Long-term economic evaluation of resectoscopic endometrial ablation versus hysterectomy for the treatment of menorrhagia

D A Hidlebaugh, Dennis Hidlebaugh, Richard K. Orr, R K Orr
The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists · 1998 · vol. 5(4) , pp. 351–356 · doi:10.1016/s1074-3804(98)80046-7 · PMID:9782137 · W2072277153
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

This study compares the long-term economic impact of resectoscopic endometrial ablation against hysterectomy for treating menorrhagia.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Catheter Ablation Hysterectomy Hysteroscopy Menorrhagia Adult Catheter Ablation Catheter Ablation Cohort Studies Costs and Cost Analysis Female Humans Hysterectomy Hysteroscopy Menorrhagia Middle Aged Treatment Outcome

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (29)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:10:35.327253+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK