Laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy

other OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-08-03

This prospective study evaluated laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy in 17 patients, finding it feasible and effective with short hospital stays and convalescence periods without serious complications.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy. DESIGN: A prospective study of the planned surgical procedure was carried out by two teams, each with two gynaecologists, who were experienced in operative laparoscopy. SETTING: The operations were carried out in a private hospital, where advanced operative laparoscopy equipment was available. PATIENTS: Seventeen patients were selected for the procedure, all of whom required hysterectomy for symptoms of pain or menorrhagia in association with uterine or other pelvic disease. Patients with carcinoma or uterine enlargement beyond 12 cm were excluded. PROCEDURE: Laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy was carried out by means of a video monitor, uterine manipulation by vaginal instrumentation, three or four abdominal punctures of less than 1 cm, and bipolar diathermy to secure vascular pedicles. The uterus was removed from the vagina by cutting vaginal skin and the cardinal ligaments. RESULTS: The operating time was 90-220 min, the blood loss was 30-200 mL, and the hospital stay lasted two to five days and convalescence two to four weeks. No serious complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy may be valuable when adnexal or uterine abnormalities are present and vaginal hysterectomy is either contraindicated or more difficult. The procedure requires special equipment and may only be carried out by experienced gynaecological operative laparoscopists. Its acceptance will depend upon reducing the operating time to less than 90 min. It has the advantage of reducing the duration of hospital stay and the duration of convalescence when compared with abdominal hysterectomy.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Hysterectomy Laparoscopy Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Blood Loss, Surgical Clinical Competence Endometriosis Endometriosis Feasibility Studies Female Humans Hysterectomy Length of Stay Menorrhagia Menorrhagia Middle Aged Patient Care Team Prospective Studies Uterine Diseases

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-13T09:25:22.628771+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:49.821429+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-17T06:32:46.214484+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine