CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine and adenosine base editing of splice-sites mediates highly-efficient disruption of proteins in primary cells

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Base editors allow for precise nucleotide editing without the need for genotoxic double-stranded breaks. Prior work has used base editors to knockout genes by introducing premature stop codons or by disrupting conserved splice-sites, but no direct comparison exists between these methods. Additionally, while base editor mediated disruption of splice sites has been used to shift the functional isoform pool, its utility for gene knockout requires further validation. To address these needs, we developed the program SpliceR (z.umn.edu/spliceR) to design cytidine-deaminase base editor (CBE) and adenosine-deaminase base editor (ABE) splice-site targeting guides. We compared the splice-site targeting and premature stop codon introduction in a knockout screen against the TCR-CD3 immune synapse in primary human T-cells. Our data suggests that 1) the CBE, BE4 is more reliable than the ABE, ABE7.10 for splice-site targeting knockout and 2) for both CBEs and ABEs, splice-donor targeting is the most reliable approach for base editing induced knockout.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-30T02:00:01.510937+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0