Prevalence of iron deficiency in pregnant women in Austria: a prospective cross-sectional study.

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Objective: To determine for the first time the prevalence of iron deficiency (ID) in Austrian pregnant population. Design Prospective cross-sectional multicentre study. Setting Six hospitals in Austria Population A cohort of 425 pregnant women Methods Patients were classified into four groups of different weeks of gestation. Group 1 was monitored longitudinally, while groups 2 to 4, iron status was sampled only once. Main Outcome Measures Evaluation of the prevalence of ID by comparing the diagnostic criteria of the WHO to the cut-off proposed by Achebe MM and Gafter-Gvili A (Achebe) and the Austrian Nutrition Report (ANR). Results In comparison with the ANR, the prevalence of ID was lower in group 1 and higher in group 2-4 (17.2 % vs 12.17 %, 25.84%, 35.29 % and 41.76 %, respectively) (p-values < 0.01 except group 1). Using WHO’s definition, the prevalence in group 1 was 12,17 % at inclusion, 2 months later 31.7% and further 2 month later 65,71 %, respectively. Using the Achebe definition number of cases doubled (for group 1 the number of cases rose from 13 to 42 (115 patients total); for groups 2 through 4 we observed an increase from 112 to 230 (340 patients total). Conclusions This study showed a prevalence of around 12 % at the beginning of pregnancy, which increased during pregnancy up to 65 %. ID can have a massive impact on the quality of life, so that screening would be entirely justified, as iron deficiency would be easy to diagnose and treat.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00