Patient Preferences Regarding the Cervix, Ovaries, and Fallopian Tubes at the Time of Hysterectomy: A Qualitative Study [ID 2683453]

In: Obstetrics & Gynecology · 2024 · vol. 143(5S) , pp. 23S–24S · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0001013168.02347.9d · W4396947000
article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-08-04 ⓘ

This qualitative study found that many patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions lacked knowledge about organ removal options and often prioritized symptom relief and long-term consequences over immediate surgical risks.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although hysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in the United States, preoperative patient counseling regarding removal or preservation of the cervix, fallopian tubes, and ovaries during benign hysterectomy is far from standardized. We aimed to understand patients' preexisting values, beliefs, and preferences regarding removal or preservation of the cervix, ovaries, and fallopian tubes at the time of benign hysterectomy. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study using semistructured interview of patients referred for benign hysterectomy with a minimally invasive gynecologic surgery division. Participants were recruited according to prespecified diversity axes. The interview guide was informed by literature review, expert stakeholders, and pilot testing. Telephone interviews occurred prior to their scheduled consultation with a surgeon. Responses were analyzed for themes using Rapid and Rigorous Data Qualitative Analysis. IRB approval was obtained. RESULTS: Age of participants (n=13) ranged from 24 to 60. Participants reported their race as non-Hispanic White (n=6), non-Hispanic Black (n=3), Hispanic (n=2), and multiracial or another race (n=2). Participants reported use of commercial insurance (n=8), Medicaid/Medicare (n=2), or self-pay/financial assistance (n=3). Identified themes included knowledge, decision making, treatment goals, short- and long-term consequences, fertility, identity, and lack of concern. Many participants expressed lacking necessary knowledge of the risks and benefits of removing the cervix and adnexa. Treatment goals included symptom relief and definitive treatment. Long-term consequences included concerns about menopause and future cancer. CONCLUSION: Prior to counseling, many patients express some degree of lack of knowledge, desire to remove most or all pelvic structures, and no attachment to their reproductive organs. Many patients expressed making decisions based on how organ removal will relieve current symptoms and long-term consequences, rather than immediate surgical risk, which can inform patient-centered counseling by their surgeon.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-08T06:33:43.470499+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK