Insights from the initial stage of a nation-wide environmental relicensing of hydropower facilities: a biologists’ perspective on court verdicts

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0

Abstract

Hydropower, utilized for centuries, is promoted globally as renewable energy. The perceived socio-economic benefits have often outweighed environmental concerns, as reflected in operational permits. In 2022, Sweden began re-licensing approximately 2000 hydroelectric facilities under the National Plan for Modern Environmental Conditions. We extracted data from 33 completed court cases, all involving relatively small hydropower facilities, with 22 resulting in withdrawal and dam removal, and 11 receiving decisions for remedial measures. The primary focus of measures was longitudinal connectivity; other environmental aspects received less attention and monitoring requirements were almost non-existent. We recommend measures using adaptive design, prioritizing functionality and monitoring over detailed technical specifications. Greater attention should be given to habitat in affected reaches; addressing e.g. flow, and water levels. In conclusion, this nation-wide process provides a unique opportunity to implement measures that could benefit the whole riverine ecosystem.
Full text 1,854 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Hydropower, utilized for centuries, is promoted globally as renewable energy. The perceived socio-economic benefits have often outweighed environmental concerns, as reflected in operational permits. In 2022, Sweden began re-licensing approximately 2000 hydroelectric facilities under the National Plan for Modern Environmental Conditions. We extracted data from 33 completed court cases, all involving relatively small hydropower facilities, with 22 resulting in withdrawal and dam removal, and 11 receiving decisions for remedial measures. The primary focus of measures was longitudinal connectivity; other environmental aspects received less attention and monitoring requirements were almost non-existent. We recommend measures using adaptive design, prioritizing functionality and monitoring over detailed technical specifications. Greater attention should be given to habitat in affected reaches; addressing e.g. flow, and water levels. In conclusion, this nation-wide process provides a unique opportunity to implement measures that could benefit the whole riverine ecosystem. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2J06V Subjects Other Life Sciences

Keywords

dam removal, Ecological rehabilitation, environmental law, fish migration, Hydroelectric production, River connectivity Dates Published: 2025-05-14 06:45 Last Updated: 2025-05-14 06:45 License CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Note that this paper is an academic contribution and should not be seen as explicit legal advice. Data and Code Availability Statement: All data presented in the paper are included in table 1-3. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0