Evaluation of ChIC-based data requires normalization that properly retains signal-to-noise ratios

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Several chromatin immunocleavage-based (ChIC) methods using Tn5 transposase have been developed to profile histone modifications and transcription factors bindings 1-5 . A recent preprint by Wang et al. raised potential concerns that these methods are prone to open chromatin bias 6 . While the authors are appreciated for alerting the community for this issue, it has been previously described and discussed by Henikoff and colleagues in the original CUT&Tag paper 3,7 . However, as described for CUT&Tag 3 , the signal-to-noise ratio is essential for Tn5-based profiling methods and all antibody-based enrichment assays. Based on this notion, we would like to point out a major analysis issue in Wang et al. that caused a complete loss or dramatic reduction of enrichment at true targets for datasets generated by Tn5-based methods, which in turn artificially enhanced the relative enrichment of potential open chromatin bias. Such analysis issue is caused by distinct background normalizations used towards ChIP-based (chromatin immunoprecipitation) data and Tn5-based data in Wang et al. Only the normalization for Tn5-based data, but not ChIP-seq based data, yielded such effects. Distortion of such signal-to-noise ratio would consequently lead to misleading results.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-30T02:00:01.510937+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0