A Preliminary Investigation of Brain Cannabinoid Receptor Type 1 (CB1R) Availability in Men with Opioid Use Disorder

A Preliminary Investigation of Brain Cannabinoid Receptor Type 1 (CB1R) Availability in Men with Opioid Use Disorder | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article A Preliminary Investigation of Brain Cannabinoid Receptor Type 1 (CB1R) Availability in Men with Opioid Use Disorder ANAHITA BASSIR NIA, Ardavan Mohammad Aghaei, Jeremy Weleff, Julia Shi, and 7 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7715611/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Revision Version 1 posted 14 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract The endocannabinoid (eCB) system has been proposed as a potential target for developing new medications for opioid use disorder (OUD). However, the status of the eCB system, specifically brain cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1R) in OUD, is unknown. In this study, CB1R availability was measured in males with OUD on stable opioid agonist treatment (OAT) (n = 10) versus healthy controls (HC) (n = 18), using High-Resolution Research Tomography (HRRT) and the CB1R-specific radiotracer, [ 11 C]OMAR. The average volume of distribution ( V T ) across 13 regions was compared between the OUD and HC groups. Average V T was 15% lower in OUD vs. HC subjects (p = 0.04). Lower V T in OUD compared to HC was also observed in several corticolimbic areas. Within OUD no effects on CB1R availability were observed for treatment medication (methadone vs. buprenorphine), current stress levels, or antidepressant medication. No associations between the average V T and duration of OAT treatment or time since the last illicit opioid use were observed. This preliminary study suggests lower CB1R availability in men with OUD. Larger studies are necessary to replicate these findings. Future research should also draw from a more heterogeneous population, particularly by incorporating females, to better assess the potential confounding and moderating clinical factors. If confirmed, the observed alterations in CB1R availability in OUD may provide a rationale for targeting the eCB system in the treatment of OUD. Health sciences/Biomarkers Biological sciences/Neuroscience Endocannabinoid Cannabinoid Receptor type 1 Opioid Use Disorder Opiates Positron Emission Tomography [11C]OMAR Figures Figure 1 Introduction An alarmingly high number of Americans continue to die from opioid overdose every day in the United States (1, 2). The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) reported that 9.9 million people misused opioids in 2018 in the US, and more than 117,000 individuals started using high-potency opioids for the first time (3). Despite widespread preventive and therapeutic efforts, the rates of drug overdose have increased fourfold over the past two decades, with opioids being involved in more than 68% of them (3). The current state-of-the-art treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) primarily involves modulation of the opioid receptor system through Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) with medications such as methadone and buprenorphine, or opioid antagonist treatment with naltrexone (4, 5). However, OAT faces challenges with high rates of opioid relapse and treatment discontinuation among patients (6–10). More than 50% of individuals enrolled in these programs continue to use illicit opioids despite being in treatment, making effective OUD treatment challenging (11–13). There is a need to look for novel approaches that target systems beyond the existing FDA-approved opioid receptor-modulating medications for OUD. Increasing evidence suggests that the endocannabinoid (eCB) system could be a promising target (14–18). The eCB system closely interacts with the endogenous opioid (opioidergic) system. Cannabinoid Receptor Type 1 (CB1R) and Mu Opioid Receptors (MOR) are both Gi/o-coupled receptors and are colocalized in several brain areas implicated in the pathophysiology of OUD (19–24). Furthermore, the eCB and opioidergic systems share similar functions in regulating stress and pain, and their agonistic activation yields similar results, including antinociception, sedation, hypotension, motor depression, and drug reward and reinforcement (25–27). Consequently, there is growing interest in exploring the role of the eCB system in OUD treatment (28, 29). Preclinical studies have shown region-specific reductions in CB1R density, G-protein binding capacity, or mRNA levels in the cerebral cortex (30), hippocampus (31, 32), basolateral amygdala (32), and cerebellum (32), although not in all regions (32, 33). In addition, chronic morphine exposure in these preclinical models was associated with higher mRNA levels of Fatty-acid Amide Hydrolase (FAAH) and Monoacylglycerol Lipase (MAGL) (31), the two main eCB degrading enzymes, and lower levels of the principal endocannabinoid 2-Arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) in several brain areas (34, 35). Consistent with preclinical findings, a recent PET imaging study using the FAAH-specific ligand showed that individuals with OUD have higher whole-brain FAAH levels (36). However, the status of CB1R in individuals with OUD has not yet been investigated. The availability of reliable CB1R-specific radiotracers makes it possible to measure CB1R availability in vivo in humans. [ 11 C]OMAR, a CB1R antagonist, has been successfully and reliably used in numerous studies to investigate CB1R availability in humans (37–42). The goal of this study was to measure CB1R in vivo in men with OUD on OAT, using [ 11 C]OMAR tracer. Subjects and Methods Approvals: This study was approved by the Yale University Institutional Review Board, the Yale Magnetic Resonance Research Center, and the Yale New Haven Hospital Radiation Drug Research Committee. All participants received detailed explanations, and written informed consent was obtained from each subject. Subjects: Males with a diagnosis of OUD who were not using cannabis or other drugs were recruited. Participants were interviewed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5), and individuals with concurrent major psychiatric disorders were excluded. Subjects were required to be under OAT with a stable dose of methadone or buprenorphine for at least one month, which was confirmed by contacting their OAT treatment centers or providers. Participants were excluded if they reported past-month use of any substances, including cannabis, and if they had a positive urine toxicology for any substance, except prescribed methadone or buprenorphine. Consistent with definitions from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other studies, individuals who reported risky alcohol use (i.e., alcohol use exceeding 14 standard drinks per week) or heavy nicotine use (i.e., nicotine or tobacco use equivalent to one or more packs of cigarettes per day (PPD)) were excluded (43-45). Other exclusion criteria included claustrophobia, ferromagnetic metal in the body, a heart pacemaker, abnormal coagulation tests, and poor arterial access. To mitigate the potential effects of acute opioid intoxication and withdrawal, all PET scans were scheduled between 9 and 11 a.m., and participants were instructed to take their daily OAT dose only after completing the PET scan. Opioid craving and withdrawal symptoms were measured in the morning before the PET scan, and the PET scan was rescheduled if they had moderate or severe withdrawal symptoms. Male healthy controls (HC) with no psychiatric diagnosis based on SCID-5 and no substance use disorder (except nicotine) served as the comparison group. Measurements: Nicotine dependence was assessed using the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), and perceived stress was evaluated using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Opioid withdrawal symptoms were measured using the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) (cutoff score for moderate withdrawal symptoms > 7), and the intensity of opioid craving was measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 100 (cutoff score for moderate craving > 30). The time since the last illicit opioid and cannabis use was recorded using the Drug History Questionnaire (DHQ), and the duration current OAT episode and current OAT dose was collected by the Methadone Questionnaire (MQ). Imaging: MR Imaging: Structural magnetic resonance imaging (3D MPRAGE) was conducted for participants using a Siemens 3-T Trio system (Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, Pennsylvania) with a circularly polarized head coil to exclude individuals with gross anatomical abnormalities and anatomically delineate regions of interest for PET analyses. The dimensions and voxel size of MR images were 256 x 256 x 176 and 0.98 x 0.98 x 1.0 mm3, respectively. PET Imaging : CB1R availability was measured using [ 11 C]OMAR (46). PET data were acquired using a High-Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT). Before PET scanning, two IV lines and an arterial catheter were placed. [ 11 C]OMAR was prepared with high molar activity by previously described methods adapted to the TRACERlab FXC Pro automated synthesis module (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) (46). Image acquisition begun with a 6-minute transmission scan acquired for attenuation correction. Emission data acquisition was started with a bolus injection of up to 740 MBq [ 11 C]OMAR and continued for at least 120 minutes. The head motion was continually tracked during the acquisition of PET data with a Vicra marker-based tracking system (NDI Systems, Waterloo, Ontario). Since no reference region existed for [ 11 C]OMAR, arterial blood samples were collected contralaterally from the radiotracer administration arm during the PET scan to measure the plasma input function and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) analysis of radioactive metabolites. Radioactivity in plasma was measured with a gamma counter. The column-switching HPLC analysis method was used to assess radioactive metabolites and unchanged parent compounds (47). The measured input function was the product of the radioactivity concentration in plasma and the unchanged parent fraction. Image Processing and Analysis: To ensure blind data processing and analysis, a pseudo-randomized subject identifier devoid of diagnostic and demographic information was created and assigned to each participant upon uploading data into our database. Image analysts only saw this subject identifier during pre-processing and analyses. List mode data was reconstructed using MOLAR (48), with attenuation, normalization, and motion corrections. Early PET image data were registered to the subject’s T1-weighted MR image. The T1-weighted MR image was non-linearly registered to MNI space for the region of interest (ROI) identification using the Anatomical Automatic Labeling (AAL) atlas (49). Predetermined ROIs included the following thirteen regions: amygdala, caudate, cerebellum, anterior cingulate (AC), posterior cingulate (PC), frontal, hippocampus, insula, occipital cortex, parietal cortex, putamen, temporal, and thalamus. The nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area were not included due to challenges in imaging with the [ 11 C]OMAR radiotracer given their small size, anatomical location, and the tracer’s characteristics. Since OUD is associated with significantly lower gray matter volumes (50-52), this was accounted for with partial volume correction (53), as previously implemented (54, 55). [ 11 C]OMAR V T was estimated using the metabolite-corrected arterial plasma input function with multilinear 1 analysis (MA1; t *=30 min) (56), which has good test-retest reproducibility with mean absolute deviations of 7.3-10.0%. Statistical Analysis: All data were summarized descriptively, and normality was assessed using normal probability plots and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test statistics. Consistent with prior PET imaging studies employing the [^11C]OMAR radiotracer in psychiatric populations (41, 42, 57), the primary outcome was defined as the average CB1R availability, calculated as the mean value across regions of interest. The primary effect of interest was the main effect of group, testing for overall differences in CB1R availability between groups. For the primary analysis, composite VT levels were compared between healthy controls (HC) and individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) using independent, two-sided t-tests. Given the small sample size, additional exploratory analyses were performed to examine region-specific differences in binding between groups using independent t-tests. For these analyses, both unadjusted and false discovery rate (FDR)–corrected p-values are reported. Further exploratory analyses employed linear mixed models (LMMs) to evaluate the main and interaction effects of potential covariates within the OUD group, including OAT medication, antidepressant use, FTND, and PSS scores. All analyses were conducted using SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Results A total of 10 male individuals with OUD and 18 male HC participants were studied (Table 1). No significant differences were found in sociodemographic characteristics. On the scan day, craving (4.0 ± 9.7 [SD]) and withdrawal (0.8 ± 1.5) scores were low among participants with OUD. As per the inclusion criteria, participants did not have concurrent active major psychiatric or substance use disorders. One subject had current symptoms of depression due to chronic dysthymia. Subjects with OUD reported more nicotine use (Table 1) and treatment with antidepressant medications for a history of depression and other psychiatric disorders (supplemental Table 1). CB1R availability in individuals with OUD compared to HC. Lower global (composite across regions) CB1R availability was observed in participants with OUD compared to HC (group effect: F (1,26) = 4.6 , p= 0.04, difference = -14.7%, d = 0.85) (Figure 1a). The exploratory analyses showed a significant group-by-region interaction ( F (12,312) = 2.42, p = 0.005), where group differences were observed in some but not all regions. Specifically, group effects were observed in several corticolimbic areas, including AC (-15.87%, F (1,312) = 5.91, p = 0.016, d =0.96), caudate (-24.21%, F (1,312) = 6.85, p = 0.009, d =1.03), frontal (-13.49%, F (1,312) = 4.60, p = 0.033, d =0.84), hippocampus (-18.57%, F (1,312) = 6.34, p = 0.012, d =0.99), insula (-17.34%, F (1,312) = 6.56, p = 0.011, d =1.01), putamen (-14.71%, F (1,312) = 4.76, p = 0.030, d =0.86), and thalamus (-15.63%, F (1,312) = 5.06, p = 0.025, d =0.89) (Table 2 and Figure 1b). In addition to these group differences, there was a highly significant group by region interaction, which was substantially driven by a greater overall region effect within HC (F (12,312) = 71.7, p<.0001), compared to OUD (F (12, 312) = 39.5, p80% higher than that for OUD. Pair-wise comparisons between regions within each group are not of primary interest and thus not reported. Supplementary Table S2 summarizes the result of a similar LMM model with age added as a covariate. Exploratory analysis of the impact of potential covariates on CB1R availability in OUD . Methadone vs. buprenorphine treatment: There were no significant differences ( F (1,8) = 0.52, p = 0.49) in overall CB1R availability between those receiving methadone (n = 7; mean dose: 80.7, SD: 32.2 mg) and those receiving buprenorphine (n = 3; mean dose: 22.7, SD: 3.2 mg) (Table S3). No associations were observed between OAT dose and CB1R availability. Current stress level: No significant associations existed between current stress levels in the OUD group, as measured using PSS, and CB1R availability (Spearman’s r= 0.07, p=0.84). Nicotine use: Among individuals with any nicotine use (n=6), no associations were observed between FTND scores and CB1R availability (Spearman’s r=0.09 , p=0.87). Antidepressant medications: Among individuals with OUD, there were no significant differences in overall CB1R availability between those taking (1.11 ± 0.042) and those not taking (1.19 ± 0.064) antidepressant medication ( F (1,8) = 1.23, p = 0.30) (Table S4). Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first study to measure CB1R availability in individuals with OUD in vivo . Males with OUD (on stable OAT) showed 15% lower global CB1R availability compared to healthy male individuals. This finding aligns with several (30–32), but not all (32, 33), animal studies showing lower CB1R density or mRNA levels in several brain regions. The findings of lower CB1R availability are intriguing in light of higher FAAH levels reported in individuals with OUD (36). Higher FAAH activity is associated with lower AEA levels (57). The lower CB1R availability observed in our study, combined with high FAAH activity in individuals with OUD reported elsewhere (36), suggests a lower eCB tone in males with OUD. There is substantial evidence of extensive overlap between the eCB and opioid systems that may explain why exposure to opioids could lead to lower CB1R levels. When administered acutely, cannabinoids and CB1R agonists increase endogenous opioid release (endorphin and enkephalin) (58, 59), and MOR expression (60, 61). Similarly, acute administration of opioids alters eCB levels (62, 63), and CB1R expression (61, 64, 65), and functionality (61). Moreover, the colocalization of CB1R and MOR in several brain areas is the basis of functional interactions (19, 20). Increasing evidence suggests that there is bidirectional modulation of the rewarding and reinforcing properties of opioids and cannabinoids (22). Preclinical studies of chronic opioid exposure have shown region-specific reductions in CB1R density, G-protein binding capacity, or mRNA levels in the cerebral cortex (30), hippocampus (31, 32), basolateral amygdala (32), and cerebellum (32), in addition to higher levels of FAAH and MAGL mRNA (31), and lower levels of 2-AG in several brain regions (34, 35). The low CB1R availability in individuals with OUD suggests that the eCB system could potentially serve as a new target in OUD treatment (27, 66–68). Preclinical studies demonstrated that eCB modulation reduces the reinforcing effects of opioids (15, 69), opioid-seeking behaviors (70, 71), and opioid withdrawal symptoms (72). Similarly, human studies reported that targeting the eCB system is effective in attenuating opioid craving (73). Moreover, positive effects of cannabinoids or eCB modulators in the treatment of OUD comorbidities such as chronic pain have been reported (74–81). Some but not all observational studies suggest that cannabinoids may have opioid-sparing effects (82), while experimental studies suggest mixed results (83). Although research on the effects of cannabis or its principal active constituent, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), on OUD treatment remains inconclusive (84), new investigational eCB modulators, such as FAAH and MAGlipase inhibitors, are now available to target the eCB system (85). Current evidence shows promising therapeutic effects of FAAH inhibitors in nicotine and cannabis dependence (86, 87). A significant advantage of these compounds is their ability to modulate the eCB function regionally, causing minimal, if any, CB1R downregulation that is typically induced by direct CB1R agonists such as THC (41). Moreover, FAAH inhibitors have low abuse liability, which is a significant benefit compared to cannabis or THC (88). Further studies are required to investigate the potential therapeutic effects of eCB modulators in treating OUD. The involvement of the eCB system in stress regulation and reward processing has been extensively reported (18, 89–94). Moreover, low CB1R availability was reported in other substance use disorders, including cannabis use disorder (41), alcohol use disorder (95), and tobacco use disorder (96). It remains unclear whether this reduced CB1R availability is drug-specific or reflects broader deficits in reward processing and heightened stress reactivity in addiction, regardless of substance type. Further investigations are also required to determine if lower CB1R in individuals with OUD precedes the development of OUD, or is a consequence of long-term opioid use, and to investigate other factors potentially involved in these alterations. Future research should consider comparing the CB1R availability in individuals with OUD who are not on OAT to assess if similar low CB1R availability exists in individuals with OUD regardless of OAT. Moreover, measuring CB1R availability before and after opioid abstinence periods would illuminate the impact of active opioid use on CB1R. Furthermore, assessing CB1R availability in individuals prescribed opioids without OUD could differentiate the general effects of opioid use on CB1R from those specifically associated with OUD. This study has certain limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. Only male participants with OUD were recruited in this study. Existing literature indicates sex differences in the eCB system both at baseline and in the context of other psychiatric disorders (97–106). Thus, future studies should explore the eCB status in females to better understand these potential sex differences. The limited sample size reduces overall statistical power, and specifically limits estimating potential covariate effects– future studies with larger samples and a comparable number of participants receiving methadone or buprenorphine treatment are necessary to replicate these preliminary findings. While there were no significant group differences in age, the OUD group was older, with a few participants over 65. Additionally, our sample was unbalanced regarding nicotine dependence. A larger study with a balanced age and nicotine dependence distribution is necessary to parse out the effect of opioid exposure from potential confounders. Furthermore, only OUD participants who were stable on OAT were included to minimize the effects of opioid withdrawal and intoxication on CB1R availability. Further research is necessary to determine if individuals with OUD who are not receiving OAT exhibit similar low CB1R availability. Lastly, our study excluded individuals using other substances, including cannabis. This decision was critical for the interpretability of the data, given strong evidence that cannabis use is associated with lower availability of CB1R (41). However, excluding other substance use may limit the generalizability of our results to the broader population of OUD individuals with co-occurring use of other substances. Future studies should consider including individuals with OUD and concurrent substance use disorders to enhance the generalizability of the findings. In summary, our results provide preliminary evidence of lower global CB1R availability (composite across regions) in males with OUD in OAT treatment. Future studies are required to determine the clinical implications of low CB1R in males with OUD, and the possibility of targeting the eCB system in treating OUD. Declarations Conflict of Interest: Deepak Cyril D’Souza currently receives or has received research support in the past 3 years from Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Jazz, Biogen, and Cerevel, administered through Yale University School of Medicine. Deepak Cyril D’Souza has served as a consultant for Jazz, Bio Haven, Atai, Abide, and France Foundation currently or in the past 3 years. Anahita Bassir Nia has served as a member of the Scientific Advisory Committee for Synendos Therapeutics over the past 3 years. All other authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. Acknowledgment: The authors would like to acknowledge the invaluable contributions of the Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit (CNRU) staff at the Connecticut Mental Health Center (CMHC) and Yale PET Center for their dedicated care of participants. This study was funded by NIDA R21DA052864 (ABN and DCD). ABN was supported by NIDA K12 DA00167. References Wide-ranging online data for epidemiologic research (WONDER). Atlanta GC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2017. Available at http://wonder.cdc.gov. National Center for Health Statistics (2025): U.S. Overdose Deaths Decrease in 2023, First Time Since 2018. National Center for Health Statistics,. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (2020): National Survey on Drug Use and Health 2019 (NSDUH-2019-DS0001). Kampman K, Jarvis M (2015): American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) National Practice Guideline for the Use of Medications in the Treatment of Addiction Involving Opioid Use. J Addict Med . 9:358-367. The ASAM National Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: 2020 Focused Update. J Addict Med . 14:1-91. Nosyk B, Marsh DC, Sun H, Schechter MT, Anis AH (2010): Trends in methadone maintenance treatment participation, retention, and compliance to dosing guidelines in British Columbia, Canada: 1996-2006. J Subst Abuse Treat . 39:22-31. Lo A, Kerr T, Hayashi K, Milloy MJ, Nosova E, Liu Y, et al. (2018): Factors associated with methadone maintenance therapy discontinuation among people who inject drugs. J Subst Abuse Treat . 94:41-46. Hser YI, Saxon AJ, Huang D, Hasson A, Thomas C, Hillhouse M, et al. (2014): Treatment retention among patients randomized to buprenorphine/naloxone compared to methadone in a multi-site trial. Addiction . 109:79-87. Smyth BP, Barry J, Keenan E, Ducray K (2010): Lapse and relapse following inpatient treatment of opiate dependence. Ir Med J . 103:176-179. Darker CD, Ho J, Kelly G, Whiston L, Barry J (2016): Demographic and clinical factors predicting retention in methadone maintenance: results from an Irish cohort. Ir J Med Sci . 185:433-441. Strain EC, Bigelow GE, Liebson IA, Stitzer ML (1999): Moderate- vs high-dose methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence: a randomized trial. JAMA . 281:1000-1005. Calabria B, Degenhardt L, Briegleb C, Vos T, Hall W, Lynskey M, et al. (2010): Systematic review of prospective studies investigating "remission" from amphetamine, cannabis, cocaine or opioid dependence. Addict Behav . 35:741-749. Vaillant GE (1973): A 20-year follow-up of New York narcotic addicts. Arch Gen Psychiatry . 29:237-241. Martínez-Rivera A, Fetcho RN, Birmingham L, Xu J, Yang R, Foord C, et al. (2024): Elevating levels of the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol blunts opioid reward but not analgesia. Sci Adv . 10:eadq4779. Wilkerson JL, Ghosh S, Mustafa M, Abdullah RA, Niphakis MJ, Cabrera R, et al. (2017): The endocannabinoid hydrolysis inhibitor SA-57: Intrinsic antinociceptive effects, augmented morphine-induced antinociception, and attenuated heroin seeking behavior in mice. Neuropharmacology . 114:156-167. Oliva I, Kazi F, Cantwell LN, Thakur GA, Crystal JD, Hohmann AG (2024): Negative allosteric modulation of CB1 cannabinoid receptor signalling decreases intravenous morphine self-administration and relapse in mice. Addict Biol . 29:e13429. Iyer V, Saberi SA, Pacheco R, Sizemore EF, Stockman S, Kulkarni A, et al. (2024): Negative allosteric modulation of CB(1) cannabinoid receptor signaling suppresses opioid-mediated tolerance and withdrawal without blocking opioid antinociception. Neuropharmacology . 257:110052. Gamble MC, Miracle S, Williams BR, Logan RW (2024): Endocannabinoid agonist 2-arachidonoylglycerol differentially alters diurnal activity and sleep during fentanyl withdrawal in male and female mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav . 240:173791. Scavone JL, Mackie K, Van Bockstaele EJ (2010): Characterization of cannabinoid-1 receptors in the locus coeruleus: relationship with mu-opioid receptors. Brain Res . 1312:18-31. Rodriguez JJ, Mackie K, Pickel VM (2001): Ultrastructural localization of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor in mu-opioid receptor patches of the rat Caudate putamen nucleus. J Neurosci . 21:823-833. Lopez-Moreno JA, Lopez-Jimenez A, Gorriti MA, de Fonseca FR (2010): Functional interactions between endogenous cannabinoid and opioid systems: focus on alcohol, genetics and drug-addicted behaviors. Curr Drug Targets . 11:406-428. Ahmad T, Lauzon NM, de Jaeger X, Laviolette SR (2013): Cannabinoid transmission in the prelimbic cortex bidirectionally controls opiate reward and aversion signaling through dissociable kappa versus mu-opiate receptor dependent mechanisms. J Neurosci . 33:15642-15651. Wills KL, DeVuono MV, Limebeer CL, Vemuri K, Makriyannis A, Parker LA (2017): CB(1) receptor antagonism in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis interferes with affective opioid withdrawal in rats. Behav Neurosci . 131:304-311. Parolaro D, Rubino T, Vigano D, Massi P, Guidali C, Realini N (2010): Cellular mechanisms underlying the interaction between cannabinoid and opioid system. Curr Drug Targets . 11:393-405. Massi P, Vaccani A, Romorini S, Parolaro D (2001): Comparative characterization in the rat of the interaction between cannabinoids and opiates for their immunosuppressive and analgesic effects. J Neuroimmunol . 117:116-124. Maldonado R, Valverde O (2003): Participation of the opioid system in cannabinoid-induced antinociception and emotional-like responses. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol . 13:401-410. Scavone JL, Sterling RC, Van Bockstaele EJ (2013): Cannabinoid and opioid interactions: implications for opiate dependence and withdrawal. Neuroscience . 248:637-654. Suzuki J, Weiss RD (2021): Cannabinoids for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: Where is the Evidence? J Addict Med . 15:91-92. Blessing E, Virani S, Rotrosen J (2020): Clinical Trials for Opioid Use Disorder. Handb Exp Pharmacol . 258:167-202. Gonzalez S, Schmid PC, Fernandez-Ruiz J, Krebsbach R, Schmid HH, Ramos JA (2003): Region-dependent changes in endocannabinoid transmission in the brain of morphine-dependent rats. Addict Biol . 8:159-166. Li W, Zhang CL, Qiu ZG (2017): Differential expression of endocannabinoid system-related genes in the dorsal hippocampus following expression and reinstatement of morphine conditioned place preference in mice. Neurosci Lett . 643:38-44. Gonzalez S, Fernandez-Ruiz J, Sparpaglione V, Parolaro D, Ramos JA (2002): Chronic exposure to morphine, cocaine or ethanol in rats produced different effects in brain cannabinoid CB(1) receptor binding and mRNA levels. Drug Alcohol Depend . 66:77-84. Rubino T, Tizzoni L, Viganò D, Massi P, Parolaro D (1997): Modulation of rat brain cannabinoid receptors after chronic morphine treatment. Neuroreport . 8:3219-3223. Vigano D, Grazia Cascio M, Rubino T, Fezza F, Vaccani A, Di Marzo V, et al. (2003): Chronic morphine modulates the contents of the endocannabinoid, 2-arachidonoyl glycerol, in rat brain. Neuropsychopharmacology . 28:1160-1167. Vigano D, Valenti M, Cascio MG, Di Marzo V, Parolaro D, Rubino T (2004): Changes in endocannabinoid levels in a rat model of behavioural sensitization to morphine. Eur J Neurosci . 20:1849-1857. Shyu C, Butler K, Tyndale RF, Smith A, Tardelli VS, Kloiber S, et al. (2024): Investigating Endocannabinoid Metabolism in Opioid Treated Chronic Pain Patients With and Without Opioid Use Disorder: A PET Study With Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Radioligand [C-11]CURB. Biological Psychiatry . 95:S113. Wong DF, Kuwabara H, Horti AG, Raymont V, Brasic J, Guevara M, et al. (2010): Quantification of cerebral cannabinoid receptors subtype 1 (CB1) in healthy subjects and schizophrenia by the novel PET radioligand [11C]OMAR. Neuroimage . 52:1505-1513. Normandin MD, Zheng MQ, Lin KS, Mason NS, Lin SF, Ropchan J, et al. (2015): Imaging the cannabinoid CB1 receptor in humans with [11C]OMAR: assessment of kinetic analysis methods, test-retest reproducibility, and gender differences. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab . 35:1313-1322. Tsujikawa T, Zoghbi SS, Hong J, Donohue SR, Jenko KJ, Gladding RL, et al. (2014): In vitro and in vivo evaluation of (11)C-SD5024, a novel PET radioligand for human brain imaging of cannabinoid CB1 receptors. Neuroimage . 84:733-741. Neumeister A, Normandin MD, Pietrzak RH, Piomelli D, Zheng MQ, Gujarro-Anton A, et al. (2013): Elevated brain cannabinoid CB1 receptor availability in post-traumatic stress disorder: a positron emission tomography study. Mol Psychiatry . 18:1034-1040. D'Souza DC, Cortes-Briones JA, Ranganathan M, Thurnauer H, Creatura G, Surti T, et al. (2016): Rapid Changes in CB1 Receptor Availability in Cannabis Dependent Males after Abstinence from Cannabis. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging . 1:60-67. Ranganathan M, Cortes-Briones J, Radhakrishnan R, Thurnauer H, Planeta B, Skosnik P, et al. (2016): Reduced Brain Cannabinoid Receptor Availability in Schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry . 79:997-1005. Boersma P, Villarroel MA, Vahratian A (2020): Heavy Drinking Among U.S. Adults, 2018. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tarasi B, Cornuz J, Clair C, Baud D (2022): Cigarette smoking during pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes: a cross-sectional study over 10 years. BMC Public Health . 22:2403. Pierce JP, Messer K, White MM, Cowling DW, Thomas DP (2011): Prevalence of heavy smoking in California and the United States, 1965-2007. Jama . 305:1106-1112. Horti AG, Fan H, Kuwabara H, Hilton J, Ravert HT, Holt DP, et al. (2006): 11C-JHU75528: a radiotracer for PET imaging of CB1 cannabinoid receptors. J Nucl Med . 47:1689-1696. Hilton J, Yokoi F, Dannals RF, Ravert HT, Szabo Z, Wong DF (2000): Column-switching HPLC for the analysis of plasma in PET imaging studies. Nucl Med Biol . 27:627-630. Carson RE, Barker WC, Liow J-S, Johnson CA (2003): Design of a motion-compensation OSEM list-mode algorithm for resolution-recovery reconstruction for the HRRT. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2003 IEEE : IEEE, pp 3281-3285. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, et al. (2002): Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage . 15:273-289. Lin HC, Wang PW, Wu HC, Ko CH, Yang YH, Yen CF (2018): Altered gray matter volume and disrupted functional connectivity of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in men with heroin dependence. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci . 72:435-444. Schmidt A, Vogel M, Baumgartner S, Wiesbeck GA, Lang U, Borgwardt S, et al. (2021): Brain volume changes after long-term injectable opioid treatment: A longitudinal voxel-based morphometry study. Addict Biol . 26:e12970. Shi H, Liang Z, Chen J, Li W, Zhu J, Li Y, et al. (2020): Gray matter alteration in heroin-dependent men: An atlas-based magnetic resonance imaging study. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging . 304:111150. Giovacchini G, Lerner A, Toczek MT, Fraser C, Ma K, DeMar JC, et al. (2004): Brain Incorporation of 11C-Arachidonic Acid, Blood Volume, and Blood Flow in Healthy Aging: A Study With Partial-Volume Correction. Journal of Nuclear Medicine . 45:1471-1479. Hillmer AT, Sandiego CM, Hannestad J, Angarita GA, Kumar A, McGovern EM, et al. (2017): In vivo imaging of translocator protein, a marker of activated microglia, in alcohol dependence. Mol Psychiatry . 22:1759-1766. Hillmer AT, Angarita GA, Esterlis I, Anderson JM, Nabulsi N, Lim K, et al. (2021): Longitudinal imaging of metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors during early and extended alcohol abstinence. Neuropsychopharmacology . 46:380-385. Ichise M, Toyama H, Innis RB, Carson RE (2002): Strategies to improve neuroreceptor parameter estimation by linear regression analysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab . 22:1271-1281. Mayo LM, Asratian A, Lindé J, Morena M, Haataja R, Hammar V, et al. (2020): Elevated Anandamide, Enhanced Recall of Fear Extinction, and Attenuated Stress Responses Following Inhibition of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase: A Randomized, Controlled Experimental Medicine Trial. Biological Psychiatry . 87:538-547. Valverde O, Noble F, Beslot F, Dauge V, Fournie-Zaluski MC, Roques BP (2001): Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol releases and facilitates the effects of endogenous enkephalins: reduction in morphine withdrawal syndrome without change in rewarding effect. Eur J Neurosci . 13:1816-1824. Koch M, Varela L, Kim JG, Kim JD, Hernandez-Nuno F, Simonds SE, et al. (2015): Hypothalamic POMC neurons promote cannabinoid-induced feeding. Nature . 519:45-50. Molaei M, Fatahi Z, Zaringhalam J, Haghparast A (2016): CB1 Cannabinoid Agonist (WIN55,212-2) Within the Basolateral Amygdala Induced Sensitization to Morphine and Increased the Level of mu-Opioid Receptor and c-fos in the Nucleus Accumbens. J Mol Neurosci . 58:446-455. Fattore L, Vigano D, Fadda P, Rubino T, Fratta W, Parolaro D (2007): Bidirectional regulation of mu-opioid and CB1-cannabinoid receptor in rats self-administering heroin or WIN 55,212-2. Eur J Neurosci . 25:2191-2200. Caille S, Alvarez-Jaimes L, Polis I, Stouffer DG, Parsons LH (2007): Specific alterations of extracellular endocannabinoid levels in the nucleus accumbens by ethanol, heroin, and cocaine self-administration. J Neurosci . 27:3695-3702. Sustkova-Fiserova M, Charalambous C, Havlickova T, Lapka M, Jerabek P, Puskina N, et al. (2017): Alterations in Rat Accumbens Endocannabinoid and GABA Content during Fentanyl Treatment: The Role of Ghrelin. Int J Mol Sci . 18. Zhang J, Wang N, Chen B, Wang Y, He J, Cai X, et al. (2016): Blockade of Cannabinoid CB1 receptor attenuates the acquisition of morphine-induced conditioned place preference along with a downregulation of ERK, CREB phosphorylation, and BDNF expression in the nucleus accumbens and hippocampus. Neurosci Lett . 630:70-76. Jin L, Pan L, Guo Y, Zheng Y, Nie Z, Zhu R (2014): Expression and localization of cannabinoid receptor 1 in rats' brain treated with acute and repeated morphine. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) . 74:288-297. Wiese B, Wilson-Poe AR (2018): Emerging Evidence for Cannabis' Role in Opioid Use Disorder. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res . 3:179-189. Chye Y, Christensen E, Solowij N, Yucel M (2019): The Endocannabinoid System and Cannabidiol's Promise for the Treatment of Substance Use Disorder. Front Psychiatry . 10:63. Sloan ME, Gowin JL, Ramchandani VA, Hurd YL, Le Foll B (2017): The endocannabinoid system as a target for addiction treatment: Trials and tribulations. Neuropharmacology . 124:73-83. Solinas M, Panlilio LV, Tanda G, Makriyannis A, Matthews SA, Goldberg SR (2005): Cannabinoid agonists but not inhibitors of endogenous cannabinoid transport or metabolism enhance the reinforcing efficacy of heroin in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology . 30:2046-2057. Lichtman AH, Sheikh SM, Loh HH, Martin BR (2001): Opioid and cannabinoid modulation of precipitated withdrawal in delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol and morphine-dependent mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther . 298:1007-1014. Yamaguchi T, Hagiwara Y, Tanaka H, Sugiura T, Waku K, Shoyama Y, et al. (2001): Endogenous cannabinoid, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, attenuates naloxone-precipitated withdrawal signs in morphine-dependent mice. Brain Res . 909:121-126. Lofwall MR, Babalonis S, Nuzzo PA, Elayi SC, Walsh SL (2016): Opioid withdrawal suppression efficacy of oral dronabinol in opioid dependent humans. Drug Alcohol Depend . 164:143-150. Hurd YL, Spriggs S, Alishayev J, Winkel G, Gurgov K, Kudrich C, et al. (2019): Cannabidiol for the Reduction of Cue-Induced Craving and Anxiety in Drug-Abstinent Individuals With Heroin Use Disorder: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry . 176:911-922. Degenhardt L, Lintzeris N, Campbell G, Bruno R, Cohen M, Farrell M, et al. (2015): Experience of adjunctive cannabis use for chronic non-cancer pain: findings from the Pain and Opioids IN Treatment (POINT) study. Drug Alcohol Depend . 147:144-150. Campbell G, Hall WD, Peacock A, Lintzeris N, Bruno R, Larance B, et al. (2018): Effect of cannabis use in people with chronic non-cancer pain prescribed opioids: findings from a 4-year prospective cohort study. Lancet Public Health . 3:e341-e350. Boehnke KF, Litinas E, Clauw DJ (2016): Medical Cannabis Use Is Associated With Decreased Opiate Medication Use in a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Survey of Patients With Chronic Pain. J Pain . 17:739-744. Haroutounian S, Ratz Y, Ginosar Y, Furmanov K, Saifi F, Meidan R, et al. (2016): The Effect of Medicinal Cannabis on Pain and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Chronic Pain: A Prospective Open-label Study. Clin J Pain . 32:1036-1043. Kral AH, Wenger L, Novak SP, Chu D, Corsi KF, Coffa D, et al. (2015): Is cannabis use associated with less opioid use among people who inject drugs? Drug Alcohol Depend . 153:236-241. Bellnier T, Brown GW, Ortega TR (2018): Preliminary evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and costs associated with the treatment of chronic pain with medical cannabis. Ment Health Clin . 8:110-115. Goggin MM, Shahriar BJ, Stead A, Janis GC (2019): Reduced urinary opioid levels from pain management patients associated with marijuana use. Pain Manag . 9:441-447. Vigil JM, Stith SS, Adams IM, Reeve AP (2017): Associations between medical cannabis and prescription opioid use in chronic pain patients: A preliminary cohort study. PLoS One . 12:e0187795. El-Mourad J, Lunghi C, Herrera NP, Zongo A (2024): Dosing of cannabinoids associated with an opioid-sparing effect: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Pain Management Nursing . 25:e8-e20. Nielsen S, Picco L, Murnion B, Winters B, Matheson J, Graham M, et al. (2022): Opioid-sparing effect of cannabinoids for analgesia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies. Neuropsychopharmacology . 47:1315-1330. Costa GPA, Nunes JC, Heringer DL, Anand A, De Aquino JP (2024): The impact of cannabis on non-medical opioid use among individuals receiving pharmacotherapies for opioid use disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse . 50:12-26. Mayo LM, Asratian A, Lindé J, Morena M, Haataja R, Hammar V, et al. (2020): Elevated Anandamide, Enhanced Recall of Fear Extinction, and Attenuated Stress Responses Following Inhibition of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase: A Randomized, Controlled Experimental Medicine Trial. Biol Psychiatry . 87:538-547. D'Souza DC, Cortes-Briones J, Creatura G, Bluez G, Thurnauer H, Deaso E, et al. (2019): Efficacy and safety of a fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor (PF-04457845) in the treatment of cannabis withdrawal and dependence in men: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, phase 2a single-site randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry . 6:35-45. Melis M, Pillolla G, Luchicchi A, Muntoni AL, Yasar S, Goldberg SR, et al. (2008): Endogenous fatty acid ethanolamides suppress nicotine-induced activation of mesolimbic dopamine neurons through nuclear receptors. J Neurosci . 28:13985-13994. Panlilio LV, Justinova Z, Goldberg SR (2013): Inhibition of FAAH and activation of PPAR: new approaches to the treatment of cognitive dysfunction and drug addiction. Pharmacol Ther . 138:84-102. Miliano C, Natividad LA, Quello S, Stoolmiller M, Gregus AM, Buczynski MW, et al. (2024): The Predictive Value of Plasma Bioactive Lipids on Craving in Human Volunteers With Alcohol Use Disorder. Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci . 4:100368. Boachie N, Gaudette E, Bazinet RP, Lin L, Tyndale RF, Mansouri E, et al. (2023): Circulating Endocannabinoids and N-Acylethanolamines in Individuals with Cannabis Use Disorder-Preliminary Findings. Brain Sci . 13. Voegel CD, Kroll SL, Schmid MW, Kexel AK, Baumgartner MR, Kraemer T, et al. (2022): Alterations of Stress-Related Glucocorticoids and Endocannabinoids in Hair of Chronic Cocaine Users. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol . 25:226-237. Mitra S, Gobira PH, Werner CT, Martin JA, Iida M, Thomas SA, et al. (2021): A role for the endocannabinoid enzymes monoacylglycerol and diacylglycerol lipases in cue-induced cocaine craving following prolonged abstinence. Addict Biol . 26:e13007. Parsons LH, Hurd YL (2015): Endocannabinoid signalling in reward and addiction. Nat Rev Neurosci . 16:579-594. Solinas M, Goldberg SR, Piomelli D (2008): The endocannabinoid system in brain reward processes. Br J Pharmacol . 154:369-383. Hirvonen J, Zanotti-Fregonara P, Umhau JC, George DT, Rallis-Frutos D, Lyoo CH, et al. (2013): Reduced cannabinoid CB1 receptor binding in alcohol dependence measured with positron emission tomography. Mol Psychiatry . 18:916-921. Hirvonen J, Zanotti-Fregonara P, Gorelick DA, Lyoo CH, Rallis-Frutos D, Morse C, et al. (2018): Decreased Cannabinoid CB(1) Receptors in Male Tobacco Smokers Examined With Positron Emission Tomography. Biol Psychiatry . 84:715-721. Farquhar CE, Breivogel CS, Gamage TF, Gay EA, Thomas BF, Craft RM, et al. (2019): Sex, THC, and hormones: Effects on density and sensitivity of CB1 cannabinoid receptors in rats. Drug and alcohol dependence . 194:20-27. Liu X, Li X, Zhao G, Wang F, Wang L (2020): Sexual dimorphic distribution of cannabinoid 1 receptor mRNA in adult C57BL/6J mice. Journal of Comparative Neurology . 528:1986-1999. Llorente-Berzal A, Assis MA, Rubino T, Zamberletti E, Marco EM, Parolaro D, et al. (2013): Sex-dependent changes in brain CB1R expression and functionality and immune CB2R expression as a consequence of maternal deprivation and adolescent cocaine exposure. Pharmacological research . 74:23-33. Paola Castelli M, Fadda P, Casu A, Sabrina Spano M, Casti A, Fratta W, et al. (2014): Male and female rats differ in brain cannabinoid CB1 receptor density and function and in behavioural traits predisposing to drug addiction: effect of ovarian hormones. Current pharmaceutical design . 20:2100-2113. Craft RM, Wakley AA, Tsutsui KT, Laggart JD (2012): Sex differences in cannabinoid 1 vs. cannabinoid 2 receptor-selective antagonism of antinociception produced by Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and CP55, 940 in the rat. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics . 340:787-800. Van Laere K, Goffin K, Casteels C, Dupont P, Mortelmans L, de Hoon J, et al. (2008): Gender-dependent increases with healthy aging of the human cerebral cannabinoid-type 1 receptor binding using [18F] MK-9470 PET. Neuroimage . 39:1533-1541. Neumeister A, Normandin MD, Pietrzak RH, Piomelli D, Zheng M-Q, Gujarro-Anton A, et al. (2013): Elevated brain cannabinoid CB1 receptor availability in post-traumatic stress disorder: a positron emission tomography study. Molecular psychiatry . 18:1034-1040. Normandin MD, Zheng M-Q, Lin K-S, Mason NS, Lin S-F, Ropchan J, et al. (2015): Imaging the cannabinoid cb1 receptor in humans with [11c] omar: assessment of kinetic analysis methods, test–retest reproducibility, and gender differences. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism . 35:1313-1322. Laurikainen H, Tuominen L, Tikka M, Merisaari H, Armio R-L, Sormunen E, et al. (2019): Sex difference in brain CB1 receptor availability in man. Neuroimage . 184:834-842. Radhakrishnan R, Worhunsky PD, Zheng M-Q, Najafzadeh S, Gallezot J-D, Planeta B, et al. (2022): Age, gender and body-mass-index relationships with in vivo CB1 receptor availability in healthy humans measured with [11C] OMAR PET. NeuroImage . 264:119674. Tables Table 1: Demographic characteristics of participants OUD (N=10) HC (N=18) p vlaue 1 Age; mean(SD) 56.82 (10.93) 49.22 (8.46) 0.08 BMI; mean(SD) 31.58 (5.77) 29.77 (5.77) 0.43 Race 0.11 African American; n(%) 1 3 Caucasian; n(%) 9 10 Other/Unknown; n(%) 0 5 Ethnicity 0.06 Non-Hispanic or Latino 10 12 Hispanic or Latino 0 0 Other/Unknown 0 6 Tracer dose; MBq; mean(SD) 429.20 (180.93) 556.11 (120.62) 0.07 Nicotine dependence 2 ; n (%) 6 (60%) 1 (5.6%) <0.01 FTND Score 3 ; mean (SD) 2.3 (1.2) 4.0 (-) - PSS score; mean (SD) 10.7 (7.2) - - COWS score 4 ; mean (SD) 0.8 (1.5) - - Craving VAS score 4 ; mean (SD) 4.0 (9.7) - - Methadone; n (%) 7 (70%) - - Methadone dose; means (SD) 80.7 (32.2) - - Buprenorphine; n (%) 3 (30%) - - Buprenorphine; dose (SD) 22.7 (2.3) - - Last illicit opioid use, months; mean (SD) 88.7 (90.07) Last cannabis use, months; mean (SD) 275.37 (180.31) Past 12 months alcohol use disorders, in remission; n (%) 1 (10%) Current antidepressant use; n (%) 6 (60%) - - Current benzodiazepine use; n (%) 0 (0%) - - Abbreviations: BMI, Body Mass Index; COWS, Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale; FTND, Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence; HC, Healthy Control; OUD, Opioid Use Disorder; PSS; Perceived Stress Scale; VAS, Visual Analog Scale. 1 Based on the T-test for continuous and Chi-square or Fisher exact test for categorical variables. 2 Defined as FTND score of greater than zero. 3 In participants with nicotine dependence. 4 Before the tracer injection. Table 2: Estimated regional LS means and SEs of CB1R availability with post hoc comparisons based on the LMM LS mean (SE) Contrast % F (1,312) d P Uncorrected OUD HC Anterior Cingulate 1.28 (0.08) 1.52 (0.06) -15.87% 5.91 0.96 0.016 Amygdala 1.25 (0.09) 1.46 (0.07) -14.59% 3.27 0.71 0.071 Caudate 0.81 (0.08) 1.07 (0.06) -24.21% 6.85 1.03 0.009 Cerebellum 1.10 (0.07) 1.27 (0.05) -13.61% 3.70 0.76 0.055 Frontal 1.20 (0.07) 1.38 (0.05) -13.49% 4.6 0.84 0.033 Hippocampus 1.06 (0.08) 1.30 (0.06) -18.57% 6.34 0.99 0.012 Insula 1.22 (0.08) 1.48 (0.06) -17.34% 6.56 1.01 0.011 Occipital 1.21 (0.08) 1.31 (0.06) -7.74% 1.14 0.42 0.286 Parietal 1.16 (0.08) 1.32 (0.06) -11.80% 2.37 0.61 0.125 Posterior Cingulate 0.99 (0.07) 1.14 (0.05) -13.36% 3.00 0.68 0.084 Putamen 1.31 (0.08) 1.54 (0.06) -14.71% 4.76 0.86 0.030 Temporal 1.23 (0.07) 1.40 (0.05) -12.04% 3.64 0.75 0.057 Thalamus 0.89 (0.06) 1.05 (0.04) -15.63% 5.06 0.89 0.025 Additional Declarations Yes Deepak Cyril D’Souza currently receives or has received research support in the past 3 years from Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Jazz, Biogen, and Cerevel, administered through Yale University School of Medicine. Deepak Cyril D’Souza has served as a consultant for Jazz, Bio Haven, Atai, Abide, and France Foundation currently or in the past 3 years. Anahita Bassir Nia has served as a member of the Scientific Advisory Committee for Synendos Therapeutics over the past 3 years. All other authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. Supplementary Files TheCB1RavailabilityinOUDSupplements.docx Supplemental Material Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Revision Version 1 posted Editorial decision: revise 16 Dec, 2025 Review # 3 received at journal 13 Nov, 2025 Review # 4 received at journal 06 Nov, 2025 Review # 1 received at journal 27 Oct, 2025 Reviewer # 4 agreed at journal 21 Oct, 2025 Reviewer # 3 agreed at journal 21 Oct, 2025 Review # 2 received at journal 14 Oct, 2025 Reviewer # 2 agreed at journal 30 Sep, 2025 Reviewer # 1 agreed at journal 30 Sep, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 30 Sep, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 29 Sep, 2025 Submission checks completed at journal 29 Sep, 2025 First submitted to journal 26 Sep, 2025 Unknown event 26 Sep, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7715611","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":522982061,"identity":"89deefcf-c47b-4585-bd1d-c0d9dbf5efa8","order_by":0,"name":"ANAHITA BASSIR NIA","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3890-3518","institution":"Yale University School of Medicine,","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"ANAHITA","middleName":"BASSIR","lastName":"NIA","suffix":""},{"id":522982062,"identity":"d5bbba7d-9b22-4b2d-a95c-6382441499c2","order_by":1,"name":"Ardavan Mohammad Aghaei","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ardavan","middleName":"Mohammad","lastName":"Aghaei","suffix":""},{"id":522982063,"identity":"d381e6c0-f06e-4c9c-b5a8-7e53b1da4cf0","order_by":2,"name":"Jeremy Weleff","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8071-7412","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jeremy","middleName":"","lastName":"Weleff","suffix":""},{"id":522982064,"identity":"4eeadc94-9c26-4a93-8555-9a4ef8b0a62d","order_by":3,"name":"Julia Shi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Julia","middleName":"","lastName":"Shi","suffix":""},{"id":522982065,"identity":"86f1cbe2-8dec-4843-92a9-6ce4bd2c106d","order_by":4,"name":"Angelina Contreras","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Angelina","middleName":"","lastName":"Contreras","suffix":""},{"id":522982066,"identity":"fb2f70b9-d55c-4b01-b407-f7abd9d88823","order_by":5,"name":"Mackenzie Griffin","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mackenzie","middleName":"","lastName":"Griffin","suffix":""},{"id":522982067,"identity":"e37e1bd1-3ed6-4970-b3f9-fb9afb240bcb","order_by":6,"name":"Oluwole Jegede","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6772-7149","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Oluwole","middleName":"","lastName":"Jegede","suffix":""},{"id":522982068,"identity":"49d0c9de-3d8c-4d07-97a1-7fb357b3e1e4","order_by":7,"name":"Brian Pittman","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Yale School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Brian","middleName":"","lastName":"Pittman","suffix":""},{"id":522982069,"identity":"d205892d-6817-45e1-892e-c83828a88779","order_by":8,"name":"Ilan Harpaz-Rotem","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6066-9406","institution":"Yale University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ilan","middleName":"","lastName":"Harpaz-Rotem","suffix":""},{"id":522982070,"identity":"f2d5cd5b-60dc-4824-b594-cc4833af84c2","order_by":9,"name":"Ansel Hillmer","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8105-1381","institution":"University of Michigan","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ansel","middleName":"","lastName":"Hillmer","suffix":""},{"id":522982071,"identity":"ec1b887a-7808-45ec-a0aa-5dcf9d0fd2fe","order_by":10,"name":"Deepak D'Souza","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3141-1462","institution":"Yale University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Deepak","middleName":"","lastName":"D'Souza","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-09-25 18:50:42","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7715611/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7715611/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":93488851,"identity":"3e3e8782-1db5-44c8-9123-7aba4d6d677f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 11:48:26","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":455114,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"TheCB1RavailabilityinmenwithOUDFigure.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/5d516401ea2e37fafdc48cca.docx"},{"id":93490065,"identity":"664629fa-67e1-4861-9de7-58590d780ead","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 12:04:26","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":205465,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"APreliminaryInvestigationofBrainCannabinoidReceptorType1AvailabilityinMenwithOpioidUseDisorder.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/62d6bb1c5c119d02d84087dc.docx"},{"id":93488850,"identity":"8610c351-32d7-4484-8403-ae7c7d56d3f2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 11:48:26","extension":"json","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":11533,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"2025TP002356.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/a559aa7eecbfb8133589be98.json"},{"id":93488848,"identity":"a3c8521a-8eed-4065-a9cc-a775aa1ff76d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 11:48:26","extension":"docx","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":24909,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"TheCB1RavailabilityinOUDSupplements.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/66b801ccc54f9e36976e2b99.docx"},{"id":93491171,"identity":"7e2dcaf4-399d-4723-8d1e-33f90be897ea","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 12:12:26","extension":"xml","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":129925,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"2025TP0023560enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/d8d57581157ce82e719a78d0.xml"},{"id":93489745,"identity":"7f07713c-0d27-4b7a-80c4-273feb529485","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 11:56:26","extension":"eps","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":249775,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"drawingimage1.eps","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/1ba776070328ec5ec4f85059.eps"},{"id":93488857,"identity":"d240fded-e0c2-445a-ab0b-388d64274b10","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 11:48:26","extension":"jpeg","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":188624,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/dbdd5c6ff4bc61c24c7b4b7a.jpeg"},{"id":93490067,"identity":"111f90d3-f109-4985-911b-4818668620d2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 12:04:26","extension":"jpeg","order_by":7,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":1074,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/ab3d88effb4622e87f54ea8c.jpeg"},{"id":93491420,"identity":"69f8dddf-70d1-4baa-8d45-956c22cff2a1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 12:20:26","extension":"jpeg","order_by":8,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":1074,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/05d04fbafe62c72db581de3d.jpeg"},{"id":93488864,"identity":"ba70c65c-528d-4aec-a393-8bf22a0dd151","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 11:48:26","extension":"jpeg","order_by":9,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":308299,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/4d4a3bc5c81cc561d59f4423.jpeg"},{"id":93489749,"identity":"5c8d295d-3a84-4923-9d49-02947376b632","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 11:56:26","extension":"jpeg","order_by":10,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":1074,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/bfeef8bcb46be442bb9de8b7.jpeg"},{"id":93488862,"identity":"a514a81c-5636-457e-9ba6-7e265e529a40","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 11:48:26","extension":"png","order_by":11,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":39631,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/e49f48f7719bedb0f77f9489.png"},{"id":93489748,"identity":"4852b13e-83cf-4643-9883-ea801d8be490","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 11:56:26","extension":"png","order_by":12,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":935,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/98627005fba929a7b21358f3.png"},{"id":93488860,"identity":"5e0d1f1f-a348-4502-a07f-479f9298ae6c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 11:48:26","extension":"png","order_by":13,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":935,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/e5722468945e33b4bebf1cda.png"},{"id":93488858,"identity":"353b0c73-04d5-4754-88c4-f2132102c8c8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 11:48:26","extension":"png","order_by":14,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":51648,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/ac7e38eec6c51dcc2b7e41d2.png"},{"id":93489747,"identity":"01d624ef-15f6-47e0-a068-ead83571e65b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 11:56:26","extension":"png","order_by":15,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":935,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/a1ff07fd95de3bc24acee80d.png"},{"id":93488865,"identity":"b34879c8-f20a-44c2-89f5-6a1e0b2313c5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 11:48:26","extension":"xml","order_by":16,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":126964,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"2025TP0023560structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/f4c49e0a1fff16c1b37ca4ce.xml"},{"id":93488866,"identity":"52bfa2b6-2d43-4fa7-bea8-5e5a5546c4a4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 11:48:26","extension":"html","order_by":17,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":140351,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/533838c15b021eb7d8517aba.html"},{"id":93489741,"identity":"894e98af-f31f-46a5-9784-e81c811d597d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 11:56:26","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":117126,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eLS means of \u0026nbsp;[\u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003eC]OMAR V\u003csub\u003eT\u003c/sub\u003e averaged across brain regions (a) and [\u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003eC]OMAR V\u003csub\u003eT \u0026nbsp;\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026nbsp;LS mean in each region b) in men with opioid use disorder (OUD) and Healthy Controls (HC). LS means presented were estimated from the same LMM with group, region, and their interaction as predictors.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/cc824a0e895446e60c50aaa8.png"},{"id":93597747,"identity":"41404ae3-04f7-42dd-bf3f-560375c4c799","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-15 14:22:19","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1201987,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/c686f1b3-f8d8-4b32-8ca9-a240a7f67960.pdf"},{"id":93488847,"identity":"b3149244-d55c-469d-9c66-e3e3665fde55","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-14 11:48:26","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":24909,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplemental Material","description":"","filename":"TheCB1RavailabilityinOUDSupplements.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7715611/v1/78fec3520b9812388c39dbb0.docx"}],"financialInterests":"\u003cb\u003eYes\u003c/b\u003e\nDeepak Cyril D’Souza currently receives or has received research support in the past 3 years from Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Jazz, Biogen, and Cerevel, administered through Yale University School of Medicine. Deepak Cyril D’Souza has served as a consultant for Jazz, Bio Haven, Atai, Abide, and France Foundation currently or in the past 3 years. Anahita Bassir Nia has served as a member of the Scientific Advisory Committee for Synendos Therapeutics over the past 3 years. All other authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.","formattedTitle":"A Preliminary Investigation of Brain Cannabinoid Receptor Type 1 (CB1R) Availability in Men with Opioid Use Disorder","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eAn alarmingly high number of Americans continue to die from opioid overdose every day in the United States (1, 2). The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) reported that 9.9\u0026nbsp;million people misused opioids in 2018 in the US, and more than 117,000 individuals started using high-potency opioids for the first time (3). Despite widespread preventive and therapeutic efforts, the rates of drug overdose have increased fourfold over the past two decades, with opioids being involved in more than 68% of them (3). The current state-of-the-art treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) primarily involves modulation of the opioid receptor system through Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) with medications such as methadone and buprenorphine, or opioid antagonist treatment with naltrexone (4, 5). However, OAT faces challenges with high rates of opioid relapse and treatment discontinuation among patients (6\u0026ndash;10). More than 50% of individuals enrolled in these programs continue to use illicit opioids despite being in treatment, making effective OUD treatment challenging (11\u0026ndash;13). There is a need to look for novel approaches that target systems beyond the existing FDA-approved opioid receptor-modulating medications for OUD. Increasing evidence suggests that the endocannabinoid (eCB) system could be a promising target (14\u0026ndash;18).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe eCB system closely interacts with the endogenous opioid (opioidergic) system. Cannabinoid Receptor Type 1 (CB1R) and Mu Opioid Receptors (MOR) are both Gi/o-coupled receptors and are colocalized in several brain areas implicated in the pathophysiology of OUD (19\u0026ndash;24). Furthermore, the eCB and opioidergic systems share similar functions in regulating stress and pain, and their agonistic activation yields similar results, including antinociception, sedation, hypotension, motor depression, and drug reward and reinforcement (25\u0026ndash;27). Consequently, there is growing interest in exploring the role of the eCB system in OUD treatment (28, 29).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePreclinical studies have shown region-specific reductions in CB1R density, G-protein binding capacity, or mRNA levels in the cerebral cortex (30), hippocampus (31, 32), basolateral amygdala (32), and cerebellum (32), although not in all regions (32, 33). In addition, chronic morphine exposure in these preclinical models was associated with higher mRNA levels of Fatty-acid Amide Hydrolase (FAAH) and Monoacylglycerol Lipase (MAGL) (31), the two main eCB degrading enzymes, and lower levels of the principal endocannabinoid 2-Arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) in several brain areas (34, 35). Consistent with preclinical findings, a recent PET imaging study using the FAAH-specific ligand showed that individuals with OUD have higher whole-brain FAAH levels (36). However, the status of CB1R in individuals with OUD has not yet been investigated.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe availability of reliable CB1R-specific radiotracers makes it possible to measure CB1R availability \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e in humans. [\u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003eC]OMAR, a CB1R antagonist, has been successfully and reliably used in numerous studies to investigate CB1R availability in humans (37\u0026ndash;42). The goal of this study was to measure CB1R \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e in men with OUD on OAT, using [\u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003eC]OMAR tracer.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Subjects and Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eApprovals:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study was approved by the Yale University Institutional Review Board, the Yale Magnetic Resonance Research Center, and the Yale New Haven Hospital Radiation Drug Research Committee. All participants received detailed explanations, and written informed consent was obtained from each subject.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSubjects:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMales with a diagnosis of OUD who were not using cannabis or other drugs were recruited. Participants were interviewed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5), and individuals with concurrent major psychiatric disorders were excluded. Subjects were required to be under OAT with a stable dose of methadone or buprenorphine for at least one month, which was confirmed by contacting their OAT treatment centers or providers. Participants were excluded if they reported past-month use of any substances, including cannabis, and if they had a positive urine toxicology for any substance, except prescribed methadone or buprenorphine. Consistent with definitions from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other studies, individuals who reported risky alcohol use (i.e., alcohol use exceeding 14 standard drinks per week) or heavy nicotine use (i.e., nicotine or tobacco use equivalent to one or more packs of cigarettes per day (PPD)) were excluded (43-45). Other exclusion criteria included claustrophobia, ferromagnetic metal in the body, a heart pacemaker, abnormal coagulation tests, and poor arterial access. To mitigate the potential effects of acute opioid intoxication and withdrawal, all PET scans were scheduled between 9 and 11 a.m., and participants were instructed to take their daily OAT dose only after completing the PET scan. Opioid craving and withdrawal symptoms were measured in the morning before the PET scan, and the PET scan was rescheduled if they had moderate or severe withdrawal symptoms. Male healthy controls (HC) with no psychiatric diagnosis based on SCID-5 and no substance use disorder (except nicotine) served as the comparison group. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMeasurements:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNicotine dependence was assessed using the Fagerstr\u0026ouml;m Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), and perceived stress was evaluated using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Opioid withdrawal symptoms were measured using the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) (cutoff score for moderate withdrawal symptoms \u0026gt; 7), and the intensity of opioid craving was measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 100 (cutoff score for moderate craving \u0026gt; 30). The time since the last illicit opioid and cannabis use was recorded using the Drug History Questionnaire (DHQ), and the duration current OAT episode and current OAT dose was collected by the Methadone Questionnaire (MQ).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eImaging:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cu\u003eMR Imaging:\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eStructural magnetic resonance imaging (3D MPRAGE) was conducted for participants using a Siemens 3-T Trio system (Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, Pennsylvania) with a circularly polarized head coil to exclude individuals with gross anatomical abnormalities and anatomically delineate regions of interest for PET analyses. The dimensions and voxel size of MR images were 256 x 256 x 176 and 0.98 x 0.98 x 1.0 mm3, respectively.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cu\u003ePET\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cu\u003eImaging\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/em\u003e:\u0026nbsp;CB1R\u0026nbsp;availability was measured using [\u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003eC]OMAR (46). PET data were acquired using a High-Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT). Before PET scanning, two IV lines and an arterial catheter were placed. [\u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003eC]OMAR was prepared with high molar activity by previously described methods adapted to the TRACERlab FXC Pro automated synthesis module (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) (46).\u0026nbsp;Image acquisition begun with a 6-minute transmission scan acquired for attenuation correction. Emission data acquisition was started with a bolus injection of up to 740 MBq [\u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003eC]OMAR and continued for at least 120 minutes. The head motion was continually tracked during the acquisition of PET data with a Vicra marker-based tracking system (NDI Systems, Waterloo, Ontario). Since no reference region existed for [\u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003eC]OMAR, arterial blood samples were collected contralaterally from the radiotracer administration arm during the PET scan to measure the plasma input function and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) analysis of radioactive metabolites. Radioactivity in plasma was measured with a gamma counter. The column-switching HPLC analysis method was used to assess radioactive metabolites and unchanged parent compounds\u0026nbsp;(47). The measured input function was the product of the radioactivity concentration in plasma and the unchanged parent fraction.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cu\u003eImage Processing and Analysis:\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eTo ensure blind data processing and analysis, a pseudo-randomized subject identifier devoid of diagnostic and demographic information was created and assigned to each participant upon uploading data into our database. Image analysts only saw this subject identifier during pre-processing and analyses. List mode data was reconstructed using MOLAR (48), with attenuation, normalization, and motion corrections. Early PET image data were registered to the subject\u0026rsquo;s T1-weighted MR image. The T1-weighted MR image was non-linearly registered to MNI space for the region of interest (ROI) identification using the Anatomical Automatic Labeling (AAL) atlas (49). Predetermined ROIs included the following thirteen regions: amygdala, caudate, cerebellum, anterior cingulate (AC), posterior cingulate \u0026nbsp;(PC), frontal, hippocampus, insula, occipital cortex, parietal cortex, putamen, temporal, and thalamus. The nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area were not included due to challenges in imaging with the [\u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003eC]OMAR radiotracer given their small size, anatomical location, and the tracer\u0026rsquo;s characteristics. \u0026nbsp;Since OUD is associated with significantly lower gray matter volumes (50-52), this was accounted for with \u003cu\u003epartial volume correction\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e(53), as previously implemented (54, 55).\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e[\u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003eC]OMAR \u003cem\u003eV\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003eT\u003c/sub\u003e was estimated using the metabolite-corrected arterial plasma input function with multilinear 1 analysis (MA1; \u003cem\u003et\u003c/em\u003e*=30 min) (56), which has good test-retest reproducibility with mean absolute deviations of 7.3-10.0%.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eStatistical Analysis:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll data were summarized descriptively, and normality was assessed using normal probability plots and Kolmogorov\u0026ndash;Smirnov test statistics. Consistent with prior PET imaging studies employing the [^11C]OMAR radiotracer in psychiatric populations (41, 42, 57), the primary outcome was defined as the average CB1R availability, calculated as the mean value across regions of interest. The primary effect of interest was the main effect of group, testing for overall differences in CB1R availability between groups.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor the primary analysis, composite VT levels were compared between healthy controls (HC) and individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) using independent, two-sided t-tests. Given the small sample size, additional exploratory analyses were performed to examine region-specific differences in binding between groups using independent t-tests. For these analyses, both unadjusted and false discovery rate (FDR)\u0026ndash;corrected p-values are reported.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFurther exploratory analyses employed linear mixed models (LMMs) to evaluate the main and interaction effects of potential covariates within the OUD group, including OAT medication, antidepressant use, FTND, and PSS scores. All analyses were conducted using SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eA total of 10 male individuals with OUD and 18 male HC participants were studied (Table 1). No significant differences were found in sociodemographic characteristics. On the scan day, craving (4.0 \u0026plusmn; 9.7 [SD]) and withdrawal (0.8 \u0026plusmn; 1.5) scores were low among participants with OUD. As per the inclusion criteria, participants did not have concurrent active major psychiatric or substance use disorders. One subject had current symptoms of depression due to chronic dysthymia. Subjects with OUD reported more nicotine use (Table 1) and treatment with antidepressant medications for a history of depression and other psychiatric disorders (supplemental Table 1).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCB1R availability in individuals with OUD compared to HC.\u003c/strong\u003e Lower global (composite across regions) CB1R availability was observed in participants with OUD compared to HC (group effect: \u003cem\u003eF\u003csub\u003e(1,26)\u003c/sub\u003e =\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e4.6\u003cem\u003e, p=\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e0.04, difference = -14.7%, \u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ed\u003c/em\u003e= 0.85) (Figure 1a). The exploratory analyses showed a significant group-by-region interaction (\u003cem\u003eF\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e(12,312)\u003c/sub\u003e= 2.42, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e= 0.005), where group differences were observed in some but not all regions. Specifically, group effects were observed in several corticolimbic areas, including AC (-15.87%, \u003cem\u003eF\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e(1,312)\u003c/sub\u003e= 5.91, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e= 0.016, \u003cem\u003ed\u003c/em\u003e=0.96), caudate (-24.21%, \u003cem\u003eF\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e(1,312)\u003c/sub\u003e= 6.85, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e= 0.009, \u003cem\u003ed\u003c/em\u003e=1.03), frontal (-13.49%, \u003cem\u003eF\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e(1,312)\u003c/sub\u003e= 4.60, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e= 0.033, \u003cem\u003ed\u003c/em\u003e=0.84), hippocampus (-18.57%, \u003cem\u003eF\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e(1,312)\u003c/sub\u003e= 6.34, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e= 0.012, \u003cem\u003ed\u003c/em\u003e=0.99), insula (-17.34%, \u003cem\u003eF\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e(1,312)\u003c/sub\u003e= 6.56, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e= 0.011, \u003cem\u003ed\u003c/em\u003e=1.01), putamen (-14.71%, \u003cem\u003eF\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e(1,312)\u003c/sub\u003e= 4.76, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e= 0.030, \u003cem\u003ed\u003c/em\u003e=0.86), and thalamus (-15.63%, \u003cem\u003eF\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e(1,312)\u003c/sub\u003e= 5.06, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e= 0.025, \u003cem\u003ed\u003c/em\u003e=0.89) (Table 2 and Figure 1b). In addition to these group differences, there was a highly significant group by region interaction, which was substantially driven by a greater overall region effect within HC (F\u003csub\u003e(12,312)\u003c/sub\u003e= 71.7, p\u0026lt;.0001), compared to OUD (F\u003csub\u003e(12, 312)\u003c/sub\u003e= 39.5, p\u0026lt;.0001). That is, although both effects are highly significant, the F-statistic for HC is \u0026gt;80% higher than that for OUD. Pair-wise comparisons between regions within each group are not of primary interest and thus not reported. Supplementary Table S2 summarizes the result of a similar LMM model with age added as a covariate.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eExploratory analysis of the impact of potential covariates on CB1R availability in OUD\u003c/strong\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eMethadone vs. buprenorphine treatment:\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThere were no significant differences (\u003cem\u003eF\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e(1,8)\u003c/sub\u003e = 0.52, p = 0.49) in overall CB1R availability between those receiving methadone (n = 7; mean dose: 80.7, SD: 32.2 mg) and those receiving buprenorphine (n = 3; mean dose: 22.7, SD: 3.2 mg) (Table S3). No associations were observed between OAT dose and CB1R availability.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eCurrent stress level:\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNo significant associations existed between current stress levels in the OUD group, as measured using PSS, and CB1R availability (Spearman\u0026rsquo;s r= 0.07, p=0.84).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eNicotine use:\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmong individuals with any nicotine use (n=6), no associations were observed between FTND scores and CB1R availability (Spearman\u0026rsquo;s r=0.09\u003cstrong\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ep=0.87).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eAntidepressant medications:\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmong individuals with OUD, there were no significant differences in overall CB1R availability between those taking (1.11 \u0026plusmn; 0.042) and those not taking (1.19 \u0026plusmn; 0.064) antidepressant medication (\u003cem\u003eF\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e(1,8)\u003c/sub\u003e = 1.23, p = 0.30) (Table S4).\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eTo our knowledge, this is the first study to measure CB1R availability in individuals with OUD \u003cem\u003ein vivo\u003c/em\u003e. Males with OUD (on stable OAT) showed 15% lower global CB1R availability compared to healthy male individuals. This finding aligns with several (30\u0026ndash;32), but not all (32, 33), animal studies showing lower CB1R density or mRNA levels in several brain regions.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe findings of lower CB1R availability are intriguing in light of higher FAAH levels reported in individuals with OUD (36). Higher FAAH activity is associated with lower AEA levels (57). The lower CB1R availability observed in our study, combined with high FAAH activity in individuals with OUD reported elsewhere (36), suggests a lower eCB tone in males with OUD.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThere is substantial evidence of extensive overlap between the eCB and opioid systems that may explain why exposure to opioids could lead to lower CB1R levels. When administered acutely, cannabinoids and CB1R agonists increase endogenous opioid release (endorphin and enkephalin) (58, 59), and MOR expression (60, 61). Similarly, acute administration of opioids alters eCB levels (62, 63), and CB1R expression (61, 64, 65), and functionality (61). Moreover, the colocalization of CB1R and MOR in several brain areas is the basis of functional interactions (19, 20). Increasing evidence suggests that there is bidirectional modulation of the rewarding and reinforcing properties of opioids and cannabinoids (22). Preclinical studies of chronic opioid exposure have shown region-specific reductions in CB1R density, G-protein binding capacity, or mRNA levels in the cerebral cortex (30), hippocampus (31, 32), basolateral amygdala (32), and cerebellum (32), in addition to higher levels of FAAH and MAGL mRNA (31), and lower levels of 2-AG in several brain regions (34, 35).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe low CB1R availability in individuals with OUD suggests that the eCB system could potentially serve as a new target in OUD treatment (27, 66\u0026ndash;68). Preclinical studies demonstrated that eCB modulation reduces the reinforcing effects of opioids (15, 69), opioid-seeking behaviors (70, 71), and opioid withdrawal symptoms (72). Similarly, human studies reported that targeting the eCB system is effective in attenuating opioid craving (73). Moreover, positive effects of cannabinoids or eCB modulators in the treatment of OUD comorbidities such as chronic pain have been reported (74\u0026ndash;81). Some but not all observational studies suggest that cannabinoids may have opioid-sparing effects (82), while experimental studies suggest mixed results (83). Although research on the effects of cannabis or its principal active constituent, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), on OUD treatment remains inconclusive (84), new investigational eCB modulators, such as FAAH and MAGlipase inhibitors, are now available to target the eCB system (85). Current evidence shows promising therapeutic effects of FAAH inhibitors in nicotine and cannabis dependence (86, 87). A significant advantage of these compounds is their ability to modulate the eCB function regionally, causing minimal, if any, CB1R downregulation that is typically induced by direct CB1R agonists such as THC (41). Moreover, FAAH inhibitors have low abuse liability, which is a significant benefit compared to cannabis or THC (88). Further studies are required to investigate the potential therapeutic effects of eCB modulators in treating OUD.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe involvement of the eCB system in stress regulation and reward processing has been extensively reported (18, 89\u0026ndash;94). Moreover, low CB1R availability was reported in other substance use disorders, including cannabis use disorder (41), alcohol use disorder (95), and tobacco use disorder (96). It remains unclear whether this reduced CB1R availability is drug-specific or reflects broader deficits in reward processing and heightened stress reactivity in addiction, regardless of substance type. Further investigations are also required to determine if lower CB1R in individuals with OUD precedes the development of OUD, or is a consequence of long-term opioid use, and to investigate other factors potentially involved in these alterations. Future research should consider comparing the CB1R availability in individuals with OUD who are not on OAT to assess if similar low CB1R availability exists in individuals with OUD regardless of OAT. Moreover, measuring CB1R availability before and after opioid abstinence periods would illuminate the impact of active opioid use on CB1R. Furthermore, assessing CB1R availability in individuals prescribed opioids without OUD could differentiate the general effects of opioid use on CB1R from those specifically associated with OUD.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis study has certain limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. Only male participants with OUD were recruited in this study. Existing literature indicates sex differences in the eCB system both at baseline and in the context of other psychiatric disorders (97\u0026ndash;106). Thus, future studies should explore the eCB status in females to better understand these potential sex differences. The limited sample size reduces overall statistical power, and specifically limits estimating potential covariate effects\u0026ndash; future studies with larger samples and a comparable number of participants receiving methadone or buprenorphine treatment are necessary to replicate these preliminary findings. While there were no significant group differences in age, the OUD group was older, with a few participants over 65. Additionally, our sample was unbalanced regarding nicotine dependence. A larger study with a balanced age and nicotine dependence distribution is necessary to parse out the effect of opioid exposure from potential confounders. Furthermore, only OUD participants who were stable on OAT were included to minimize the effects of opioid withdrawal and intoxication on CB1R availability. Further research is necessary to determine if individuals with OUD who are not receiving OAT exhibit similar low CB1R availability. Lastly, our study excluded individuals using other substances, including cannabis. This decision was critical for the interpretability of the data, given strong evidence that cannabis use is associated with lower availability of CB1R (41). However, excluding other substance use may limit the generalizability of our results to the broader population of OUD individuals with co-occurring use of other substances. Future studies should consider including individuals with OUD and concurrent substance use disorders to enhance the generalizability of the findings.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn summary, our results provide preliminary evidence of lower global CB1R availability (composite across regions) in males with OUD in OAT treatment. Future studies are required to determine the clinical implications of low CB1R in males with OUD, and the possibility of targeting the eCB system in treating OUD.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003ch2\u003eConflict of Interest:\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDeepak Cyril D\u0026rsquo;Souza currently receives or has received research support in the past 3 years from Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Jazz, Biogen, and Cerevel, administered through Yale University School of Medicine. Deepak Cyril D\u0026rsquo;Souza has served as a consultant for Jazz, Bio Haven, Atai, Abide, and France Foundation currently or in the past 3 years. Anahita Bassir Nia has served as a member of the Scientific Advisory Committee for Synendos Therapeutics over the past 3 years. All other authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgment:\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors would like to acknowledge the invaluable contributions of the Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit (CNRU) staff at the Connecticut Mental Health Center (CMHC) and Yale PET Center for their dedicated care of participants. This study was funded by NIDA R21DA052864 (ABN and DCD). ABN was supported by NIDA K12 DA00167.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWide-ranging online data for epidemiologic research (WONDER). Atlanta GC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2017. Available at http://wonder.cdc.gov.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNational Center for Health Statistics (2025): U.S. Overdose Deaths Decrease in 2023, First Time Since 2018. National Center for Health Statistics,.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eU.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (2020): National Survey on Drug Use and Health 2019 (NSDUH-2019-DS0001).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKampman K, Jarvis M (2015): American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) National Practice Guideline for the Use of Medications in the Treatment of Addiction Involving Opioid Use. \u003cem\u003eJ Addict Med\u003c/em\u003e. 9:358-367.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe ASAM National Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: 2020 Focused Update. \u003cem\u003eJ Addict Med\u003c/em\u003e. 14:1-91.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNosyk B, Marsh DC, Sun H, Schechter MT, Anis AH (2010): Trends in methadone maintenance treatment participation, retention, and compliance to dosing guidelines in British Columbia, Canada: 1996-2006. \u003cem\u003eJ Subst Abuse Treat\u003c/em\u003e. 39:22-31.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLo A, Kerr T, Hayashi K, Milloy MJ, Nosova E, Liu Y, et al. (2018): Factors associated with methadone maintenance therapy discontinuation among people who inject drugs. \u003cem\u003eJ Subst Abuse Treat\u003c/em\u003e. 94:41-46.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHser YI, Saxon AJ, Huang D, Hasson A, Thomas C, Hillhouse M, et al. (2014): Treatment retention among patients randomized to buprenorphine/naloxone compared to methadone in a multi-site trial. \u003cem\u003eAddiction\u003c/em\u003e. 109:79-87.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSmyth BP, Barry J, Keenan E, Ducray K (2010): Lapse and relapse following inpatient treatment of opiate dependence. \u003cem\u003eIr Med J\u003c/em\u003e. 103:176-179.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDarker CD, Ho J, Kelly G, Whiston L, Barry J (2016): Demographic and clinical factors predicting retention in methadone maintenance: results from an Irish cohort. \u003cem\u003eIr J Med Sci\u003c/em\u003e. 185:433-441.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStrain EC, Bigelow GE, Liebson IA, Stitzer ML (1999): Moderate- vs high-dose methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence: a randomized trial. \u003cem\u003eJAMA\u003c/em\u003e. 281:1000-1005.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCalabria B, Degenhardt L, Briegleb C, Vos T, Hall W, Lynskey M, et al. (2010): Systematic review of prospective studies investigating \u0026quot;remission\u0026quot; from amphetamine, cannabis, cocaine or opioid dependence. \u003cem\u003eAddict Behav\u003c/em\u003e. 35:741-749.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVaillant GE (1973): A 20-year follow-up of New York narcotic addicts. \u003cem\u003eArch Gen Psychiatry\u003c/em\u003e. 29:237-241.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMart\u0026iacute;nez-Rivera A, Fetcho RN, Birmingham L, Xu J, Yang R, Foord C, et al. (2024): Elevating levels of the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol blunts opioid reward but not analgesia. \u003cem\u003eSci Adv\u003c/em\u003e. 10:eadq4779.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWilkerson JL, Ghosh S, Mustafa M, Abdullah RA, Niphakis MJ, Cabrera R, et al. (2017): The endocannabinoid hydrolysis inhibitor SA-57: Intrinsic antinociceptive effects, augmented morphine-induced antinociception, and attenuated heroin seeking behavior in mice. \u003cem\u003eNeuropharmacology\u003c/em\u003e. 114:156-167.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOliva I, Kazi F, Cantwell LN, Thakur GA, Crystal JD, Hohmann AG (2024): Negative allosteric modulation of CB1 cannabinoid receptor signalling decreases intravenous morphine self-administration and relapse in mice. \u003cem\u003eAddict Biol\u003c/em\u003e. 29:e13429.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIyer V, Saberi SA, Pacheco R, Sizemore EF, Stockman S, Kulkarni A, et al. (2024): Negative allosteric modulation of CB(1) cannabinoid receptor signaling suppresses opioid-mediated tolerance and withdrawal without blocking opioid antinociception. \u003cem\u003eNeuropharmacology\u003c/em\u003e. 257:110052.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGamble MC, Miracle S, Williams BR, Logan RW (2024): Endocannabinoid agonist 2-arachidonoylglycerol differentially alters diurnal activity and sleep during fentanyl withdrawal in male and female mice. \u003cem\u003ePharmacol Biochem Behav\u003c/em\u003e. 240:173791.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScavone JL, Mackie K, Van Bockstaele EJ (2010): Characterization of cannabinoid-1 receptors in the locus coeruleus: relationship with mu-opioid receptors. \u003cem\u003eBrain Res\u003c/em\u003e. 1312:18-31.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRodriguez JJ, Mackie K, Pickel VM (2001): Ultrastructural localization of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor in mu-opioid receptor patches of the rat Caudate putamen nucleus. \u003cem\u003eJ Neurosci\u003c/em\u003e. 21:823-833.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLopez-Moreno JA, Lopez-Jimenez A, Gorriti MA, de Fonseca FR (2010): Functional interactions between endogenous cannabinoid and opioid systems: focus on alcohol, genetics and drug-addicted behaviors. \u003cem\u003eCurr Drug Targets\u003c/em\u003e. 11:406-428.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAhmad T, Lauzon NM, de Jaeger X, Laviolette SR (2013): Cannabinoid transmission in the prelimbic cortex bidirectionally controls opiate reward and aversion signaling through dissociable kappa versus mu-opiate receptor dependent mechanisms. \u003cem\u003eJ Neurosci\u003c/em\u003e. 33:15642-15651.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWills KL, DeVuono MV, Limebeer CL, Vemuri K, Makriyannis A, Parker LA (2017): CB(1) receptor antagonism in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis interferes with affective opioid withdrawal in rats. \u003cem\u003eBehav Neurosci\u003c/em\u003e. 131:304-311.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eParolaro D, Rubino T, Vigano D, Massi P, Guidali C, Realini N (2010): Cellular mechanisms underlying the interaction between cannabinoid and opioid system. \u003cem\u003eCurr Drug Targets\u003c/em\u003e. 11:393-405.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMassi P, Vaccani A, Romorini S, Parolaro D (2001): Comparative characterization in the rat of the interaction between cannabinoids and opiates for their immunosuppressive and analgesic effects. \u003cem\u003eJ Neuroimmunol\u003c/em\u003e. 117:116-124.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMaldonado R, Valverde O (2003): Participation of the opioid system in cannabinoid-induced antinociception and emotional-like responses. \u003cem\u003eEur Neuropsychopharmacol\u003c/em\u003e. 13:401-410.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScavone JL, Sterling RC, Van Bockstaele EJ (2013): Cannabinoid and opioid interactions: implications for opiate dependence and withdrawal. \u003cem\u003eNeuroscience\u003c/em\u003e. 248:637-654.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSuzuki J, Weiss RD (2021): Cannabinoids for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: Where is the Evidence? \u003cem\u003eJ Addict Med\u003c/em\u003e. 15:91-92.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBlessing E, Virani S, Rotrosen J (2020): Clinical Trials for Opioid Use Disorder. \u003cem\u003eHandb Exp Pharmacol\u003c/em\u003e. 258:167-202.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGonzalez S, Schmid PC, Fernandez-Ruiz J, Krebsbach R, Schmid HH, Ramos JA (2003): Region-dependent changes in endocannabinoid transmission in the brain of morphine-dependent rats. \u003cem\u003eAddict Biol\u003c/em\u003e. 8:159-166.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLi W, Zhang CL, Qiu ZG (2017): Differential expression of endocannabinoid system-related genes in the dorsal hippocampus following expression and reinstatement of morphine conditioned place preference in mice. \u003cem\u003eNeurosci Lett\u003c/em\u003e. 643:38-44.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGonzalez S, Fernandez-Ruiz J, Sparpaglione V, Parolaro D, Ramos JA (2002): Chronic exposure to morphine, cocaine or ethanol in rats produced different effects in brain cannabinoid CB(1) receptor binding and mRNA levels. \u003cem\u003eDrug Alcohol Depend\u003c/em\u003e. 66:77-84.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRubino T, Tizzoni L, Vigan\u0026ograve; D, Massi P, Parolaro D (1997): Modulation of rat brain cannabinoid receptors after chronic morphine treatment. \u003cem\u003eNeuroreport\u003c/em\u003e. 8:3219-3223.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVigano D, Grazia Cascio M, Rubino T, Fezza F, Vaccani A, Di Marzo V, et al. (2003): Chronic morphine modulates the contents of the endocannabinoid, 2-arachidonoyl glycerol, in rat brain. \u003cem\u003eNeuropsychopharmacology\u003c/em\u003e. 28:1160-1167.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVigano D, Valenti M, Cascio MG, Di Marzo V, Parolaro D, Rubino T (2004): Changes in endocannabinoid levels in a rat model of behavioural sensitization to morphine. \u003cem\u003eEur J Neurosci\u003c/em\u003e. 20:1849-1857.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShyu C, Butler K, Tyndale RF, Smith A, Tardelli VS, Kloiber S, et al. (2024): Investigating Endocannabinoid Metabolism in Opioid Treated Chronic Pain Patients With and Without Opioid Use Disorder: A PET Study With Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Radioligand [C-11]CURB. \u003cem\u003eBiological Psychiatry\u003c/em\u003e. 95:S113.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWong DF, Kuwabara H, Horti AG, Raymont V, Brasic J, Guevara M, et al. (2010): Quantification of cerebral cannabinoid receptors subtype 1 (CB1) in healthy subjects and schizophrenia by the novel PET radioligand [11C]OMAR. \u003cem\u003eNeuroimage\u003c/em\u003e. 52:1505-1513.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNormandin MD, Zheng MQ, Lin KS, Mason NS, Lin SF, Ropchan J, et al. (2015): Imaging the cannabinoid CB1 receptor in humans with [11C]OMAR: assessment of kinetic analysis methods, test-retest reproducibility, and gender differences. \u003cem\u003eJ Cereb Blood Flow Metab\u003c/em\u003e. 35:1313-1322.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTsujikawa T, Zoghbi SS, Hong J, Donohue SR, Jenko KJ, Gladding RL, et al. (2014): In vitro and in vivo evaluation of (11)C-SD5024, a novel PET radioligand for human brain imaging of cannabinoid CB1 receptors. \u003cem\u003eNeuroimage\u003c/em\u003e. 84:733-741.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNeumeister A, Normandin MD, Pietrzak RH, Piomelli D, Zheng MQ, Gujarro-Anton A, et al. (2013): Elevated brain cannabinoid CB1 receptor availability in post-traumatic stress disorder: a positron emission tomography study. \u003cem\u003eMol Psychiatry\u003c/em\u003e. 18:1034-1040.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eD\u0026apos;Souza DC, Cortes-Briones JA, Ranganathan M, Thurnauer H, Creatura G, Surti T, et al. (2016): Rapid Changes in CB1 Receptor Availability in Cannabis Dependent Males after Abstinence from Cannabis. \u003cem\u003eBiol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging\u003c/em\u003e. 1:60-67.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRanganathan M, Cortes-Briones J, Radhakrishnan R, Thurnauer H, Planeta B, Skosnik P, et al. (2016): Reduced Brain Cannabinoid Receptor Availability in Schizophrenia. \u003cem\u003eBiol Psychiatry\u003c/em\u003e. 79:997-1005.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBoersma P, Villarroel MA, Vahratian A (2020): Heavy Drinking Among U.S. Adults, 2018. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTarasi B, Cornuz J, Clair C, Baud D (2022): Cigarette smoking during pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes: a cross-sectional study over 10 years. \u003cem\u003eBMC Public Health\u003c/em\u003e. 22:2403.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePierce JP, Messer K, White MM, Cowling DW, Thomas DP (2011): Prevalence of heavy smoking in California and the United States, 1965-2007. \u003cem\u003eJama\u003c/em\u003e. 305:1106-1112.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHorti AG, Fan H, Kuwabara H, Hilton J, Ravert HT, Holt DP, et al. (2006): 11C-JHU75528: a radiotracer for PET imaging of CB1 cannabinoid receptors. \u003cem\u003eJ Nucl Med\u003c/em\u003e. 47:1689-1696.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHilton J, Yokoi F, Dannals RF, Ravert HT, Szabo Z, Wong DF (2000): Column-switching HPLC for the analysis of plasma in PET imaging studies. \u003cem\u003eNucl Med Biol\u003c/em\u003e. 27:627-630.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCarson RE, Barker WC, Liow J-S, Johnson CA (2003): Design of a motion-compensation OSEM list-mode algorithm for resolution-recovery reconstruction for the HRRT. \u003cem\u003eNuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2003 IEEE\u003c/em\u003e: IEEE, pp 3281-3285.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, et al. (2002): Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. \u003cem\u003eNeuroimage\u003c/em\u003e. 15:273-289.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLin HC, Wang PW, Wu HC, Ko CH, Yang YH, Yen CF (2018): Altered gray matter volume and disrupted functional connectivity of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in men with heroin dependence. \u003cem\u003ePsychiatry Clin Neurosci\u003c/em\u003e. 72:435-444.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSchmidt A, Vogel M, Baumgartner S, Wiesbeck GA, Lang U, Borgwardt S, et al. (2021): Brain volume changes after long-term injectable opioid treatment: A longitudinal voxel-based morphometry study. \u003cem\u003eAddict Biol\u003c/em\u003e. 26:e12970.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShi H, Liang Z, Chen J, Li W, Zhu J, Li Y, et al. (2020): Gray matter alteration in heroin-dependent men: An atlas-based magnetic resonance imaging study. \u003cem\u003ePsychiatry Res Neuroimaging\u003c/em\u003e. 304:111150.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGiovacchini G, Lerner A, Toczek MT, Fraser C, Ma K, DeMar JC, et al. (2004): Brain Incorporation of 11C-Arachidonic Acid, Blood Volume, and Blood Flow in Healthy Aging: A Study With Partial-Volume Correction. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Nuclear Medicine\u003c/em\u003e. 45:1471-1479.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHillmer AT, Sandiego CM, Hannestad J, Angarita GA, Kumar A, McGovern EM, et al. (2017): In vivo imaging of translocator protein, a marker of activated microglia, in alcohol dependence. \u003cem\u003eMol Psychiatry\u003c/em\u003e. 22:1759-1766.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHillmer AT, Angarita GA, Esterlis I, Anderson JM, Nabulsi N, Lim K, et al. (2021): Longitudinal imaging of metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors during early and extended alcohol abstinence. \u003cem\u003eNeuropsychopharmacology\u003c/em\u003e. 46:380-385.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIchise M, Toyama H, Innis RB, Carson RE (2002): Strategies to improve neuroreceptor parameter estimation by linear regression analysis. \u003cem\u003eJ Cereb Blood Flow Metab\u003c/em\u003e. 22:1271-1281.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMayo LM, Asratian A, Lind\u0026eacute; J, Morena M, Haataja R, Hammar V, et al. (2020): Elevated Anandamide, Enhanced Recall of Fear Extinction, and Attenuated Stress Responses Following Inhibition of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase: A Randomized, Controlled Experimental Medicine Trial. \u003cem\u003eBiological Psychiatry\u003c/em\u003e. 87:538-547.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eValverde O, Noble F, Beslot F, Dauge V, Fournie-Zaluski MC, Roques BP (2001): Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol releases and facilitates the effects of endogenous enkephalins: reduction in morphine withdrawal syndrome without change in rewarding effect. \u003cem\u003eEur J Neurosci\u003c/em\u003e. 13:1816-1824.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKoch M, Varela L, Kim JG, Kim JD, Hernandez-Nuno F, Simonds SE, et al. (2015): Hypothalamic POMC neurons promote cannabinoid-induced feeding. \u003cem\u003eNature\u003c/em\u003e. 519:45-50.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMolaei M, Fatahi Z, Zaringhalam J, Haghparast A (2016): CB1 Cannabinoid Agonist (WIN55,212-2) Within the Basolateral Amygdala Induced Sensitization to Morphine and Increased the Level of mu-Opioid Receptor and c-fos in the Nucleus Accumbens. \u003cem\u003eJ Mol Neurosci\u003c/em\u003e. 58:446-455.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFattore L, Vigano D, Fadda P, Rubino T, Fratta W, Parolaro D (2007): Bidirectional regulation of mu-opioid and CB1-cannabinoid receptor in rats self-administering heroin or WIN 55,212-2. \u003cem\u003eEur J Neurosci\u003c/em\u003e. 25:2191-2200.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCaille S, Alvarez-Jaimes L, Polis I, Stouffer DG, Parsons LH (2007): Specific alterations of extracellular endocannabinoid levels in the nucleus accumbens by ethanol, heroin, and cocaine self-administration. \u003cem\u003eJ Neurosci\u003c/em\u003e. 27:3695-3702.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSustkova-Fiserova M, Charalambous C, Havlickova T, Lapka M, Jerabek P, Puskina N, et al. (2017): Alterations in Rat Accumbens Endocannabinoid and GABA Content during Fentanyl Treatment: The Role of Ghrelin. \u003cem\u003eInt J Mol Sci\u003c/em\u003e. 18.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhang J, Wang N, Chen B, Wang Y, He J, Cai X, et al. (2016): Blockade of Cannabinoid CB1 receptor attenuates the acquisition of morphine-induced conditioned place preference along with a downregulation of ERK, CREB phosphorylation, and BDNF expression in the nucleus accumbens and hippocampus. \u003cem\u003eNeurosci Lett\u003c/em\u003e. 630:70-76.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJin L, Pan L, Guo Y, Zheng Y, Nie Z, Zhu R (2014): Expression and localization of cannabinoid receptor 1 in rats\u0026apos; brain treated with acute and repeated morphine. \u003cem\u003eActa Neurobiol Exp (Wars)\u003c/em\u003e. 74:288-297.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWiese B, Wilson-Poe AR (2018): Emerging Evidence for Cannabis\u0026apos; Role in Opioid Use Disorder. \u003cem\u003eCannabis Cannabinoid Res\u003c/em\u003e. 3:179-189.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChye Y, Christensen E, Solowij N, Yucel M (2019): The Endocannabinoid System and Cannabidiol\u0026apos;s Promise for the Treatment of Substance Use Disorder. \u003cem\u003eFront Psychiatry\u003c/em\u003e. 10:63.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSloan ME, Gowin JL, Ramchandani VA, Hurd YL, Le Foll B (2017): The endocannabinoid system as a target for addiction treatment: Trials and tribulations. \u003cem\u003eNeuropharmacology\u003c/em\u003e. 124:73-83.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSolinas M, Panlilio LV, Tanda G, Makriyannis A, Matthews SA, Goldberg SR (2005): Cannabinoid agonists but not inhibitors of endogenous cannabinoid transport or metabolism enhance the reinforcing efficacy of heroin in rats. \u003cem\u003eNeuropsychopharmacology\u003c/em\u003e. 30:2046-2057.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLichtman AH, Sheikh SM, Loh HH, Martin BR (2001): Opioid and cannabinoid modulation of precipitated withdrawal in delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol and morphine-dependent mice. \u003cem\u003eJ Pharmacol Exp Ther\u003c/em\u003e. 298:1007-1014.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYamaguchi T, Hagiwara Y, Tanaka H, Sugiura T, Waku K, Shoyama Y, et al. (2001): Endogenous cannabinoid, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, attenuates naloxone-precipitated withdrawal signs in morphine-dependent mice. \u003cem\u003eBrain Res\u003c/em\u003e. 909:121-126.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLofwall MR, Babalonis S, Nuzzo PA, Elayi SC, Walsh SL (2016): Opioid withdrawal suppression efficacy of oral dronabinol in opioid dependent humans. \u003cem\u003eDrug Alcohol Depend\u003c/em\u003e. 164:143-150.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHurd YL, Spriggs S, Alishayev J, Winkel G, Gurgov K, Kudrich C, et al. (2019): Cannabidiol for the Reduction of Cue-Induced Craving and Anxiety in Drug-Abstinent Individuals With Heroin Use Disorder: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. \u003cem\u003eAm J Psychiatry\u003c/em\u003e. 176:911-922.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDegenhardt L, Lintzeris N, Campbell G, Bruno R, Cohen M, Farrell M, et al. (2015): Experience of adjunctive cannabis use for chronic non-cancer pain: findings from the Pain and Opioids IN Treatment (POINT) study. \u003cem\u003eDrug Alcohol Depend\u003c/em\u003e. 147:144-150.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCampbell G, Hall WD, Peacock A, Lintzeris N, Bruno R, Larance B, et al. (2018): Effect of cannabis use in people with chronic non-cancer pain prescribed opioids: findings from a 4-year prospective cohort study. \u003cem\u003eLancet Public Health\u003c/em\u003e. 3:e341-e350.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBoehnke KF, Litinas E, Clauw DJ (2016): Medical Cannabis Use Is Associated With Decreased Opiate Medication Use in a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Survey of Patients With Chronic Pain. \u003cem\u003eJ Pain\u003c/em\u003e. 17:739-744.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHaroutounian S, Ratz Y, Ginosar Y, Furmanov K, Saifi F, Meidan R, et al. (2016): The Effect of Medicinal Cannabis on Pain and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Chronic Pain: A Prospective Open-label Study. \u003cem\u003eClin J Pain\u003c/em\u003e. 32:1036-1043.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKral AH, Wenger L, Novak SP, Chu D, Corsi KF, Coffa D, et al. (2015): Is cannabis use associated with less opioid use among people who inject drugs? \u003cem\u003eDrug Alcohol Depend\u003c/em\u003e. 153:236-241.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBellnier T, Brown GW, Ortega TR (2018): Preliminary evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and costs associated with the treatment of chronic pain with medical cannabis. \u003cem\u003eMent Health Clin\u003c/em\u003e. 8:110-115.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGoggin MM, Shahriar BJ, Stead A, Janis GC (2019): Reduced urinary opioid levels from pain management patients associated with marijuana use. \u003cem\u003ePain Manag\u003c/em\u003e. 9:441-447.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVigil JM, Stith SS, Adams IM, Reeve AP (2017): Associations between medical cannabis and prescription opioid use in chronic pain patients: A preliminary cohort study. \u003cem\u003ePLoS One\u003c/em\u003e. 12:e0187795.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEl-Mourad J, Lunghi C, Herrera NP, Zongo A (2024): Dosing of cannabinoids associated with an opioid-sparing effect: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. \u003cem\u003ePain Management Nursing\u003c/em\u003e. 25:e8-e20.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNielsen S, Picco L, Murnion B, Winters B, Matheson J, Graham M, et al. (2022): Opioid-sparing effect of cannabinoids for analgesia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies. \u003cem\u003eNeuropsychopharmacology\u003c/em\u003e. 47:1315-1330.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCosta GPA, Nunes JC, Heringer DL, Anand A, De Aquino JP (2024): The impact of cannabis on non-medical opioid use among individuals receiving pharmacotherapies for opioid use disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. \u003cem\u003eAm J Drug Alcohol Abuse\u003c/em\u003e. 50:12-26.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMayo LM, Asratian A, Lind\u0026eacute; J, Morena M, Haataja R, Hammar V, et al. (2020): Elevated Anandamide, Enhanced Recall of Fear Extinction, and Attenuated Stress Responses Following Inhibition of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase: A Randomized, Controlled Experimental Medicine Trial. \u003cem\u003eBiol Psychiatry\u003c/em\u003e. 87:538-547.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eD\u0026apos;Souza DC, Cortes-Briones J, Creatura G, Bluez G, Thurnauer H, Deaso E, et al. (2019): Efficacy and safety of a fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor (PF-04457845) in the treatment of cannabis withdrawal and dependence in men: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, phase 2a single-site randomised controlled trial. \u003cem\u003eLancet Psychiatry\u003c/em\u003e. 6:35-45.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMelis M, Pillolla G, Luchicchi A, Muntoni AL, Yasar S, Goldberg SR, et al. (2008): Endogenous fatty acid ethanolamides suppress nicotine-induced activation of mesolimbic dopamine neurons through nuclear receptors. \u003cem\u003eJ Neurosci\u003c/em\u003e. 28:13985-13994.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePanlilio LV, Justinova Z, Goldberg SR (2013): Inhibition of FAAH and activation of PPAR: new approaches to the treatment of cognitive dysfunction and drug addiction. \u003cem\u003ePharmacol Ther\u003c/em\u003e. 138:84-102.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMiliano C, Natividad LA, Quello S, Stoolmiller M, Gregus AM, Buczynski MW, et al. (2024): The Predictive Value of Plasma Bioactive Lipids on Craving in Human Volunteers With Alcohol Use Disorder. \u003cem\u003eBiol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci\u003c/em\u003e. 4:100368.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBoachie N, Gaudette E, Bazinet RP, Lin L, Tyndale RF, Mansouri E, et al. (2023): Circulating Endocannabinoids and N-Acylethanolamines in Individuals with Cannabis Use Disorder-Preliminary Findings. \u003cem\u003eBrain Sci\u003c/em\u003e. 13.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVoegel CD, Kroll SL, Schmid MW, Kexel AK, Baumgartner MR, Kraemer T, et al. (2022): Alterations of Stress-Related Glucocorticoids and Endocannabinoids in Hair of Chronic Cocaine Users. \u003cem\u003eInt J Neuropsychopharmacol\u003c/em\u003e. 25:226-237.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMitra S, Gobira PH, Werner CT, Martin JA, Iida M, Thomas SA, et al. (2021): A role for the endocannabinoid enzymes monoacylglycerol and diacylglycerol lipases in cue-induced cocaine craving following prolonged abstinence. \u003cem\u003eAddict Biol\u003c/em\u003e. 26:e13007.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eParsons LH, Hurd YL (2015): Endocannabinoid signalling in reward and addiction. \u003cem\u003eNat Rev Neurosci\u003c/em\u003e. 16:579-594.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSolinas M, Goldberg SR, Piomelli D (2008): The endocannabinoid system in brain reward processes. \u003cem\u003eBr J Pharmacol\u003c/em\u003e. 154:369-383.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHirvonen J, Zanotti-Fregonara P, Umhau JC, George DT, Rallis-Frutos D, Lyoo CH, et al. (2013): Reduced cannabinoid CB1 receptor binding in alcohol dependence measured with positron emission tomography. \u003cem\u003eMol Psychiatry\u003c/em\u003e. 18:916-921.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHirvonen J, Zanotti-Fregonara P, Gorelick DA, Lyoo CH, Rallis-Frutos D, Morse C, et al. (2018): Decreased Cannabinoid CB(1) Receptors in Male Tobacco Smokers Examined With Positron Emission Tomography. \u003cem\u003eBiol Psychiatry\u003c/em\u003e. 84:715-721.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFarquhar CE, Breivogel CS, Gamage TF, Gay EA, Thomas BF, Craft RM, et al. (2019): Sex, THC, and hormones: Effects on density and sensitivity of CB1 cannabinoid receptors in rats. \u003cem\u003eDrug and alcohol dependence\u003c/em\u003e. 194:20-27.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiu X, Li X, Zhao G, Wang F, Wang L (2020): Sexual dimorphic distribution of cannabinoid 1 receptor mRNA in adult C57BL/6J mice. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Comparative Neurology\u003c/em\u003e. 528:1986-1999.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLlorente-Berzal A, Assis MA, Rubino T, Zamberletti E, Marco EM, Parolaro D, et al. (2013): Sex-dependent changes in brain CB1R expression and functionality and immune CB2R expression as a consequence of maternal deprivation and adolescent cocaine exposure. \u003cem\u003ePharmacological research\u003c/em\u003e. 74:23-33.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePaola Castelli M, Fadda P, Casu A, Sabrina Spano M, Casti A, Fratta W, et al. (2014): Male and female rats differ in brain cannabinoid CB1 receptor density and function and in behavioural traits predisposing to drug addiction: effect of ovarian hormones. \u003cem\u003eCurrent pharmaceutical design\u003c/em\u003e. 20:2100-2113.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCraft RM, Wakley AA, Tsutsui KT, Laggart JD (2012): Sex differences in cannabinoid 1 vs. cannabinoid 2 receptor-selective antagonism of antinociception produced by \u0026Delta;9-tetrahydrocannabinol and CP55, 940 in the rat. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics\u003c/em\u003e. 340:787-800.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVan Laere K, Goffin K, Casteels C, Dupont P, Mortelmans L, de Hoon J, et al. (2008): Gender-dependent increases with healthy aging of the human cerebral cannabinoid-type 1 receptor binding using [18F] MK-9470 PET. \u003cem\u003eNeuroimage\u003c/em\u003e. 39:1533-1541.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNeumeister A, Normandin MD, Pietrzak RH, Piomelli D, Zheng M-Q, Gujarro-Anton A, et al. (2013): Elevated brain cannabinoid CB1 receptor availability in post-traumatic stress disorder: a positron emission tomography study. \u003cem\u003eMolecular psychiatry\u003c/em\u003e. 18:1034-1040.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNormandin MD, Zheng M-Q, Lin K-S, Mason NS, Lin S-F, Ropchan J, et al. (2015): Imaging the cannabinoid cb1 receptor in humans with [11c] omar: assessment of kinetic analysis methods, test\u0026ndash;retest reproducibility, and gender differences. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow \u0026amp; Metabolism\u003c/em\u003e. 35:1313-1322.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLaurikainen H, Tuominen L, Tikka M, Merisaari H, Armio R-L, Sormunen E, et al. (2019): Sex difference in brain CB1 receptor availability in man. \u003cem\u003eNeuroimage\u003c/em\u003e. 184:834-842.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRadhakrishnan R, Worhunsky PD, Zheng M-Q, Najafzadeh S, Gallezot J-D, Planeta B, et al. (2022): Age, gender and body-mass-index relationships with in vivo CB1 receptor availability in healthy humans measured with [11C] OMAR PET. \u003cem\u003eNeuroImage\u003c/em\u003e. 264:119674.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Tables","content":"\u003cp\u003eTable 1: Demographic characteristics of participants\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"484\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOUD (N=10)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHC (N=18)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;vlaue\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAge; mean(SD)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e56.82 (10.93)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e49.22 (8.46)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBMI; mean(SD)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e31.58 (5.77)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e29.77 (5.77)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.43\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRace\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAfrican American; n(%)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCaucasian; n(%)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther/Unknown; n(%)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthnicity\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.06\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNon-Hispanic or Latino\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHispanic or Latino\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther/Unknown\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTracer dose; MBq; mean(SD)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e429.20 (180.93)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e556.11 (120.62)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.07\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNicotine dependence\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e; n (%)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6 (60%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1 (5.6%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;0.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFTND Score\u003csup\u003e3\u003c/sup\u003e; mean (SD)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.3 (1.2)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.0 (-)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePSS score; mean (SD)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.7 (7.2)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCOWS score\u003csup\u003e4\u003c/sup\u003e; mean (SD)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.8 (1.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCraving VAS score\u003csup\u003e4\u003c/sup\u003e; mean (SD)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.0 (9.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethadone; n (%)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7 (70%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethadone dose; means (SD)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e80.7 (32.2)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBuprenorphine; n (%)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3 (30%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBuprenorphine; dose (SD)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22.7 (2.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLast illicit opioid use, months; mean (SD)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e88.7 (90.07)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLast cannabis use, months; mean (SD)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e275.37 (180.31)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePast 12 months alcohol use disorders, in remission; n (%)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1 (10%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCurrent antidepressant use; n (%)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6 (60%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 170px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCurrent benzodiazepine use; n (%)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 118px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0 (0%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 82px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAbbreviations: BMI, Body Mass Index; COWS, Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale; FTND, Fagerstr\u0026ouml;m Test for Nicotine Dependence; HC, Healthy Control; OUD, Opioid Use Disorder; PSS; Perceived Stress Scale; VAS, Visual Analog Scale.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003csup\u003e1\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sup\u003eBased on the T-test for continuous and Chi-square or Fisher exact test for categorical variables.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003csup\u003e2\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sup\u003eDefined as FTND score of greater than zero.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003csup\u003e3\u003c/sup\u003e In participants with nicotine dependence.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003csup\u003e4\u003c/sup\u003e Before the tracer injection.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 2: Estimated regional LS means and SEs of CB1R availability with post hoc comparisons based on the LMM\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv align=\"\"\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"629\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 177px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLS mean (SE)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 81px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eContrast %\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 87px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eF\u003csub\u003e(1,312)\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 85px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003ed\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003csub\u003eUncorrected\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 91px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eOUD\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHC\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 81px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 87px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 85px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAnterior Cingulate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 91px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.28 (0.08)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.52 (0.06)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 81px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-15.87%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 87px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.91\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 85px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.96\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e0.016\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAmygdala\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 91px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.25 (0.09)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.46 (0.07)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 81px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-14.59%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 87px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.27\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 85px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.71\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.071\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCaudate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 91px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.81 (0.08)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.07 (0.06)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 81px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-24.21%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 87px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.85\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 85px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.03\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e0.009\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCerebellum\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 91px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.10 (0.07)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.27 (0.05)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 81px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-13.61%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 87px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.70\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 85px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.76\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.055\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFrontal\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 91px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.20 (0.07)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.38 (0.05)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 81px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-13.49%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 87px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 85px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.84\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e0.033\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHippocampus\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 91px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.06 (0.08)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.30 (0.06)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 81px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-18.57%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 87px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.34\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 85px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.99\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e0.012\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInsula\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 91px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.22 (0.08)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.48 (0.06)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 81px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-17.34%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 87px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.56\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 85px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e0.011\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOccipital\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 91px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.21 (0.08)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.31 (0.06)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 81px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-7.74%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 87px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.14\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 85px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.42\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.286\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eParietal\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 91px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.16 (0.08)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.32 (0.06)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 81px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-11.80%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 87px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.37\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 85px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.61\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.125\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePosterior Cingulate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 91px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.99 (0.07)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.14 (0.05)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 81px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-13.36%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 87px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.00\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 85px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.68\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.084\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePutamen\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 91px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.31 (0.08)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.54 (0.06)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 81px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-14.71%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 87px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.76\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 85px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.86\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e0.030\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTemporal\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 91px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.23 (0.07)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.40 (0.05)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 81px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-12.04%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 87px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.64\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 85px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.75\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.057\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThalamus\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 91px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.89 (0.06)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.05 (0.04)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 81px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-15.63%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 87px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.06\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 85px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.89\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 86px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e0.025\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"translational-psychiatry","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"tp","sideBox":"Learn more about [Translational Psychiatry](http://www.nature.com/tp/)","snPcode":"41398","submissionUrl":"https://mts-tp.nature.com/cgi-bin/main.plex","title":"Translational Psychiatry","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Nature AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Endocannabinoid, Cannabinoid Receptor type 1, Opioid Use Disorder, Opiates, Positron Emission Tomography, [11C]OMAR","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7715611/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7715611/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThe endocannabinoid (eCB) system has been proposed as a potential target for developing new medications for opioid use disorder (OUD). However, the status of the eCB system, specifically brain cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1R) in OUD, is unknown. In this study, CB1R availability was measured in males with OUD on stable opioid agonist treatment (OAT) (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;10) versus healthy controls (HC) (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;18), using High-Resolution Research Tomography (HRRT) and the CB1R-specific radiotracer, [\u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003eC]OMAR. The average volume of distribution (\u003cem\u003eV\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eT\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e ) across 13 regions was compared between the OUD and HC groups. Average \u003cem\u003eV\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eT\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e was 15% lower in OUD vs. HC subjects (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.04). Lower \u003cem\u003eV\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eT\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e in OUD compared to HC was also observed in several corticolimbic areas. Within OUD no effects on CB1R availability were observed for treatment medication (methadone vs. buprenorphine), current stress levels, or antidepressant medication. No associations between the average \u003cem\u003eV\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eT\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e and duration of OAT treatment or time since the last illicit opioid use were observed. This preliminary study suggests lower CB1R availability in men with OUD. Larger studies are necessary to replicate these findings. Future research should also draw from a more heterogeneous population, particularly by incorporating females, to better assess the potential confounding and moderating clinical factors. If confirmed, the observed alterations in CB1R availability in OUD may provide a rationale for targeting the eCB system in the treatment of OUD.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"A Preliminary Investigation of Brain Cannabinoid Receptor Type 1 (CB1R) Availability in Men with Opioid Use Disorder","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-10-14 11:48:21","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7715611/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"revise","date":"2025-12-16T08:47:18+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-11-13T06:19:24+00:00","index":3,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-11-06T15:33:06+00:00","index":4,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-10-27T06:42:23+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-10-21T14:11:54+00:00","index":4,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-10-21T07:16:28+00:00","index":3,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-10-14T15:57:47+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-09-30T20:37:54+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-09-30T15:47:44+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-09-30T15:45:54+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-09-29T16:22:32+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2025-09-29T15:53:36+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Translational Psychiatry","date":"2025-09-26T14:23:52+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksFailed","content":"","date":"2025-09-26T13:59:08+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"translational-psychiatry","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"tp","sideBox":"Learn more about [Translational Psychiatry](http://www.nature.com/tp/)","snPcode":"41398","submissionUrl":"https://mts-tp.nature.com/cgi-bin/main.plex","title":"Translational Psychiatry","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Nature AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"f6666893-ff30-4060-a160-eda06488ba5c","owner":[],"postedDate":"October 14th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"in-revision","subjectAreas":[{"id":55591311,"name":"Health sciences/Biomarkers"},{"id":55591312,"name":"Biological sciences/Neuroscience"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-12-16T08:57:54+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-10-14 11:48:21","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7715611","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7715611","identity":"rs-7715611","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}