Cognitive Demands and Strategic Preparedness of Novice English Teachers for ELL Instruction in Zhejiang province, China

Cognitive Demands and Strategic Preparedness of Novice English Teachers for ELL Instruction in Zhejiang province, China | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Cognitive Demands and Strategic Preparedness of Novice English Teachers for ELL Instruction in Zhejiang province, China Ruyang li, Mohamed Ismail Ahamad Shah This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3790747/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This study explores the cognitive challenges and preparedness of novice English language teachers in Zhejiang Province, China, for teaching English Language Learners (ELLs). Addressing the gap in research on the application of theoretical frameworks in this context, the qualitative descriptive research involved 15 novice educators through interviews, observations, and document analysis. It is grounded in Illeris' Contemporary Learning Theory and Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory. Key findings include the identification of significant cognitive challenges in addressing diverse learning needs and knowledge gaps among ELLs. The study also highlights the effective use of metacognitive techniques and scaffolding in ELL instruction. It underscores the need for comprehensive teacher training in China, advocating for programs that go beyond linguistic skills to include varied pedagogical strategies, catering to the complex requirements of ELL students. Cognitive Demands Teacher Preparedness English Language Learners Metacognitive Tactics Scaffolding Techniques Figures Figure 1 Introduction The increasing presence of English Language Learners (ELLs) in schools globally, including China, brings to the forefront the need for effective cognitive strategies in education (Mancilla-Martinez et al., 2020 ). ELLs encounter distinct cognitive challenges in classrooms, such as language barriers and difficulties in processing academic language, which can impede their learning and social-emotional development (Shohamy, 2022 ). The effectiveness of instruction for these learners’ hinges on teachers' cognitive preparedness, especially in managing language and cultural differences (Wolf et al., 2022 ). In China, many novice teachers are tasked with instructing ELLs without having received specialized training in cognitive strategies tailored to these learners' needs (Rabelo et al., 2022 ). This gap in preparation can exacerbate the challenges faced by both teachers and ELLs. Studies highlight the crucial role of cognitive-based teacher preparation in equipping educators with the necessary skills and knowledge for effective ELL instruction (Schall-Leckrone, 2022 ) Teachers need to navigate not only the linguistic but also the cognitive aspects of language learning, such as understanding and addressing the specific cognitive processes involved in language acquisition. Furthermore, the cognitive dimension of teaching ELLs extends to cultural competence. ELLs often come from diverse cultural backgrounds, which can present unique cognitive challenges in the classroom (Lin et al., 2023 ). Teachers' familiarity with and ability to incorporate these diverse cognitive and cultural perspectives into their teaching strategies are essential for creating inclusive and effective learning environments for ELLs (Peng et al., 2022 ). This study adopts a qualitative methodology, focusing on semi-structured interviews with novice English teachers in China, specifically examining their preparedness in the cognitive dimension for teaching ELLs. The diverse sample, drawn from various urban and rural schools, includes teachers with varied backgrounds and experiences with ELLs. Thematic analysis of the data reveals key cognitive challenges and strategies, providing insights into the cognitive aspects of teaching ELLs among first-year teachers. These findings, essential for understanding cognitive preparedness, inform the enhancement of teacher training programs. The study's focus on the cognitive dimension extends to examining the role of cultural competence, language policies, and technology in this context. The outcomes are geared towards improving teacher readiness in cognitive strategies for ELL instruction, contributing to policy and curriculum development in this area. Overall, this study provides insights into the preparedness of first-year teachers in China to teach ELLs and contributes to the development of more effective teacher education programs and support systems. It is hoped that the findings of this study will help improve the quality of education provided to ELLs in China and promote their academic success. About this study Importance of teacher preparedness The importance of education for ELLs cannot be overstated. English language proficiency is increasingly seen as a necessary skill in today's global society, and ELLs face numerous challenges in acquiring this proficiency while also learning academic content. English language proficiency is an important factor in academic success, career advancement, and social integration for individuals who are non-native English speakers (Kendrick et al., 2022 ). It was found that English language learners who receive appropriate support and instruction are more likely to achieve academic success and improve their English language skills (Ardasheva et al., 2021 ). According to Aguilar et al. ( 2020 ), English language learners who have access to quality language instruction and resources are better equipped to participate in the global economy and compete in the job market. In a report by the Migration Policy Institute, it was stated that the education of English language learners is crucial for the economic, social, and cultural well-being of communities and the country (Leo, 2022 ). Research by Sato & Storch ( 2020 ) found that English language learners who receive culturally responsive instruction who respects their linguistic and cultural backgrounds are more likely to feel a sense of belonging and engagement in the classroom, which can lead to improved academic outcomes. The growing number of ELLs in schools has created a pressing need for teachers who are prepared to meet the unique needs of these students. Teachers must be equipped with the knowledge and skills to teach language and content effectively to ELLs, who often face significant language and cultural barriers in the classroom. Teacher preparation programs have traditionally focused on preparing teachers to work with native English speakers, but there is now an increased emphasis on preparing teachers to work with ELLs. However, research has shown that many teachers do not feel adequately prepared to meet the needs of ELLs in their classrooms (Dwomoh et al., 2022 ). There are several dimensions of teacher preparedness for ELL instruction, including cognitive, emotional, sociocultural, and pedagogical knowledge (Nguyen & Dang, 2019 ). Teachers must have the knowledge and skills to effectively teach content and language to ELLs, be emotionally ready to work with these students, understand the cultural and social contexts in which ELLs learn, and be familiar with effective pedagogical strategies for teaching ELLs. Despite the importance of teacher preparedness for ELL instruction, there are still many challenges that teachers face in meeting the needs of these students. These challenges include a lack of training and support in working with ELLs, a lack of access to appropriate instructional materials and resources, and the difficulty of balancing the needs of ELLs with those of native English speakers in the classroom (Kim & Burić, 2020 ). Overall, there is a critical need for teachers who are prepared to work effectively with ELLs in the classroom. Teacher preparation programs must focus on developing the knowledge and skills necessary to meet the unique needs of ELLs, and schools must provide ongoing training and support for teachers to ensure that they are able to provide high-quality instruction to all students, regardless of their language background. Cognitive dimensions of Teacher Preparation The cognitive dimension of teacher preparation includes the knowledge and skills necessary to teach content effectively. In the context of ELLs, this may involve understanding the unique linguistic and cultural backgrounds of these students and adapting teaching strategies accordingly (Dwomoh et al., 2022 ). To effectively teach ELLs, teachers must have a deep understanding of the unique linguistic and cultural backgrounds of these students. As stated by Prasad & Lory ( 2019 ), ELLs in China come from diverse linguistic backgrounds, including those who speak Mandarin as a second language, minority languages, and foreign languages. This diversity can create significant challenges for teachers who must adapt their teaching strategies to meet the needs of each student. In addition to linguistic diversity, ELLs may also have different cultural backgrounds and experiences that can impact their learning in the classroom. As noted by Schachner et al. ( 2019 ), cultural differences can impact everything from communication styles and learning preferences to attitudes toward authority and classroom participation. To address these challenges, teachers must be equipped with the knowledge and skills necessary to adapt their teaching strategies to the needs of ELLs. This may involve developing culturally responsive teaching practices, such as incorporating the cultural backgrounds of ELLs into classroom activities and adapting instructional materials to be more culturally relevant (Lin et al., 2023 ). Furthermore, teachers must be knowledgeable about second language acquisition theory and how it can inform their teaching practices. In line with Bai & Wang ( 2020 ) effective language teaching should incorporate opportunities for meaningful interaction, comprehensible input, and task-based learning, among other strategies. Theoretical framework The amalgamation of Illeris' Contemporary Learning Theory (2018) with Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory (1978) establishes a formidable theoretical infrastructure for dissecting the complexities of teacher readiness, particularly within the ambit of ELLs. Though these theories originate from distinct conceptual roots and primarily focus on different aspects, they converge notably in their recognition of the dynamic interaction between the individual learner and the social context in the process of learning (Timmis & Muñoz-Chereau, 2019). Illeris' theory delineates three pivotal dimensions of learning: cognitive, emotional, and societal. It advocates that efficacious learning emanates from the synergy of these facets, underscoring a holistic perspective of the learning paradigm. This conceptualization finds resonance in the study's probe into the cognitive, emotional, and sociocultural facets of teacher preparedness, shedding light on the interplay and mutual influence among these dimensions (Andriopoulou & Prowse, 2020 ). Conversely, Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory accentuates the influence of social interactions and cultural instruments in the evolution of cognitive development. It posits learning as a socially mediated process, where knowledge construction is facilitated through interactions with peers and engagement with cultural artifacts (Esterhazy et al., 2019 ). This theoretical stance aligns with the study's focus on the sociocultural dimension of teacher preparedness, highlighting how educators' interactions with students, colleagues, and curricular content sculpt their teaching methodologies (Andriopoulou & Prowse, 2020 ). Figure 1: Theoretical Framework The integration of these theoretical perspectives offers a succinct yet comprehensive understanding of teacher preparedness, emphasizing its embeddedness within a broader sociocultural context. This approach facilitates a focused exploration of the challenges and opportunities for emerging English teachers in Zhejiang province, enhancing our understanding of their readiness to teach ELLs (Schendel et al., 2020 ). Notably, the framework underscores the importance of the cognitive dimension, acknowledging how teachers' knowledge, thought processes, and problem-solving skills are crucial in navigating the complexities of the classroom. It also highlights the interaction between these cognitive aspects and the sociocultural environment, including how teachers' beliefs and mental frameworks are shaped by and respond to their educational settings (Tang et al., 2021 ). This focus on the cognitive dimension allows for a deeper analysis of the internal factors influencing teacher preparedness, enriching our insight into their professional development. Aims and Objectives The primary aim of this study was to assess the extent of preparedness among novice teachers for instructing ELLs in cognitive aspects of teaching. The objectives focused on evaluating the teachers' self-perceived readiness, identifying the specific cognitive challenges they face, and exploring the strategies they employ to address these challenges. Additionally, the study aimed to assess the effectiveness of current teacher training programs in equipping novice teachers with the necessary cognitive skills for teaching ELLs. This comprehensive approach is intended to deepen the understanding of the cognitive dimensions in teaching ELLs, with a view to enhancing teacher training and support mechanisms in this critical area of education. Research Question The main research question and sub-questions are as follows: Main research question: "To what extent do novice teachers feel prepared to instruct ELLs in their classes in terms of cognitive challenges and strategies?" Sub-questions: RQ1: What specific cognitive challenges do novice teachers encounter when instructing ELLs, and how do these challenges impact their sense of preparedness? RQ2: What cognitive strategies do novice teachers employ to overcome the challenges they face in teaching ELLs, and how effective do they perceive these strategies to be? RQ3: In what ways do existing teacher training programs support novice teachers in developing cognitive strategies for teaching ELLs, and where are the gaps in this preparation? Methodology In this section, the research methodology employed in this qualitative descriptive study is outlined and discussed in detail, as it allows for an in-depth exploration of the complex experiences, beliefs, and challenges faced by novice English teachers in China when teaching ELLs. Qualitative research is particularly suited for understanding the intricacies of human experiences and the social processes involved in teaching ELLs. Through this approach, the study seeks to gain insights into how these teachers perceive their preparedness and the challenges they face in the Chinese educational context, thereby providing valuable information for informing policy and practice. Recruitment process The recruitment phase targeted educational institutions in Wenzhou, a nexus for English language education in Zhejiang province. Invitations were extended to novice English teachers, articulating the study's aims and their potential contribution to understanding English teaching dynamics. This approach capitalized on institutional networks for effective outreach. All interviewees received ‘Participant Information Sheet' and gave their informed consent to participate. Ethics approval was granted by the internal ethics committee of the first author’s university. The first author is in charge of data collection and analysis while a joint effort of the two authors has been made to conduct theoretical framing and writing. Of the twenty-five novice teachers from Wenzhou who expressed interest, a rigorous screening process refined the cohort to nineteen, aligning with the study’s criteria. These educators were then presented with detailed consent forms, ensuring their informed participation, confidentiality, and the freedom to withdraw. This meticulous selection process resulted in a diverse group of fifteen teachers participating, reflecting a 79% participation rate, and encompassing a range of experiences from Wenzhou's urban and suburban areas, thereby capturing varied pedagogical contexts. Interview scheduling After participants expressed interest and gave consent, they were contacted to schedule interviews. The scheduling considered the participants' convenience, ensuring that interviews did not disrupt their teaching schedules. Reminder emails or messages were sent out a day before the interview to confirm availability. Descriptive data on participants Understanding the background and characteristics of the participants is crucial for contextualizing the findings of the study (Kálmán et al., 2019 ). This section provides a detailed descriptive analysis of the participants, shedding light on their demographics, educational background, and teaching experiences. Table 1 Summarized Demographic Profile of Participants Demographic Category Number of Participants Gender Male 7 Female 8 Years of Teaching Experience Less than 1 year 6 1–3 years 6 4–5 years 3 District in Wenzhou Lucheng 4 Ouhai 3 Longwan 3 Rui'an 2 Others 3 Number of ELL Students in Class Less than 20 3 20–40 7 More than 40 5 After the table summarizing participants' demographics, a detailed exploration of their backgrounds and experiences follows. This examination reveals the diverse backgrounds of novice English teachers in Wenzhou city, showcasing their individual journeys, challenges, and aspirations. This study examines English teaching dynamics with an equal gender distribution and varied teaching tenure, ranging from novices struggling with classroom management to more experienced teachers mastering diverse classrooms and technology integration (Turner III et al., 2022). Participants are from diverse areas of Wenzhou city, with urban teachers facing high expectations and rural teachers experiencing strong community support but limited resources. All teachers have at least a bachelor's degree, with postgraduates contributing advanced pedagogical methods and innovative strategies. In summary, this in-depth look at participants' profiles highlights the richness of the data collected. Each teacher's unique journey and challenges contribute to a comprehensive understanding of novice English teachers' lives in Wenzhou city. Limitations of Study While this study on novice English teachers in Zhejiang Province provides valuable insights, it is not without limitations. The geographic concentration on Zhejiang Province may not reflect the experiences of novice teachers in other regions of China. Additionally, the study’s exclusive reliance on qualitative methods may limit the generalizability of the findings. Another significant limitation is its sole focus on novice teachers, excluding the viewpoints of more experienced educators, which could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the teaching landscape. Furthermore, the study's theoretical framework is confined to Knud Illeris' Contemporary Learning Theory, emphasizing only the cognitive dimension and potentially overlooking other critical aspects of teaching and learning. Future research would benefit from incorporating a broader geographic representation, employing a blend of both qualitative and quantitative methodologies, and integrating a variety of theoretical perspectives to capture a more holistic view of English language teaching in diverse educational contexts. Findings The cognitive dimension of teaching is pivotal to effective instruction, especially when instructing ELLs (Delprato & Antequera, 2021 ). To delve deeper into this dimension, the researcher engaged with 15 novice teachers in Zhejiang province, China, through in-depth interviews, meticulous observations, and thorough document analyses. This triangulated data collection approach enabled the researcher to capture a comprehensive understanding of their cognitive preparedness. The researchers' findings, distilled into two central themes, offer a panoramic view of the cognitive landscape for novice teachers in Zhejiang as they navigate the complexities of ELL instruction. To ensure confidentiality and privacy, pseudonyms are used throughout the presentation of these findings. Cognitive challenges Guiding English language learners along their educational path is an undoubtedly rewarding endeavour, yet it is not without its complexities. In particular, the cognitive dimension of ELL instruction presents a unique set of challenges that teachers must skillfully address. These challenges, often multifaceted, require a deep understanding and strategic approach to ensure effective instruction ((Delprato & Antequera, 2021 ). This section delves into the cognitive challenges faced by novice teachers in Zhejiang province, China, as they endeavour to instruct ELLs. Through meticulous data analysis, two predominant sub-themes have emerged, each shedding light on a specific aspect of the cognitive challenges encountered. These sub-themes, detailed in the table below, provide a structured overview of the challenges, offering insights into their nature, implications, and potential solutions. Table 2 Cognitive Challenges Faced by Novice Teachers Theme Sub-theme Description Cognitive Challenges Navigating Diverse Learning Styles Challenges related to addressing the varied learning preferences and needs of ELLs. Bridging Prior Knowledge Gaps Difficulties in connecting new information to ELLs' existing knowledge base. In the subsequent sections, each of these sub-themes will be explored in depth, drawing from the experiences and reflections of the participants, and juxtaposed with relevant literature to provide a comprehensive understanding of the cognitive challenges in ELL instruction. Navigating diverse learning styles Navigating the varied learning styles and preferences of students, especially in an ELL classroom, presents a cognitive challenge for teachers (Aiken, 2021 ). Being able to discern and adapt to these diverse needs requires a blend of observation, understanding, and flexibility (Sahan & Şahan, 2021 ). Such adaptability ensures that lessons resonate with every student, regardless of their preferred learning modality. Ms. Liu, a relatively experienced novice teacher from Wenzhou city, shared her insights on this during her interview. She described her classroom as a mosaic of unique personalities and learning styles, ranging from visual to auditory and kinesthetic learners. Ms. Liu stated: ...Every classroom is... it's like a mosaic. Each student brings their unique personality, their unique style of learning. Some are visual... while others... they might be more auditory or kinesthetic. (I/T-G, lines 32–35) (She gestured expansively, emphasizing the diversity she encountered daily.) Echoing Ms. Liu’s experience, Mr. Zhao's teaching approach, as observed during a classroom observation (CO), demonstrated a dynamic adaptation to these varied learning styles. His technique involved using a range of instructional methods – visuals, hands-on activities, and audio clips – within a single lesson. The observation notes described: it was evident that Mr. Zhao was constantly... shifting his teaching techniques. He used visuals, then switched to hands-on activities, then to audio clips – all in one lesson. It felt... comprehensive, tailored to cater to everyone in the room. (CO-H, observation notes) (His dynamic approach was evident, and his eyes constantly scanned the room, ensuring engagement.) Ms. Zhang, in her reflective journal, expressed the ongoing challenge of catering to every student’s needs. She frequently questioned the diversity and effectiveness of her lessons, highlighting the constant need for adaptation and innovation in her teaching methods. Ms. Zhang wrote: There are days when I... I wonder if I'm reaching out to every student. Are my lessons diverse enough? It's a continuous process... of adaptation and innovation. (RJ-K, entry 5) (Her writing was filled with self-questioning, showing her determination to evolve.) Adding weight to these firsthand accounts, Greenwood-Hau ( 2021 ) emphasizes that diversity in the classroom is not just about background or culture; it is fundamentally about the myriad ways students assimilate knowledge. Teachers are not just instructors; they are navigators of this diverse landscape. Moreover, the critical exploration of small-group teaching practice in higher education underscores the need for a dynamic understanding of diversity, considering the classroom as a relational experience shaped by gendered and racialized frames (Gibbs et al., 2019 ). However, Ms. Zhang's reflective notes provided a slightly divergent view: While researchers advocate for a fluid understanding of learning styles, on-ground realities can sometimes be starkly different. Meeting every student's unique need within the constraints of time and resources is no small feat. (RJ-K, entry 3) (Her writing conveyed a sense of challenge intermingled with hope.) Additionally, Dimmock et al. ( 2021 ) stated that diverse learning styles are both a challenge and an opportunity. The beauty lies in the dance between adapting and innovating. In summation, the process of engaging with diverse learning styles represents a nuanced interplay of keen observation, dynamic adaptation, and creative innovation (Schendel et al., 2020 ). Educators who proficiently navigate this realm not only cultivate an environment of inclusivity within their classrooms but also ensure the fulfilment of each learner's distinctive educational requisites. This is especially pertinent in the contextually demanding milieu of ELL education, where tailored approaches are paramount. Navigating diverse learning styles Navigating the varied learning styles and preferences of students, especially in an ELL classroom, presents a cognitive challenge for teachers (Aiken, 2021 ). Being able to discern and adapt to these diverse needs requires a blend of observation, understanding, and flexibility (Sahan & Şahan, 2021 ). Such adaptability ensures that lessons resonate with every student, regardless of their preferred learning modality. Ms. Liu, a relatively experienced novice teacher from Wenzhou city, shared her insights on this during her interview. She described her classroom as a mosaic of unique personalities and learning styles, ranging from visual to auditory and kinesthetic learners. Ms. Liu stated: ...Every classroom is... it's like a mosaic. Each student brings their unique personality, their unique style of learning. Some are visual... while others... they might be more auditory or kinesthetic. (I/T-G, lines 32–35) (She gestured expansively, emphasizing the diversity she encountered daily.) Echoing Ms. Liu’s experience, Mr. Zhao's teaching approach, as observed during a classroom observation (CO), demonstrated a dynamic adaptation to these varied learning styles. His technique involved using a range of instructional methods – visuals, hands-on activities, and audio clips – within a single lesson. The observation notes described: it was evident that Mr. Zhao was constantly... shifting his teaching techniques. He used visuals, then switched to hands-on activities, then to audio clips – all in one lesson. It felt... comprehensive, tailored to cater to everyone in the room. (CO-H, observation notes) (His dynamic approach was evident, and his eyes constantly scanned the room, ensuring engagement.) Ms. Zhang, in her reflective journal, expressed the ongoing challenge of catering to every student’s needs. She frequently questioned the diversity and effectiveness of her lessons, highlighting the constant need for adaptation and innovation in her teaching methods. Ms. Zhang wrote: There are days when I... I wonder if I'm reaching out to every student. Are my lessons diverse enough? It's a continuous process... of adaptation and innovation. (RJ-K, entry 5) (Her writing was filled with self-questioning, showing her determination to evolve.) Adding weight to these firsthand accounts, Greenwood-Hau ( 2021 ) emphasizes that diversity in the classroom is not just about background or culture; it is fundamentally about the myriad ways students assimilate knowledge. Teachers are not just instructors; they are navigators of this diverse landscape. Moreover, the critical exploration of small-group teaching practice in higher education underscores the need for a dynamic understanding of diversity, considering the classroom as a relational experience shaped by gendered and racialized frames (Gibbs et al., 2019 ). However, Ms. Zhang's reflective notes provided a slightly divergent view: While researchers advocate for a fluid understanding of learning styles, on-ground realities can sometimes be starkly different. Meeting every student's unique need within the constraints of time and resources is no small feat. (RJ-K, entry 3) (Her writing conveyed a sense of challenge intermingled with hope.) Additionally, Dimmock et al. ( 2021 ) stated that diverse learning styles are both a challenge and an opportunity. The beauty lies in the dance between adapting and innovating. In summation, the process of engaging with diverse learning styles represents a nuanced interplay of keen observation, dynamic adaptation, and creative innovation (Schendel et al., 2020 ). Educators who proficiently navigate this realm not only cultivate an environment of inclusivity within their classrooms but also ensure the fulfilment of each learner's distinctive educational requisites. This is especially pertinent in the contextually demanding milieu of ELL education, where tailored approaches are paramount. Bridging prior knowledge gaps One of the paramount challenges that educators face, especially in the realm of teaching ELLs, is addressing and bridging the gaps in prior knowledge (Arokiyaraj et al., 2021). These gaps can vary significantly, stemming from diverse cultural backgrounds, differing educational systems, or even individual life experiences (Venn et al., 2020 ). Navigating these can often dictate the trajectory of a student's learning experience. Ms. Xu, during her interview, reflected on her initial assumptions about her students' baseline knowledge and the subsequent realization of the disparities among them. She remarked, In the beginning... I assumed all students came with a similar baseline... of prior knowledge. It was... a stark realization when I noticed the disparities. (I/T-J, lines 46–49) (Her face took on a sombre expression as she reflected on her early days of teaching, indicating a common challenge faced by educators in assessing and addressing varied student backgrounds..) Her reflection, marked by a sombre tone, echoes the sentiments of five other respondents, including ten and eight. In a contrasting observation, Mr. Wang's strategy appeared more pre-emptive. During a class observation, it is noted: Mr. Wang began his lesson with a brief diagnostic test, intending to gauge the students' prior understanding. This informed the rest of his lesson, allowing him to tailor his approach accordingly. (CO-L, observation notes) (His proactive approach seemed to instill confidence in his students.) Drawing from an academic perspective, Deniz (2021) argues that the first step to effective teaching is understanding where your students stand. Ignoring prior knowledge gaps can lead to a fractured learning experience. Yet, Mr. Chen's reflective journal offered a nuanced perspective that slightly diverged from Deniz's viewpoint: While it's essential to recognize prior knowledge... sometimes, dwelling too much on what students don't know can overshadow the potential of what they can learn. It's a delicate balance. In my classes, for example, I acknowledge the gaps in their English skills, but I focus more on building from what they do know. This approach encourages a positive learning environment and emphasizes growth and potential rather than deficits. (RJ-L, entry 5) (His words carried an undertone of optimism and forward-thinking.) Validating this challenge, Williamson et al. ( 2020 ) emphasizes that prior knowledge is the foundation upon which new learning builds. If that foundation is shaky or uneven, the new learning might just collapse. Synthesizing these insights, it becomes evident that bridging prior knowledge gaps is not just about addressing disparities. It is about laying a robust foundation, fostering an environment of inclusivity, and facilitating a cohesive learning journey, particularly pivotal in ELL settings (Kreber & Wealer, 2021 ). Cognitive strategies The complexities of teaching, especially in the context of ELLs, demand not only profound knowledge but also a repertoire of cognitive strategies to facilitate effective learning (Howson & Kingsbury, 2021). Cognitive strategies represent a set of techniques or tools that teachers consciously employ to assist, enhance, or optimize the learning process (Venn et al., 2020 ). Delving into the cognitive strategies adapted by teachers provides insights into the multifaceted world of pedagogy, offering a clearer picture of how educators mentally maneuver their way through the teaching landscape (Conto et al., 2021). The subsequent sub-themes provide an in-depth exploration of the various cognitive strategies employed by teachers, highlighting their significance, application, and effectiveness: Table 3 Sub-themes under Cognitive Strategies in Teaching Theme Sub-theme Description Cognitive Strategies in Teaching Metacognitive Tactics Strategies related to thinking about one's own thinking, including planning, monitoring, and evaluating one's own learning Scaffolding Techniques Techniques employed to progressively move students toward greater independence and understanding during learning sessions These sub-themes collectively underscore the varied cognitive strategies harnessed by educators to augment teaching effectiveness, ensuring a more resonant learning experience for their ELLs. Metacognitive tactics Metacognition, or "thinking about thinking," is a crucial component of effective teaching, particularly when instructing ELLs (Kreber & Wealer, 2021 ). Metacognitive strategies enable educators to introspectively evaluate their teaching methods, plan and monitor instruction based on student feedback, and adjust their approach as needed (Schendel et al., 2020 ). By doing so, teachers can create a learning environment that fosters not only knowledge transfer but also the cultivation of self-directed learning and critical thinking skills. Peter, in his interview, shared his approach to teaching, emphasizing the importance of flexibility and adaptability. He described how he begins each lesson with a planned strategy but remains open to adjusting his methods based on student interactions and understanding. Peter stated: Every time I teach, I start with a strategy but adapt as I interact with students, assessing their understanding and adjusting my approach. Teaching for me is dynamic, a responsive dance to the classroom's pulse. This reflects my emphasis on metacognitive strategies in teaching. (I/T-F, lines 52–59) Echoing Peter's approach, Jenny, in her reflective journal, also emphasized the dynamic nature of teaching. She described how her planned lesson evolved into spontaneous improvisation, blending art and science. Jenny's entry read: Today, my teaching evolved from a planned lesson to spontaneous improvisation, blending the art and science of teaching. This process involves deep reflection and intuition, highlighting the fluid nature of education. (RJ-B, entry dated April 10) Her words reveal a deep passion and understanding of her role. During a classroom observation of Peter's teaching, his application of metacognitive strategies was clear. The observer noted Peter's skill in merging teaching with real-time assessment, using questions and anecdotes to understand and respond to student needs. The observation detailed: In his lesson, Peter adeptly combined teaching with on-the-spot assessment, using questions and anecdotes to gauge student understanding. His skill in integrating teaching with immediate feedback exemplifies a mastery in metacognition. (CO-H, Entry 8) Adding a broader perspective, academic research mirrors these practitioner insights. Arokiyaraj et al. (2021) insightfully stated that in the realm of education, metacognitive awareness is non-negotiable. The ability of an educator to continually evaluate, introspect, and recalibrate their teaching techniques, drawing from a reservoir of experience and intuition, delineates a good teacher from a great one. This aligns with the notion that effective teaching involves a continuous process of self-assessment and adaptation, drawing from both experience and intuition (Arokiyaraj et al., 2021). Furthermore, the ability to recalibrate teaching methods based on metacognitive awareness is crucial for educators to transition from being merely good teachers to becoming exceptional ones (Arokiyaraj et al., 2021). Collectively, these insights emphasize the critical role of metacognitive tactics in teaching. By continuously reflecting on their practice, developing self-awareness of their strengths and weaknesses, and demonstrating adaptive agility in their teaching methods, educators can truly resonate with their students, especially in diverse and challenging contexts like ELL instruction. Scaffolding techniques The concept of scaffolding in education, first popularized by Vygotsky (1978), alludes to the provision of support structures that enable learners to move towards new skills, concepts, or understanding. Especially in the context of ELL instruction, scaffolding serves as a bridge, allowing students to grasp and internalize new linguistic constructs within their current understanding (Heron et al., 2021 ). Scaffolding techniques, which can range from visual aids to guided practice, evolve as learners grow in their knowledge, eventually leading to independent competency. In her interview session, Clara provided an insightful look into her tailored teaching methods. She described how she caters to the varied backgrounds and learning paces of her students by using different support mechanisms. Clara explained: In each class, I address diverse backgrounds and learning speeds by providing varied support, like visual aids, repetition, or group activities, to align everyone's understanding. (I/T-J, lines 62–68) (Her firm tone underscores her dedication to inclusivity and individual growth). Mark, in his reflective journal, offered a different angle on teaching methodology. He discussed his approach to teaching complex sentence structures by starting with simpler sentences and incrementally increasing complexity. Mark's entry read: Today, I taught complex sentence structures, starting with simple sentences and gradually building complexity, leading to the class's confident understanding. This methodical approach allowed the students to grasp the basics first and then slowly comprehend more intricate patterns. By the end of the lesson, their confident understanding was evident in their writing and speech. (RJ-D, entry 5) (His writing reflects a strategic, scaffolded approach to teaching). A classroom observation (CO-K) of Clara’s teaching provided further evidence of the effective use of scaffolding in her approach. The observer noted how Clara skillfully blends traditional teaching methods with scaffolding techniques. The note read: Clara's teaching method combines traditional approaches with scaffolding, linking new vocabulary to familiar concepts with visuals or examples. Rather than giving direct answers, she uses leading questions to encourage discovery-based learning. For instance, when introducing new vocabulary, she connects it to things students already know, like using images of common items in their culture. And instead of simply giving answers, she asks questions like, 'How would you use this word in a sentence about your favourite festival?' This encourages discovery-based learning, helping students engage with and internalize the new language more effectively (CO-K, Entry 12) Supporting these firsthand accounts, Schweisfurth ( 2023 )) underscored the importance of scaffolding, stating in diverse classrooms, scaffolding is not just an instructional strategy; it is an essential bridge, fostering connections between prior knowledge and new learning. Scaffolding techniques play an indispensable role in facilitating learning, especially in the context of ELL instruction. By tailoring support structures to individual needs, educators can ensure that every student, irrespective of their starting point, is granted an equitable opportunity to succeed and flourish (Roberts-Bowman et al., 2022 ). Scaffolding is essential for helping ELLs progress from their current understanding to the desired learning objectives. Teachers might use tools like visual aids, graphic organizers, or sentence starters to assist ELLs in grasping and using complex language. Providing opportunities for guided practice, peer collaboration, and feedback are also key scaffolding techniques. Thoughtfully applied, scaffolding can enable ELLs to surmount language barriers and realize their full potential. Conclusion and recommendation This research unravels the cognitive complexities and strategic approaches of novice English teachers in Zhejiang Province, China, particularly in teaching ELLs. Based on Knud Illeris' Contemporary Learning Theory, it explores the various challenges and adaptive strategies of these teachers. The study's conclusions are vital for understanding English language teaching and teacher education. It offers practical recommendations based on its findings to improve the training and professional development of novice English teachers. These suggestions are relevant not just for Zhejiang Province but for educators worldwide facing similar issues in different educational settings. Contributions of the Study This research on novice English teachers in Zhejiang Province, China, significantly enriches the field of teacher education and English language teaching both theoretically and practically. It examines the complex challenges and strategies in this context, adding depth to existing pedagogical theories, especially within the framework of Knud Illeris' Contemporary Learning Theory. The study's key contributions lie in enhancing theoretical understanding and providing practical insights for teacher training, curriculum design, and educational policy. Its findings are crucial for developing more nuanced and effective approaches in English language teaching and teacher preparation, particularly in culturally diverse and dynamic educational environments. Theoretical Contributions This research focusing on novice English teachers in Zhejiang Province makes a significant contribution to the cognitive dimension of Knud Illeris' Contemporary Learning Theory. By underscoring the cognitive challenges in teaching ELLs, it extends Illeris' framework to encompass the subtleties of cultural adaptation in the Chinese context. The study illustrates how novice teachers' strategies resonate with and expand upon Illeris' cognitive aspects of learning, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive teacher training. This alignment and expansion of Illeris' theory underscore its applicability and relevance in the diverse and complex landscape of modern ELL education. Practical Contributions Fostering Advanced Cognitive Skills in Teacher Training This study emphasizes the necessity of evolving teacher training programs for novice English teachers in Zhejiang Province, focusing on the development of advanced cognitive skills. Training modules should be designed to equip teachers with strategies for cognitive development, alongside techniques for adaptive teaching and culturally responsive pedagogy. By integrating these cognitive-focused elements, the proposed enhancements in teacher training programs aim to thoroughly prepare novice teachers for the multifaceted demands of modern classrooms. This approach would not only strengthen their pedagogical capabilities but also enable them to adeptly navigate and manage the cognitive complexities inherent in diverse educational settings. Curriculum Design and Instructional Strategies The study's findings suggest a need for a more nuanced approach in curriculum design and instructional strategies for English language education. It highlights the importance of developing curricula that are learner-centered and adaptable to different teaching contexts, addressing the cognitive challenges faced by novice teachers. Furthermore, instructional methods should include collaborative and interactive techniques, which can help overcome some of these challenges, enhance student engagement, and equip teachers to handle diverse classroom dynamics effectively. Policy Implications and Educational Practices This research underscores the importance of policy changes to better support novice English teachers. It advocates for stronger in-school support systems, such as mentorship programs and professional learning communities, to enhance the development of teaching skills and strategies. Policies should also foster a supportive teaching environment that encourages and facilitates continuous learning and professional growth. In a broader sense, the findings suggest that educational practices need to evolve to accommodate the diverse needs of teachers, equipping them with not only teaching skills but also the tools to navigate the complexities of modern educational environments. Recommendation for further research Based on the insights and limitations of this study on novice English teachers in Zhejiang Province, several recommendations are proposed for future research: Geographical Expansion: Extend research beyond Zhejiang Province to other regions within China or conduct cross-national comparisons to understand how regional and cultural variations affect novice English teachers. Methodological Diversification: Incorporate quantitative methods or a mixed-methods approach for a more comprehensive analysis and broader generalizations, along with statistical validation. Comparative Studies with Experienced Teachers: Include experienced teachers in research to compare their experiences and strategies with those of novices, providing insights into the professional development trajectory in ESL teaching. Interdisciplinary and Theoretical Exploration: Employ additional theoretical frameworks or interdisciplinary approaches to gain a deeper understanding of the complexities of teaching and learning in ESL contexts. Longitudinal Studies: Conduct long-term research to track the evolution of teachers' challenges and strategies, offering a clearer view of how novice teachers develop their skills over time. Implementing these recommendations would enhance the depth and breadth of ESL teaching research, contributing valuable academic insights and informing practical applications in teacher training, curriculum design, and educational policy. Conclusion This study sheds light on the cognitive demands and strategic readiness of novice English teachers in Zhejiang Province, China, within the framework of Knud Illeris' Contemporary Learning Theory. It uncovers the challenges faced by these educators and their innovative strategies, contributing significantly to both theory and practice in teacher education. The study enriches learning theory discussions and has practical implications for teacher training, curriculum development, and policymaking. However, its geographic focus on Zhejiang Province and its specific methodology imply caution in generalizing the findings. These limitations also open up opportunities for future research to broaden and validate these insights in varied contexts. Overall, this study marks a crucial step in enhancing our understanding and support for English teachers, particularly novices. It lays groundwork for further research, aiming to improve educational standards and teacher support globally. Declarations Ethical Approval This study was approved by the SEGi Ethics Committee (Approval Number: SEGiEC/SR/FOELPM/151/2023–2024). All procedures involving human subjects were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the committee and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in the study. Funding not applicable Author Contribution All authors reviewed the manuscript Availability of data and materials The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The data is not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions. References Aguilar, G., Uccelli, P., & Galloway, E. P. (2020). Toward Biliteracy: Unpacking the Contribution of Mid-adolescent Dual Language Learners’ Spanish and English Academic Language Skills to English Reading Comprehension. TESOL Quarterly , 54 (4), 1010–1036. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.570 . Aiken, V. (2021). Academic literacies and the tilts within: the push and pull of student writing. Teaching in Higher Education , 28 (8), 2104–2120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1952565 . Alban Conto, C., Akseer, S., Dreesen, T., Kamei, A., Mizunoya, S., & Rigole, A. (2021). Potential effects of COVID-19 school closures on foundational skills and Country responses for mitigating learning loss. Int J Educ Dev , 87 , 102434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102434 . Andriopoulou, P., & Prowse, A. (2020). Towards an effective supervisory relationship in research degree supervision: insights from attachment theory. Teaching in Higher Education , 25 (5), 648–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1731449 . Ardasheva, Y., Crosson, A. C., Carbonneau, K. J., & French, B. F. (2021). Unpacking Contributions of Morphosyntactic Awareness and Vocabulary to Science Reading Comprehension among Linguistically Diverse Students. TESOL Quarterly , 55 (3), 931–965. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3039 . Bai, B., & Wang, J. (2020). The role of growth mindset, self-efficacy and intrinsic value in self-regulated learning and English language learning achievements. Language Teaching Research , 27 (1), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820933190 . Bowman, S., Salter, J., Stephenson, C., & Humble, D. (2022). Metamodern sensibilities: toward a pedagogical framework for a wicked world. Teaching in Higher Education , 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2151835 . Delprato, M., & Antequera, G. (2021). School efficiency in low and middle income countries: An analysis based on PISA for development learning survey. International Journal of Educational Development , 80 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102296 . Dimmock, C., Tan, C. Y., Nguyen, D., Tran, T. A., & Dinh, T. T. (2021). Implementing education system reform: Local adaptation in school reform of teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Development , 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102302 . Dwomoh, R., Osei-Tutu, A. A. Z., Chhikara, A., Zhou, L., Oudghiri, S., & Bell, T. (2022). Critical Understanding of English Learners: Experience and Practice of Educators in a Professional Development Course. TESOL Quarterly , 57 (4), 1401–1433. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3200 . Esterhazy, R., Nerland, M., & Damşa, C. (2019). Designing for productive feedback: an analysis of two undergraduate courses in biology and engineering. Teaching in Higher Education , 26 (6), 806–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1686699 . Gibbs, J., Hartviksen, J., Lehtonen, A., & Spruce, E. (2019). Pedagogies of inclusion: a critical exploration of small-group teaching practice in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education , 26 (5), 696–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1674276 . Greenwood-Hau, J. (2021). Teaching facts or teaching thinking? The potential of hooks’ ‘engaged pedagogy’ for teaching politics in a ‘post-truth’ moment. Teaching in Higher Education , 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1965567 . Heron, M., Dippold, D., Aksit, N., Aksit, T., Doubleday, J., & McKeown, K. (2021). Tutors’ beliefs about language and roles: practice as language policy in EMI contexts. Teaching in Higher Education , 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1973410 . Kálmán, O., Tynjälä, P., & Skaniakos, T. (2019). Patterns of university teachers’ approaches to teaching, professional development and perceived departmental cultures. Teaching in Higher Education , 25 (5), 595–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1586667 . Kandiko Howson, C., & Kingsbury, M. (2021). Curriculum change as transformational learning. Teaching in Higher Education , 28 (8), 1847–1866. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1940923 . Kendrick, M., Early, M., Michalovich, A., & Mangat, M. (2022). Digital Storytelling With Youth From Refugee Backgrounds: Possibilities for Language and Digital Literacy Learning. TESOL Quarterly , 56 (3), 961–984. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3146 . Kim, L. E., & Burić, I. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy and burnout: Determining the directions of prediction through an autoregressive cross-lagged panel model. Journal of Educational Psychology , 112 (8), 1661–1676. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000424 . Kreber, C., & Wealer, C. (2021). Intentions, concepts and conceptions of research supervision: a consideration of three disciplines. Teaching in Higher Education , 28 (6), 1446–1463. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1900815 . Leo, A. (2022). Agency in Constrained Spaces: How English Learners and their Teachers Negotiate the Power of High-stakes Exams. TESOL Quarterly , 57 (2), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3149 . Lin, T. J., Chen, J., Lu, M., Sun, J., Purtell, K., Ansari, A., & Justice, L. (2023). The influence of classroom language contexts on dual language learners’ language development. Journal of Educational Psychology , 115 (6), 877–890. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000804 . Mancilla-Martinez, J., Hwang, J. K., Oh, M. H., & McClain, J. B. (2020). Early Elementary Grade Dual Language Learners from Spanish-speaking Homes Struggling with English Reading Comprehension: The Dormant Role of Language Skills. Journal Of Educational Psychology , 112 (5), 880–894. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000402 . Nguyen, C. D., & Dang, T. C. T. (2019). Second Language Teacher Education in Response to Local Needs: Preservice Teachers of English Learning to Teach Diverse Learners in Communities. TESOL Quarterly , 54 (2), 404–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.551 . Peng, A., Orosco, M. J., Wang, H., Swanson, H. L., & Reed, D. K. (2022). Cognition and writing development in early adolescent English learners. Journal of Educational Psychology , 114 (5), 1136–1155. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000695 . Prasad, G., & Lory, M. P. (2019). Linguistic and Cultural Collaboration in Schools: Reconciling Majority and Minoritized Language Users. TESOL Quarterly , 54 (4), 797–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.560 . Rabelo, L. O., Mattos, C. R., & Abib, M. L. V. (2022). d. S. Beginning a teaching career: Contradictions and alienations. Teaching and Teacher Education , 119 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103872 . Sahan, K., & Şahan, Ö. (2021). Investigating student and alumni perspectives on language learning and career prospects through English medium instruction. Teaching in Higher Education , 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1973407 . Sato, M., & Storch, N. (2020). Context matters: Learner beliefs and interactional behaviors in an EFL vs. ESL context. Language Teaching Research , 26 (5), 919–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820923582 . Schachner, M. K., Schwarzenthal, M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Noack, P. (2019). How all students can belong and achieve: Effects of the cultural diversity climate amongst students of immigrant and nonimmigrant background in Germany. Journal of Educational Psychology , 111 (4), 703–716. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000303 . Schall-Leckrone, L. (2022). Equipping all teachers to teach disciplinary language: Toward a developmental continuum in teacher education. TESOL Quarterly , 56 (2), 840–851. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3141 . Schendel, R., McCowan, T., Rolleston, C., Adu-Yeboah, C., Omingo, M., & Tabulawa, R. (2020). Pedagogies for critical thinking at universities in Kenya, Ghana and Botswana: the importance of a collective ‘teaching culture'. Teaching in Higher Education , 28 (4), 717–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1852204 . Schweisfurth, M. (2023). Disaster didacticism: Pedagogical interventions and the ‘learning crisis’. International Journal of Educational Development , 96 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102707 . Selvaraj, A., Radhin, V., Ka, N., Benson, N., & Mathew, A. J. (2021). Effect of pandemic based online education on teaching and learning system. Int J Educ Dev , 85 , 102444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102444 . Shohamy, E. (2022). Critical Language Testing, Multilingualism and Social Justice. TESOL Quarterly , 56 (4), 1445–1457. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3185 . Tang, A. L. L., Walker-Gleaves, C., & Rattray, J. (2021). University students’ conceptions and experiences of teacher care amidst online learning. Teaching in Higher Education , 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1989579 . Venn, E., Park, J., Andersen, L. P., & Hejmadi, M. (2020). How do learning technologies impact on undergraduates’ emotional and cognitive engagement with their learning? Teaching in Higher Education , 28 (4), 822–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863349 . Williamson, B., Bayne, S., & Shay, S. (2020). The datafication of teaching in Higher Education: critical issues and perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education , 25 (4), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1748811 . Wolf, M. K., Bailey, A. L., & Ballard, L. (2022). Aligning English Language Proficiency Assessments to Standards: Conceptual and Technical Issues. TESOL Quarterly , 57 (2), 670–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3199 . Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-3790747","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":264044428,"identity":"7bb1a8a2-b656-45d0-99ad-d00e0e25c785","order_by":0,"name":"Ruyang li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ruyang","middleName":"","lastName":"li","suffix":""},{"id":264044430,"identity":"79f5219b-5797-4902-ab8d-22d817656323","order_by":1,"name":"Mohamed Ismail Ahamad Shah","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mohamed","middleName":"Ismail Ahamad","lastName":"Shah","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2023-12-22 08:14:13","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3790747/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3790747/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":49073021,"identity":"c85058b3-d9b9-4fd4-9975-2a7e18254468","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-01-02 17:23:48","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":92023,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eTheoretical Framework\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3790747/v1/641a24101fb9441bb2ed1ab7.png"},{"id":51036147,"identity":"2526d8aa-b50a-45a5-886f-3d0c11ec60ce","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-02-13 05:11:03","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":589082,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3790747/v1/6c61c425-27b5-4f9b-a5a8-1203fb964bf5.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Cognitive Demands and Strategic Preparedness of Novice English Teachers for ELL Instruction in Zhejiang province, China","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe increasing presence of English Language Learners (ELLs) in schools globally, including China, brings to the forefront the need for effective cognitive strategies in education (Mancilla-Martinez et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). ELLs encounter distinct cognitive challenges in classrooms, such as language barriers and difficulties in processing academic language, which can impede their learning and social-emotional development (Shohamy, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). The effectiveness of instruction for these learners’ hinges on teachers' cognitive preparedness, especially in managing language and cultural differences (Wolf et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). In China, many novice teachers are tasked with instructing ELLs without having received specialized training in cognitive strategies tailored to these learners' needs (Rabelo et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). This gap in preparation can exacerbate the challenges faced by both teachers and ELLs.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudies highlight the crucial role of cognitive-based teacher preparation in equipping educators with the necessary skills and knowledge for effective ELL instruction (Schall-Leckrone, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) Teachers need to navigate not only the linguistic but also the cognitive aspects of language learning, such as understanding and addressing the specific cognitive processes involved in language acquisition. Furthermore, the cognitive dimension of teaching ELLs extends to cultural competence. ELLs often come from diverse cultural backgrounds, which can present unique cognitive challenges in the classroom (Lin et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Teachers' familiarity with and ability to incorporate these diverse cognitive and cultural perspectives into their teaching strategies are essential for creating inclusive and effective learning environments for ELLs (Peng et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study adopts a qualitative methodology, focusing on semi-structured interviews with novice English teachers in China, specifically examining their preparedness in the cognitive dimension for teaching ELLs. The diverse sample, drawn from various urban and rural schools, includes teachers with varied backgrounds and experiences with ELLs. Thematic analysis of the data reveals key cognitive challenges and strategies, providing insights into the cognitive aspects of teaching ELLs among first-year teachers. These findings, essential for understanding cognitive preparedness, inform the enhancement of teacher training programs. The study's focus on the cognitive dimension extends to examining the role of cultural competence, language policies, and technology in this context. The outcomes are geared towards improving teacher readiness in cognitive strategies for ELL instruction, contributing to policy and curriculum development in this area.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOverall, this study provides insights into the preparedness of first-year teachers in China to teach ELLs and contributes to the development of more effective teacher education programs and support systems. It is hoped that the findings of this study will help improve the quality of education provided to ELLs in China and promote their academic success.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec2\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eAbout this study\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eImportance of teacher preparedness\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe importance of education for ELLs cannot be overstated. English language proficiency is increasingly seen as a necessary skill in today's global society, and ELLs face numerous challenges in acquiring this proficiency while also learning academic content. English language proficiency is an important factor in academic success, career advancement, and social integration for individuals who are non-native English speakers (Kendrick et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). It was found that English language learners who receive appropriate support and instruction are more likely to achieve academic success and improve their English language skills (Ardasheva et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). According to Aguilar et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), English language learners who have access to quality language instruction and resources are better equipped to participate in the global economy and compete in the job market. In a report by the Migration Policy Institute, it was stated that the education of English language learners is crucial for the economic, social, and cultural well-being of communities and the country (Leo, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Research by Sato \u0026amp; Storch (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) found that English language learners who receive culturally responsive instruction who respects their linguistic and cultural backgrounds are more likely to feel a sense of belonging and engagement in the classroom, which can lead to improved academic outcomes. The growing number of ELLs in schools has created a pressing need for teachers who are prepared to meet the unique needs of these students. Teachers must be equipped with the knowledge and skills to teach language and content effectively to ELLs, who often face significant language and cultural barriers in the classroom. Teacher preparation programs have traditionally focused on preparing teachers to work with native English speakers, but there is now an increased emphasis on preparing teachers to work with ELLs. However, research has shown that many teachers do not feel adequately prepared to meet the needs of ELLs in their classrooms (Dwomoh et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). There are several dimensions of teacher preparedness for ELL instruction, including cognitive, emotional, sociocultural, and pedagogical knowledge (Nguyen \u0026amp; Dang, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Teachers must have the knowledge and skills to effectively teach content and language to ELLs, be emotionally ready to work with these students, understand the cultural and social contexts in which ELLs learn, and be familiar with effective pedagogical strategies for teaching ELLs. Despite the importance of teacher preparedness for ELL instruction, there are still many challenges that teachers face in meeting the needs of these students. These challenges include a lack of training and support in working with ELLs, a lack of access to appropriate instructional materials and resources, and the difficulty of balancing the needs of ELLs with those of native English speakers in the classroom (Kim \u0026amp; Burić, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOverall, there is a critical need for teachers who are prepared to work effectively with ELLs in the classroom. Teacher preparation programs must focus on developing the knowledge and skills necessary to meet the unique needs of ELLs, and schools must provide ongoing training and support for teachers to ensure that they are able to provide high-quality instruction to all students, regardless of their language background.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eCognitive dimensions of Teacher Preparation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe cognitive dimension of teacher preparation includes the knowledge and skills necessary to teach content effectively. In the context of ELLs, this may involve understanding the unique linguistic and cultural backgrounds of these students and adapting teaching strategies accordingly (Dwomoh et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). To effectively teach ELLs, teachers must have a deep understanding of the unique linguistic and cultural backgrounds of these students. As stated by Prasad \u0026amp; Lory (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e), ELLs in China come from diverse linguistic backgrounds, including those who speak Mandarin as a second language, minority languages, and foreign languages. This diversity can create significant challenges for teachers who must adapt their teaching strategies to meet the needs of each student. In addition to linguistic diversity, ELLs may also have different cultural backgrounds and experiences that can impact their learning in the classroom. As noted by Schachner et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e), cultural differences can impact everything from communication styles and learning preferences to attitudes toward authority and classroom participation. To address these challenges, teachers must be equipped with the knowledge and skills necessary to adapt their teaching strategies to the needs of ELLs. This may involve developing culturally responsive teaching practices, such as incorporating the cultural backgrounds of ELLs into classroom activities and adapting instructional materials to be more culturally relevant (Lin et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Furthermore, teachers must be knowledgeable about second language acquisition theory and how it can inform their teaching practices. In line with Bai \u0026amp; Wang (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) effective language teaching should incorporate opportunities for meaningful interaction, comprehensible input, and task-based learning, among other strategies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eTheoretical framework\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe amalgamation of Illeris' Contemporary Learning Theory (2018) with Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory (1978) establishes a formidable theoretical infrastructure for dissecting the complexities of teacher readiness, particularly within the ambit of ELLs. Though these theories originate from distinct conceptual roots and primarily focus on different aspects, they converge notably in their recognition of the dynamic interaction between the individual learner and the social context in the process of learning (Timmis \u0026amp; Muñoz-Chereau, 2019).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIlleris' theory delineates three pivotal dimensions of learning: cognitive, emotional, and societal. It advocates that efficacious learning emanates from the synergy of these facets, underscoring a holistic perspective of the learning paradigm. This conceptualization finds resonance in the study's probe into the cognitive, emotional, and sociocultural facets of teacher preparedness, shedding light on the interplay and mutual influence among these dimensions (Andriopoulou \u0026amp; Prowse, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConversely, Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory accentuates the influence of social interactions and cultural instruments in the evolution of cognitive development. It posits learning as a socially mediated process, where knowledge construction is facilitated through interactions with peers and engagement with cultural artifacts (Esterhazy et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). This theoretical stance aligns with the study's focus on the sociocultural dimension of teacher preparedness, highlighting how educators' interactions with students, colleagues, and curricular content sculpt their teaching methodologies (Andriopoulou \u0026amp; Prowse, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFigure 1: Theoretical Framework\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e The integration of these theoretical perspectives offers a succinct yet comprehensive understanding of teacher preparedness, emphasizing its embeddedness within a broader sociocultural context. This approach facilitates a focused exploration of the challenges and opportunities for emerging English teachers in Zhejiang province, enhancing our understanding of their readiness to teach ELLs (Schendel et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Notably, the framework underscores the importance of the cognitive dimension, acknowledging how teachers' knowledge, thought processes, and problem-solving skills are crucial in navigating the complexities of the classroom. It also highlights the interaction between these cognitive aspects and the sociocultural environment, including how teachers' beliefs and mental frameworks are shaped by and respond to their educational settings (Tang et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). This focus on the cognitive dimension allows for a deeper analysis of the internal factors influencing teacher preparedness, enriching our insight into their professional development.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e "},{"header":"Aims and Objectives","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe primary aim of this study was to assess the extent of preparedness among novice teachers for instructing ELLs in cognitive aspects of teaching. The objectives focused on evaluating the teachers' self-perceived readiness, identifying the specific cognitive challenges they face, and exploring the strategies they employ to address these challenges. Additionally, the study aimed to assess the effectiveness of current teacher training programs in equipping novice teachers with the necessary cognitive skills for teaching ELLs. This comprehensive approach is intended to deepen the understanding of the cognitive dimensions in teaching ELLs, with a view to enhancing teacher training and support mechanisms in this critical area of education.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResearch Question\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe main research question and sub-questions are as follows:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMain research question: \"To what extent do novice teachers feel prepared to instruct ELLs in their classes in terms of cognitive challenges and strategies?\"\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSub-questions: RQ1: What specific cognitive challenges do novice teachers encounter when instructing ELLs, and how do these challenges impact their sense of preparedness?\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRQ2: What cognitive strategies do novice teachers employ to overcome the challenges they face in teaching ELLs, and how effective do they perceive these strategies to be?\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRQ3: In what ways do existing teacher training programs support novice teachers in developing cognitive strategies for teaching ELLs, and where are the gaps in this preparation?\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methodology","content":" \u003cp\u003eIn this section, the research methodology employed in this qualitative descriptive study is outlined and discussed in detail, as it allows for an in-depth exploration of the complex experiences, beliefs, and challenges faced by novice English teachers in China when teaching ELLs. Qualitative research is particularly suited for understanding the intricacies of human experiences and the social processes involved in teaching ELLs. Through this approach, the study seeks to gain insights into how these teachers perceive their preparedness and the challenges they face in the Chinese educational context, thereby providing valuable information for informing policy and practice.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eRecruitment process\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe recruitment phase targeted educational institutions in Wenzhou, a nexus for English language education in Zhejiang province. Invitations were extended to novice English teachers, articulating the study's aims and their potential contribution to understanding English teaching dynamics. This approach capitalized on institutional networks for effective outreach.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAll interviewees received ‘Participant Information Sheet' and gave their informed consent to participate. Ethics approval was granted by the internal ethics committee of the first author’s university. The first author is in charge of data collection and analysis while a joint effort of the two authors has been made to conduct theoretical framing and writing.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOf the twenty-five novice teachers from Wenzhou who expressed interest, a rigorous screening process refined the cohort to nineteen, aligning with the study’s criteria. These educators were then presented with detailed consent forms, ensuring their informed participation, confidentiality, and the freedom to withdraw. This meticulous selection process resulted in a diverse group of fifteen teachers participating, reflecting a 79% participation rate, and encompassing a range of experiences from Wenzhou's urban and suburban areas, thereby capturing varied pedagogical contexts.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eInterview scheduling\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e After participants expressed interest and gave consent, they were contacted to schedule interviews. The scheduling considered the participants' convenience, ensuring that interviews did not disrupt their teaching schedules. Reminder emails or messages were sent out a day before the interview to confirm availability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eDescriptive data on participants\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eUnderstanding the background and characteristics of the participants is crucial for contextualizing the findings of the study (Kálmán et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). This section provides a detailed descriptive analysis of the participants, shedding light on their demographics, educational background, and teaching experiences.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSummarized Demographic Profile of Participants\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDemographic Category\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNumber of Participants\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGender\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFemale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eYears of Teaching Experience\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLess than 1 year\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1–3 years\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4–5 years\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDistrict in Wenzhou\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLucheng\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOuhai\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLongwan\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRui'an\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOthers\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNumber of ELL Students in Class\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLess than 20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20–40\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMore than 40\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAfter the table summarizing participants' demographics, a detailed exploration of their backgrounds and experiences follows. This examination reveals the diverse backgrounds of novice English teachers in Wenzhou city, showcasing their individual journeys, challenges, and aspirations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study examines English teaching dynamics with an equal gender distribution and varied teaching tenure, ranging from novices struggling with classroom management to more experienced teachers mastering diverse classrooms and technology integration (Turner III et al., 2022). Participants are from diverse areas of Wenzhou city, with urban teachers facing high expectations and rural teachers experiencing strong community support but limited resources. All teachers have at least a bachelor's degree, with postgraduates contributing advanced pedagogical methods and innovative strategies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn summary, this in-depth look at participants' profiles highlights the richness of the data collected. Each teacher's unique journey and challenges contribute to a comprehensive understanding of novice English teachers' lives in Wenzhou city.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eLimitations of Study\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhile this study on novice English teachers in Zhejiang Province provides valuable insights, it is not without limitations. The geographic concentration on Zhejiang Province may not reflect the experiences of novice teachers in other regions of China. Additionally, the study’s exclusive reliance on qualitative methods may limit the generalizability of the findings. Another significant limitation is its sole focus on novice teachers, excluding the viewpoints of more experienced educators, which could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the teaching landscape. Furthermore, the study's theoretical framework is confined to Knud Illeris' Contemporary Learning Theory, emphasizing only the cognitive dimension and potentially overlooking other critical aspects of teaching and learning. Future research would benefit from incorporating a broader geographic representation, employing a blend of both qualitative and quantitative methodologies, and integrating a variety of theoretical perspectives to capture a more holistic view of English language teaching in diverse educational contexts.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Findings","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe cognitive dimension of teaching is pivotal to effective instruction, especially when instructing ELLs (Delprato \u0026amp; Antequera, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). To delve deeper into this dimension, the researcher engaged with 15 novice teachers in Zhejiang province, China, through in-depth interviews, meticulous observations, and thorough document analyses. This triangulated data collection approach enabled the researcher to capture a comprehensive understanding of their cognitive preparedness.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe researchers' findings, distilled into two central themes, offer a panoramic view of the cognitive landscape for novice teachers in Zhejiang as they navigate the complexities of ELL instruction. To ensure confidentiality and privacy, pseudonyms are used throughout the presentation of these findings.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eCognitive challenges\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eGuiding English language learners along their educational path is an undoubtedly rewarding endeavour, yet it is not without its complexities. In particular, the cognitive dimension of ELL instruction presents a unique set of challenges that teachers must skillfully address. These challenges, often multifaceted, require a deep understanding and strategic approach to ensure effective instruction ((Delprato \u0026amp; Antequera, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). This section delves into the cognitive challenges faced by novice teachers in Zhejiang province, China, as they endeavour to instruct ELLs. Through meticulous data analysis, two predominant sub-themes have emerged, each shedding light on a specific aspect of the cognitive challenges encountered. These sub-themes, detailed in the table below, provide a structured overview of the challenges, offering insights into their nature, implications, and potential solutions.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCognitive Challenges Faced by Novice Teachers\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTheme\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSub-theme\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDescription\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCognitive Challenges\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNavigating Diverse Learning Styles\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChallenges related to addressing the varied learning preferences and needs of ELLs.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBridging Prior Knowledge Gaps\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDifficulties in connecting new information to ELLs' existing knowledge base.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn the subsequent sections, each of these sub-themes will be explored in depth, drawing from the experiences and reflections of the participants, and juxtaposed with relevant literature to provide a comprehensive understanding of the cognitive challenges in ELL instruction.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eNavigating diverse learning styles\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eNavigating the varied learning styles and preferences of students, especially in an ELL classroom, presents a cognitive challenge for teachers (Aiken, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Being able to discern and adapt to these diverse needs requires a blend of observation, understanding, and flexibility (Sahan \u0026amp; Şahan, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Such adaptability ensures that lessons resonate with every student, regardless of their preferred learning modality.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e Ms. Liu, a relatively experienced novice teacher from Wenzhou city, shared her insights on this during her interview. She described her classroom as a mosaic of unique personalities and learning styles, ranging from visual to auditory and kinesthetic learners. Ms. Liu stated:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e...Every classroom is... it's like a mosaic. Each student brings their unique personality, their unique style of learning. Some are visual... while others... they might be more auditory or kinesthetic. (I/T-G, lines 32–35) (She gestured expansively, emphasizing the diversity she encountered daily.)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEchoing Ms. Liu’s experience, Mr. Zhao's teaching approach, as observed during a classroom observation (CO), demonstrated a dynamic adaptation to these varied learning styles. His technique involved using a range of instructional methods – visuals, hands-on activities, and audio clips – within a single lesson. The observation notes described:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eit was evident that Mr. Zhao was constantly... shifting his teaching techniques. He used visuals, then switched to hands-on activities, then to audio clips – all in one lesson. It felt... comprehensive, tailored to cater to everyone in the room. (CO-H, observation notes) (His dynamic approach was evident, and his eyes constantly scanned the room, ensuring engagement.)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMs. Zhang, in her reflective journal, expressed the ongoing challenge of catering to every student’s needs. She frequently questioned the diversity and effectiveness of her lessons, highlighting the constant need for adaptation and innovation in her teaching methods. Ms. Zhang wrote:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere are days when I... I wonder if I'm reaching out to every student. Are my lessons diverse enough? It's a continuous process... of adaptation and innovation. (RJ-K, entry 5) (Her writing was filled with self-questioning, showing her determination to evolve.)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdding weight to these firsthand accounts, Greenwood-Hau (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e) emphasizes that diversity in the classroom is not just about background or culture; it is fundamentally about the myriad ways students assimilate knowledge. Teachers are not just instructors; they are navigators of this diverse landscape. Moreover, the critical exploration of small-group teaching practice in higher education underscores the need for a dynamic understanding of diversity, considering the classroom as a relational experience shaped by gendered and racialized frames (Gibbs et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). However, Ms. Zhang's reflective notes provided a slightly divergent view:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhile researchers advocate for a fluid understanding of learning styles, on-ground realities can sometimes be starkly different. Meeting every student's unique need within the constraints of time and resources is no small feat. (RJ-K, entry 3) (Her writing conveyed a sense of challenge intermingled with hope.)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdditionally, Dimmock et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e) stated that diverse learning styles are both a challenge and an opportunity. The beauty lies in the dance between adapting and innovating.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn summation, the process of engaging with diverse learning styles represents a nuanced interplay of keen observation, dynamic adaptation, and creative innovation (Schendel et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Educators who proficiently navigate this realm not only cultivate an environment of inclusivity within their classrooms but also ensure the fulfilment of each learner's distinctive educational requisites. This is especially pertinent in the contextually demanding milieu of ELL education, where tailored approaches are paramount.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\u003ch2\u003eNavigating diverse learning styles\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eNavigating the varied learning styles and preferences of students, especially in an ELL classroom, presents a cognitive challenge for teachers (Aiken, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Being able to discern and adapt to these diverse needs requires a blend of observation, understanding, and flexibility (Sahan \u0026amp; Şahan, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Such adaptability ensures that lessons resonate with every student, regardless of their preferred learning modality.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e Ms. Liu, a relatively experienced novice teacher from Wenzhou city, shared her insights on this during her interview. She described her classroom as a mosaic of unique personalities and learning styles, ranging from visual to auditory and kinesthetic learners. Ms. Liu stated:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e...Every classroom is... it's like a mosaic. Each student brings their unique personality, their unique style of learning. Some are visual... while others... they might be more auditory or kinesthetic. (I/T-G, lines 32–35) (She gestured expansively, emphasizing the diversity she encountered daily.)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eEchoing Ms. Liu’s experience, Mr. Zhao's teaching approach, as observed during a classroom observation (CO), demonstrated a dynamic adaptation to these varied learning styles. His technique involved using a range of instructional methods – visuals, hands-on activities, and audio clips – within a single lesson. The observation notes described:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eit was evident that Mr. Zhao was constantly... shifting his teaching techniques. He used visuals, then switched to hands-on activities, then to audio clips – all in one lesson. It felt... comprehensive, tailored to cater to everyone in the room. (CO-H, observation notes) (His dynamic approach was evident, and his eyes constantly scanned the room, ensuring engagement.)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMs. Zhang, in her reflective journal, expressed the ongoing challenge of catering to every student’s needs. She frequently questioned the diversity and effectiveness of her lessons, highlighting the constant need for adaptation and innovation in her teaching methods. Ms. Zhang wrote:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThere are days when I... I wonder if I'm reaching out to every student. Are my lessons diverse enough? It's a continuous process... of adaptation and innovation. (RJ-K, entry 5) (Her writing was filled with self-questioning, showing her determination to evolve.)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAdding weight to these firsthand accounts, Greenwood-Hau (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e) emphasizes that diversity in the classroom is not just about background or culture; it is fundamentally about the myriad ways students assimilate knowledge. Teachers are not just instructors; they are navigators of this diverse landscape. Moreover, the critical exploration of small-group teaching practice in higher education underscores the need for a dynamic understanding of diversity, considering the classroom as a relational experience shaped by gendered and racialized frames (Gibbs et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). However, Ms. Zhang's reflective notes provided a slightly divergent view:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWhile researchers advocate for a fluid understanding of learning styles, on-ground realities can sometimes be starkly different. Meeting every student's unique need within the constraints of time and resources is no small feat. (RJ-K, entry 3) (Her writing conveyed a sense of challenge intermingled with hope.)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAdditionally, Dimmock et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e) stated that diverse learning styles are both a challenge and an opportunity. The beauty lies in the dance between adapting and innovating.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn summation, the process of engaging with diverse learning styles represents a nuanced interplay of keen observation, dynamic adaptation, and creative innovation (Schendel et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Educators who proficiently navigate this realm not only cultivate an environment of inclusivity within their classrooms but also ensure the fulfilment of each learner's distinctive educational requisites. This is especially pertinent in the contextually demanding milieu of ELL education, where tailored approaches are paramount.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eBridging prior knowledge gaps\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eOne of the paramount challenges that educators face, especially in the realm of teaching ELLs, is addressing and bridging the gaps in prior knowledge (Arokiyaraj et al., 2021). These gaps can vary significantly, stemming from diverse cultural backgrounds, differing educational systems, or even individual life experiences (Venn et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Navigating these can often dictate the trajectory of a student's learning experience.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMs. Xu, during her interview, reflected on her initial assumptions about her students' baseline knowledge and the subsequent realization of the disparities among them. She remarked,\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn the beginning... I assumed all students came with a similar baseline... of prior knowledge. It was... a stark realization when I noticed the disparities. (I/T-J, lines 46–49) (Her face took on a sombre expression as she reflected on her early days of teaching, indicating a common challenge faced by educators in assessing and addressing varied student backgrounds..)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHer reflection, marked by a sombre tone, echoes the sentiments of five other respondents, including ten and eight. In a contrasting observation, Mr. Wang's strategy appeared more pre-emptive. During a class observation, it is noted:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMr. Wang began his lesson with a brief diagnostic test, intending to gauge the students' prior understanding. This informed the rest of his lesson, allowing him to tailor his approach accordingly. (CO-L, observation notes) (His proactive approach seemed to instill confidence in his students.)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDrawing from an academic perspective, Deniz (2021) argues that the first step to effective teaching is understanding where your students stand. Ignoring prior knowledge gaps can lead to a fractured learning experience. Yet, Mr. Chen's reflective journal offered a nuanced perspective that slightly diverged from Deniz's viewpoint:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWhile it's essential to recognize prior knowledge... sometimes, dwelling too much on what students don't know can overshadow the potential of what they can learn. It's a delicate balance. In my classes, for example, I acknowledge the gaps in their English skills, but I focus more on building from what they do know. This approach encourages a positive learning environment and emphasizes growth and potential rather than deficits. (RJ-L, entry 5) (His words carried an undertone of optimism and forward-thinking.)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eValidating this challenge, Williamson et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) emphasizes that prior knowledge is the foundation upon which new learning builds. If that foundation is shaky or uneven, the new learning might just collapse. Synthesizing these insights, it becomes evident that bridging prior knowledge gaps is not just about addressing disparities. It is about laying a robust foundation, fostering an environment of inclusivity, and facilitating a cohesive learning journey, particularly pivotal in ELL settings (Kreber \u0026amp; Wealer, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eCognitive strategies\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe complexities of teaching, especially in the context of ELLs, demand not only profound knowledge but also a repertoire of cognitive strategies to facilitate effective learning (Howson \u0026amp; Kingsbury, 2021). Cognitive strategies represent a set of techniques or tools that teachers consciously employ to assist, enhance, or optimize the learning process (Venn et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Delving into the cognitive strategies adapted by teachers provides insights into the multifaceted world of pedagogy, offering a clearer picture of how educators mentally maneuver their way through the teaching landscape (Conto et al., 2021).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe subsequent sub-themes provide an in-depth exploration of the various cognitive strategies employed by teachers, highlighting their significance, application, and effectiveness:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSub-themes under Cognitive Strategies in Teaching\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTheme\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSub-theme\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDescription\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCognitive Strategies in Teaching\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMetacognitive Tactics\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStrategies related to thinking about one's own thinking, including planning, monitoring, and evaluating one's own learning\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eScaffolding Techniques\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTechniques employed to progressively move students toward greater independence and understanding during learning sessions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eThese sub-themes collectively underscore the varied cognitive strategies harnessed by educators to augment teaching effectiveness, ensuring a more resonant learning experience for their ELLs.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eMetacognitive tactics\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eMetacognition, or \"thinking about thinking,\" is a crucial component of effective teaching, particularly when instructing ELLs (Kreber \u0026amp; Wealer, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Metacognitive strategies enable educators to introspectively evaluate their teaching methods, plan and monitor instruction based on student feedback, and adjust their approach as needed (Schendel et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). By doing so, teachers can create a learning environment that fosters not only knowledge transfer but also the cultivation of self-directed learning and critical thinking skills.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePeter, in his interview, shared his approach to teaching, emphasizing the importance of flexibility and adaptability. He described how he begins each lesson with a planned strategy but remains open to adjusting his methods based on student interactions and understanding. Peter stated:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eEvery time I teach, I start with a strategy but adapt as I interact with students, assessing their understanding and adjusting my approach. Teaching for me is dynamic, a responsive dance to the classroom's pulse. This reflects my emphasis on metacognitive strategies in teaching. (I/T-F, lines 52–59)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eEchoing Peter's approach, Jenny, in her reflective journal, also emphasized the dynamic nature of teaching. She described how her planned lesson evolved into spontaneous improvisation, blending art and science. Jenny's entry read:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eToday, my teaching evolved from a planned lesson to spontaneous improvisation, blending the art and science of teaching. This process involves deep reflection and intuition, highlighting the fluid nature of education. (RJ-B, entry dated April 10) Her words reveal a deep passion and understanding of her role.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDuring a classroom observation of Peter's teaching, his application of metacognitive strategies was clear. The observer noted Peter's skill in merging teaching with real-time assessment, using questions and anecdotes to understand and respond to student needs. The observation detailed:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn his lesson, Peter adeptly combined teaching with on-the-spot assessment, using questions and anecdotes to gauge student understanding. His skill in integrating teaching with immediate feedback exemplifies a mastery in metacognition. (CO-H, Entry 8)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAdding a broader perspective, academic research mirrors these practitioner insights. Arokiyaraj et al. (2021) insightfully stated that in the realm of education, metacognitive awareness is non-negotiable. The ability of an educator to continually evaluate, introspect, and recalibrate their teaching techniques, drawing from a reservoir of experience and intuition, delineates a good teacher from a great one. This aligns with the notion that effective teaching involves a continuous process of self-assessment and adaptation, drawing from both experience and intuition (Arokiyaraj et al., 2021). Furthermore, the ability to recalibrate teaching methods based on metacognitive awareness is crucial for educators to transition from being merely good teachers to becoming exceptional ones (Arokiyaraj et al., 2021).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCollectively, these insights emphasize the critical role of metacognitive tactics in teaching. By continuously reflecting on their practice, developing self-awareness of their strengths and weaknesses, and demonstrating adaptive agility in their teaching methods, educators can truly resonate with their students, especially in diverse and challenging contexts like ELL instruction.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eScaffolding techniques\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe concept of scaffolding in education, first popularized by Vygotsky (1978), alludes to the provision of support structures that enable learners to move towards new skills, concepts, or understanding. Especially in the context of ELL instruction, scaffolding serves as a bridge, allowing students to grasp and internalize new linguistic constructs within their current understanding (Heron et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Scaffolding techniques, which can range from visual aids to guided practice, evolve as learners grow in their knowledge, eventually leading to independent competency.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn her interview session, Clara provided an insightful look into her tailored teaching methods. She described how she caters to the varied backgrounds and learning paces of her students by using different support mechanisms. Clara explained:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn each class, I address diverse backgrounds and learning speeds by providing varied support, like visual aids, repetition, or group activities, to align everyone's understanding. (I/T-J, lines 62–68) (Her firm tone underscores her dedication to inclusivity and individual growth).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMark, in his reflective journal, offered a different angle on teaching methodology. He discussed his approach to teaching complex sentence structures by starting with simpler sentences and incrementally increasing complexity. Mark's entry read:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eToday, I taught complex sentence structures, starting with simple sentences and gradually building complexity, leading to the class's confident understanding. This methodical approach allowed the students to grasp the basics first and then slowly comprehend more intricate patterns. By the end of the lesson, their confident understanding was evident in their writing and speech. (RJ-D, entry 5) (His writing reflects a strategic, scaffolded approach to teaching).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA classroom observation (CO-K) of Clara’s teaching provided further evidence of the effective use of scaffolding in her approach. The observer noted how Clara skillfully blends traditional teaching methods with scaffolding techniques. The note read:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eClara's teaching method combines traditional approaches with scaffolding, linking new vocabulary to familiar concepts with visuals or examples. Rather than giving direct answers, she uses leading questions to encourage discovery-based learning. For instance, when introducing new vocabulary, she connects it to things students already know, like using images of common items in their culture. And instead of simply giving answers, she asks questions like, 'How would you use this word in a sentence about your favourite festival?' This encourages discovery-based learning, helping students engage with and internalize the new language more effectively (CO-K, Entry 12)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSupporting these firsthand accounts, Schweisfurth (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e)) underscored the importance of scaffolding, stating in diverse classrooms, scaffolding is not just an instructional strategy; it is an essential bridge, fostering connections between prior knowledge and new learning. Scaffolding techniques play an indispensable role in facilitating learning, especially in the context of ELL instruction. By tailoring support structures to individual needs, educators can ensure that every student, irrespective of their starting point, is granted an equitable opportunity to succeed and flourish (Roberts-Bowman et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eScaffolding is essential for helping ELLs progress from their current understanding to the desired learning objectives. Teachers might use tools like visual aids, graphic organizers, or sentence starters to assist ELLs in grasping and using complex language. Providing opportunities for guided practice, peer collaboration, and feedback are also key scaffolding techniques. Thoughtfully applied, scaffolding can enable ELLs to surmount language barriers and realize their full potential.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion and recommendation","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis research unravels the cognitive complexities and strategic approaches of novice English teachers in Zhejiang Province, China, particularly in teaching ELLs. Based on Knud Illeris' Contemporary Learning Theory, it explores the various challenges and adaptive strategies of these teachers. The study's conclusions are vital for understanding English language teaching and teacher education. It offers practical recommendations based on its findings to improve the training and professional development of novice English teachers. These suggestions are relevant not just for Zhejiang Province but for educators worldwide facing similar issues in different educational settings.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eContributions of the Study\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis research on novice English teachers in Zhejiang Province, China, significantly enriches the field of teacher education and English language teaching both theoretically and practically. It examines the complex challenges and strategies in this context, adding depth to existing pedagogical theories, especially within the framework of Knud Illeris' Contemporary Learning Theory. The study's key contributions lie in enhancing theoretical understanding and providing practical insights for teacher training, curriculum design, and educational policy. Its findings are crucial for developing more nuanced and effective approaches in English language teaching and teacher preparation, particularly in culturally diverse and dynamic educational environments.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eTheoretical Contributions\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis research focusing on novice English teachers in Zhejiang Province makes a significant contribution to the cognitive dimension of Knud Illeris' Contemporary Learning Theory. By underscoring the cognitive challenges in teaching ELLs, it extends Illeris' framework to encompass the subtleties of cultural adaptation in the Chinese context. The study illustrates how novice teachers' strategies resonate with and expand upon Illeris' cognitive aspects of learning, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive teacher training. This alignment and expansion of Illeris' theory underscore its applicability and relevance in the diverse and complex landscape of modern ELL education.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003ePractical Contributions\u003c/h2\u003e\u003ch2\u003eFostering Advanced Cognitive Skills in Teacher Training\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis study emphasizes the necessity of evolving teacher training programs for novice English teachers in Zhejiang Province, focusing on the development of advanced cognitive skills. Training modules should be designed to equip teachers with strategies for cognitive development, alongside techniques for adaptive teaching and culturally responsive pedagogy. By integrating these cognitive-focused elements, the proposed enhancements in teacher training programs aim to thoroughly prepare novice teachers for the multifaceted demands of modern classrooms. This approach would not only strengthen their pedagogical capabilities but also enable them to adeptly navigate and manage the cognitive complexities inherent in diverse educational settings.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eCurriculum Design and Instructional Strategies\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe study's findings suggest a need for a more nuanced approach in curriculum design and instructional strategies for English language education. It highlights the importance of developing curricula that are learner-centered and adaptable to different teaching contexts, addressing the cognitive challenges faced by novice teachers. Furthermore, instructional methods should include collaborative and interactive techniques, which can help overcome some of these challenges, enhance student engagement, and equip teachers to handle diverse classroom dynamics effectively.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003ePolicy Implications and Educational Practices\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis research underscores the importance of policy changes to better support novice English teachers. It advocates for stronger in-school support systems, such as mentorship programs and professional learning communities, to enhance the development of teaching skills and strategies. Policies should also foster a supportive teaching environment that encourages and facilitates continuous learning and professional growth. In a broader sense, the findings suggest that educational practices need to evolve to accommodate the diverse needs of teachers, equipping them with not only teaching skills but also the tools to navigate the complexities of modern educational environments.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eRecommendation for further research\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eBased on the insights and limitations of this study on novice English teachers in Zhejiang Province, several recommendations are proposed for future research:\u003c/p\u003e\u003col\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eGeographical Expansion: Extend research beyond Zhejiang Province to other regions within China or conduct cross-national comparisons to understand how regional and cultural variations affect novice English teachers.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eMethodological Diversification: Incorporate quantitative methods or a mixed-methods approach for a more comprehensive analysis and broader generalizations, along with statistical validation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eComparative Studies with Experienced Teachers: Include experienced teachers in research to compare their experiences and strategies with those of novices, providing insights into the professional development trajectory in ESL teaching.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eInterdisciplinary and Theoretical Exploration: Employ additional theoretical frameworks or interdisciplinary approaches to gain a deeper understanding of the complexities of teaching and learning in ESL contexts.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eLongitudinal Studies: Conduct long-term research to track the evolution of teachers' challenges and strategies, offering a clearer view of how novice teachers develop their skills over time.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e\u003cp\u003eImplementing these recommendations would enhance the depth and breadth of ESL teaching research, contributing valuable academic insights and informing practical applications in teacher training, curriculum design, and educational policy.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study sheds light on the cognitive demands and strategic readiness of novice English teachers in Zhejiang Province, China, within the framework of Knud Illeris' Contemporary Learning Theory. It uncovers the challenges faced by these educators and their innovative strategies, contributing significantly to both theory and practice in teacher education. The study enriches learning theory discussions and has practical implications for teacher training, curriculum development, and policymaking.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHowever, its geographic focus on Zhejiang Province and its specific methodology imply caution in generalizing the findings. These limitations also open up opportunities for future research to broaden and validate these insights in varied contexts.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOverall, this study marks a crucial step in enhancing our understanding and support for English teachers, particularly novices. It lays groundwork for further research, aiming to improve educational standards and teacher support globally.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eEthical Approval\u003c/strong\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e This study was approved by the SEGi Ethics Committee (Approval Number: SEGiEC/SR/FOELPM/151/2023\u0026ndash;2024). All procedures involving human subjects were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the committee and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in the study.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eFunding\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003enot applicable\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eAll authors reviewed the manuscript\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The data is not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAguilar, G., Uccelli, P., \u0026amp; Galloway, E. P. (2020). Toward Biliteracy: Unpacking the Contribution of Mid-adolescent Dual Language Learners\u0026rsquo; Spanish and English Academic Language Skills to English Reading Comprehension. \u003cem\u003eTESOL Quarterly\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e54\u003c/em\u003e(4), 1010\u0026ndash;1036. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.570\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/tesq.570\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAiken, V. (2021). Academic literacies and the tilts within: the push and pull of student writing. \u003cem\u003eTeaching in Higher Education\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e28\u003c/em\u003e(8), 2104\u0026ndash;2120. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1952565\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13562517.2021.1952565\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlban Conto, C., Akseer, S., Dreesen, T., Kamei, A., Mizunoya, S., \u0026amp; Rigole, A. (2021). Potential effects of COVID-19 school closures on foundational skills and Country responses for mitigating learning loss. \u003cem\u003eInt J Educ Dev\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e87\u003c/em\u003e, 102434. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102434\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102434\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAndriopoulou, P., \u0026amp; Prowse, A. (2020). Towards an effective supervisory relationship in research degree supervision: insights from attachment theory. \u003cem\u003eTeaching in Higher Education\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e25\u003c/em\u003e(5), 648\u0026ndash;661. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1731449\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13562517.2020.1731449\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eArdasheva, Y., Crosson, A. C., Carbonneau, K. J., \u0026amp; French, B. F. (2021). Unpacking Contributions of Morphosyntactic Awareness and Vocabulary to Science Reading Comprehension among Linguistically Diverse Students. \u003cem\u003eTESOL Quarterly\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e55\u003c/em\u003e(3), 931\u0026ndash;965. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3039\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/tesq.3039\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBai, B., \u0026amp; Wang, J. (2020). The role of growth mindset, self-efficacy and intrinsic value in self-regulated learning and English language learning achievements. \u003cem\u003eLanguage Teaching Research\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e27\u003c/em\u003e(1), 207\u0026ndash;228. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820933190\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/1362168820933190\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBowman, S., Salter, J., Stephenson, C., \u0026amp; Humble, D. (2022). Metamodern sensibilities: toward a pedagogical framework for a wicked world. \u003cem\u003eTeaching in Higher Education\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;20. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2151835\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13562517.2022.2151835\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDelprato, M., \u0026amp; Antequera, G. (2021). School efficiency in low and middle income countries: An analysis based on PISA for development learning survey. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Educational Development\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e80\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102296\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102296\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDimmock, C., Tan, C. Y., Nguyen, D., Tran, T. A., \u0026amp; Dinh, T. T. (2021). Implementing education system reform: Local adaptation in school reform of teaching and learning. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Educational Development\u003c/em\u003e, 80. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102302\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102302\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDwomoh, R., Osei-Tutu, A. A. Z., Chhikara, A., Zhou, L., Oudghiri, S., \u0026amp; Bell, T. (2022). Critical Understanding of English Learners: Experience and Practice of Educators in a Professional Development Course. \u003cem\u003eTESOL Quarterly\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e57\u003c/em\u003e(4), 1401\u0026ndash;1433. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3200\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/tesq.3200\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEsterhazy, R., Nerland, M., \u0026amp; Damşa, C. (2019). Designing for productive feedback: an analysis of two undergraduate courses in biology and engineering. \u003cem\u003eTeaching in Higher Education\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e26\u003c/em\u003e(6), 806\u0026ndash;822. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1686699\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13562517.2019.1686699\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGibbs, J., Hartviksen, J., Lehtonen, A., \u0026amp; Spruce, E. (2019). Pedagogies of inclusion: a critical exploration of small-group teaching practice in higher education. \u003cem\u003eTeaching in Higher Education\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e26\u003c/em\u003e(5), 696\u0026ndash;711. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1674276\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13562517.2019.1674276\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGreenwood-Hau, J. (2021). Teaching facts or teaching thinking? The potential of hooks\u0026rsquo; \u0026lsquo;engaged pedagogy\u0026rsquo; for teaching politics in a \u0026lsquo;post-truth\u0026rsquo; moment. \u003cem\u003eTeaching in Higher Education\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;18. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1965567\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13562517.2021.1965567\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHeron, M., Dippold, D., Aksit, N., Aksit, T., Doubleday, J., \u0026amp; McKeown, K. (2021). Tutors\u0026rsquo; beliefs about language and roles: practice as language policy in EMI contexts. \u003cem\u003eTeaching in Higher Education\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;15. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1973410\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13562517.2021.1973410\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eK\u0026aacute;lm\u0026aacute;n, O., Tynj\u0026auml;l\u0026auml;, P., \u0026amp; Skaniakos, T. (2019). Patterns of university teachers\u0026rsquo; approaches to teaching, professional development and perceived departmental cultures. \u003cem\u003eTeaching in Higher Education\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e25\u003c/em\u003e(5), 595\u0026ndash;614. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1586667\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13562517.2019.1586667\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKandiko Howson, C., \u0026amp; Kingsbury, M. (2021). Curriculum change as transformational learning. \u003cem\u003eTeaching in Higher Education\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e28\u003c/em\u003e(8), 1847\u0026ndash;1866. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1940923\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13562517.2021.1940923\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKendrick, M., Early, M., Michalovich, A., \u0026amp; Mangat, M. (2022). Digital Storytelling With Youth From Refugee Backgrounds: Possibilities for Language and Digital Literacy Learning. \u003cem\u003eTESOL Quarterly\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e56\u003c/em\u003e(3), 961\u0026ndash;984. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3146\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/tesq.3146\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKim, L. E., \u0026amp; Burić, I. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy and burnout: Determining the directions of prediction through an autoregressive cross-lagged panel model. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Educational Psychology\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e112\u003c/em\u003e(8), 1661\u0026ndash;1676. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000424\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1037/edu0000424\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKreber, C., \u0026amp; Wealer, C. (2021). Intentions, concepts and conceptions of research supervision: a consideration of three disciplines. \u003cem\u003eTeaching in Higher Education\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e28\u003c/em\u003e(6), 1446\u0026ndash;1463. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1900815\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13562517.2021.1900815\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLeo, A. (2022). Agency in Constrained Spaces: How English Learners and their Teachers Negotiate the Power of High-stakes Exams. \u003cem\u003eTESOL Quarterly\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e57\u003c/em\u003e(2), 351\u0026ndash;374. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3149\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/tesq.3149\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLin, T. J., Chen, J., Lu, M., Sun, J., Purtell, K., Ansari, A., \u0026amp; Justice, L. (2023). The influence of classroom language contexts on dual language learners\u0026rsquo; language development. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Educational Psychology\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e115\u003c/em\u003e(6), 877\u0026ndash;890. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000804\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1037/edu0000804\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMancilla-Martinez, J., Hwang, J. K., Oh, M. H., \u0026amp; McClain, J. B. (2020). Early Elementary Grade Dual Language Learners from Spanish-speaking Homes Struggling with English Reading Comprehension: The Dormant Role of Language Skills. \u003cem\u003eJournal Of Educational Psychology\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e112\u003c/em\u003e(5), 880\u0026ndash;894. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000402\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1037/edu0000402\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNguyen, C. D., \u0026amp; Dang, T. C. T. (2019). Second Language Teacher Education in Response to Local Needs: Preservice Teachers of English Learning to Teach Diverse Learners in Communities. \u003cem\u003eTESOL Quarterly\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e54\u003c/em\u003e(2), 404\u0026ndash;435. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.551\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/tesq.551\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePeng, A., Orosco, M. J., Wang, H., Swanson, H. L., \u0026amp; Reed, D. K. (2022). Cognition and writing development in early adolescent English learners. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Educational Psychology\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e114\u003c/em\u003e(5), 1136\u0026ndash;1155. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000695\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1037/edu0000695\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePrasad, G., \u0026amp; Lory, M. P. (2019). Linguistic and Cultural Collaboration in Schools: Reconciling Majority and Minoritized Language Users. \u003cem\u003eTESOL Quarterly\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e54\u003c/em\u003e(4), 797\u0026ndash;822. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.560\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/tesq.560\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRabelo, L. O., Mattos, C. R., \u0026amp; Abib, M. L. V. (2022). d. S. Beginning a teaching career: Contradictions and alienations. \u003cem\u003eTeaching and Teacher Education\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e119\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103872\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.tate.2022.103872\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSahan, K., \u0026amp; Şahan, \u0026Ouml;. (2021). Investigating student and alumni perspectives on language learning and career prospects through English medium instruction. \u003cem\u003eTeaching in Higher Education\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;22. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1973407\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13562517.2021.1973407\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSato, M., \u0026amp; Storch, N. (2020). Context matters: Learner beliefs and interactional behaviors in an EFL vs. ESL context. \u003cem\u003eLanguage Teaching Research\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e26\u003c/em\u003e(5), 919\u0026ndash;942. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820923582\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/1362168820923582\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchachner, M. K., Schwarzenthal, M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., \u0026amp; Noack, P. (2019). How all students can belong and achieve: Effects of the cultural diversity climate amongst students of immigrant and nonimmigrant background in Germany. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Educational Psychology\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e111\u003c/em\u003e(4), 703\u0026ndash;716. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000303\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1037/edu0000303\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchall-Leckrone, L. (2022). Equipping all teachers to teach disciplinary language: Toward a developmental continuum in teacher education. \u003cem\u003eTESOL Quarterly\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e56\u003c/em\u003e(2), 840\u0026ndash;851. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3141\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/tesq.3141\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchendel, R., McCowan, T., Rolleston, C., Adu-Yeboah, C., Omingo, M., \u0026amp; Tabulawa, R. (2020). Pedagogies for critical thinking at universities in Kenya, Ghana and Botswana: the importance of a collective \u0026lsquo;teaching culture'. \u003cem\u003eTeaching in Higher Education\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e28\u003c/em\u003e(4), 717\u0026ndash;738. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1852204\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13562517.2020.1852204\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchweisfurth, M. (2023). Disaster didacticism: Pedagogical interventions and the \u0026lsquo;learning crisis\u0026rsquo;. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Educational Development\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e96\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102707\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102707\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSelvaraj, A., Radhin, V., Ka, N., Benson, N., \u0026amp; Mathew, A. J. (2021). Effect of pandemic based online education on teaching and learning system. \u003cem\u003eInt J Educ Dev\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e85\u003c/em\u003e, 102444. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102444\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102444\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShohamy, E. (2022). Critical Language Testing, Multilingualism and Social Justice. \u003cem\u003eTESOL Quarterly\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e56\u003c/em\u003e(4), 1445\u0026ndash;1457. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3185\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/tesq.3185\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTang, A. L. L., Walker-Gleaves, C., \u0026amp; Rattray, J. (2021). University students\u0026rsquo; conceptions and experiences of teacher care amidst online learning. \u003cem\u003eTeaching in Higher Education\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;22. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1989579\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13562517.2021.1989579\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVenn, E., Park, J., Andersen, L. P., \u0026amp; Hejmadi, M. (2020). How do learning technologies impact on undergraduates\u0026rsquo; emotional and cognitive engagement with their learning? \u003cem\u003eTeaching in Higher Education\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e28\u003c/em\u003e(4), 822\u0026ndash;839. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863349\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13562517.2020.1863349\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWilliamson, B., Bayne, S., \u0026amp; Shay, S. (2020). The datafication of teaching in Higher Education: critical issues and perspectives. \u003cem\u003eTeaching in Higher Education\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e25\u003c/em\u003e(4), 351\u0026ndash;365. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1748811\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13562517.2020.1748811\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWolf, M. K., Bailey, A. L., \u0026amp; Ballard, L. (2022). Aligning English Language Proficiency Assessments to Standards: Conceptual and Technical Issues. \u003cem\u003eTESOL Quarterly\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e57\u003c/em\u003e(2), 670\u0026ndash;685. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3199\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/tesq.3199\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Cognitive Demands, Teacher Preparedness, English Language Learners, Metacognitive Tactics, Scaffolding Techniques","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3790747/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3790747/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"This study explores the cognitive challenges and preparedness of novice English language teachers in Zhejiang Province, China, for teaching English Language Learners (ELLs). Addressing the gap in research on the application of theoretical frameworks in this context, the qualitative descriptive research involved 15 novice educators through interviews, observations, and document analysis. It is grounded in Illeris' Contemporary Learning Theory and Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory. Key findings include the identification of significant cognitive challenges in addressing diverse learning needs and knowledge gaps among ELLs. The study also highlights the effective use of metacognitive techniques and scaffolding in ELL instruction. It underscores the need for comprehensive teacher training in China, advocating for programs that go beyond linguistic skills to include varied pedagogical strategies, catering to the complex requirements of ELL students.","manuscriptTitle":"Cognitive Demands and Strategic Preparedness of Novice English Teachers for ELL Instruction in Zhejiang province, China","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-01-02 17:23:44","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3790747/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"613d1bb4-8db9-4994-8eef-ff3c4173e8ee","owner":[],"postedDate":"January 2nd, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-02-13T05:02:56+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-01-02 17:23:44","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-3790747","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-3790747","identity":"rs-3790747","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}