Ovarian suppression induced with Buserelin or danazol in the management of endometriosis: a randomized, comparative study

rct OA: closed public-domain-us
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-22 ⓘ

This randomized study compared Buserelin and danazol for endometriosis management, finding similar ovarian suppression, clinical improvement, lesion regression, and side effects despite differing impacts on HDL-cholesterol and androgenic adverse events.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The effectiveness of Buserelin (Hoechst-Roussel Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Somerville, NJ) (0.2 mg subcutaneously [SC] or 1.2 mg intranasally [IN] per day) and danazol (800 mg per day) in inducing ovarian suppression for the management of endometriosis was compared in a prospective randomized study. During 6 months of treatment, peripheral follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and estradiol concentrations were suppressed to a similar degree in both groups. Symptomatic improvement and laparoscopically assessed regression of endometriotic lesions also were comparable. After treatment, 8 of 18 infertile women treated with Buserelin and 5 of 8 treated with danazol conceived. General and hypoestrogenic side effects were similar in both groups, while androgenic and anabolic were more frequent with danazol. High density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol increased in the Buserelin and decreased in the danazol group. The study indicates that at the dose tested, buserelin and danazol induce a similar degree of ovarian suppression resulting in a comparable clinical improvement and regression of endometriotic lesions.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Buserelin Danazol Endometriosis Ovary Pelvic Neoplasms Pregnadienes Adult Buserelin Buserelin Danazol Danazol Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Hormones Hormones Humans Menstruation Menstruation Ovary

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-01T06:15:55.914501+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:09:15.954262+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-17T06:32:46.214484+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine