Accountability, Populism and Expertise: The United Kingdom Government's Response to COVID-19

preprint OA: closed
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

This article questions the perceived or assumed dichotomy between populism and expertise. Using the United Kingdom’s executive response to the COVID-19 crisis in 2020 as a case study, it argues that there is in fact an alignment or synergy between populism and expertise, one that has important implications for public law, particularly for the principle of accountability. More specifically, it argues that technocratic means – and reliance on scientific expertise in particular – can indeed be useful to populists to the extent that they can be utilised as a way to depoliticise issues and at least partially shield them from direct political accountability. This, in turn, allows populists to escape responsibility for their policy choices in a way that, perhaps ironically, resembles the populist critique of the “undemocratic” nature or “technocratic” tendencies of present-day liberal democracy.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00