Conventional versus modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial

Conventional versus modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Conventional versus modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial Chaoyue Wen, Xuemin Liu, Ying Wang, Jun Wang This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1520689/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 8 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon (CCRB) for induction of labor (IOL) at term in primipara. Methods A total of 227 singleton full-term pregnancies with indications of IOL were enrolled and randomly divided into the control and study groups in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2021. In the control group, a conventional method was used. Both the uterine and vaginal balloons were filled to 80 mL and removed after 12 hours. In the study group, a modified method was used. The uterine and vaginal balloons were filled to 120 mL and 40 mL respectively. Small weight traction was given to help CCRB discharged after 12 hours placement. Oxytocin was administered in both groups after CCRB was discharged without labor starting. The improved Bishop scores, duration of labor, and spontaneous delivery rate were evaluated in the two groups. Results The improved Bishop scores in the study group were 3.06 ± 0.97 at 12 hours placement of CCRB and 4.37 ± 0.87 when CCRB was discharged, which were significantly higher than 2.52 ± 0.79 in the control group ( p < 0.05). The first and total stages of labor in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group ((6.17 ± 2.85) h vs. (7.27 ± 2.90) h, p = 0.010; (7.07 ± 3.18) h vs. (8.09 ± 3.11) h, p = 0.028). No difference in spontaneous delivery rate between the two groups was observed. But the delivery rate within 24h between the two groups had a significant difference (79.79% vs. 55.91%, p < 0.05). For the cases with initial Bishop scores ≤ 3, the improved score was significantly increased, the first and total stages of labor were significantly shorter in the study group than those in the control group ( p < 0.05). Those Cervical ripening Induction of labor COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon Term pregnancy Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Background Induction of labor (IOL) is the artificial initiation of labor before its spontaneous onset to achieve vaginal delivery [ 1 ]. IOL at term is mainly applied to pregnant women with some comorbidities that required termination of pregnancy. In recent years, some research has shown that IOL after 39 gestational weeks without medical indication can lower the risk of cesarean section [ 2 , 3 ]. In the United States, the rate of IOL in primipara increased from 22.5% in 2006 to 42.9% in 2012 [ 4 , 5 ]. The rate of IOL at term in China also increased from 20.4% to more than 30% in 2013 [ 6 ]. Therefore, it is particularly important to choose an efficient and safe method of IOL. Cervical maturity evaluated with the Bishop score is the key to predicting the outcome of IOL. Induction to active labor is usually successful with a score of 9 or greater and is often failure with a score less than 6 [ 5 ]. At present, the commonly used cervical ripening methods include pharmacological methods represented by prostaglandin E2 and mechanical methods represented by COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon (CCRB). According to literature reports, there is no significant difference in the spontaneous delivery rate between the two methods [ 7 , 8 ]. Compared with pharmacological methods, mechanical methods are preferred for cervical ripening with fewer pain scores and less uterine hyperstimulation [ 8 – 11 ]. The mechanical methods induce uterine contractions mainly by squeezing the internal cervical os through a uterine balloon, which stretches the lower uterine segment, thereby promoting the local release of prostaglandins [ 12 ]. Besides the local effect, the balloon can also promote uterine contractions through neuro-endocrine reflexes (such as the Ferguson reflex) [ 13 ]. CCRB is currently the most used cervical ripening double-balloon device clinically. Besides the uterine balloon, CCRB has another balloon named vaginal balloon, which helps to fix the uterine balloon on the lower uterine segment. However, the success rate of spontaneous delivery after cervical ripening with CCRB is about 66%-70% according to the manufacturer’s instructions [ 7 , 8 ]. We try to modify the operating procedure of CCRB to achieve a better cervical ripening effect and improve the success rate of spontaneous delivery. Methods Selection and grouping of patients In this study, 227 pregnancies were selected from 976 hospitalized singleton full-term patients ready for IOL and were randomly divided into the control group and the study group in the Shengjing Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University from January 2021 to December 2021. Inclusion criteria included: (1) primiparous pregnancy; (2) cephalic presentation; (3) NST reaction type; (4) cervical Bishop score ≤ 6. Exclusion criteria included (1) placenta previa; (2) rupture of membranes; (3) hydramnios; (4) scarred uterus; (5) fetal malformation or intrauterine fetal death; (6) combined vaginitis; (7) history of late abortion or premature delivery; (8) presence of contraindications to vaginal delivery. (Fig. 1) Ethical approval and patient consent The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Shengjing Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University (Ethics No. 2021PS248J) and all patients signed informed consent forms. Study methods and operating procedures CCRB (Type J-CRBS-184000, Spencer, IN, USA) was uniformly used in the present study. The detailed operating procedures of the two groups were as follows (Fig. 2). On the first day, CCRB was placed at 6 pm. CCRB catheter was placed through the cervical canal to the internal cervical os after strict sterilization without touching the vaginal wall. Filled the uterine balloon with 40 mL saline and pulled back the device until the uterine balloon was against the internal cervical os and the vaginal balloon was set outside the external cervical os. Filled the vaginal balloon with 20 mL saline, so that the two balloons were respectively located on the inner and outer sides of the cervix. Continued to inject saline until the uterine and vaginal balloon reached the target volume. The target volume of the control group: 80 mL in the uterine balloon and 80 mL in the vaginal balloon; The target volume of the study group: 120 mL in the uterine balloon and 40 mL in the vaginal balloon. On the second day, the Bishop score was evaluated and an electronic fetal monitor was given at 6 am. For the control group, CCRB was removed if the uterine balloon was not discharged during the night. For the study group, 500g weight traction of the catheter was given if the uterine balloon was not discharged at 6 am. The Bishop score was evaluated again when the uterine balloon was discharged. In both groups, fetal heart rate and uterine contractions were observed for an hour after removal of CCRB. If labor had not started, oxytocin was administered to promote contractions. And the timing of artificial rupture of membranes was decided by the assessment of obstetricians. The oxytocin administration was performed as the conventional oxytocin labor induction. Briefly, a concentration of 0.5% oxytocin was given intravenously 8 drops per minute (8 drops/min), if type I electronic fetal monitoring with no regular uterine contractions was traced. The fetal heart rate was monitored and the titer of oxytocin was increased by 8 drops/min every 30 minutes until regular uterine contractions occurred. The maximum titer of oxytocin was 40 drops/min, and the maximum concentration was 1%. If labor was not initiated at 5 pm, oxytocin administration was stopped and performed again at 6 am on the following days until delivery. CCRB was removed if the following conditions occurred: (1) spontaneous rupture of membranes; (2) regular uterine contractions; (3) signs of intrauterine infection; (4) uterine hyperstimulation; (5) fetal distress; (6) abnormal bleeding suspicious for placental abruption. Observation indicators The following characteristics were recorded: age, gravidity, height, body weight, body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), gestational age, indications of IOL, initial Bishop scores, neonatal birth weight, and time of rupture of membranes. The following primary outcomes were recorded: the Bishop scores at 6 am in both groups, the Bishop score when the uterine balloon was discharged in the study group, modes of delivery, indications of cesarean section, first and total stages of labor, the induction-delivery time (Time from placement of CCRB to vaginal delivery), successful induction rate=number of cases entering active phase within 72h (cases where women entered active phase but for whom birth was by cesarean section due to abnormal stage of labor or fetal heart rate, were nevertheless considered effective) /total number, spontaneous delivery rate= vaginal delivery number/ total number (including cesarean delivery), delivery rate within 24h= the induction-delivery time within 24h number/ total number (excluding cesarean delivery). The following secondary outcomes were recorded: 1-minute and 5-minute neonatal Apgar scores, postpartum hemorrhage, cervical laceration, fetal distress, and other delivery complications, midwifery and modes of midwifery, labor analgesia, and pain scores from placement of CCRB to removal (using the visual analog scale, VAS:0-10, 0=no pain, 10=worst pain possible). Statistical methods SPSS 26.0 statistical software was used to analyze the differences between the two groups. The values and variables are reported as the means ± standard deviation. The student’s T-test was performed to compare the variables in a Gaussian distribution. The chi-square test was used to evaluate the categorical variables. The Wilcoxon test was used to evaluate the difference in a non-Gaussian distribution between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to analyze the cumulative number of successful vaginal deliveries in the two groups at different times. Log-Rank test was used to compare the difference between the two groups. "Vaginal delivery" was used as the observation endpoint. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 227 pregnant women who met the criteria participated in this study, including 119 in the control group and 108 in the study group. In the control group, 2 cases were excluded. 1 case had spontaneous rupture of membranes, 1 case had massive vaginal bleeding shortly after placement of CCRB (The second case was diagnosed placenta previa after emergent cesarean section). Finally, the control group enrolled 117 cases and the study group enrolled 108 cases (Fig.1). Baseline clinical characteristics of the two groups The age, gravidity, height, body weight, BMI, gestational age, indications of IOL, initial Bishop scores, and neonatal birth weight were compared. There were no significant differences in basic clinical characteristics, indications of IOL, and neonatal birth weight between the two groups (Table 1). Primary outcomes of the two groups We observed that the uterine balloons were discharged in 25.6% cases of the control group and 20.4% cases of the study group at 6 am of the next day. The improvement of the Bishop score, successful induction rate, spontaneous delivery rate, cesarean section rate, and the indications were compared between the two groups (Table 2). The improved Bishop scores at 12 hours after the placement of CCRB in the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group (3.06 ± 0.97 vs. 2.52 ± 0.79, p =0.000), and the improvement was even larger when CCRB was discharged (4.37 ± 0.87 vs. 2.52 ± 0.79, p =0.000). Analyzing the five scoring items of the Bishop score respectively, we found that whether in the study group or the control group, the dilation item was increased by more than 1 point, the most in the five items, followed by the cervical consistency item, while the effacement and position of cervix items increased less, and the station item score even decreased. Similar improvements were observed in the study group when CCRB was discharged, except the total score and dilation item score improved more than those at 12 hours and the improvement of the effacement score came to second place in the study group. The successful induction rate in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (100% vs 95.73%, p =0.030). The spontaneous delivery rate in the study group was higher than that in the control group (87.04% vs 79.49%), but there was no significant difference ( p = 0.131). The indications of cesarean section in two groups were analyzed. With 14 cases undergoing cesarean section in the study group, 9 for fetal distress, 4 for the abnormal stage of labor (2 for arrested active phase, 1 for arrested descent, and 1 for protracted second stage), and 1 for maternal loss of confidence due to long induction time. In the control group, 24 cases were undergoing cesarean section, 10 for fetal distress, 6 for the abnormal stage of labor (3 for arrested active phase, 2 for arrested descent, and 1 for protracted second stage), and 8 for losing confidence due to long induction time. The cases of cesarean section due to psychological factors in the control group were significantly higher than that in the study group (6.84% vs. 0.93%, p = 0.024). Delivery process of the two groups Eventually, 93 cases in the control group and 94 cases in the study group were spontaneous delivery. The process of delivery was compared between the two groups (Table 3). The first and total stages of labor in the study group were significantly shorter than those of the control group (for the first stage (6.17 ± 2.85) h vs. (7.27 ± 2.90) h, p =0.010; for the total stage (7.07 ± 3.18) h vs. (8.09 ± 3.11) h, p = 0.028). Delivery rate within 24h was significantly higher in the study group than that in the control group (79.79% vs. 55.91%, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the pain scores during placement of CCRB between the two groups (4.10 ± 1.33 vs. 3.94 ± 1.15, p = 0.379). However, the use of labor analgesia in the control group was significantly higher than that in the study group (35.48% vs. 22.34%; p = 0.047). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare cumulative successful vaginal delivery rates between the two groups. All cases achieved vaginal delivery within 48 hours in the study group while there were still a few cases not achieving successful vaginal delivery after 72 hours in the control group. The median time from placement of CCRB to vaginal delivery in the study group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (Log-Rank test, p < 0.001) (Fig.3). Cervical ripening effects with different initial Bishop scores To find the ripening effects of the modified method on the cervix with different initial maturities, we stratified the cases of the two groups with initial Bishop scores (Table 4). There were 187 cases achieving vaginal delivery in this study. For the 130 cases with initial Bishop scores ≤ 3 points, 66 cases of the control group and 64 cases of the study group; for the remaining 57 cases with initial Bishop scores of 4-6 points, 27 cases in the control group and 30 cases in the study group. For patients with the initial Bishop scores ≤ 3 points, the Bishop score improved significantly in the study group compared with that in the control group both at 12 hours of placement and when CCRB was discharged ( p = 0.000, p = 0.000). The duration of the first and total stages of labor were significantly shorter than those in the control group ( p = 0.009, p = 0.036). For those with the initial Bishop scores of 4-6 points, the improvement of the Bishop score in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group when CCRB was discharged ( p = 0.000). There was no significant difference in the improvement of the Bishop score at 12 hours of placement, the first stage of labor, or the total stage of labor in the study group compared with the control group ( p > 0.05). Similarly, each assigned item of the Bishop score was analyzed, we found that the dilatation score improved the most, the cervical consistency score improved the second, and the effacement and position score of the cervix improved the least, while the fetal presentation position score even decreased in both groups whether the initial Bishop scores were high or low at 12 hours of placement. When CCRB was discharged, the improvement of the effacement score came to second place in the study group. Delivery-related risks and outcomes of the two groups The occurrence of delivery-related risks and outcomes in the two groups were analyzed (Table 5). There were no significant differences in the incidence of placental abruption, intrauterine infection, postpartum hemorrhage, cervical laceration, perineal laceration, forceps delivery, episiotomy, umbilical cord prolapse, neonatal hypoxic or asphyxia, and neonatal death between the two groups ( p > 0.05). Effects of the different timing of rupture of membranes on the delivery process We then analyzed the effects of the different timing of rupture of membranes on the delivery process (Table 6). In the control group, the first stage of labor was (6.23 ± 1.60) h when amniotomy or spontaneous rupture of membranes before labor, which was (7.59 ± 3.13) h when rupture of membranes after labor, and the difference was significant ( p = 0.009). There were no significant differences in the total stage of labor and the induction-delivery time whether rupture of membranes happened before or after labor ( p > 0.05). In the study group, the induction-delivery time when rupture of membranes before labor was significantly shorter than that of after labor ((20.38 ± 5.32) h vs. (25.00 ± 8.60) h, p = 0.015). There were no significant differences in the first and total stages of labor whether rupture of membranes happened before or after labor ( p > 0.05). Discussion IOL in late pregnancy can reduce the occurrence of post-term pregnancy and post-term related complications, and protect the fetus from adverse pregnancy outcomes [ 8 ]. The World Health Organization recommends delivery rate within 24h as a key indicator for evaluating the effects of IOL [ 14 ]. At present, cervical ripening with CCRB combined with oxytocin administration is a common clinical method of IOL. The delivery rate within 24h of the recommended procedure is about 69% [ 15 ]. For those with poor cervical maturity, the cervical ripening effect is even more unsatisfactory. In our study, according to the CCRB manufacturer’s instructions, the delivery rate within 24h was 55.91% in the control group, slightly lower than that reported by the previous research, which might be related to the relatively lower initial Bishop scores of this group of patients. However, the delivery rate reached 79.79% within 24h and 100% within 48h in the study group with our modified procedure, which were significantly higher than those of the control group. It showed our modified procedure was more efficient than the recommended protocol. A related study pointed out that the Bishop score after cervical ripening can better predict the duration of labor than initial Bishop scores [ 16 ]. We observed that CCRB improved the Bishop score mainly in the dilation item and cervical consistency item in our study. For the station item, the score was even decreased due to the fetal head pushed up by the uterine balloon, especially in patients with low initial Bishop scores. The uterine balloon of CCRB was about 3 cm in diameter when filled to 80 mL (Fig. 4 A). According to the instructions, CCRB should be removed after 12 hours of placement regardless of whether the uterine balloon is discharged or not. In this study, the uterine balloons were discharged spontaneously only 25.6% cases in the control group and 20.4% cases in the study group at 12 hours placement of CCRB. This means cervical dilation does not reach 2–3 cm in 75–80% of cases if CCRB is removed at this time. That is, the Bishop score improves by only 1 point or less in the dilation item and the total Bishop scores might still be less than 8 points, in such a condition the success rate of IOL with intravenous oxytocin is very low, which might lead to the anxiety of the pregnancies. In the present study, 6.84% of the patients requested cesarean section due to psychological factors in the control group, which was much higher than the rate of 0.93% in the study group. We modified the operating process of CCRB in the following respects. First, we increased the volume of the uterine balloon to 120 mL, so that the maximum diameter of the balloon can reach 6 cm under the fetal head compression (Fig. 4 B). Second, small-weight traction was given to the catheter until it was discharged, and the added mechanical force increased the dilatation effect of the uterine balloon on the cervical canal if the uterine balloon was not discharged at 12 hours of placement and there were no signs of infection. In such a condition, even if the cervical dilatation retracted slightly after the uterine balloon was discharged, the dilation score can still be increased by 2–3 points and the Bishop score can reach more than 8 points, thereby improving the success rate of oxytocin induction. A significantly shorter first and total stages of labor, and a distinct higher delivery rate within 24h were observed in the study group. It might be because when CCRB was discharged, the cervix dilation reached 4–5 cm. Therefore, once uterine contractions were onset, labor quickly entered the active phase. The duration of labor was so short that many cases did not even require labor analgesia. Which might explain the significantly lower labor analgesia rate in the study group. Other scholars have also noticed that the volume of the balloon might influence the induction to delivery time. Schoen CN et al reviewed seven randomized controlled trials and concluded that women with a larger balloon volume had a significantly shorter time from induction to delivery [ 17 ]. In this study, we filled the uterine balloon to 120 mL and assisted the CCRB with small weight traction until the uterine balloon was discharged. So CCRB can give a full dilation to the cervix. We did not use a larger volume, that’s on the one hand considering the limited tension of the balloon, and on the other hand, increasing the volume will increase the risk of placental abruption. In addition, the increased uterine balloon might lift the fetal presentation, be not conducive to the engagement of the fetal head, and increase the risk of umbilical cord prolapse. Another modification of the operating process of CCRB was to reduce the volume of the vaginal balloon from 80 mL to 40 mL. The role of the vaginal balloon of CCRB was to fix the uterine balloon at the internal cervical os to achieve a full compression effect. A volume of 40 mL doesn’t reduce the diameter of the balloon too much, but might relieve vaginal foreign body sensation and avoid the occurrence of dysuria. Therefore, it increases the compliance of the patients. The manufacturer’s instructions of CCRB recommend setting the catheter for no more than 12 hours. This may be to prevent infection. With our modified procedure all the cases discharged the uterine balloon within 24 hours. No maternal or fetal infection was observed in both groups. Peng J et al’s research also showed that prolonging the balloon placement time to 24 hours improved the cervical maturity without increasing the chance of infection [ 18 ]. When to perform amniotomy during IOL is controversial [ 19 ]. In this study, it was observed in the control group that rupture of membranes before labor could significantly shorten the duration of the first stage. In the study group, amniotomy before labor significantly shortened the induction to delivery time but didn’t distinctly change the duration of the first and total stages. We thought it might be due to the short stage of labor in the study group, so the effects of the timing of amniotomy were not much obviously. In this study, our modified operation of CCRB helped the cervix to dilate well, and effectively improved the Bishop score to 8 points or more. And following amniotomy and oxytocin induction, most patients entered the active phase quickly. The new protocol significantly improved the success rate of IOL and shortened the labor process. Stratified analysis showed that our modified protocol was even more effective in patients with poor initial cervical maturity (the initial Bishop scores ≤ 3). Besides those, reduced volume of the vaginal balloon reduced the incidence of vaginal foreign body sensation and dysuria. Patients might have better compliance. This study also has some limitations. It was conducted in a general tertiary hospital. There might be some selection bias. In addition, the sample size of the study was relatively small. The results should be verified in larger sample studies in the future. Conclusions In summary, this study modified the operating procedure of CCRB for cervical ripening. The modified method significantly improved the clinical efficiency, reduced the sensation of vaginal pressure, improved the delivery rate within 24h, and shortened the length of hospital stay. It can improve patient compliance and reduce the cesarean section rate caused by psychological factors. The modified method may benefit from the perspective of health economics, which has good clinical application value and is worthy of promotion. Abbreviations IOL Induction of labor CCRB COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon BMI Body mass index HDP hypertensive disorders of pregnancy PGDM pregestational diabetes mellitus GDM gestational diabetes mellitus. Declarations Acknowledgements Not applicable. Authors' contributions JW conceived the study, interpreted the results, and revised the manuscript. JW, XL, and YW operated the modified method in clinical. CW collected the data, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Funding This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of the Liaoning Province (Funding No. 20180530076). Availability of data and materials The final trial datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study will be available in the ResMan repository. http://www.medresman.org.cn. And all data generated or analyzed during the current study are also available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Ethics approval and consent to participate The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Shengjing Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University (Ethics No. 2021PS248J) and all patients signed informed consent forms. It complies with the statements of the Declaration of Helsinki. It has also been retrospectively registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) with the registration number: ChiCTR2200058270. Registered 04/04/2022. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. References Penfield CA, Wing DA: Labor Induction Techniques: Which Is the Best?[J]. Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America 2017, 44(4): 567-582. El-Sayed YY, Rice MM, Grobman WA, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, Hill K, Thom EA, Wapner RJ et al: Elective Labor Induction at 39 Weeks of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management: Factors Associated With Adverse Outcomes in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women[J]. Obstetrics and gynecology 2020, 136(4): 692-697. Souter V, Painter I, Sitcov K, Caughey AB: Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term[J]. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2019, 220(3): 273.e271-273.e211. Laughon SK, Zhang J, Grewal J, Sundaram R, Beaver J, Reddy UM: Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort[J]. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2012, 206(6): 486.e481-489. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor[J]. Obstetrics and gynecology 2009, 114(2 Pt 1): 386-397. Vogel JP, Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM: Patterns and Outcomes of Induction of Labour in Africa and Asia: a secondary analysis of the WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Neonatal Health[J]. PloS one 2013, 8(6): e65612. Du YM, Zhu LY, Cui LN, Jin BH, Ou JL: Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials[J]. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2017, 124(6): 891-899. Wang L, Wang G, Cao W, Guo L, Hu H, Li Y, Zhang Q: Comparison of the Cook vaginal cervical ripening balloon with prostaglandin E2 insert for induction of labor in late pregnancy[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2020, 302(3): 579-584. Lim SE, Tan TL, Ng GYH, Tagore S, Kyaw EEP, Yeo GSH: Patient satisfaction with the cervical ripening balloon as a method for induction of labour: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Singapore Med J 2018, 59(8): 419-424. Grace Ng YH, Aminuddin AA, Tan TL, Kuppusamy R, Tagore S, Yeo GSH: Multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing the safety in the first 12 h, efficacy and maternal satisfaction of a double balloon catheter and prostaglandin pessary for induction of labour[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022, 305(1): 11-18. Liu YR, Pu CX, Wang XY, Wang XY: Double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone insert for labour induction: a meta-analysis[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019, 299(1): 7-12. Keirse MJ, Thiery M, Parewijck W, Mitchell MD: Chronic stimulation of uterine prostaglandin synthesis during cervical ripening before the onset of labor[J]. Prostaglandins 1983, 25(5): 671-682. Krammer J, O'Brien WF: Mechanical methods of cervical ripening[J]. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology 1995, 38(2): 280-286. Du H, Zhang N, Xiao CY, Sun GQ, Zhao Y: Effectiveness of Dinoprostone and Cook's Balloon for Labor Induction in Primipara Women at Term[J]. Current medical science 2020, 40(5): 951-959. Wu X, Wang C, Li Y, Ouyang C, Liao J, Cai W, Zhong Y, Zhang J, Chen H: Cervical dilation balloon combined with intravenous drip of oxytocin for induction of term labor: a multicenter clinical trial[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018, 297(1): 77-83. Jung A, Beckmann M: Predicting the duration of induction of labour in nulliparous women[J]. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2020, 40(2): 167-170. Schoen CN, Saccone G, Backley S, Sandberg EM, Gu N, Delaney S, Berghella V: Increased single-balloon Foley catheter volume for induction of labor and time to delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2018, 97(9): 1051-1060. Peng J, Li R, Du S, Yin H, Li M, Zheng X, Wu S, Zhao Y: Induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using double-balloon catheter placement within 12 h versus within 12-24 h[J]. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2021, 21(1): 17. Smyth RM, Alldred SK, Markham C: Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour[J]. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2013(1): Cd006167. Tables Table 1 Baseline clinical characteristics of the two groups Variable Control group (n=117) Study group (n=108) p value Age (y,`X±s) Gravidity (n, min-max) 30.54±3.15 1-3 30.21±3.71 1-3 0.478 0.265 Height (m,`X±s) 1.64±0.59 1.65±0.48 0.777 Body weight (kg,`X±s) 75.29±10.05 73.45±9.86 0.168 BMI (kg/m 2 ,`X±s) Gestational age (week,`X±s) 27.85±3.50 39.85±0.85 27.11±3.64 39.93±0.71 0.123 0.425 Indications of IOL，n（%) Delayed pregnancy Oligohydramnios HDP PGDM and GDM Suspected macrosomia 47 (40.17) 35 (29.91) 23 (19.66) 8 (6.84) 4 (3.42) 41 (37.96) 33 (30.56) 18 (16.67) 10 (9.26) 6 (5.56) 0.735 0.917 0.561 0.504 0.437 Initial Bishop scores (`X±s) Birth weight (g,`X±s) 2.85±0.97 3392.09±356.46 2.99±1.09 3408.06±378.66 0.294 0.745 Abbreviations: BMI: Body mass index; HDP: hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; PGDM: pregestational diabetes mellitus; GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus. Student’s T-test, Chi-square test, and Wilcoxon test were used. Table 2 Primary outcomes of the two groups Variable Control group (n=117) Study group (n=108) p value CCRB was discharged within 12h, n (%) 30 (25.6) 22 (20.4) 0.349 The improved Bishop scores at 12h (`X±s) Total scores 2.52±0.79 3.06±0.97 0.000* Dilation 1.17±0.38 1.62±0.51 0.000* Cervical consistency 0.91±0.32 0.94±0.27 0.332 Effacement 0.60±0.49 0.66±0.48 0.362 Position of cervix 0.18±0.39 0.19±0.40 0.775 Station -0.33±0.50 -0.36±0.57 0.696 The improved Bishop scores when CCRB was discharged (`X±s) Total scores 2.52±0.79 4.37±0.87 0.000* Dilation 1.17±0.38 2.03±0.21 0.000* Cervical consistency 0.91±0.32 1.00±0.36 0.040* Effacement 0.60±0.49 1.30±0.65 0.000* Position of cervix 0.18±0.39 0.25±0.44 0.201 Station -0.33±0.50 -0.20±0.47 0.044 Successful induction rate, n (%) 112 (95.73) 108(100) 0.030* Spontaneous delivery rate, n (%) 93 (79.49) 94(87.04) 0.131 Cesarean section rate, n (%) 24 (20.51) 14(12.96) 0.131 Indications of cesarean section, n (%) Abnormal fetal heart rate 10 (8.55) 9(8.33) 0.954 Abnormal stage of labor 6 (5.13) 4 (3.70) 0.604 Psychological factors 8 (6.84) 1 (0.93) 0.024* Student’s T-test, Chi-square test, and Wilcoxon test were used. * p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Table 3 Delivery process of the two groups Variable Control group (n=93) Study group (n=94) p value First stage of labor (h,`X±s) 7.27±2.90 6.17±2.85 0.010* Total stage of labor (h, `X±s) 8.09±3.11 7.07±3.18 0.028* Delivery rate within 24h，n (%) 52 (55.91) 75 (79.79) 0.000* Pain scores during placement of CCRB (`X±s) Labor analgesia during labor，n (%) 3.94±1.15 33 (35.48) 4.10±1.33 21 (22.34) 0.379 0.047* Student’s T-test and Chi-square test were used. * p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Table 4 Cervical ripening effects with different initial Bishop scores Variable Initial Bishop scores≤3 Initial Bishop scores 4-6 Control group (n=66) Study group (n=64) p value Control group (n=27) Study group (n=30) p value The improved Bishop scores at 12h (`X±s) Total scores 2.56±0.70 3.11±0.99 0.000* 2.41±0.89 2.93±1.08 0.051 Dilation 1.11±0.31 1.53±0.50 0.000* 1.33±0.48 1.83±0.46 0.000* Cervical consistency 0.95±0.27 1.02±0.13 0.106 0.78±0.42 0.80±0.41 0.841 Effacement 0.61±0.49 0.61±0.49 0.969 0.59±0.50 0.73±0.45 0.271 Position of cervix 0.20±0.40 0.20±0.41 0.931 0.11±0.32 0.20±0.41 0.367 Station -0.30±0.46 -0.25±0.44 0.503 -0.41±0.57 -0.63±0.72 0.198 The improved Bishop scores when CCRB was discharged (`X±s) Total scores 2.56±0.70 4.56±0.87 0.000* 2.41±0.89 3.93±0.74 0.000* Dilation 1.11±0.31 2.03±0.25 0.000* 1.33±0.48 2.03±0.18 0.000* Cervical consistency 0.95±0.27 1.09±0.29 0.006* 0.78±0.42 0.80±0.41 0.841 Effacement 0.61±0.49 1.33±0.69 0.000* 0.59±0.50 1.23±0.57 0.000* Position of cervix 0.20±0.40 0.28±0.45 0.264 0.11±0.32 0.23±0.43 0.226 Station -0.30±0.46 -0.17±0.42 0.093 -0.41±0.57 -0.37±0.56 0.786 First stage of labor (h, `X±s) 7.72±2.77 6.42±2.86 0.009* 6.16±2.95 5.64±2.82 0.502 Total stage of labor (h, `X±s) 8.52±3.09 7.36±3.20 0.036* 7.02±2.93 6.47±3.11 0.494 Student’s T-test was used. * p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Table 5 Delivery-related risks and outcomes of the two groups Variable Control group (n=93) Study group (n=94) p value Placental abruption，n (%) 0 0 - Intrauterine infection，n (%) 2(2.15) 2(2.13) 0.991 Postpartum hemorrhage，n (%) 7(7.53) 5(5.32) 0.538 Cervical laceration，n (%) 1(1.08) 2(2.13) 0.567 Perineal laceration，n (%) 10(11.11) 19(20.21) 0.074 Forceps delivery，n (%) 3(3.23) 4(4.26) 0.711 Episiotomy，n (%) 79(84.95) 69(73.40) 0.052 Umbilical cord prolapse，n (%) Apgar score (min-max) 1-min score 5-min score 0 9 -10 10-10 0 9 -10 10-10 - 0.286 - Neonatal hypoxic or asphyxia，n (%) 0 0 - Neonatal death，n (%) 0 0 - Chi-square test and Wilcoxon test were used. Table 6 Effects of the different timing of rupture of membranes on the delivery process Group n First stage (h) Total stage (h) Induction-delivery time (h) Control group Before labor # 93 22 6.23±1.60 7.04±1.68 25.20±13.03 After labor # 71 7.59±3.13 8.41±3.37 29.75±9.83 p value 0.009* 0.070 0.135 Study group 94 Before labor # 26 6.12±2.77 6.90±2.97 20.38±5.32 After labor # 68 6.28±3.11 7.53±3.70 25.00±8.60 p value 0.816 0.390 0.015* Student’s T-test was used. * p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. “ # ” amniotomy or spontaneous rupture of membranes before or after labor. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Major revision 10 Aug, 2022 Reviews received at journal 25 Jul, 2022 Reviewers agreed at journal 12 Jul, 2022 Reviewers invited by journal 12 Jul, 2022 Editor assigned by journal 12 Jul, 2022 Editor invited by journal 12 Jul, 2022 Submission checks completed at journal 21 Apr, 2022 First submitted to journal 04 Apr, 2022 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-1520689","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":100222832,"identity":"13df22eb-1c31-47d1-8134-241675e2630c","order_by":0,"name":"Chaoyue Wen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Chaoyue","middleName":"","lastName":"Wen","suffix":""},{"id":100222833,"identity":"058f0898-6b43-46df-b6b9-1bcdad84e875","order_by":1,"name":"Xuemin Liu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xuemin","middleName":"","lastName":"Liu","suffix":""},{"id":100222834,"identity":"f02af825-662d-4e5b-9dd7-daf51857e0ba","order_by":2,"name":"Ying Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ying","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":100222835,"identity":"750bdbf7-62d4-4b09-a45e-99e82543687f","order_by":3,"name":"Jun Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jun","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2022-04-04 07:14:22","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1520689/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1520689/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":20661994,"identity":"6e5f2f87-b45b-48e2-ba6f-4b2378cd598c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-04-22 14:53:19","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":15830,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eFlowchart demonstrating\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1520689/v1/7f94c60d0def9c6e840ddac2.png"},{"id":20662280,"identity":"5e14bda8-f8a3-48b3-9fbd-34e3d3ab9da2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-04-22 14:58:19","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":20697,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eOperating procedures for the control group (left) and the study group (right).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1520689/v1/2505d9be46f9ad63ae67242f.png"},{"id":20661992,"identity":"4d5da06b-6c86-4759-a593-fc04bb7a0e62","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-04-22 14:53:19","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":33456,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eRemaining not delivery cases at the time from placement of CCRB to vaginal delivery (excluding cesarean delivery cases).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1520689/v1/ff2fc6d62c4133649b5527fd.png"},{"id":20661995,"identity":"13ee61bc-42c4-4751-a4e6-efc2680b71f1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-04-22 14:53:19","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":273485,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eUltrasonic images of the uterine balloon with different volumes\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA: Control group; B: Study group\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1520689/v1/cc3d7d5f4444f0d6f3a6f978.png"},{"id":20662281,"identity":"e4746af5-b7aa-4d28-a6ad-ea265698e862","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-04-22 14:58:23","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":639826,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1520689/v1/78fac8b0-7d02-4270-8df6-e0dd0a4136da.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Conventional versus modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial","fulltext":[{"header":"Background","content":"\u003cp\u003eInduction of labor (IOL) is the artificial initiation of labor before its spontaneous onset to achieve vaginal delivery [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. IOL at term is mainly applied to pregnant women with some comorbidities that required termination of pregnancy. In recent years, some research has shown that IOL after 39 gestational weeks without medical indication can lower the risk of cesarean section [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e]. In the United States, the rate of IOL in primipara increased from 22.5% in 2006 to 42.9% in 2012 [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. The rate of IOL at term in China also increased from 20.4% to more than 30% in 2013 [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e]. Therefore, it is particularly important to choose an efficient and safe method of IOL.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCervical maturity evaluated with the Bishop score is the key to predicting the outcome of IOL. Induction to active labor is usually successful with a score of 9 or greater and is often failure with a score less than 6 [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. At present, the commonly used cervical ripening methods include pharmacological methods represented by prostaglandin E2 and mechanical methods represented by COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon (CCRB). According to literature reports, there is no significant difference in the spontaneous delivery rate between the two methods [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e]. Compared with pharmacological methods, mechanical methods are preferred for cervical ripening with fewer pain scores and less uterine hyperstimulation [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR9 CR10\" citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. The mechanical methods induce uterine contractions mainly by squeezing the internal cervical os through a uterine balloon, which stretches the lower uterine segment, thereby promoting the local release of prostaglandins [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e]. Besides the local effect, the balloon can also promote uterine contractions through neuro-endocrine reflexes (such as the Ferguson reflex) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCCRB is currently the most used cervical ripening double-balloon device clinically. Besides the uterine balloon, CCRB has another balloon named vaginal balloon, which helps to fix the uterine balloon on the lower uterine segment. However, the success rate of spontaneous delivery after cervical ripening with CCRB is about 66%-70% according to the manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s instructions [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e]. We try to modify the operating procedure of CCRB to achieve a better cervical ripening effect and improve the success rate of spontaneous delivery.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSelection and grouping of patients\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn this study, 227 pregnancies were selected from 976 hospitalized singleton full-term patients ready for IOL and were randomly divided into the control group and the study group in the Shengjing Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University from January 2021 to December 2021.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eInclusion criteria included: (1) primiparous pregnancy; (2) cephalic presentation; (3) NST reaction type; (4) cervical Bishop score \u0026le; 6.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eExclusion criteria included (1) placenta previa; (2) rupture of membranes; (3) hydramnios; (4) scarred uterus; (5) fetal malformation or intrauterine fetal death; (6) combined vaginitis; (7) history of late abortion or premature delivery; (8) presence of contraindications to vaginal delivery. (Fig. 1)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthical approval and patient consent\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Shengjing Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University (Ethics No. 2021PS248J) and all patients signed informed consent forms.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eStudy methods and operating procedures \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCCRB (Type J-CRBS-184000, Spencer, IN, USA) was uniformly used in the present study. The detailed operating procedures of the two groups were as follows (Fig. 2).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOn the first day, CCRB was placed at 6 pm. CCRB catheter was placed through the cervical canal to the internal cervical os after strict sterilization without touching the vaginal wall. Filled the uterine balloon with 40 mL saline and pulled back the device until the uterine balloon was against the internal cervical os and the vaginal balloon was set outside the external cervical os. Filled the vaginal balloon with 20 mL saline, so that the two balloons were respectively located on the inner and outer sides of the cervix. Continued to inject saline until the uterine and vaginal balloon reached the target volume.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe target volume of the control group: 80 mL in the uterine balloon and 80 mL in the vaginal balloon;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe target volume of the study group: 120 mL in the uterine balloon and 40 mL in the vaginal balloon.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOn the second day, the Bishop score was evaluated and an electronic fetal monitor was given at 6 am.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor the control group, CCRB was removed if the uterine balloon was not discharged during the night.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor the study group, 500g weight traction of the catheter was given if the uterine balloon was not discharged at 6 am. The Bishop score was evaluated again when the uterine balloon was discharged.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn\u0026nbsp;both groups, fetal heart rate and uterine contractions were observed for an hour after removal of CCRB. If labor\u0026nbsp;had not started, oxytocin was administered to promote contractions.\u0026nbsp;And the timing of artificial rupture of membranes was decided by the assessment of obstetricians.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe oxytocin administration was performed as the conventional oxytocin labor induction. Briefly, a concentration of 0.5% oxytocin was given intravenously 8 drops per minute (8 drops/min), if type I electronic fetal monitoring with no regular uterine contractions was traced. The fetal heart rate was monitored and the titer of oxytocin was increased by 8 drops/min every 30 minutes until regular uterine contractions occurred. The maximum titer of oxytocin was 40 drops/min, and the maximum concentration was 1%. If labor was not initiated at 5 pm, oxytocin administration was stopped and performed again at 6 am on the following days until delivery.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCCRB was removed if the following conditions occurred:\u0026nbsp;(1) spontaneous rupture of membranes;\u0026nbsp;(2)\u0026nbsp;regular uterine contractions;\u0026nbsp;(3) signs of\u0026nbsp;intrauterine infection;\u0026nbsp;(4)\u0026nbsp;uterine hyperstimulation;\u0026nbsp;(5)\u0026nbsp;fetal distress;\u0026nbsp;(6)\u0026nbsp;abnormal bleeding suspicious for placental abruption.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eObservation indicators\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe following characteristics were recorded: age, gravidity, height, body weight, body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), gestational age, indications of IOL, initial Bishop scores, neonatal birth weight, and time of rupture of membranes.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe following primary outcomes were recorded: the Bishop scores at 6 am in both groups, the Bishop score when the uterine balloon was discharged in the study group, modes of delivery,\u0026nbsp;indications of cesarean section, first and total stages of labor, the induction-delivery time (Time from placement of CCRB to vaginal delivery), successful induction rate=number of cases entering active phase within 72h (cases where women entered active phase but for whom birth was by cesarean section due to abnormal stage of labor or fetal heart rate, were nevertheless considered effective) /total number, spontaneous delivery rate= vaginal delivery number/ total number (including cesarean delivery), delivery rate within 24h= the induction-delivery time within 24h number/ total number (excluding cesarean delivery).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe following secondary outcomes were recorded: 1-minute and 5-minute neonatal Apgar scores, postpartum hemorrhage, cervical laceration, fetal distress, and other delivery complications, midwifery and modes of midwifery, labor analgesia, and pain scores from placement of CCRB to removal (using the visual analog scale, VAS:0-10, 0=no pain, 10=worst pain possible).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eStatistical methods\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSPSS 26.0 statistical software was used to analyze the differences between the two groups.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe values and variables are reported as the means \u0026plusmn; standard deviation. The student\u0026rsquo;s T-test was performed to compare the variables in a Gaussian distribution. The chi-square test was used to evaluate the categorical variables. The Wilcoxon test was used to evaluate the difference in a non-Gaussian distribution between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to analyze the cumulative number of successful vaginal deliveries in the two groups at different times. Log-Rank test was used to compare the difference between the two groups. \u0026quot;Vaginal delivery\u0026quot; was used as the observation endpoint. \u003cem\u003eP\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eA total of 227 pregnant women who met the criteria participated in this study, including 119 in the control group and 108 in the study group. In the control group, 2 cases were excluded. 1 case had spontaneous rupture of membranes, 1 case had massive vaginal bleeding shortly after placement of CCRB (The second case was diagnosed placenta previa after emergent cesarean section). Finally, the control group enrolled 117 cases and the study group\u0026nbsp;enrolled\u0026nbsp;108 cases\u0026nbsp;(Fig.1).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBaseline clinical characteristics of the two groups\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe age, gravidity, height, body weight, BMI, gestational age, indications of IOL, initial Bishop scores, and neonatal birth weight were compared. There were no significant differences in basic\u0026nbsp;clinical characteristics,\u0026nbsp;indications of IOL, and neonatal birth weight between the two groups (Table 1).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePrimary outcomes of the two groups\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe observed that the uterine balloons were discharged in 25.6% cases of the control group and 20.4% cases of the study group at 6 am of the next day. The improvement of the Bishop score, successful induction rate, spontaneous delivery rate, cesarean section rate, and the indications were compared between the two groups (Table 2).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe improved Bishop scores at 12 hours after the placement of CCRB in the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group (3.06 \u0026plusmn; 0.97 vs. 2.52 \u0026plusmn; 0.79, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e=0.000), and the improvement was even larger when CCRB was discharged (4.37 \u0026plusmn; 0.87 vs. 2.52 \u0026plusmn; 0.79, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e =0.000).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAnalyzing the five scoring items of the Bishop score respectively, we found that whether in the study group or the control group, the dilation item was increased by more than 1 point, the most in the five items, followed by the cervical consistency item, while the effacement and position of cervix items increased less, and the station item score even decreased.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSimilar improvements were observed in the study group when CCRB was discharged, except the total score and dilation item score improved more than those at 12 hours and the improvement of the effacement score came to second place in the study group. The successful induction rate in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (100% vs 95.73%,\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;p\u003c/em\u003e =0.030). The spontaneous delivery rate in the study group was higher than that in the control group (87.04% vs 79.49%), but there was no significant difference (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.131). The indications of cesarean section in two groups were analyzed. With 14 cases undergoing cesarean section in the study group, 9 for fetal distress, 4 for the abnormal stage of labor (2 for arrested active phase, 1 for arrested descent, and 1 for protracted second stage), and 1 for maternal loss of confidence due to long induction time. In the control group, 24 cases were undergoing cesarean section, 10 for fetal distress, 6 for the abnormal stage of labor (3 for arrested active phase, 2 for arrested descent, and 1 for protracted second stage), and 8 for losing confidence due to long induction time. The cases of cesarean section due to psychological factors in the control group were significantly higher than that in the study group (6.84% vs. 0.93%, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.024).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDelivery process of the two groups\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEventually, 93 cases in the control group and 94 cases in the study group were spontaneous delivery. The process of delivery was compared between the two groups (Table 3).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe first and total stages of labor in the study group were significantly shorter than those of the control group (for the first stage (6.17 \u0026plusmn; 2.85) h vs. (7.27 \u0026plusmn; 2.90) h, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e =0.010; for the total stage (7.07 \u0026plusmn; 3.18) h vs. (8.09 \u0026plusmn; 3.11) h, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.028).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDelivery rate within 24h was significantly higher in the study group than that in the control group (79.79% vs. 55.91%, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e \u0026lt; 0.05).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThere was no significant difference in the pain scores during placement of CCRB between the two groups (4.10 \u0026plusmn; 1.33 vs. 3.94 \u0026plusmn; 1.15, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.379). However, the use of labor analgesia in the control group was significantly higher than that in the study group (35.48% vs. 22.34%; \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.047). \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKaplan-Meier curves were used to compare cumulative successful vaginal delivery rates between the two groups. All cases achieved vaginal delivery within 48 hours in the study group while there were still a few cases not achieving successful vaginal delivery after 72 hours in the control group. The median time from placement of CCRB to vaginal delivery in the study group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (Log-Rank test, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e \u0026lt; 0.001) (Fig.3).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCervical ripening effects with different initial Bishop scores\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo find the ripening effects of the modified method on the cervix with different initial maturities, we stratified the cases of the two groups with initial Bishop scores (Table 4).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThere were 187 cases achieving vaginal delivery in this study. For the 130 cases with initial Bishop scores \u0026le; 3 points, 66 cases of the control group and 64 cases of the study group; for the remaining 57 cases with initial Bishop scores of 4-6 points, 27 cases in the control group and 30 cases in the study group.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor patients with the initial Bishop scores \u0026le; 3 points, the Bishop score improved significantly in the study group compared with that in the control group both at 12 hours of placement and when CCRB was discharged (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.000, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.000). The duration of the first and total stages of labor were significantly shorter than those in the control group (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.009, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.036).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor those with the initial Bishop scores of 4-6 points, the improvement of the Bishop score in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group when CCRB was discharged (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.000). There was no significant difference in the improvement of the Bishop score at 12 hours of placement, the first stage of labor, or the total stage of labor in the study group compared with the control group (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e \u0026gt; 0.05).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSimilarly, each assigned item of the Bishop score was analyzed, we found that the dilatation score improved the most, the cervical consistency score improved the second, and the effacement and position score of the cervix improved the least, while the fetal presentation position score even decreased in both groups whether the initial Bishop scores were high or low at 12 hours of placement. When CCRB was discharged, the improvement of the effacement score came to second place in the study group.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDelivery-related risks and outcomes of the two groups\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe occurrence of delivery-related risks and outcomes in the two groups were analyzed (Table 5). There were no significant differences in the incidence of placental abruption, intrauterine infection, postpartum hemorrhage, cervical laceration, perineal laceration, forceps delivery, episiotomy, umbilical cord prolapse, neonatal hypoxic or asphyxia, and neonatal death between the two groups (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e \u0026gt; 0.05).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEffects of the different timing of rupture of membranes on the delivery process\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe then analyzed the effects of the different timing of rupture of membranes on the delivery process (Table 6).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the control group, the first stage of labor was (6.23 \u0026plusmn; 1.60) h when amniotomy or spontaneous rupture of membranes before labor, which was (7.59 \u0026plusmn; 3.13) h when rupture of membranes after labor, and the difference was significant (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.009). There were no significant differences in the total stage of labor and the induction-delivery time whether rupture of membranes happened before or after labor (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e \u0026gt; 0.05).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the study group, the induction-delivery time when rupture of membranes before labor was significantly shorter than that of after labor ((20.38 \u0026plusmn; 5.32) h vs. (25.00 \u0026plusmn; 8.60) h, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e = 0.015). There were no significant differences in the first and total stages of labor whether rupture of membranes happened before or after labor (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e \u0026gt; 0.05).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eIOL in late pregnancy can reduce the occurrence of post-term pregnancy and post-term related complications, and protect the fetus from adverse pregnancy outcomes [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e]. The World Health Organization recommends delivery rate within 24h as a key indicator for evaluating the effects of IOL [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. At present, cervical ripening with CCRB combined with oxytocin administration is a common clinical method of IOL. The delivery rate within 24h of the recommended procedure is about 69% [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e]. For those with poor cervical maturity, the cervical ripening effect is even more unsatisfactory. In our study, according to the CCRB manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s instructions, the delivery rate within 24h was 55.91% in the control group, slightly lower than that reported by the previous research, which might be related to the relatively lower initial Bishop scores of this group of patients. However, the delivery rate reached 79.79% within 24h and 100% within 48h in the study group with our modified procedure, which were significantly higher than those of the control group. It showed our modified procedure was more efficient than the recommended protocol.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA related study pointed out that the Bishop score after cervical ripening can better predict the duration of labor than initial Bishop scores [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e]. We observed that CCRB improved the Bishop score mainly in the dilation item and cervical consistency item in our study. For the station item, the score was even decreased due to the fetal head pushed up by the uterine balloon, especially in patients with low initial Bishop scores. The uterine balloon of CCRB was about 3 cm in diameter when filled to 80 mL (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA). According to the instructions, CCRB should be removed after 12 hours of placement regardless of whether the uterine balloon is discharged or not. In this study, the uterine balloons were discharged spontaneously only 25.6% cases in the control group and 20.4% cases in the study group at 12 hours placement of CCRB. This means cervical dilation does not reach 2\u0026ndash;3 cm in 75\u0026ndash;80% of cases if CCRB is removed at this time. That is, the Bishop score improves by only 1 point or less in the dilation item and the total Bishop scores might still be less than 8 points, in such a condition the success rate of IOL with intravenous oxytocin is very low, which might lead to the anxiety of the pregnancies. In the present study, 6.84% of the patients requested cesarean section due to psychological factors in the control group, which was much higher than the rate of 0.93% in the study group.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe modified the operating process of CCRB in the following respects. First, we increased the volume of the uterine balloon to 120 mL, so that the maximum diameter of the balloon can reach 6 cm under the fetal head compression (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eB). Second, small-weight traction was given to the catheter until it was discharged, and the added mechanical force increased the dilatation effect of the uterine balloon on the cervical canal if the uterine balloon was not discharged at 12 hours of placement and there were no signs of infection. In such a condition, even if the cervical dilatation retracted slightly after the uterine balloon was discharged, the dilation score can still be increased by 2\u0026ndash;3 points and the Bishop score can reach more than 8 points, thereby improving the success rate of oxytocin induction. A significantly shorter first and total stages of labor, and a distinct higher delivery rate within 24h were observed in the study group. It might be because when CCRB was discharged, the cervix dilation reached 4\u0026ndash;5 cm. Therefore, once uterine contractions were onset, labor quickly entered the active phase. The duration of labor was so short that many cases did not even require labor analgesia. Which might explain the significantly lower labor analgesia rate in the study group.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther scholars have also noticed that the volume of the balloon might influence the induction to delivery time. Schoen CN et al reviewed seven randomized controlled trials and concluded that women with a larger balloon volume had a significantly shorter time from induction to delivery [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e]. In this study, we filled the uterine balloon to 120 mL and assisted the CCRB with small weight traction until the uterine balloon was discharged. So CCRB can give a full dilation to the cervix. We did not use a larger volume, that\u0026rsquo;s on the one hand considering the limited tension of the balloon, and on the other hand, increasing the volume will increase the risk of placental abruption. In addition, the increased uterine balloon might lift the fetal presentation, be not conducive to the engagement of the fetal head, and increase the risk of umbilical cord prolapse.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnother modification of the operating process of CCRB was to reduce the volume of the vaginal balloon from 80 mL to 40 mL. The role of the vaginal balloon of CCRB was to fix the uterine balloon at the internal cervical os to achieve a full compression effect. A volume of 40 mL doesn\u0026rsquo;t reduce the diameter of the balloon too much, but might relieve vaginal foreign body sensation and avoid the occurrence of dysuria. Therefore, it increases the compliance of the patients.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s instructions of CCRB recommend setting the catheter for no more than 12 hours. This may be to prevent infection. With our modified procedure all the cases discharged the uterine balloon within 24 hours. No maternal or fetal infection was observed in both groups. Peng J et al\u0026rsquo;s research also showed that prolonging the balloon placement time to 24 hours improved the cervical maturity without increasing the chance of infection [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhen to perform amniotomy during IOL is controversial [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e]. In this study, it was observed in the control group that rupture of membranes before labor could significantly shorten the duration of the first stage. In the study group, amniotomy before labor significantly shortened the induction to delivery time but didn\u0026rsquo;t distinctly change the duration of the first and total stages. We thought it might be due to the short stage of labor in the study group, so the effects of the timing of amniotomy were not much obviously.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this study, our modified operation of CCRB helped the cervix to dilate well, and effectively improved the Bishop score to 8 points or more. And following amniotomy and oxytocin induction, most patients entered the active phase quickly. The new protocol significantly improved the success rate of IOL and shortened the labor process. Stratified analysis showed that our modified protocol was even more effective in patients with poor initial cervical maturity (the initial Bishop scores\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;3). Besides those, reduced volume of the vaginal balloon reduced the incidence of vaginal foreign body sensation and dysuria. Patients might have better compliance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study also has some limitations. It was conducted in a general tertiary hospital. There might be some selection bias. In addition, the sample size of the study was relatively small. The results should be verified in larger sample studies in the future.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn summary, this study modified the operating procedure of CCRB for cervical ripening. The modified method significantly improved the clinical efficiency, reduced the sensation of vaginal pressure, improved the delivery rate within 24h, and shortened the length of hospital stay. It can improve patient compliance and reduce the cesarean section rate caused by psychological factors. The modified method may benefit from the perspective of health economics, which has good clinical application value and is worthy of promotion.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Abbreviations","content":"\u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionList\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eIOL\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInduction of labor\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eCCRB\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCOOK Cervical Ripening Balloon\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eBMI\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBody mass index\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eHDP\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ehypertensive disorders of pregnancy\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003ePGDM\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003epregestational diabetes mellitus\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003eGDM\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003egestational diabetes mellitus.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAuthors\u0026apos; contributions\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJW conceived the study, interpreted the results, and revised the manuscript. JW, XL, and YW operated the modified method in clinical. CW collected the data, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFunding\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of the Liaoning Province (Funding No. 20180530076).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe final trial datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study will be available in the ResMan repository. http://www.medresman.org.cn. And all data generated or analyzed during the current study are also available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Shengjing Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University (Ethics No. 2021PS248J) and all patients signed informed consent forms. It complies with the statements of the Declaration of Helsinki. It has also been retrospectively registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) with the registration number: ChiCTR2200058270. Registered 04/04/2022.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConsent for publication\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePenfield CA, Wing DA: Labor Induction Techniques: Which Is the Best?[J]. Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America 2017, 44(4): 567-582.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEl-Sayed YY, Rice MM, Grobman WA, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, Hill K, Thom EA, Wapner RJ et al: Elective Labor Induction at 39 Weeks of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management: Factors Associated With Adverse Outcomes in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women[J]. Obstetrics and gynecology 2020, 136(4): 692-697.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSouter V, Painter I, Sitcov K, Caughey AB: Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term[J]. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2019, 220(3): 273.e271-273.e211.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLaughon SK, Zhang J, Grewal J, Sundaram R, Beaver J, Reddy UM: Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort[J]. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2012, 206(6): 486.e481-489.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor[J]. Obstetrics and gynecology 2009, 114(2 Pt 1): 386-397.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVogel JP, Souza JP, G\u0026uuml;lmezoglu AM: Patterns and Outcomes of Induction of Labour in Africa and Asia: a secondary analysis of the WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Neonatal Health[J]. PloS one 2013, 8(6): e65612.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDu YM, Zhu LY, Cui LN, Jin BH, Ou JL: Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials[J]. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2017, 124(6): 891-899.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang L, Wang G, Cao W, Guo L, Hu H, Li Y, Zhang Q: Comparison of the Cook vaginal cervical ripening balloon with prostaglandin E2 insert for induction of labor in late pregnancy[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2020, 302(3): 579-584.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLim SE, Tan TL, Ng GYH, Tagore S, Kyaw EEP, Yeo GSH: Patient satisfaction with the cervical ripening balloon as a method for induction of labour: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Singapore Med J 2018, 59(8): 419-424.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGrace Ng YH, Aminuddin AA, Tan TL, Kuppusamy R, Tagore S, Yeo GSH: Multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing the safety in the first 12 h, efficacy and maternal satisfaction of a double balloon catheter and prostaglandin pessary for induction of labour[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022, 305(1): 11-18.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiu YR, Pu CX, Wang XY, Wang XY: Double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone insert for labour induction: a meta-analysis[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019, 299(1): 7-12.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKeirse MJ, Thiery M, Parewijck W, Mitchell MD: Chronic stimulation of uterine prostaglandin synthesis during cervical ripening before the onset of labor[J]. Prostaglandins 1983, 25(5): 671-682.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKrammer J, O\u0026apos;Brien WF: Mechanical methods of cervical ripening[J]. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology 1995, 38(2): 280-286.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDu H, Zhang N, Xiao CY, Sun GQ, Zhao Y: Effectiveness of Dinoprostone and Cook\u0026apos;s Balloon for Labor Induction in Primipara Women at Term[J]. Current medical science 2020, 40(5): 951-959.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWu X, Wang C, Li Y, Ouyang C, Liao J, Cai W, Zhong Y, Zhang J, Chen H: Cervical dilation balloon combined with intravenous drip of oxytocin for induction of term labor: a multicenter clinical trial[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018, 297(1): 77-83.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJung A, Beckmann M: Predicting the duration of induction of labour in nulliparous women[J]. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2020, 40(2): 167-170.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSchoen CN, Saccone G, Backley S, Sandberg EM, Gu N, Delaney S, Berghella V: Increased single-balloon Foley catheter volume for induction of labor and time to delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2018, 97(9): 1051-1060.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeng J, Li R, Du S, Yin H, Li M, Zheng X, Wu S, Zhao Y: Induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using double-balloon catheter placement within 12\u0026thinsp;h versus within 12-24\u0026thinsp;h[J]. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2021, 21(1): 17.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSmyth RM, Alldred SK, Markham C: Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour[J]. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2013(1): Cd006167.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Tables","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 1\u003c/strong\u003e Baseline clinical characteristics of the two groups\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" width=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"30.858085808580856%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVariable\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"24.917491749174918%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eControl group\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(n=117)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.887788778877887%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStudy group\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(n=108)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.336633663366335%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e value\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"30.858085808580856%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAge (y,`X\u0026plusmn;s)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGravidity (n, min-max)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.917491749174918%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.54\u0026plusmn;3.15\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1-3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"27.887788778877887%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.21\u0026plusmn;3.71\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1-3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.336633663366335%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.478\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.265\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"30.858085808580856%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHeight (m,`X\u0026plusmn;s)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.917491749174918%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.64\u0026plusmn;0.59\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"27.887788778877887%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.65\u0026plusmn;0.48\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.336633663366335%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.777\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"30.858085808580856%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBody weight (kg,`X\u0026plusmn;s)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.917491749174918%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e75.29\u0026plusmn;10.05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"27.887788778877887%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e73.45\u0026plusmn;9.86\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.336633663366335%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.168\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"30.858085808580856%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBMI (kg/m\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e,`X\u0026plusmn;s)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGestational age (week,`X\u0026plusmn;s)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.917491749174918%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e27.85\u0026plusmn;3.50\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e39.85\u0026plusmn;0.85\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"27.887788778877887%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e27.11\u0026plusmn;3.64\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e39.93\u0026plusmn;0.71\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.336633663366335%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.123\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.425\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"30.858085808580856%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndications of IOL，n（%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDelayed pregnancy\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eOligohydramnios\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHDP\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePGDM and GDM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSuspected macrosomia\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.917491749174918%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e47 (40.17)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e35 (29.91)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e23 (19.66)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8 (6.84)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4 (3.42)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"27.887788778877887%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e41 (37.96)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e33 (30.56)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18 (16.67)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10 (9.26)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6 (5.56)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.336633663366335%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.735\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.917\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.561\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.504\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.437\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"30.858085808580856%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eInitial Bishop scores (`X\u0026plusmn;s)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBirth weight (g,`X\u0026plusmn;s)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.917491749174918%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.85\u0026plusmn;0.97\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3392.09\u0026plusmn;356.46\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"27.887788778877887%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.99\u0026plusmn;1.09\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3408.06\u0026plusmn;378.66\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.336633663366335%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.294\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.745\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAbbreviations: BMI: Body mass index; HDP: hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; PGDM: pregestational diabetes mellitus; GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStudent\u0026rsquo;s T-test, Chi-square test, and Wilcoxon test were used.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 2\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ePrimary outcomes of the two groups\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" width=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVariable\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eControl group\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(n=117)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStudy group\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(n=108)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e value\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"top\" style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" width=\"69.62457337883959%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCCRB was discharged within 12h, n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30 (25.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22 (20.4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.349\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe improved Bishop scores at 12h (`X\u0026plusmn;s)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTotal scores\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;2.52\u0026plusmn;0.79\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.06\u0026plusmn;0.97\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;0.000*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDilation\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.17\u0026plusmn;0.38\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.62\u0026plusmn;0.51\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.000*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCervical consistency\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.91\u0026plusmn;0.32\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.94\u0026plusmn;0.27\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.332\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEffacement\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.60\u0026plusmn;0.49\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.66\u0026plusmn;0.48\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.362\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePosition of cervix\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.18\u0026plusmn;0.39\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.19\u0026plusmn;0.40\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.775\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStation\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.33\u0026plusmn;0.50\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.36\u0026plusmn;0.57\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.696\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"4\" valign=\"top\" width=\"100%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe improved Bishop scores when CCRB was discharged (`X\u0026plusmn;s)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTotal scores\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.52\u0026plusmn;0.79\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.37\u0026plusmn;0.87\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.000*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDilation\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.17\u0026plusmn;0.38\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.03\u0026plusmn;0.21\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.000*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCervical consistency\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.91\u0026plusmn;0.32\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.00\u0026plusmn;0.36\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.040*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEffacement\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.60\u0026plusmn;0.49\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.30\u0026plusmn;0.65\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.000*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePosition of cervix\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.18\u0026plusmn;0.39\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.25\u0026plusmn;0.44\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.201\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStation\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.33\u0026plusmn;0.50\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.20\u0026plusmn;0.47\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.044\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSuccessful induction rate, n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e112 (95.73)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e108(100)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.030*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSpontaneous delivery rate, n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;93 (79.49)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e94(87.04)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.131\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCesarean section rate, n (%) \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e24 (20.51)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14(12.96)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.131\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndications of cesarean section, n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAbnormal fetal heart rate\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10 (8.55)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9(8.33)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.954\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAbnormal stage of labor\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6 (5.13)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4 (3.70)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.604\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 46.5625%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.19795221843003%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePsychological factors\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 20.1211%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.426621160409557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8 (6.84)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 15.5664%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"19.283276450511945%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1 (0.93)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 19.8086%;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.092150170648464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.024*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStudent\u0026rsquo;s T-test, Chi-square test, and Wilcoxon test were used.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e* \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 3\u003c/strong\u003e Delivery process of the two groups\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" width=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"45.289256198347104%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVariable\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.859504132231404%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eControl group (n=93)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"23.47107438016529%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStudy group\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(n=94)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.380165289256198%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e value\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"45.289256198347104%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFirst stage of labor (h,`X\u0026plusmn;s)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.859504132231404%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.27\u0026plusmn;2.90\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.47107438016529%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.17\u0026plusmn;2.85\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.380165289256198%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.010*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"45.289256198347104%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTotal stage of labor (h,\u0026nbsp;`X\u0026plusmn;s)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.859504132231404%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.09\u0026plusmn;3.11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.47107438016529%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.07\u0026plusmn;3.18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.380165289256198%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.028*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"45.289256198347104%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDelivery rate within 24h，n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.859504132231404%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e52 (55.91)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.47107438016529%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e75 (79.79)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.380165289256198%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.000*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"45.289256198347104%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePain scores during placement of CCRB (`X\u0026plusmn;s)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLabor analgesia during labor，n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.859504132231404%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.94\u0026plusmn;1.15\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e33 (35.48)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.47107438016529%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.10\u0026plusmn;1.33\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e21 (22.34)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.380165289256198%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.379\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.047*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStudent\u0026rsquo;s T-test and Chi-square test were used.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e* \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 4\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eCervical ripening effects with different initial Bishop scores\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" width=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd rowspan=\"2\" width=\"24.423337856173678%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVariable\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\" width=\"38.398914518317504%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eInitial Bishop scores\u0026le;3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\" width=\"37.17774762550882%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eInitial Bishop scores 4-6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"20.28725314183124%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eControl group\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(n=66)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"18.671454219030522%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStudy group\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(n=64)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"11.8491921005386%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e value\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"18.671454219030522%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eControl group\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(n=27)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"18.671454219030522%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStudy group\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;(n=30)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"11.8491921005386%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e value\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"39.75576662143826%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe improved Bishop scores at 12h (`X\u0026plusmn;s)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.423337856173678%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTotal scores\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.332428765264586%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.56\u0026plusmn;0.70\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.11\u0026plusmn;0.99\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.000*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.41\u0026plusmn;0.89\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.93\u0026plusmn;1.08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.051\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.423337856173678%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDilation\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.332428765264586%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.11\u0026plusmn;0.31\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.53\u0026plusmn;0.50\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.000*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.33\u0026plusmn;0.48\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.83\u0026plusmn;0.46\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.000*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.423337856173678%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCervical consistency\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.332428765264586%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.95\u0026plusmn;0.27\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.02\u0026plusmn;0.13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.106\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.78\u0026plusmn;0.42\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.80\u0026plusmn;0.41\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.841\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.423337856173678%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEffacement\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.332428765264586%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.61\u0026plusmn;0.49\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.61\u0026plusmn;0.49\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.969\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.59\u0026plusmn;0.50\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.73\u0026plusmn;0.45\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.271\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.423337856173678%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePosition of cervix\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.332428765264586%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.20\u0026plusmn;0.40\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.20\u0026plusmn;0.41\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.931\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.11\u0026plusmn;0.32\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.20\u0026plusmn;0.41\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.367\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.423337856173678%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStation\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.332428765264586%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.30\u0026plusmn;0.46\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.25\u0026plusmn;0.44\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.503\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.41\u0026plusmn;0.57\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.63\u0026plusmn;0.72\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.198\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\" width=\"53.86702849389417%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe improved Bishop scores when CCRB was discharged (`X\u0026plusmn;s)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.423337856173678%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTotal scores\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.332428765264586%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.56\u0026plusmn;0.70\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.56\u0026plusmn;0.87\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.000*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.41\u0026plusmn;0.89\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.93\u0026plusmn;0.74\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.000*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.423337856173678%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDilation\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.332428765264586%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.11\u0026plusmn;0.31\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.03\u0026plusmn;0.25\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.000*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.33\u0026plusmn;0.48\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.03\u0026plusmn;0.18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.000*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.423337856173678%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCervical consistency\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.332428765264586%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.95\u0026plusmn;0.27\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.09\u0026plusmn;0.29\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.006*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.78\u0026plusmn;0.42\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.80\u0026plusmn;0.41\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.841\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.423337856173678%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEffacement\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.332428765264586%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.61\u0026plusmn;0.49\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.33\u0026plusmn;0.69\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.000*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.59\u0026plusmn;0.50\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.23\u0026plusmn;0.57\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.000*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.423337856173678%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePosition of cervix\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.332428765264586%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.20\u0026plusmn;0.40\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.28\u0026plusmn;0.45\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.264\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.11\u0026plusmn;0.32\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.23\u0026plusmn;0.43\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.226\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.423337856173678%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStation\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.332428765264586%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.30\u0026plusmn;0.46\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.17\u0026plusmn;0.42\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.093\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.41\u0026plusmn;0.57\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.37\u0026plusmn;0.56\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.786\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.423337856173678%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFirst stage of labor (h,\u0026nbsp;`X\u0026plusmn;s)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.332428765264586%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.72\u0026plusmn;2.77\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.42\u0026plusmn;2.86\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.009*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.16\u0026plusmn;2.95\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.64\u0026plusmn;2.82\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.502\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.423337856173678%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTotal stage of labor (h,\u0026nbsp;`X\u0026plusmn;s)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.332428765264586%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.52\u0026plusmn;3.09\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.36\u0026plusmn;3.20\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.036*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.02\u0026plusmn;2.93\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"14.111261872455902%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.47\u0026plusmn;3.11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"8.955223880597014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.494\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStudent\u0026rsquo;s T-test was used.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e* \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 5\u003c/strong\u003e Delivery-related risks and outcomes of the two groups\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" width=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"39.00826446280992%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVariable\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.330578512396695%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eControl group\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(n=93)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"24.297520661157026%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStudy group\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(n=94)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.363636363636363%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e value\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"39.00826446280992%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePlacental abruption，n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"20.330578512396695%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.297520661157026%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.363636363636363%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"39.00826446280992%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIntrauterine infection，n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"20.330578512396695%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2(2.15)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.297520661157026%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2(2.13)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.363636363636363%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.991\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"39.00826446280992%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePostpartum hemorrhage，n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"20.330578512396695%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7(7.53)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.297520661157026%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5(5.32)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.363636363636363%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.538\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"39.00826446280992%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCervical laceration，n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"20.330578512396695%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1(1.08)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.297520661157026%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2(2.13)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.363636363636363%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.567\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"39.00826446280992%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePerineal laceration，n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"20.330578512396695%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10(11.11)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.297520661157026%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19(20.21)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.363636363636363%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.074\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"39.00826446280992%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eForceps delivery，n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"20.330578512396695%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3(3.23)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.297520661157026%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4(4.26)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.363636363636363%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.711\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"39.00826446280992%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEpisiotomy，n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"20.330578512396695%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e79(84.95)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.297520661157026%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e69(73.40)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.363636363636363%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.052\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"39.00826446280992%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eUmbilical cord prolapse，n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eApgar score (min-max)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1-min score\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5-min score\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"20.330578512396695%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9 -10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10-10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.297520661157026%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9 -10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10-10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.363636363636363%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.286\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"39.00826446280992%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNeonatal hypoxic or asphyxia，n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"20.330578512396695%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.297520661157026%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.363636363636363%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"39.00826446280992%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNeonatal death，n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"20.330578512396695%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.297520661157026%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.363636363636363%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChi-square test and Wilcoxon test were used.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 6\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eEffects of the different\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003etiming of rupture of membranes on the delivery process \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" width=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.646209386281587%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGroup\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"5.415162454873646%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003en\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.826714801444044%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFirst stage (h)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"17.14801444043321%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTotal stage (h)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"29.96389891696751%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eInduction-delivery time (h)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.646209386281587%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eControl group\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;Before labor\u003csup\u003e#\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"5.415162454873646%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e93\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.826714801444044%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.23\u0026plusmn;1.60\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"17.14801444043321%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.04\u0026plusmn;1.68\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"29.96389891696751%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e25.20\u0026plusmn;13.03\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.646209386281587%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;After labor\u003csup\u003e#\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"5.415162454873646%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e71\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.826714801444044%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.59\u0026plusmn;3.13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"17.14801444043321%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.41\u0026plusmn;3.37\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"29.96389891696751%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e29.75\u0026plusmn;9.83\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.646209386281587%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e value\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"5.415162454873646%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.826714801444044%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.009*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"17.14801444043321%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.070\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"29.96389891696751%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.135\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.646209386281587%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStudy group\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"5.415162454873646%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e94\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.826714801444044%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"17.14801444043321%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"29.96389891696751%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.646209386281587%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;Before labor\u003csup\u003e#\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"5.415162454873646%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e26\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.826714801444044%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.12\u0026plusmn;2.77\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"17.14801444043321%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.90\u0026plusmn;2.97\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"29.96389891696751%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20.38\u0026plusmn;5.32\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.646209386281587%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;After labor\u003csup\u003e#\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"5.415162454873646%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e68\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.826714801444044%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.28\u0026plusmn;3.11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"17.14801444043321%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.53\u0026plusmn;3.70\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"29.96389891696751%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e25.00\u0026plusmn;8.60\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.646209386281587%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e value\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"5.415162454873646%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.826714801444044%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.816\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"17.14801444043321%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.390\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"29.96389891696751%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.015*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStudent\u0026rsquo;s T-test was used.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e* \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003csup\u003e#\u003c/sup\u003e\u0026rdquo; amniotomy or spontaneous rupture of membranes before or after labor.\u003c/p\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-pregnancy-and-childbirth","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"prch","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth](http://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/prch/default.aspx","title":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","twitterHandle":"@BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Cervical ripening, Induction of labor, COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon, Term pregnancy","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1520689/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1520689/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003ch2\u003eBackground\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon (CCRB) for induction of labor (IOL) at term in primipara.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eMethods\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA total of 227 singleton full-term pregnancies with indications of IOL were enrolled and randomly divided into the control and study groups in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2021. In the control group, a conventional method was used. Both the uterine and vaginal balloons were filled to 80 mL and removed after 12 hours. In the study group, a modified method was used. The uterine and vaginal balloons were filled to 120 mL and 40 mL respectively. Small weight traction was given to help CCRB discharged after 12 hours placement. Oxytocin was administered in both groups after CCRB was discharged without labor starting. The improved Bishop scores, duration of labor, and spontaneous delivery rate were evaluated in the two groups.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResults\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe improved Bishop scores in the study group were 3.06\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.97 at 12 hours placement of CCRB and 4.37\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.87 when CCRB was discharged, which were significantly higher than 2.52\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.79 in the control group (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). The first and total stages of labor in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group ((6.17\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.85) h vs. (7.27\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.90) h, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.010; (7.07\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.18) h vs. (8.09\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.11) h, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.028). No difference in spontaneous delivery rate between the two groups was observed. But the delivery rate within 24h between the two groups had a significant difference (79.79% vs. 55.91%, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). For the cases with initial Bishop scores\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;3, the improved score was significantly increased, the first and total stages of labor were significantly shorter in the study group than those in the control group (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). Those\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Conventional versus modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2022-04-22 14:53:17","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1520689/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Major revision","date":"2022-08-10T11:04:56+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2022-07-25T06:03:37+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"f6513272-5db0-4fad-9ebc-d5c20744732d","date":"2022-07-13T03:43:30+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2022-07-13T02:51:30+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2022-07-13T02:49:55+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2022-07-13T02:20:53+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2022-04-21T05:26:29+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","date":"2022-04-04T07:08:28+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-pregnancy-and-childbirth","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"prch","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth](http://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/prch/default.aspx","title":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","twitterHandle":"@BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"493b240d-daf4-4bff-bfd9-ebd321faefc2","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 22nd, 2022","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2022-09-06T08:59:37+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2022-04-22 14:53:17","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-1520689","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-1520689","identity":"rs-1520689","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"7rjqhiLT3MXkJMwkYKINL","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}