Improving clinical understanding of the effect of ovarian stimulation on women's lives

Qualitative OA: bronze CC0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-04 ⓘ

This study developed a conceptual model and patient-reported outcome measure identifying psychological, daily life interference, logistical, and side effect domains to assess the impact of ovarian stimulation on women’s functioning and wellbeing.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

A conceptual model was developed of the impact of ovarian stimulation on women's functioning and wellbeing. A patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure was generated based on this model. Qualitative measures used comprised a discussion guide and coding system devised according to the Food and Drug Administration guidelines for developing PRO measures. Data were gathered through telephone and face-to-face interviews and focus groups. A total of 47 women across nine fertility healthcare providers in France, UK and USA were included in the analysis. The mean age of patients was 35 years (range 24-44). Based on data collected and prior postulated domains, a conceptual model of the impact of ovarian stimulation was developed. Three major (psychological, interference in daily life, logistics) and one minor (side effects) domain were identified. Short-term consequences included problems with psychological health and productivity. Longer term consequences included depression and poor self-image. Factors that modified the impact of ovarian stimulation were also identified. This is the first model providing insight into the impact of ovarian stimulation on women's functioning and wellbeing. Once validated, it can be applied in quantitative research to improve understanding of the impact of ovarian stimulation, and assist in developing more patient-centred approaches to treatment.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Ovulation Induction Adult Female Focus Groups France Humans Interviews as Topic Mental Health United Kingdom United States

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

References (28)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:06:15.453410+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK