaction.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDrawing on \u003cstrong\u003eFoucault’s (1975)\u003c/strong\u003e notion of the medical gaze, we see how institutional structures frame patients as “cases” to be managed, rather than people with lived realities. The public health system inadvertently encourages this depersonalization doctors are held accountable for numbers, not narratives.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e5.2 Perceptions of Patient Behavior: Trust and Moral Judgement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe narrative of patients being “ignorant,” “uncooperative,” or “excessively emotional” frequently surfaced. This aligns with \u003cstrong\u003eEisenberg’s (1977)\u003c/strong\u003e disease-illness dichotomy and \u003cstrong\u003eKleinman’s (1980)\u003c/strong\u003e concept of clashing explanatory models. Many doctors felt patients misunderstood the purpose of prescriptions or expected immediate pharmaceutical solutions, even when unwarranted. However, such perceptions may obscure deeper systemic failures such as poor health literacy stemming from lack of public education or community health engagement.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFurthermore, Chapter 7 reflects how some doctors interpret patient behavior through a moral lens. They see patients not just as medically uninformed but also as socially undisciplined or lacking gratitude. These judgments reflect the \u003cstrong\u003emedical habitus\u003c/strong\u003e (Bourdieu, 1990) internalized through professional training and class position, reinforcing emotional distance.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e5.3 Doctors as Bureaucratic Subjects\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoctors are not just providers—they are also subjects within a hierarchical, under-resourced, and often punitive bureaucracy. Many respondents, as reflected in your thesis, expressed frustration over being blamed for medicine shortages, equipment failure, or procedural delays they do not control. This aligns with what Elizabeth (2001) frames in her \u003cstrong\u003esystemic model of care quality\u003c/strong\u003e: organizational structure, resource flows, and control variables heavily influence both staff and patient outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn this system, doctors develop survival strategies: limiting interaction, following rigid routines, or emotionally distancing themselves. While this protects the provider, it inadvertently harms the patient experience and increases alienation. As your field insights suggest, doctors may even feel “punished” for showing compassion, as emotional labor goes unrecognized in formal assessments.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e5.4 Gender, Class, and Patient Stereotyping\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoctors' views of patients were also shaped by gendered and classed perceptions. Female patients were often seen as timid or hesitant yet their silence may result from structural barriers like lack of transport, financial dependence, or fear of stigma. Similarly, doctors were more critical of “entitled” patients from elite backgrounds who questioned clinical decisions, despite these patients often being more informed.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis power imbalance reinforces a \u003cstrong\u003etop-down model of care\u003c/strong\u003e, where the ideal patient is passive, grateful, and deferential. When this script is disrupted by skepticism, alternative beliefs, or emotion—doctors may respond with authority rather than empathy.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e5.5 Toward a Contextualized Understanding of Quality Care\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIntegrating your reflections from \u003cstrong\u003eElizabeth’s (2001)\u003c/strong\u003e care quality framework and the \u003cstrong\u003eSystem Approach\u003c/strong\u003e, the study supports the notion that care outcomes are not merely determined by clinical skill but by how care is organized, perceived, and enacted. The interaction between \u003cstrong\u003eorganizational structures\u003c/strong\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003edoctors' perspectives\u003c/strong\u003e, and \u003cstrong\u003epatients’ expectations\u003c/strong\u003e produces a lived experience of healthcare that cannot be reduced to inputs and outputs.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIf doctors view patients as irrational or inconvenient, and patients view doctors as rushed or arrogant, the relationship becomes adversarial rather than therapeutic. To bridge this gap, we need to humanize both sides of the encounter.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"6. Recommendations","content":"\u003col start=\"1\" type=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMandate training on communication and cultural competence\u003c/strong\u003e in MBBS and in-service medical curricula.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIntroduce structured time for reflection and supervision\u003c/strong\u003e for doctors, particularly those in high-pressure rural postings.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eImprove material support\u003c/strong\u003e (housing, bonuses, career incentives) for doctors in peripheral facilities to reduce stress and burnout.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEstablish patient feedback systems\u003c/strong\u003e to promote mutual understanding and accountability.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBridge doctor-patient gaps through community health mediators\u003c/strong\u003e or trained social workers, particularly for gender-sensitive communication.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"7. Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe doctor-patient relationship in Tetulia is shaped by more than clinical expertise—it is defined by cultural expectations, institutional hierarchies, and emotional survival strategies. By exploring how doctors perceive their patients, this study sheds light on a critical but often ignored facet of healthcare delivery: the moral and emotional labor of caregiving under constraint. A reorientation toward empathetic, inclusive, and reflective clinical practice is urgently needed in Bangladesh’s public health system.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis manuscript is based on my original academic thesis work. I, Md. Mamunur Rashid, confirm that I solely conducted all aspects of the research, including the development of the research proposal, literature review, ethnographic data collection, transcription, data analysis, interpretation, and manuscript writing. No external assistance was used in the conceptual or analytical components of this study. The work presented is entirely my own and has not been published or submitted elsewhere.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eClinical trial number: not applicable\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEthics Approval Statement: This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the Department of Anthropology, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh, in 2014. All research participants provided informed consent prior to participation.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCassell, E. J. (1976). \u003cem\u003eThe healer\u0026rsquo;s art: A new approach to the doctor-patient relationship\u003c/em\u003e. Lippincott.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eEisenberg, L. (1977). Disease and illness: Distinctions between professional and popular ideas of sickness. \u003cem\u003eCulture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 1\u003c/em\u003e(1), 9\u0026ndash;23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114809\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eElizabeth, B. (2001). Organizational influences on quality care. In B. Elizabeth \u0026amp; C. Leatt (Eds.), \u003cem\u003eManaging Health Services\u003c/em\u003e (pp. 150\u0026ndash;175). Open University Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFoucault, M. (1975). \u003cem\u003eThe birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception\u003c/em\u003e (A. M. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published in 1963)\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eIslam, K. K. (1996). \u003cem\u003ePatients\u0026rsquo; opinions regarding the quality of medical care in a government hospital\u003c/em\u003e (Unpublished MPH thesis). National Institute of Preventive and Social Medicine (NIPSOM), Dhaka.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eJalal, S., \u0026amp; Nahar, A. (1994). Anthropology of health and illness: Bangladesh perspective. \u003cem\u003eThe Jahangirnagar Review\u003c/em\u003e, XV\u0026ndash;XVIII.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKleinman, A. (1980). \u003cem\u003ePatients and healers in the context of culture: An exploration of the borderland between anthropology, medicine, and psychiatry\u003c/em\u003e. University of California Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLandy, D. (1977). \u003cem\u003eCulture, disease, and healing: Studies in medical anthropology\u003c/em\u003e. Macmillan Publishing.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePress, I. (1980). Problems in the definition and classification of medical systems. \u003cem\u003eSocial Science \u0026amp; Medicine. Part B: Medical Anthropology, 14\u003c/em\u003e(1), 45\u0026ndash;57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7987(80)90005-5\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSen, A., \u0026amp; Sengupta, S. (1983). Malnutrition of rural children and the sex bias. \u003cem\u003eEconomic and Political Weekly\u003c/em\u003e, 18(19/21), 855\u0026ndash;864. https://www.epw.in/journal/1983/19-21\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWebster, C., \u0026amp; Anderson, I. (2001). Applying a systems approach to health services. In \u003cem\u003eManaging Health Services\u003c/em\u003e (pp. 100\u0026ndash;125). Open University Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eIslam, K. K. (1996). Patients\u0026apos; Opinions Regarding the Quality of Medical Care. MPH Thesis, NIPSOM.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Doctor-patient relationship, rural healthcare, perception, bureaucracy, Bangladesh, medical anthropology","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6383931/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6383931/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThis ethnographic study explores how doctors perceive patients in a rural government hospital in Bangladesh and how such perceptions influence clinical interaction. Conducted at Tetulia Upazila Health Complex in Panchagarh, one of the country\u0026rsquo;s most remote subdistricts the study uncovers how systemic pressures, institutional norms, and cultural assumptions shape the dynamics of the doctor-patient relationship. Drawing from in-depth interviews and field observation, it reveals that doctors often see patients through a lens of frustration and mistrust, while simultaneously expressing compassion and professional commitment. This paper argues that to improve patient-centered care in Bangladesh, it is vital to address both interpersonal and structural challenges within the healthcare system.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Doctors’ Perception on Patients: Dynamics of Relationships and Challenges in a Peripheral Hospital in Bangladesh","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-04-10 04:54:32","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6383931/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"2b280684-8988-4886-8bf9-384ae40cfea7","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 10th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-04-11T14:23:53+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-04-10 04:54:32","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6383931","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6383931","identity":"rs-6383931","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}