Strengths of relationships among soil microbial and organic matter properties are scale-dependent

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text

The paper investigates how observation scale affects relationships among soil microbial communities (bacterial, archaeal, and fungal taxa richness and density) and organic matter properties (carbon and nitrogen content, stoichiometric and isotopic ratios) plus soil water content, comparing millimetre-sized aggregates to bulk homogenised soil cores across two soil layers. Using pairwise correlation analyses, it finds that organic matter properties correlate more strongly in bulk soil, while correlations between microbial community metrics and organic matter properties are weaker in bulk samples than in aggregates, particularly in topsoil. It also reports systematic differences between aggregates and bulk samples for several individual microbial and organic matter properties in topsoil. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Relationships among variables in ecological systems are inherently scale-dependent, especially in heterogeneous systems. Yet it remains to be examined whether relationships among variables vary across observation scales in soil. Generally, it is desirable that observation scale matches the intrinsic scale of a process or pattern. Millimetre-sized soil aggregates are closer to the intrinsic scale of microbial communities than traditionally studied bulk soil samples, making them more suitable for studying potential links between microbial communities and their environment. To explore the effect of observation scale on relationships among soil parameters, we measured bacterial, archaeal, and fungal taxa richness and density, organic matter properties (e.g., carbon and nitrogen content, stoichiometric and isotopic ratios), and soil water content in individual aggregates and aliquots of homogenised soil cores, bulk soil samples, in two soil layers. We analysed pairwise correlations among these variables and assessed whether individual aggregates systematically differed from bulk soil samples. Organic matter properties were more strongly correlated in bulk soil samples, consistent with the idea that increasing the sample volume reduces noise. In contrast, microbial community and organic matter properties showed weaker correlations in bulk soil samples than aggregates in topsoil. In addition, we found that aggregates and bulk soil samples differed systematically in individual microbial and organic matter properties, particularly in the topsoil. Our study demonstrates that relationships among variables in soil are spatial scale-dependent. Aggregates offer valuable insights into microbial communities in soil, complementing bulk soil samples, and are useful for studying links between microbial communities and their environment.
Full text 1,936 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Relationships among variables in ecological systems are inherently scale-dependent, especially in heterogeneous systems. Yet it remains to be examined whether relationships among variables vary across observation scales in soil. Generally, it is desirable that observation scale matches the intrinsic scale of a process or pattern. Millimetre-sized soil aggregates are closer to the intrinsic scale of microbial communities than traditionally studied bulk soil samples, making them more suitable for studying potential links between microbial communities and their environment. To explore the effect of observation scale on relationships among soil parameters, we measured bacterial, archaeal, and fungal taxa richness and density, organic matter properties (e.g., carbon and nitrogen content, stoichiometric and isotopic ratios), and soil water content in individual aggregates and aliquots of homogenised soil cores, bulk soil samples, in two soil layers. We analysed pairwise correlations among these variables and assessed whether individual aggregates systematically differed from bulk soil samples. Organic matter properties were more strongly correlated in bulk soil samples, consistent with the idea that increasing the sample volume reduces noise. In contrast, microbial community and organic matter properties showed weaker correlations in bulk soil samples than aggregates in topsoil. In addition, we found that aggregates and bulk soil samples differed systematically in individual microbial and organic matter properties, particularly in the topsoil. Our study demonstrates that relationships among variables in soil are spatial scale-dependent. Aggregates offer valuable insights into microbial communities in soil, complementing bulk soil samples, and are useful for studying links between microbial communities and their environment. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-29T02:00:03.542394+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0