The effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on death and severity of disease in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A meta-analysis
preprint
OA: gold
publisher-OA-unknown
Abstract
Aims and Methods Effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) on outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is uncertain. Available evidence is limited to a few retrospective observational studies with small number of patients. We did a meta-analysis to assess the effect of ACEi/ARB in patients with COVID-19 on severity of disease, risk for hospitalisation, and death compared to those not on ACEi/ARB. We searched the Cochrane library, PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrial.gov and medRxiv for studies published until 25.04.2020. Inclusion criteria included all studies with patients with confirmed COVID-19 either taking, or not taking, ACEi/ARB. Depending on degree of heterogeneity, fixed or random effect model was selected to calculate effect size (Odds ratio). Results Six studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. These included 423 patients on ACEi/ARB, and 1419 not on ACEi/ARB. Compared to patients with COVID-19 not on ACEi/ARB, there was a statistically significant 43% reduction (OR 0.57, CI: 0.37–0.88, I 2 0.000) in the odds of death in those on ACEi/ARB. There was a statistically non-significant 38% reduction (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.31–1.23, I 2 =70.36) in the odds of developing severe disease and 19% reduction (OR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.42–1.55, I 2 0.000) in the odds of hospitalisation among those on ACEi/ARB. Discussion It is safe to use ACEi/ARB in patients with COVID-19 requiring these medications for associated comorbidities. Although limited by confounding factors typical of a meta-analysis of retrospective observational studies, our data suggests that use of these medications may reduce the odds of death. Conclusion Our meta-analysis of the updated studies on SARS-CoV-2 reassures the medical fraternity on the use of and continuation of ACEi/ARB, supporting all recent recommendations. Evidence before this study The postulated dual role of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has created a dilemma for clinicians. On the one hand, there is speculation that by upregulating ACE2, ACEi/ARBs might increase the risk and severity of COVID-19. On the other hand, there is evidence that downregulation of ACE2 can mediate acute lung injury. Further evidence is urgently needed to guide clinicians in the use of ACEi/ARB in patients with COVID-19 with co-morbidities. What does this article add Our meta-analysis, which is the first to assess the effect of use of ACEi/ARB in patients with COVID-19, reports that use of ACEi/ARB statistically significantly reduced the risk of death, with a trend towards reduction in risk of severe disease and hospitalisation compared to those who were not on ACEi/ARB. Further information from on-going RCTs shall take time to fruition; in the interim, based on these findings, clinicians can safely continue to use ACEi/ARB in patients with COVID-19 with comorbidities. Review Criteria A web-based search was conducted using the Cochrane library, PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrial.gov and medRxiv using specific keywords. Narrowing down of the citations was done based on full text availability and a set of pre-determined inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was conducted on the pooled data comparing ACEi/ARB group versus the non-ACEi/ARB group on death, severity of disease and hospitalization using the CMA software version 3, Biostat Inc., Englewood, NJ, USA. Effect size was reported as odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval and the degree of heterogeneity of the pooled data. Message for the clinic There is no indication from present evidence to withhold or withdraw ACEi/ARB in patients with SARS-CoV-2.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: publisher-OA-unknown
· commercial use NOT OK
· attribution required