Women’s Sexist Attitudes and Their Self-Silencing Tendency to Sexismthe Buffering Role of Personal Belief in a Just World and Gender Role-Related Attitudes

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

The current study tested the hypothesis that personal belief in a just world and gender role-related attitudes would mediate the effect of women’s sexist attitudes (hostile and benevolent sexism) on their self-silencing tendency to sexism. An online cross-sectional study was administered between September 2 and December 30, 2021. The total sample comprised two hundred and twenty-one respondents (Mage =38.22, _SD = 2.75)_. A between-subject, correlational design was utilized. Bootstrapping analysis for simple mediation models (Hayes, 2013; Model 4) was performed to test the current study’s hypothesis. This study demonstrates that gender role-related attitudes and a personal belief in a just world could act as a set of a system justifying beliefs buffering women’s motivation to challenge everyday sexism. The theoretical implication of this relationship is that individuals who endorse sexist attitudes and gender stereotypes are expected to exhibit corresponding behaviors.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-30T02:00:01.510937+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0