Diagnosis of emergencies/urgencies in gynecology and during the first trimester of pregnancy

article OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-07

Gynecological and early pregnancy emergencies like ectopic pregnancies and ovarian torsions are diagnosed using symptoms, physical exams, ultrasound, and lab tests, with CT or MRI considered if ultrasound is inconclusive.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

The paper reviews potential gynecologic and first-trimester pregnancy emergencies/urgencies, including ectopic pregnancy, hemorrhagic or ruptured ovarian cysts, adnexal torsion, threatened or inevitable miscarriage, inflammatory gynecologic disorders, complicated uterine fibroids, endometriosis, and spontaneous uterine rupture. It outlines a diagnostic approach based on symptom patterns (acute pelvic/abdominal pain with or without bleeding), physical and bimanual exam findings, ultrasound using transabdominal and/or transvaginal techniques, and laboratory tests, noting that ultrasound can be non-conclusive when symptoms and signs are minimal. A key limitation stated is that diagnosis is often not straightforward and ultrasound may be insufficient for definitive diagnosis, requiring consideration of CT or MRI when needed, particularly in pregnant patients. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper explicitly lists endometriosis among possible acute complications causing emergencies/urgencies, though its main focus is a broad diagnostic framework for gynecologic and early-pregnancy urgent conditions.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 9,035 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Several surgical and/or medical emergencies/urgencies may occur in gynecologic patients and in pregnant women during the first trimester. Particularly, ectopic pregnancies, ruptured or hemorrhagic ovarian cysts, ovarian or adnexal torsions, threatened or inevitable miscarriages, phlogistic gynecological disorders, complications involving the uterine fibroids, endometriosis, and spontaneous uterine rupture are possible acute complications. The diagnosis is suspected on the basis of symptoms (acute pelvic and/or abdominal pain, with or without vaginal bleeding or discharge, until acute abdomen with peritonitis), by means physical evaluation (abdominal, pelvic, and bimanual gynecological examinations), by means of transabdominal (TAS) and/or transvaginal (TVS) sonography, and laboratory tests. However, the diagnosis is often not that simple, especially when the symptoms and clinical signs are minimal, and ultrasound (US) examination is not diriment. The differential diagnosis of abdominal/pelvic pain is broad and includes primarily gastrointestinal and urogenital disorders. Generally, TAS should usually be used in conjunction with TVS for evaluation of the female pelvis. If the US examination is not conclusive, CT or MRI, especially in pregnant patients, should be considered. Riassunto Diverse emergenze/urgenze chirurgiche e/o mediche possono interessare le pazienti ginecologiche e le gravide al primo trimestre. In particolare, le gravidanze ectopiche, le cisti ovariche rotte o torte, le torsioni ovariche o annessiali, le minacce d’aborto o gli aborti inevitabili, le patologie infiammatorie ginecologiche, i fibromi uterini complicati, l’endometriosi e la rottura uterina spontanea rappresentano possibili complicanze acute. La diagnosi può essere sospettata in base alla sintomatologia (algie pelviche e/o addominali acute, con eventuali perdite vaginali, fino a un quadro di addome acuto con peritonite), alla visita (valutazione addominale, pelvica ed esplorazione ginecologica bimanuale), all’ecografia transaddominale (TAS) e/o transvaginale (TVS), e agli esami di laboratorio. Tuttavia, la diagnosi spesso non è semplice, soprattutto quando i sintomi e i segni clinici sono lievi e l’ecografia non è dirimente. La diagnosi differenziale del dolore addominale/pelvico comprende un’ampia varietà di disordini, in particolare gastrointestinali e urogenitali. Generalmente, la valutazione della pelvi femminile dovrebbe essere eseguita mediante ecografia sia transaddominale che transvaginale. Se l’esame ecografico non consente di fare diagnosi, dovrebbero essere presi in considerazione la TC o, specialmente nelle donne gravide, la RMI. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Boyd CA, Riall TS (2012) Unexpected gynecologic findings during abdominal surgery. Curr Probl Surg 49:195–251 Gupta S, Manyonda IT (2009) Acute complications of fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 23(5):609–617. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.012 Gramith F, Sirr S, Hollerman J, Hawks L (1991) Transvaginal versus transabdominal sonography in patients suspected of having ectopic pregnancy. Minn Med 74(1):27–31 Lambert MJ, Villa M (2004) Gynecologic ultrasound in emergency medicine. Emerg Med Clin North Am 22(3):683–696 Cicchiello LA, Hamper UM, Scoutt LM (2011) Ultrasound evaluation of gynecologic causes of pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 38(1):85–114, viii. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2011.02.005 Simsek T, Dogan A, Simsek M, Pestereli E (2008) Heterotopic triplet pregnancy (twin tubal) in a natural cycle with tubal rupture: case report and review of the literature. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 34(4 Pt 2):759–762 Casadio P, Formelli G, Spagnolo E, De Angelis D, Marra E, Armillotta F et al (2009) Laparoscopic treatment of interstitial twin pregnancy. Fertil Steril 92:390.e13–390.e17 Nama V, Manyonda I (2009) Tubal ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis and management. Arch Gynecol Obstet 279(4):443–453 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2004) The management of tubal pregnancy. Guideline no. 21, May 2004, Reviewed 2010 Hajenius PJ, Mol F, Mol BW, Bossuyt PM, Ankum WM, van der Veen F (2007 ) Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD000324 Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Santos R, Tsymbal T, Pineda G, Arslan AA (2012) The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(1):44.e1–56.e13 Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A (2012) Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(1):14–29 Lau S et al (2013) Conservative medical and surgical management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 72:207–215 Moawad NS, Tulandi T (1999) Current diagnosis and treatment of interstitial pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(1):15–29 Varras M, Akrivis C, Hadjopoulos G, Antoniou N (2003) Heterotopic pregnancy in a natural conception cycle presenting with tubal rupture: a case report and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 106(1):79–82 Bai XX, Gao HJ, Yang XF, Dong MY, Zhu YM (2012) Expectant management of heterotopic cesarean scar pregnancy. Chin Med J (Engl) 125(7):1341–1344 Ugurlucan FG, Bastu E, Dogan M, Kalelioglu I, Alanya S, Has R (2012) Management of cesarean heterotopic pregnancy with transvaginal ultrasound-guided potassium chloride injection and gestational sac aspiration, and review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19(5):671–673 Moragianni VA, Hamar BD, McArdle C, Ryley DA (2012) Management of a cervical heterotopic pregnancy presenting with first-trimester bleeding: case report and review of the literature. Fertil Steril 98(1):89–94 Julania S, Tai R (2013) Heterotopic simultaneous splenic and intrauterine pregnancy after spontaneous conception and review of literature. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 39:367–370 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2006) The management of early pregnancy loss. Green-top Guideline No. 25 October 2006 Rackow BW, Patrizio P (2007) Successful pregnancy complicated by early and late adnexal torsion after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 87:697 Hoover K, Jenkins TR (2011) Evaluation and management of adnexal mass in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205(2):97–102 Glanc P, Salem S, Farine D (2008) Adnexal masses in the pregnant patient: a diagnostic and management challenge. Ultrasound Q 24(4):225–240 Huchon C, Fauconnier A (2010) Adnexal torsion: a literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 150(1):8–12 Valsky DV, Esh-Broder E, Cohen SM, Lipschuetz M, Yagel S (2010) Added value of the gray-scale whirlpool sign in the diagnosis of adnexal torsion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36(5):630–634 Vijayaraghavan SB (2004) Sonographic whirlpool sign in ovarian torsion. J Ultrasound Med 23(12):1643–1649 (quiz 1650–1651) Koo YJ, Lee JE, Lim KT, Shim JU, Mok JE, Kim TJ (2011) A 10-year experience of laparoscopic surgery for adnexal masses during pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 113(1):36–39 Hasson J, Tsafrir Z, Azem F, Bar-On S, Almog B, Mashiach R et al (2010) Comparison of adnexal torsion between pregnant and nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(6):536.e1–536.e6 Leiserowitz G (2006) Managing ovarian masses during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 61:463–470 Whitecar MP, Turner S, Higby MK (1999) Adnexal masses in pregnancy: a review of 130 cases undergoing surgical management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:19–24 Yuen P, Ng PS, Leung PL, Rogers MS (2004) Outcome in laparoscopic management of persistent adnexal mass during the second trimester of pregnancy. Surg Endosc 18:1354–1357 Ko ML, Lai TH, Chen SC (2009) Laparoscopic management of complicated adnexal masses in the first trimester of pregnancy. Fertil Steril 92:283–287 Mathevet P, Nessah K, Dargent D, Mellier G (2003) Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses in pregnancy: a case series. Eur J Obstet Gyncol Biol 108:217–222 Timor-Tritsch IE, Lerner JP, Monteagudo A, Murphy KE, Heller DS (1998) Transvaginal sonographic markers of tubal inflammatory disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 12:56–66 Jaiyeoba O, Soper DE (2011) A practical approach to the diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2011:753037. doi:10.1155/2011/753037 Mirhashemi R, Schoell WM, Estape R, Angioli R, Averette HE (1999) Trends in the management of pelvic abscesses. J Am Coll Surg 188(5):567–572 Conflict of interest Stefano Zucchini and Elena Marra declare that they have no conflict of interest. Human and animal studies The study described in this article did not include any procedures involving humans or animals. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Zucchini, S., Marra, E. Diagnosis of emergencies/urgencies in gynecology and during the first trimester of pregnancy. J Ultrasound 17, 41–46 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-013-0059-0 Received: Accepted: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-013-0059-0

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

Cited by (1)

References (37)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:35.150238+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK