Impact of 26 Skin Diseases on the Risk of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Mendelian Randomization Study Using FinnGen R11 Data
This Mendelian randomization study found genetic predisposition to dermatitis herpetiformis and acne were associated with increased risk of lung squamous cell carcinoma, and rhinophyma, hidradenitis suppurativa, and dermatitis herpetiformis with increased risk of lung adenocarcinoma.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This Mendelian randomization study used FinnGen R11 data to test whether genetic predisposition to 26 skin diseases is associated with risk of non-small cell lung cancer, analyzing multiple NSCLC histologic types with methods including inverse-variance weighted, MR-Egger regression, weighted median, and weighted mode, and assessing heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy. Genetically predicted dermatitis herpetiformis showed a significant association with increased risk of lung squamous cell carcinoma, and acne showed a nominal association with increased squamous cell carcinoma risk. Rhinophyma, hidradenitis suppurativa, and dermatitis herpetiformis were nominally associated with higher risk of lung adenocarcinoma, while 15 other skin diseases showed no statistically significant associations; 7 conditions lacked sufficient instrumental variables for inclusion. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
3,357 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-30T02:00:01.510937+00:00