Imaging of the Uterus after Endometrial Ablation

review OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This paper reviews the imaging findings of the post-endometrial ablation uterus, aiming to aid radiologists in recognizing expected changes and differentiating them from other uterine pathologies.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometrial ablation (EA), a therapeutic alternative to hysterectomy for the treatment of excessive uterine bleeding, is increasing in utilization and popularity among gynecologists performing this procedure and women undergoing it. The increase in utilization of this minimally invasive surgery has resulted in the growth of intentional and nonintentional imaging of the postablation uterus. Although routinely performed cross-sectional imaging modalities such as US, CT, and MRI are expected to provide optimal assessment of the post-EA uterus, often the findings are confusing as they overlap with those of other pathologic processes seen in the uterus such as endometrial cancer and adenomyosis, resulting in misinterpretation. In addition, many radiologists are unaware of the changes in the uterus after the procedure. Moreover, many women undergo imaging for unrelated medical conditions, and this pertinent surgical history may be unknown or undocumented at the time of imaging review, making radiologic interpretations even more challenging. The radiologic literature is scarce on this topic, with few articles describing imaging findings of the postablation uterus. This striking gap in knowledge leads to a wide range of misdiagnoses and mismanagement. The authors provide a brief summary of the pathophysiology of abnormal uterine bleeding and discuss the main concepts of EA techniques, followed by a focused detailed description of the imaging findings associated with EA, which can aid in recognition of the expected changes in the uterus, as well as accurate identification, diagnosis, and prompt management of related complications. Additionally, the authors provide a review of differentiating features that can help with diagnosis of other pathologic conditions of the uterus that can mimic post-EA related changes. ©RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.
Full text 1,653 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Visual Abstract Get full access to this article View all available purchase options and get full access to this article. Figures

References

Information & Authors Information Published In Abbreviations - AUB - abnormal uterine bleeding - EA - endometrial ablation - IUD - intrauterine device - MEA - microwave EA - RFA - radiofrequency ablation - SI - signal intensity - TOA - tubo-ovarian abscess Copyright History Authors Disclosures of conflicts of interest.— Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage Altmetrics Citations Export citation Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication. There are no citations for this item View Options To read the full-text, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access. RSNA members have free access to all RadioGraphics content. However, complimentary journal-based CME activities are only included for members with the Standard or Full Access packages. RSNA Journals participate in the World Health Organization's Research4Life program and the online versions of the journals are either freely available or are available with low-cost access to not-for-profit institutions in eligible countries. Login options Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article. Purchase Options Subscribe and get full access to this article. Recommend to a librarian Recommend this journal to your librarian Redeem Voucher Access tokens allow you to activate and access content online. If you have been issued an access token, please enter it here and click 'Submit':

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques Endometrial Ablation Techniques

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-30T00:31:16.422117+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine