CD4+ T-cells create a stable mechanical environment for force-sensitive TCR:pMHC interactions

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Mechanical forces acting on ligand-engaged T-cell receptors (TCRs) have previously been implicated in T-cell antigen recognition and ligand discrimination, yet their magnitude, frequency, and impact remain unclear. We quantitatively assess forces across various TCR:pMHC pairs with different bond lifetimes at single-molecule resolution, both before and during T-cell activation, on platforms that either include or exclude tangential force registration. Our results imply that CD4+ T-cell TCRs experience significantly lower forces than previously estimated, with only a small fraction of ligand-engaged TCRs being subjected to these forces during antigen scanning. These rare and minute mechanical forces do not impact the global lifetime distribution of the TCR:ligand bond. We propose that the immunological synapse is created as biophysically stable environment to prevent pulling forces from disturbing antigen recognition.
Full text 1,016 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Mechanical forces acting on ligand-engaged T-cell receptors (TCRs) have previously been implicated in T-cell antigen recognition and ligand discrimination, yet their magnitude, frequency, and impact remain unclear. We quantitatively assess forces across various TCR:pMHC pairs with different bond lifetimes at single-molecule resolution, both before and during T-cell activation, on platforms that either include or exclude tangential force registration. Our results imply that CD4+ T-cell TCRs experience significantly lower forces than previously estimated, with only a small fraction of ligand-engaged TCRs being subjected to these forces during antigen scanning. These rare and minute mechanical forces do not impact the global lifetime distribution of the TCR:ligand bond. We propose that the immunological synapse is created as biophysically stable environment to prevent pulling forces from disturbing antigen recognition. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00