Metrics Driven Human Oversight Framework for AI Systems

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

The deployment of AI systems in healthcare demands continuous, risk-aligned oversight to ensure safe and responsible operations. We propose a Metrics-driven model that calibrates human involvement based on metrics risk (including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, transparency etc). High-risk Systems require Human-in-Command (HIC) oversight, with final decision authority. Medium-risk systems operate under Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) models, with human supervision and active feedback. Low-risk systems function under Human-on-the-Loop (HOTL) oversight, where humans monitor system outputs and intervene only when anomalies occur. This metrics driven Human Oversight Framework for AI Systems balances innovation with accountability. Unlike existing AI governance approaches that treat performance metrics and human oversight as separate considerations, this work explicitly links metrics-derived risk thresholds to proportional human oversight models (HIC, HITL, HOTL), providing an auditable and operational framework for regulated environments.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-30T02:00:01.510937+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0