Theoretical value of radiation priming for mitigating toxicity in radiation therapy

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The relevance of ionizing radiation effects is high in the field of radiation oncology. Namely, radiation toxicity is a crucial limiting factor in dose administration. To address this concern, by adopting an empirical approach it is possible to uncover certain truths that might not be attainable through rigorous biophysical analysis, as the human body represents a complex system. That is, even possessing complete knowledge of interactions between its elementary units (cells) may prove insufficient in explaining the overall system’s reactions. An empirical mathematical model for adaptive biological response to time-dependent irradiation of arbitrary time-shapes was developed. The model was based on the damped-oscillator analogy from physics. The research reported here is a generalization of the damped-oscillator model by introducing a biologically relevant inverted Gompertzian-like shape, rather commonly employed in adaptive response modeling, with practical implications for biologists and oncologists. Based on the developed model, a practical approach is suggested to improve radiation therapy protocols by radiation training (priming) through administration of low, gradually increasing total-body irradiation doses. Following this priming, individuals should be capable of withstanding higher therapeutic doses, maybe up to five times the regular amount. Initial estimations propose a training time of approximately six weeks and a training dose of up to approximately 600 cGy. If the model is correct, effectiveness of radiation therapy can be significantly improved by radiation priming, since administration of considerably higher therapeutic doses would be enabled through priming procedures.
Full text 1,838 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The relevance of ionizing radiation effects is high in the field of radiation oncology. Namely, radiation toxicity is a crucial limiting factor in dose administration. To address this concern, by adopting an empirical approach it is possible to uncover certain truths that might not be attainable through rigorous biophysical analysis, as the human body represents a complex system. That is, even possessing complete knowledge of interactions between its elementary units (cells) may prove insufficient in explaining the overall system’s reactions. An empirical mathematical model for adaptive biological response to time-dependent irradiation of arbitrary time-shapes was developed. The model was based on the damped-oscillator analogy from physics. The research reported here is a generalization of the damped-oscillator model by introducing a biologically relevant inverted Gompertzian-like shape, rather commonly employed in adaptive response modeling, with practical implications for biologists and oncologists. Based on the developed model, a practical approach is suggested to improve radiation therapy protocols by radiation training (priming) through administration of low, gradually increasing total-body irradiation doses. Following this priming, individuals should be capable of withstanding higher therapeutic doses, maybe up to five times the regular amount. Initial estimations propose a training time of approximately six weeks and a training dose of up to approximately 600 cGy. If the model is correct, effectiveness of radiation therapy can be significantly improved by radiation priming, since administration of considerably higher therapeutic doses would be enabled through priming procedures. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Email: yshaki{at}jct.ac.il

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-30T02:00:01.510937+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0