Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Pouch of Douglas Obliteration
This paper describes the pouch of Douglas and explains that its obliteration is often caused by adhesions from endometriosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, or surgery, with partial obliteration possible.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This chapter describes the pouch of Douglas (POD) and how complete POD obliteration is defined on imaging as the point at which the peritoneum between the posterior cervix and anterior rectum is no longer visible, most often due to adhesions. It explains that POD obliteration is commonly associated with endometriosis-related deep nodules and discusses alternative causes such as pelvic inflammatory disease scarring, prior surgery, or extensive ovarian/peritoneal endometriosis, including unilateral or partial obliteration when some peritoneum remains visible. A key sonographic concept highlighted is the use of transvaginal ultrasound “sliding signs” (positive vs negative) between adjacent structures, with references to studies that have evaluated prediction models and reproducibility, while implicitly acknowledging learning curves and operator-dependent variability. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it focuses on ultrasound evaluation of POD obliteration and its relationship to deep infiltrating endometriosis-related adhesions.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
5,782 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (9)
- Can anyone screen for deep infiltrating endometriosis with transvaginal ultrasound? via openalex
- Is Pouch of Douglas Obliteration a Marker of Bowel Endometriosis? via openalex
- Learning curve for the detection of pouch of Douglas obliteration and deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum via openalex
- OP34.04: Accuracy of different imaging techniques to assess <scp>POD</scp> obliteration: a systematic review and meta‐analysis via openalex
- Prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration in women with suspected endometriosis using a new real-time dynamic transvaginal ultrasound technique: the sliding sign via openalex
- Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group via openalex
- The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility via openalex
- Uterine sliding sign: a simple sonographic predictor for presence of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum via openalex
- W1899096956 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00