Two, five, six, eight (thousand): Time to end the dimension reduction debate!

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

In the latest salvo in the century-long lexical-dimensionality-reduction debate (Galton, 1884), Ashton and Lee (2020) argue their HEXACO model is superior to Big Five models. We argue that debates comparing alternative low-dimensional personality structures no longer advance personality science or practice. Instead, researchers should embrace the inherent complexity and high dimensionality of human individual differences. If a low-dimensional model is used, investigators should choose a model based on its coherent representation of traits they deem meaningful for the research domain, rather than its alignment with a specific factor analysis solution.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00