Methods
Data for this study were collected as part of an ongoing study to screen women for the presence of vulvar pain conducted in the metropolitan area of Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota. Participants included randomly-selected women aged 18 to 40 years who had been seen for any reason at any of the Twin Cities Metro area Fairview Health Services Clinics within the previous two years and listed a home address within a 70-mile radius of the University of Minnesota Twin Cities campus.
A total of 25,754 women were identified as eligible for the study, in which women were mailed a self-administered survey that screened for history, length and current chronic vulvar pain. In addition, basic demographic, reproductive, pain histories, and perceived stigma regarding pain were surveyed. Women were given the option of completing the survey in one of three ways: via the enclosed hard copy survey with a prepaid return envelope, a secure online site, or over the telephone with trained interviewers. The survey response rate was 13,740/25,754 (53.4%). Of these women, 298 were not included into the final dataset because they did not respond to the primary questions on perceived stigma; another 359 did not report on the outcome of vulvar pain or the covariates necessary for the multivariable analysis (age, education, marital status, race or obesity); and a final 249 incompletely answered questions regarding other types of pain necessary for the multiple pain analyses. Thus, our final dataset included 12,834 women. This study was approved by the University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board.
Chronic vulvar pain consistent with a vulvodynia diagnosis was defined as having experienced burning in the vulvar area or excessive vulvar pain on contact that limited or prevented intercourse. Women were asked “Did you ever experience excessive vulvar pain on contact or touching” and “Did you ever experience burning in your vulvar area that persisted for 3 months or longer?”. Women were categorized as having chronic vulvar pain if they reported feeling excessive pain or burning. This categorization was made regardless of the woman's report of the presence of absence of vulvar itching. Population-based screeners such as this have been used with high specificity to identify women with symptoms characteristic of vulvodynia. 33
Due to the fact that most all of the literature to support feelings of perceived stigma and chronic pain have been conducted among individuals with syndromic conditions, our analyses stratified chronic pain conditions into syndromic pain conditions or non-syndromic pain conditions to capture potential differences in response between the two categories. Syndromic pain conditions were defined as: chronic fatigue syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, interstitial cystitis, and fibromyalgia. Non-syndromic pain conditions were considered to be: endometriosis, migraine headaches, polycystic ovaries, fibroids, and pelvic inflammatory disease.
Women were asked to answer the following two questions on a 5-point Likert scale: 1) Doctors think that people with chronic pain exaggerate their pain (termed “doctor’s opinions”; and 2) People believe that genital pain is used as an excuse to avoid having sex (termed “people’s opinions”). For analysis, results were then dichotomized into agree (defined as reporting “Strongly Agree” or “Agree”) or not (defined as reporting “Neutral”, “Disagree” or “Strongly disagree”). The first question was taken from the Chronic Pain Stigma Scale, while the second was slightly modified from the original Scale question, “People think that chronic pain is used as an excuse to get pain medication” 34 .
Means and proportions were used to describe the distribution of characteristics in this population. We examined three dichotomous outcomes (doctor's opinions, people's opinions, and whether women with chronic vulvar pain symptoms sought medical care for their pain). Separate binomial regression models were fit for each of the three outcomes. Generalized linear models with log link and binomial family allowed estimation of the relative risks. The main exposure in each model was pain type classified into 7 categories (vulvar pain only, vulvar pain plus a pain syndrome, vulvar pain plus non-syndromic pain, syndromic pain only, non-syndromic pain only, syndromic pain plus non-syndromic pain, and all three types of pain), with women with no type of chronic pain as the reference.
In each analysis, we accounted for factors that may confound the association between having chronic vulvar pain and perception of stigma. Women's age (5 categories), educational status (at least college educated or not), marital status (currently married or not), race (White or not), and obesity (current BMI ≥ 30 or not) were identified from previous literature and considered confounders in each model. Analyses were performed using STATA v.12 (College Station, TX).
Results
Our overall sample included 12,834 women, of which 85.7% were White, 59.2% held at least a college degree, 56.9% were married and 55.0% were of normal weight. ( Table 1 ) Nearly 40% of women had some type of chronic pain. 1,651 of the 12,834 (12.86%) women reported a history of chronic vulvar pain. Among these, 7.5% had vulvar pain only, 3.5% for vulvar pain with a non-syndromic pain syndrome, 0.9% for vulvar pain and an additional syndromic pain syndrome, and1.1% had all three types of pain.
Thirty percent of women in the general population sample agreed (26% agreed plus 4% agreed strongly) with the statement regarding doctors believe pain is exaggerated among chronic pain suffers. ( Figure ) While 17.2% of the sample agreed that people in general believe that vulvar pain is used as an excuse to avoid having sex. ( Figure )
Table 2 shows the results of the binary regression models examining responses congruent with the belief that doctors hold stereotypes of individuals with chronic pain (left) and regression models congruent with the belief that people think vulvar pain is used as an excuse to avoid sex (right). In the presence of any type of pain, whether it was syndromic, non-syndromic or vulvar pain, women were significantly more likely to agree with the stigmatizing statements (adj. RR about doctors=1.44, 95% CI: 1.36 – 1.52; adj. RR about other people=1.58, 95% CI: 1.46 – 1.70). Women with chronic vulvar pain alone were 37% more likely (95% CI: 1.25-1.51) than women without any pain to believe that doctors hold this negative stereotype of pain sufferers.
Our data indicate that the number of pain conditions may affect the association, with those having all three types of pain conditions exhibiting more than a two-fold increased risk of believing this about doctors compared to those with no pain (adj. RR=2.16, 95% CI: 1.87-2.50), which was higher than women with only one or two types of pain. ( Table 2 )
Although there was some evidence to suggest that women with other chronic pain conditions endorsed the notion of stereotyping against those with vulvar pain as it related to sexual intercourse, it was the women with chronic vulvar pain, especially those with additional pain types, who had the highest level of endorsement (adj. RRs=1.69 - 2.28). ( Table 2 )
50.1% of all of women with chronic vulvar pain reported seeking care for their vulvar pain or burning ( Table 3 ). Among the 1,651 women who reported a history of chronic vulvar pain consistent with vulvodynia regardless of co-morbidity, we assessed the extent to which their choice to seek care for their pain may have been influenced by their perception of doctor's and other people's beliefs regarding their pain. ( Table 3 ) Women who believed doctors held stereotypes against pain sufferers were 11% more likely to have sought care (adj. RR=1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.23) relative to those who did not endorse this stereotype. No association was observed between seeking care and endorsing the stereotype that vulvar pain is an excuse to avoid sex.
Discussion
Our study determined the prevalence of stigmatizing opinions regarding chronic pain among women in the general population. We found that 30% of women in the sample population agree that doctors have an unfavorable perception that individuals with chronic pain exaggerate their pain level. As expected, this opinion was more highly endorsed by individuals who themselves have chronic pain. However unexpectedly, we found that contrary to our original hypothesis, our data does not indicate that it is the fear of physician stereotyping that kept women with chronic vulvar pain from seeking care. In fact, we found that endorsement of physician stereotyping was significantly higher among those women who sought care.
Approximately half of our study sample who experienced chronic vulvar pain sought medical care. This is consistent with two previous studies that found between 48 – 60% of women sought treatment 1 , 4 . Given that it has been greater than 10 years since Harlow and Stewart collected their data, it suggests that attempts to increase public awareness for increased screening of this condition have not yet been successful.
We had hypothesized that women with chronic pain who felt that they were being stereotyped for their pain would be less likely to seek medical care. But in fact, we found that it was actually women who felt stigmatized were more likely to have sought care than those who did not feel stigmatized. This was contrary to what we had hypothesized and may be a result of reverse causality. Women who sought care may not have found adequate support from their clinicians; it has been reported that the majority of women with vulvodynia sought care from 3 or more physicians prior to their diagnosis 1 .
We failed to observe any association between perceived stereotyping from other people and seeking medical care. Several factors could contribute to this finding. First, women may differentiate between stereotyping by the general population and those in the medical profession, perhaps holding more regard to physicians on this topic. Secondly, previous studies have found that women are more likely to speak of their vulvar pain when the level of pain is greater 9 . If this is true, women may seek care despite public perception simply because their pain and discomfort have been too great to bear any longer without speaking to a physician.
When we compared our findings for women with chronic vulvar pain to other types of chronic pain (other pain syndromes and pain conditions that are associated with less stigma), we found similar results for endorsing these two stereotyping opinions. Expectedly, when investigating the question more specific to vulvodynia, whether vulvar pain was used as an excuse to avoid sex, the magnitude of the association was greater for women with chronic vulvar pain compared to those with other pain conditions.
Our results represent responses from a recent community-based survey of over 12,000 women, and are the first to address the issue of whether perceived pain stereotyping is associated with failure to seek care for women with chronic pain. Our findings are not free of limitations and should be viewed with these in mind. First, our questions on perceived stereotyping have not been previously validated for use with vulvar pain. However, there were only slight modifications of the question to address vulvar pain. Secondly, there was no clinical diagnosis of pain conditions. However, self-report of chronic vulvar pain in a survey has found to have high validity 33 , 35 .
In conclusion, a history of chronic vulvar pain in this population of relatively young women was common. Similar to previous reports, half of the women with chronic vulvar pain consistent with a diagnosis of vulvodynia did not seek medical care for their pain. However, our evidence does not suggest that perception of stereotyping from physicians or other people were barriers to seeking care. In fact, we observed that women who sought care were more likely to have a poor perception of physicians’ stereotyping opinions. Our findings suggest that other causes influencing the failure to seek care for chronic vulvar pain should be investigated. In addition, future research should determine the validity of physician stigma and stereotyping of women with chronic vulvar pain in attempts to develop successful interactions between pain suffers and their physicians.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.