Pelvic MRI: Is Endovaginal or Rectal Filling Needed?

other OA: gold CC-BY-NC-4.0
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging is the optimal modality for pelvic imaging. It is based on T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) sequences allowing uterine and vaginal cavity assessment as well as rectal evaluation. Anatomical depiction of these structures may benefit from distension, and conditions either developing inside the lumen of cavities or coming from the outside may then be better delineated and localized. The need for distension, either rectal or vaginal, and the way to conduct it are matters of debate, depending on indication for which the MR examination is being conducted. In this review, we discuss advantages and potential drawbacks of this technique, based on literature and our experience, in the evaluation of various gynecological and rectal diseases.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Genital Diseases, Female Magnetic Resonance Imaging Rectal Diseases Adult Contrast Media Contrast Media Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Genital Diseases, Female Genital Diseases, Female Humans Middle Aged Rectal Diseases Rectal Diseases Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-23T06:15:44.889181+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:19:49.066213+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine