“To Do, or Not to Do?”: Determinants of Stakeholders’ Acceptance on Dengue Vaccine Using PLS-SEM Analysis between Scientists and Public in Malaysia.

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Background: Dengue vaccine is the best potential alternative for protecting communities and cities from dengue. Nevertheless, the dengue vaccine’s acceptance must be considered a guide for authorities to continue intensified research and, eventually, execute dengue vaccine injections to improve public health. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the relationship between the predictor factors that influence stakeholders’ attitude and intention towards the dengue vaccine. Methods: : Survey data collected from 399 respondents which represent two primary stakeholder groups: scientist ( n = 202) and public ( n = 197) were analysed by producing a Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) model using Smart Partial Least Square (Smart-PLS) software. Results: : The findings indicated a strong positive relationship between attitudes and intentions to support the dengue vaccine, followed by a perceived benefit. The perceived benefit was the most significant predictor for attitude to dengue vaccine, followed by religiosity, attitudes to technology, and trust in key players. The findings provide insights into the multi-dimensional association of the determinants of attitude-intention to support the dengue vaccine. Conclusion: Although the findings showed that stakeholders in Malaysia are optimistic about the dengue vaccine, the effectiveness of this vaccine has not been tested in Malaysia. Hence, the ongoing research must be intensified. Therefore, this study can be used to guide decision-making on the execution of the dengue vaccine not only in Malaysia but also in other countries with a history of serious dengue transmission.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-30T02:00:01.510937+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0