Laparoscopic uterine artery ligation for treatment of symptomatic adenomyosis
other
OA: closed
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
This pilot study found laparoscopic uterine artery ligation provided limited improvement in uterine size, bleeding, and pain for symptomatic adenomyosis patients, resulting in low satisfaction and a high rate of dissatisfaction.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of laparoscopic uterine artery ligation on symptomatic adenomyosis.
DESIGN: Prospective pilot study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING: Tertiary care major teaching hospital.
PATIENTS: Twenty women with symptomatic adenomyosis.
INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic ligation of bilateral uterine arteries with hemoclips and electrocoagulation of bilateral uterine ovarian vessels.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients underwent sonographic measurement of uterine size, and recorded amount of menstruation and dysmenorrhea preoperatively and postoperatively. Six months postoperatively, mean uterine size had decreased by an amount ranging from 0.4% to 74.0%. Two of nine women achieved remission of the mass effect of an enlarged uterus. Thirteen of 16 patients achieved bleeding control and 5 returned to eumenorrhea or hypomenorrhea. Twelve of 16 patients achieved control of dysmenorrhea and 6 were analgesic free. However, nine women experienced nonmenstrual pain after surgery, three of whom underwent hysterectomy later. Treatment was rated as satisfactory by 15% of patients, but 45% were dissatisfied. Seventeen women would have refused to undergo the procedure if they could make the decision again.
CONCLUSION: Poor satisfaction in this preliminary study suggests that symptomatic adenomyosis may not be effectively treated by laparoscopic uterine artery ligation.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-21T06:08:07.822426+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:13:07.520820+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-22T06:12:16.469521+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine